“The line up for a pay out from the Trump fund”

This isn't the end of a fight. It's the start of one. Lioness, the critically acclaimed original series from Taylor Sheridan, returns August 2nd only on Paramount Plus. In the new season, hidden networks, foreign operatives, and personal betrayals collide while Joe walks the line between duty and family. Don't Miss Lioness. Starring Zoe Saldana, Michael Kelly, with Morgan Freeman and Nicole Kidman, streaming August 2nd only on Paramount Plus. Watch Disclosure Day at Home Now with exclusive bonus features. If you found out we weren't alone, if someone showed you, proved it to you? Would that frighten you? Well, now the truth belongs to 7 billion people in an original event film directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by David Kep starring Emily Blunt, Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Eve Hewson, and Coleman Domingo. Find Disclosure Day on major digital platforms now with no subscription required, also in theaters.

Hi there, everyone. It is 4 o'clock in New York. I'm Eamon Mohedin in for Nicole Wallace. The backlash to the nearly $1.8 billion fund that has been set up by the Trump administration to potentially payout Trump supporters and his allies is only growing today, as everyone from disgraced Congressman George Santos to Capitol rioters hope to cash in on it. The Washington Post reports that among the people thinking about applying for these taxpayer-funded payouts... This guy on your screen, Mark McCloskey, one half of the couple that gained notoriety for pointing guns at Black Lives Matter protesters back in 2020. He says his reputation was damaged. It also includes the former Congressman George Santos, who was serving time for wire fraud and identity theft before having his sentence commuted by Donald Trump. CNN reports also that my pillow guy, you remember him, election denier Michael Endowell, well, he's hoping to cash in on it as well, and he wants to get compensated. One person has already reportedly filed a claim, former Trump staffer Michael Caputo. He's seeking $2.7 million for being investigated by the FBI's Russia probe. Now, if you don't remember, U.S. intelligence concluded that Caputo worked with Russian agents to produce a documentary about Ukraine and Trump's first impeachment. But in Caputo's telling, he is a victim of so-called weaponization. Now, the prospect of people like these, getting potentially millions of your dollars, has enraged Democrats, and it has made quite a few Republicans in Congress very uncomfortable. Outgoing Louisiana Republican Senator, Bill Cassidy tweeted out, quote, people are concerned about paying their mortgage or rent, affording groceries, and paying for gas. Not about putting together a $1.8 billion fund for the president and his allies to pay whomever they wish with no legal precedent. or accountability. This is adding to our national debt. If there needs to be a settlement, the administration should bring it to Congress to decide. Another senator, Thom Tillis, saying this, quote, imagine that. A fund that is set up to compensate people who assaulted Capitol police officers. How absurd does that sound coming out of my mouth? Well, Democrats are trying to ensure that Republicans pay a steep political price. Congressman Jamie Raskin says that he plans to propose a bill to block funding for the fund, an effort to force every Republican member to get on the record and decide where they stand. Now, political, ethical, and legal firestorm around this so-called slush fund is where we begin today. Tracy Fight Love is here. She is the founder and executive director of lawyers for good government. Also with us, Scott McFarlane. He is a chief Washington correspondent for Midas Touch. He did extensive investigative reporting around the capital insurrection, including the prosecution's sentencing and trials of those rioters. And with me here at the table, legal analyst Christy Greenberg. She's a former criminal division, deputy chief at SDNY, and host of the YouTube show Courtside. It's great to have all three of you with us.

