PoliticsLeft-leaningNational

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick is a left-leaning legal and political analysis show that critically examines judicial figures and legal issues with a focus on ethics and the rule of law.

54
Episodes transcribed
Sep 2025Aug 2026 covered
53
Episodes analyzed
362 tone reads — one per figure per episode
Attack-heavy
Knifes Alito

What This Tone Is Based On

The tone scores on this page come from analyzing how this show covers each political figure it mentions. Below is the breakdown of how many of those reads were positive, neutral, or negative.

Positive4512%
Neutral12133%
Negative19654%

Net media tone Very Negative across 362 figure-in-episode tone reads (not audience/impressions).

How Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick Differs from Other Shows

Compared to 163 outlets · Sep 2025–Aug 2026

This show's average tone sits near the field, but its coverage is far more split by figure. It rates Elena Kagan +0.27 above the media average on the figures it favors and Clarence Thomas -0.63 below it on the ones it criticizes — a 0.90-point gap between its most favorable and most critical coverage that a typical outlet doesn't show.

How its coverage of these figures differs from other shows
  • Clarence Thomas-0.63more critical vs. other shows
    Show -0.54Other shows +0.09
    12 eps
  • Samuel Alito-0.51more critical vs. other shows
    Show -0.50Other shows +0.01
    25 eps
  • Stephen Miller-0.41more critical vs. other shows
    Show -0.67Other shows↓↓ -0.26
    14 eps
  • Todd Blanche-0.40more critical vs. other shows
    Show↓↓ -0.39Other shows +0.01
    11 eps
  • Brett Kavanaugh-0.39more critical vs. other shows
    Show↓↓ -0.39