You did some of the most important reporting around January 6, but let's start with what you are hearing from folks on Capitol Hill about this fund and how this is all going down on the place that was attacked back on January the 6th. Amen, the sales pitch the Trump administration undertook for this slush fund on Capitol Hill is something they could put on a White House blooper reel. It has been a clown show. From the start of the pitch to where we are now, the Senate was to take up a critical Trump priority, a reconciliation plan, a priority list of things for Trump's immigration and customs enforcement agencies. That thing blew up. The Senate pieced out and left town. for two weeks because they were stuck in the mud on what to do about the $1.7 billion fund for convicted crooks and rioters. Haven't found a single senator, not a single one, who says declaratively that he or she supports this thing. Senator John Hoven of North Dakota told me that this is one of the issues. The slush fund, or he calls it the potential guardrails that are needed for the weaponization fund. is a wedge issue even inside the Republican conference. There are no owners of this thing on Capitol Hill, and the White House has had trouble selling anybody publicly on it. And, Amon, when you list the names of the January 6 defendants, the high profile fraudsters who say they want millions of dollars from taxpayers, that makes this sales pitch even harder. Krista, give me your thoughts on this when you just hear about what is happening with this fund that is being set up. I don't think anybody in this country with a straight face would look at what happened on January the 6th and say those people who attacked our capital were somehow unjustly prosecuted. In some cases, they actually admitted their own wrongdoings on that day, some people who ultimately went to prison for it. And yet this is a fund that is meant. to correct an injustice in the eyes of this administration. What do you make of it? The inmates are running the asylum. Right. These are the criminals. These are people who are found in court to be guilty of crimes. We all saw these crimes happen on TV before us. We all saw the attack on the Capitol. And now they are crime victims. It's outrageous. And it's dangerous. It's bad enough to pardon these people. But to now reward them, I mean, it was, we remember Trump saying, stand back and stand by. Now it's... stand up and cash in. And the message that sends that it's not just for rewarding what they did in the past, but the future January 6th that we could see. I mean, the midterms are just six months away. And so...

Yes, this is corrupt, but to me it is more than that. It is dangerous. I worry about the message this sends in a time where we really have to worry about political violence that somehow this is endorsing it. And the fact that the attorney general, acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, when he was asked... If anybody who assaulted a police officer, if any of them would be eligible to make a claim, he didn't rule it out. He said, sure, they can make a claim and it'll be up to the commission. The answer to that question should have been, of course not. Of course anybody who assaulted a police officer won't get the taxpayer's money. And he didn't say that. And that tells me that's exactly who it's intended for because nobody is telling us anything different. It's just... It's all fundamentally based on this lie of trying to rewrite history that somehow this wasn't a violent attack on the Capitol. This wasn't trying to steal the 2020 election. And this is how the rule of law is dying right in front of us. It's deaths by a thousand lies. Yeah, you bring up a really important point that I wanted to ask you about Tracy, and that is the issue of rule of law. And let me just ask you about this fund and how it potentially works. The Washington Post reports that, quote, the agreement states that payments will be. reported quarterly to the Justice Department, but that those records will remain confidential, and that the funds members will get to decide whether to disclose their processes for granting or denying claims. So on one hand, the payouts are confidential, and the board members don't have to explain who gets a claim. There's actually no transparency in this process whatsoever, and to... You know, Chris Christie's point about rewriting the narrative around an attack like January the 6th is that history will look back and say these people were wrongly convicted and deserve some kind of compensation and we have no visibility into how or why. The complete lack of transparency, lack of accountability, attempt to shield this entire fund and this entire process from any sort of oversight is all part and parcel of one single thing that we have all now been watching for quite some time. And that is one of the most brazen abuses of presidential power that we have ever seen in this country. It is presidential self-dealing by means of a manufactured legal process in an attempt to legitimize corruption. That's all it is What do you think of the lack of transparency in all of this, Christine, the fact that there's no, not only no visibility. I mean, James Comey, the former FBI director, who's now not been prosecuted once, but potentially twice. I mean, obviously the first one was dismissed, but not for a lack of trying on the part of this DOJ. A real example of what many believe to be the weaponization of a Department of Justice going after the president's political opponents while simultaneously.

creating a fund for all those who are basically his foot soldiers. Yeah, so let's take the James Comey example. So James Comey has a case right now, pending case, and I expect he will make a motion to the judge that he is being vindictively prosecuted. Trump's DOJ will get to respond. We will all get to see the briefing and there will be argument and then a judge will issue a decision and it will all be transparent. That is how vindictive prosecution claims have always worked. There is transparency around them because there is a public interest in knowing if our government is being weaponized in some way. It's rare in the past at least that it happens, but you know about it. And if there is a finding of vindictive prosecution, there can be payments made. You can get attorney's fees. You can move for costs. You can move for sanctions against the prosecutors. But it's all public. It's all transparent. This, the fact that they are hiding this, the fact that they don't want us to know who is getting the money, what the amount of the payouts are, that this is all, again, people that the Attorney General is going to get to choose, and Trump can just remove the commission at will who gets to make these decisions. I mean, he is pulling the puppet strings here. I mean, this is all Donald Trump. He says he didn't know anything about it. He's all over this. He was bragging about it last week in the Oval Office this week. He doesn't know anything about it because of the backlash that it created. But in this theory, does James Comey, does he have a legitimate grievance here that if he gets, if the DOJ is being weaponized against him, can he make a claim here? He should make a claim. So he should make a claim. Letitia James should make a claim. John Brennan. Everybody that feels they have a claim should make the claim. And then let's see what happens. I mean, I will eat my words if any of them see a penny from this one. Tracy, what are the best legal means you think people have to fight this? There's already been some news that people like Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges have filed lawsuits. Give me your sense of what you think happens with those lawsuits and if there's a chance for them to succeed. The possible legal remedies here are very limited. And the reality is that the whole way in which this settlement took place was designed to create exactly that outcome. That's why I say this is all fabricated. It's meant to look like a legitimate legal process, but it isn't one. So I believe our best bet at this point is to look to Congress and to insist that every member of Congress pay attention and do their jobs in ensuring that we have some type of oversight over what is, in fact, a giant conflict of interest masquerading as a legal outcome. Scott, let me play for you what two Capitol rioters told CNN. Take a listen to this.

A lot of people don't agree with what happened on January 6th. But when you step back and you look at somebody like me, for example, my major felony had to be struck down by the Supreme Court. It's my crime that day of breaking a window. Technically, that's a misdemeanor charge. And yet, I had three years of a house arrest than having to endure everything I did through prison and getting a five-year sentence on top of that. That's clearly weaponization. I rationalize people, even violent people, getting paid for that day because the government set it up and also on top of that, they stole the election. So the first woman there you can see she was breaking the window at the Capitol. The second person interviewed still believes the election was stolen or believes election lies. Is this what Donald Trump is validating when he makes them eligible for taxpayer dollars? Here's the first sign that you have an indefensible idea. You have to... pervasively put out false information to defend that idea. The critics of the January 6th prosecutions have alleged it was a Biden-launched weaponization. It was Donald Trump's first term in which those prosecutions were launched. It was Trump's Department of Justice that did so. They called themselves victims of weaponized prosecutions. That assumes that every single grand juror and every single trial juror, hundreds of people were all in on this. which is a preposterous notion. What's more, it also indicates to me that they haven't made peace with reality, that the 2020 election was not rigged, that January 6th was not a setup. I'll tell you, Amon, I was in the courtroom for hundreds of the hearings, hundreds of the cases. A lot of people were denying reality during their own proceedings to their own detriment at sentencing. They were denying reality. Yeah, Scott, what I was going to say in that process is people forget that Donald Trump was the president when the election happened on January the 6th, when people come out and say, oh, the FBI had people there or this was an attempt by the government to overturn an election. Who is the person that was in charge of the DOJ? Who is the person that was executive at the time? It was Donald Trump. They're claiming that Donald Trump rigged an election that he would lose. I'm also just gobsmacked, A. By the idea that juries, by the dozens, all colluded with each other to convict every single person who went to trial by jury. Amen. Every single person who went to trial by jury was convicted. You cannot get 12 people in lockstep on anything in life. That they all were synchronized tells you how overwhelming and damning the evidence was. The same evidence that will be on television, on our phones in perpetuity. cop beaters get taxpayer money. So, Scott, let me go back to a point that Tracy brought up, which is hoping that Congress does its part and oversight and have some kind of visibility into this. You said that from the senators that you spoke to not a single one showed an appetite for this. Give us a sense if there's an effort right now, a concerted effort, to try and prevent this fund from actually getting up off the ground.

This is like the least popular thing I've seen in Congress. Like getting carrot sticks on Halloween. Like this is not what anybody wants. And they don't even want to be talking about it. I can't find Republicans to even tacitly endorse this thing. And they know their constituents are well aware. that as they pay so much for so many things in life, as they're groaning beneath the weight of costs, that they want any of their money going towards this fund, they're not going to find constituents championing this either, and they know it, that they had to walk away from a critical priority of the Trump administration, the immigration and customs enforcement reconciliation bill today, and just go home without it because they couldn't figure out what to do with the slush fund. That's a problem, and it's not a problem that's going away. Tracy, what is it that Democrats can do with this right now besides Capitol Hill? I mean, we're going into the midterms. There's a long list of what many people believe to be a grift by this administration, by this president, for his allies, for his family, for his interests. And, you know, they obviously don't have the power on Capitol Hill, but short of being able to get some Republicans to break rank and cross the aisle to support whatever measure they have. What else can Democrats do here to prevent this from taking off? I mean, I think one of the most important things that every member of Congress who understands what's happening right now needs to do is help to educate the general public and voters well in advance of midterms about what's taking place and what should not be allowed to take place. The Justice Department is not Donald Trump's personal law firm. The IRS is not his private bargaining chip. Taxpayer money cannot become a loyalty fund for the president's allies. Every member of the public needs to understand. And the reality is if this entire process, if this settlement is legal, then Congress needs to look at how to change that because this should in no way be illegal and every voter going into the midterms needs to understand that. Yeah, one more example of the many loopholes Donald Trump in this administration have exposed. Tracy Fight-Love, Scott McFarlane, thank you to the both of you for starting us off. Christine I'm going to ask you to stick around. We've got a lot more to discuss when we come back. We're going to talk more about Todd Blanche's private meeting with Republican senators, the same senators who have been very vocal against the slush fund and the ballroom and that abrupt decision to delay a vote on the budget. We're going to talk with one Democratic senator on what he is hearing about this mess happening right now on Capitol Hill. Plus, Trump promised lower gas prices to Americans, lower inflation and no foreign wars. And those broken campaign promises are starting to come back at Donald Trump and the Republicans. A new wave of data showing just how angry voters of both parties are right now. We're going to bring that to you and look at whether it signals disaster for Republicans in the midterms. And later in the show, more on the president who sued himself and won.

And that grift keeps growing all those stories and much more when Deadline White House continues after this quick break. Instagram teen accounts, automatic protections for teens. Instagram teen accounts have built-in content settings and limits for who can contact teens. Plus, teens under 16 can't change these default safety settings without parental approval. so parents can help teens connect safely. Instagram teen accounts, automatic protections for who can contact teens and the content they can see. Learn more at Instagram.com slash teen accounts. Watch Disclosure Day at home now with exclusive bonus features. If you found out we weren't alone, if someone showed you, proved it to you? Would that frighten you? Well, now the truth belongs to 7 billion people in an original event film directed by Steven Spielberg from a screenplay by David Kep starring Emily Blunt, Josh O'Connor, Colin Firth, Eve Hewson, and Coleman Domingo. Find Disclosure Day on major digital platforms now with no subscription required, also in theaters. Hi, it's Sierra Miller. I can't wait for you to check out my new collection of shoes and accessories at Designer Shoe Warehouse. If you love shoes as much as I do, then trust me, I got you. From cute sneakerinas to the perfect flip-flops to stunning heels. These shoes are all style, no drama. It's a girls' girl's summer, and DSW has just the shoes. Shop the Sierra Miller collection right now at your DSW store or DSW.com.

What are you making this $1.7 billion fund for... Bad news. We're going to try to kill it. You're going to try and kill it? Wow. Okay. And how? Well, we're considering legislative options. We're going to write a letter to the AG to start, but we're considering a legislative option. Okay. We're trying to unpack exactly, you know, what the legal machinations are, but can't do that. We have an update to what Republican Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick told reporter Scott McFarlane yesterday. Our Capitol Hill reporter Michael Schnell reports that Fitzpatrick is working across the aisle with Democrat Tom Suozzi on a bill that prevents taxpayer dollars from going to this anti-weaponization fund that Donald Trump is trying to set up. It's just one of many efforts to block the fund. from going forward. Over in the Senate, Democrats had been preparing amendments to a legislative package that Republicans have been building, but the backlash over the fund and the White House ballroom has led the GOP to punt on voting on the bill. for the rest of this month. I want to bring it into the conversation, Democratic Senator Chris Coons of Delaware Center. It's great to see you again. You told our team that you're filing two amendments on this bill that has now been, as I mentioned, punted to June. Tell us about those amendments and if you expect them to pass. Amen, I was counting on two votes tonight on amendments to the reconciliation bill that directly relate to this slush fund, this $1.7 billion weaponization fund. Two days ago, the acting attorney general was in front of me on the Appropriations Committee. He couldn't answer. Whether or not those convicted of assaulting police officers here on January 6th would get million dollar payouts, so one of my amendments would prohibit that? He couldn't answer whether President Trump's businesses or family would be eligible for a big payout, so another amendment would answer that issue. Look, reconciliation is this complicated process, but it allows the Republicans to pass with just 50 votes. things they otherwise can't do. What were they going to use reconciliation for tonight? $72 billion more for ICE and Border Patrol enforcement. Rather than negotiating with Democrats on a reasonable set of reforms to how they are conducting immigration enforcement, they were going to jam this through. And frankly, I'm relieved. that some Republicans have woken up to the fact that funding Trump's billion dollar golden ballroom or funding Trump's $1.7 billion grievance fueled fund for payouts is not a good idea when most Americans can't make ends meet, can't meet their bills, and are seeing steadily rising costs for everything from gas at the pump to groceries at the grocery store to family health care and rent.

So let me ask you about that meeting with Todd Blanche. Politico is reporting that the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, had this very highly contentious meeting with Republicans today before it was decided that they would start voting on the bill. Do you have any insight as to what happened? Did Todd Blanche fail to convince his party or the Republican Party to take votes on the fund? Was that a factor? Well. What I have heard is that it was a very contentious lunch. Dozens of Republicans pressed him for answers on some of the issues I was just talking about. And he was combative, defensive, and as a result, they don't have enough votes to pass reconciliation. So they're going to take the next week and try and see what changes they have to make to the package to get the votes. But I'll remind your viewers. There's still probably enough votes in the Republican caucus to put another $72 billion towards mass deportation. That's still popular with Republicans. It's not popular with the American people because we all saw what happened in Minneapolis. And it was a disgrace. I was responsible, Eamon, for the second largest police department in my state when I was county executive. And we know how to do policing in an appropriate and constitutional way in this country. We just need to adopt standards that say no masks. You have to wear a badge and an ID that shows what agency you're from. You can't run around in like hop. up vehicles in Cabela's gear, you have to present as an officer. There has to be a process for resolving inappropriate use of force, and they can't just kick down doors with an administrative warrant. Our Constitution's Fourth Amendment says there has to be a judicial warrant to get into a residence. That's just a few of the issues. But rather than negotiate with us in good faith, they're going to give ICE and Border Patrol more money than the Marine Corps. And that's a basic disagreement between our parties. And I think something that's broadly unpopular with the American people. Senator, what does it say to you that Republicans are suddenly feeling squeamish about the ballroom, this so-called slush fund, the billions of dollars that appear to be wasted on vanity projects? Have they found their red line with Donald Trump? Well, they're seeing the same numbers that we are. On a recent Fox News poll, President Trump is the least popular he's been in his second term. And the issues that were winners for him in 24 are losers for him now. Remember, he ran on lowering your costs, making America healthy again, releasing the Epstein files and no new stupid foreign wars. And he's failing on all of those fronts. So I think this is a symptom, this is a sign, that Republicans in the Senate are hearing. from their constituents that rather than spending billions on ballrooms and a victory arch and a grievance payout fund, they'd like to see that money spent on their health care or the president and Republicans focused on lowering their costs. President Trump's completely distracted. He's now seriously talking about starting a war in Cuba when he hasn't even resolved the conflict in Iran.

And I think the average American would really rather see him stick to their daily concerns, which is their steadily rising family costs. All right, Senator Chris Coons, thank you so much. Really appreciate our time today, Senator. Thank you. Thank you, Raymond. Chris, let me get your thoughts on this. I mean, we're starting to see Republicans, not across the board, but some having an issue with... Donald Trump's spending on some of these projects. Why do you think this is the issue that they're starting to break on? Not two Americans being killed in Minneapolis, not the $72 billion more, not the potential wars in Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran that have no legal basis in it. Why is this the one where Republicans are saying, hey, maybe this is a bridge too far? Well, I think if you... claim to be the party of law and order, and you claim to back the blue, this is about giving money to people who have been convicted of crimes. I don't, those two things are so fundamentally intentioned that I don't think, I don't see how Republicans can, can square the two. And so. I think they really have to look at this. I mean, and also the Capitol police that were there that day, they were protecting these members of Congress. And so, you know, I don't know if many of them have a conscience, but you'd like to think at least some of them do and know the sacrifice that was made on their behalf to protect them. So, you know, maybe that is kicking in. It's hard to say. They saw it with their own eyes. They felt the fear that day. And so they can't just kind of brush that off. Absolutely. Christy Greenberg, great to see you as always. Thank you so much. Thanks for having me. Really appreciate it. After the break, another new poll showing just how unpopular Donald Trump is. It is a pattern for sure. But this one coming from his preferred news network, as you just heard earlier, sinking to a record low among his own party. We're going to talk about that and what it all means next.

At DSW, we ask the important questions. Like, what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding season, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an RSVP. So own the moment. You've got big plans and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with designer shoe warehouse. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. And let us surprise you. Traditional home security only alerts you after a break-in, and that's too late. SimplySafe is changing that. Stop. This is SimplySafe. Police are on the way. We don't just alert. We stop crime before it starts. SimplySafe, plans starting around a dollar a day. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at Simplysafe.com slash SXM or with promo code SXM. Outdoor deterrence requires a Simplysafe ActiveGuard outdoor protection plan starting at 4999 a month. Visit simplysafe.com slash licenses for alarm license information, Tennessee 2012. A beauty rest mattress gives you unparalleled motion separation, isolating movement with our pocketed coil technology, while providing individualized support for every sleeping position. People at their best get their beauty rest for 100 years. Donald Trump is facing one devastating poll after another when it comes to how the country thinks he is handling his job, especially on the issues that matter most to voters. This time, a new poll from Fox News shows that a record high, 61% of the country disapproves of the job Donald Trump is doing. Those numbers driven in large part by the economic hardships that Americans are facing as a casualty did Donald Trump's war of choice with Iran. That poll shows that a whopping 71% of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of the economy. That's a five-point higher jump than just last month. And notably, that increase includes a seven-point rise in disapproval among Republicans. Look, those are devastating numbers for a president who built his brand on promising a booming economy. and relief does not appear to be anywhere in sight. Gas prices hit another record high just today since the start of the war. They are now at a staggering $4.56 a gallon, I should say. Let's bring in the director of polling at the Institute of Politics for Harvard University, MS now contributor, John Delafope. Also joining us as Charlie Sykes. He is the author of the newsletter to the contrary. It's good to have both of you with us. Charlie, those numbers on the economy alone have to be a massive red flag for the Republicans. But this is undoubtedly a self-inflicted problem between the war of choice on Iran that led the gas prices and the tariffs that are making the rest of goods in this country skyrocket. Well, I think that's the key. Yes, they are devastated, and it is an own goal, right? All of this is self-inflicted by Donald Trump's own policies. But not only is it devastating, but I also think that in terms of the cost of living, but I think Americans are also seeing the lack of focus. They're seeing a president who is so concerned about almost everything other than what's happening to their financial condition. I mean, when you have the billionaire president focused on his ballroom in the reflecting ponds.

building the arch and hanging out with his fellow billionaires and saying that the cost of gas is just is just peanuts. What you're seeing is a disconnect. They're looking at a president who's saying you're not focused on what you claim to be focused on. You're not accomplishing what you said you were going to do. And that's really hard to overcome. John, what do you make of Republicans here increasingly disapproving of Trump's handling of the economy? And could it signal long-term problems for the Republican Party? They've always felt that they've had an upper hand when it comes to the economy. But 71% disapproving is a staggering number for any president, let alone a Republican president. True. So, Amon, we are now in a new era, I think, of how we think and we should understand politics. We're in an era where ideology is important, but experience is more important. And the experience that Americans are having, including Republicans, including the 89% of Republicans in that Fox poll, say that the Iran War is responsible for the hiking gas taxes. 84% of Republicans say that gas prices are a problem for them. And more than half of Republicans say the economy today is fair, only fair or poor. It doesn't matter if we're talking to working class, world voters, college educated voters. That is what is so clear about that Fox poll. And that is the reason we see for the first time in years that Democrats are doing better on the generic ballot, but Democrats are also doing better on which party is more trusted on handling the economy. Charlie, the president has struggled to explain this. He has struggled to even talk about this. Let me play for you how he talked about the very real problem of soaring gas prices this week. Take a listen to this. This is peanuts, and I appreciate everybody putting up with it for a little while. It won't be much longer, but you're going to have, and frankly, there is so much oil out there. One of the things that is happening is these big ships are coming up to Texas, Louisiana, and Alaska, and they're loading up. But I don't even think about that. What I think about is you can't let Iran have a nuclear weapon, and they won't have a nuclear weapon. So last week, the message coming out of Donald Trump was he didn't care about what Americans felt at the gas pump. Now the message has slightly been modified to say, I hear you, but it's peanuts. Hang in there. It's going to get better soon.

Well, I mean, he keeps saying it's going to get better soon. He's been saying that since the beginning of this war, right? The war that we won on day one, if you look at oil futures, it would suggest the oil markets think that the price of oil is going to be high for quite a long time. And clearly, Donald Trump does not have an exit strategy, doesn't have an off-ramp to this war. And it also seems as if, as if, you know, Grandpa's kind of fallen, you know, asleep in front of the Iran television show that he's lost interest in it. It's sort of faded. He wants to talk about really a lot of other things. So you have disconnect, layered upon, disconnect with the president with these numbers. And by the way, you know, in your last segment, you were asking, why are Republicans, you know, pushing back? Well, look, I think the Republicans have been, you know, they, they. Donald has made it very clear that he controls the Republican Party. But what Republicans are realizing is that Donald Trump doesn't care about what happens to the Republican Party in the general election. And they see these headwinds, and they know that Donald Trump is not making life more interesting than them. And every time he throws one of their members under the bus, he reminds them that the loyalty only goes one way. Yeah, and speaking of that disconnect, John, that was Donald Trump speaking outside of a construction site. That was the ballroom behind him, with Trump literally talking to the American people telling him their woes are simply peanuts because of the gas prices. This is what the Fox News poll shows when it comes to American concerns over gas prices. I'm going to put this up on the screen here for our viewers. 96% of Americans see gas prices as a problem. 75% call it a major problem. Donald Trump. calls it peanuts. And they're connecting the dots between the Iran and what's happening in the pump and every single day. Americans, Republican voters as well, are passing gas stations, but they're also experiencing inflation multiple times every single day. And I have not seen a poll where the first five or even 10 open-ended questions, whether it's in a Fox News survey or any other survey or the constituent surveys that Republican members of Congress are doing, where the Iran nuclear capability is anywhere close to kind of a top priority. What Americans care about, whether Democrat, Republic, or Independent, is staying in their homes, is affording health care. It's affording gas to get to work. Those are the essential things. And what we can see in the polls are that it's clear that Americans don't feel like the president is hearing them or listening to them. And that's why we see the ratings where they are, 29% approve of rating on the economy. That's all that matters right now. It's a top issue. All right. Everyone stay with me. No one's going anywhere after a break. Donald Trump, another Donald Trump project that absolutely no one asked for. Got the green light today to move forward by a group filled with no surprise here, Trump appointees. We're going to tell you about that next.

So while Americans want Donald Trump to actually focus on lowering their cost of living and gas prices and what have you, here's what he is actually focused on instead. More of his vanity projects. The Washington Post reports today that Trump is planning on building that 250-foot arch near Arlington National Cemetery. without approval from Congress. Now, according to that, reporting, the Trump administration is, quote, arguing that they do not need it because lawmakers a century ago authorized a somewhat similar project that was never built. Trump officials claim that building, that arch today, would be carrying out past lawmakers' wishes. We were back with John and Charlie. John, you know, these vanity projects really seem to be Trump's top priority and his obsession, even though polling shows that some of them are deeply unpopular, including the ballroom and even this arch. Well, I think the voters that we talk to think about this in the following way. Number one is an arch often should represent. A triumph, okay, a victory of some kind, a place where there is a national consensus. Those are the times where Americans I talk to believe we ought to have a public monument number one. Number two, and I know that when members of Congress go back to their districts, and if they ask them, with a billion dollars, what could we do? The answer wouldn't be an arch. It wouldn't be a ballroom. It would be about help keep me in my home. Help support the veterans who are suffering from mental health crises every single day. Help reduce my medical debt or make it more affordable to go to college. I mean, these are the issues that we all know. Millions of Americans are struggling with, and they see this as further evidence that in this case, the president, but largely the infrastructure within Washington, D.C., and Democrats as well don't understand. what is happening every single day in millions of homes because they're looking for someone to hear them and they're asking more from Republicans, but also more from Democrats as well. I mean, Charlie, can you imagine for a second what the outrage would be if a Democratic president tried to bypass Congress to build a 250-foot monument if he had torn down the east wing of the White House without congressional planning or approval to slap his name on the Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Center to try to get his face minted on coins? I can go on and on and on and on. And I can imagine on and on and on what the outrage would be, the kinds of people who would have their hair on fire. I mean, two points. I mean, number one, you described it accurately as a vanity project. You looked this up in the dictionary, vanity project. It would be Donald Trump in the middle of a war, in the middle of economic anxiety, building a 250-foot arch, which will obscure the view of Arlington National Cemetery. I don't know what effect it has on the flight patterns to Reagan Airport. But I guess this is the larger point. There is a reason why he doesn't want to have congressional approval.

because, you know, right now we are actually seeing that there is a red line. You know, members of Congress do not want to vote for the ballroom. They do not want to vote for the slush fund. And they sure as heck do not want to explain to their constituents why at a time when we have $39 trillion in national debt, they will build an arch. which no one asked for, no one can use, and for which he's provided really no rationale. I mean, at least a ballroom, you know, they tried to put, you know, some lipstick on it by saying we need it for security or these various other things. What the hell do you do with an arch? You know, other than basically create another monument to Donald Trump's massive ego and another expression of his, you know, bottomless self-doubt. And to that point, I mean, Charlie, there's another part in all of this, which is the sick of fancy that we're seeing in various agencies. Today, a federal panel approved Trump's plans for that arch. But here's the catch. The panel that actually approved it is all filled with Donald Trump appointees. And you can almost kind of go down the list of almost everything that he's doing somewhere along the line. You know, somebody is rubber stamping what Donald Trump wants to do, whether it's this panel or Congress or somebody at the FCC. You can go on and on with that as well. Well, I think this is actually an important point because in this particular case, you get an arch, but you're seeing what Todd Blanche, the acting attorney general, is willing to do with the Department of Justice. You're seeing what Brendan Carr is willing to do with the FCC. And it's obvious by now that the qualification for being part of any of these independent, alleged independent agencies is not just loyalty to Donald Trump. It is a willingness. to take the most egregious acts. It is if Donald Trump is testing them by saying, what can I get away with? What can I make you do? What will you approve? So Todd Blanche approves the most corrupt, brazen deal in the history of American political corruption. And whoever it is who's doing this is approving something that, frankly, I doubt is going to be built and will doubt will stand through future administrations. But again, it's an indication that Donald Trump, Trump foresees the federal government as an extension of his own ego, of his own id. Yeah, absolutely. Charlie Sykes, John Delavalpe, thank you to the both of you today. I really appreciate your insights as always. Thank you. Coming out, when we come back, a big wedding this weekend to tell you about with one noticeable RSVP still pending.

Well, in case you haven't heard, there is a big Trump wedding happening this weekend. Donald Jr. is getting married reportedly in the Bahamas, but the father of the groom might be missing. Is your son's budding this weekend, by the way? He'd like me to go, but it's going to be just a small little private affair, and I'm going to try and make it. I'm in the midst. I said, you know, this is not good timing for me. I have a thing called Iran and other things. That's one I can't win on. If I do attend... I get killed. If I don't attend, I get killed. By the fake news, of course, I'm talking about now. But he's got a very person who I've known for a long time, and hopefully they're going to have a great marriage. A person I've known for a long time. And just to be clear, it's not exactly clear whether Trump was referring to his son or soon to be daughter-in-law there. And sure, it's bad optics to jet off to a wedding in the middle of a war you chose to start. But the optics have never been Trump's thing, given that he has played over a dozen rounds of golf since he decided to start that war with Iran. After a break, there seems to be no limit to the Trump family's desire to make a quick buck. There's a lot more news ahead. We'll tell you about that and a whole lot more. Stay with us.

Walmart shoppers, meet the debit card design with you in mind. The Walmart Money Card offers up to $75 cash back on purchases at Walmart each year, early direct deposit, overdraft protection, and so much more. When Walmart is your everyday store, you need a card to match. That's the Walmart Money Card. Open your account today. The Walmart Money Card is issued by green dot bank, member FDIC. Fees, terms, and conditions apply. Visit WalmartMoneycard.com to learn more.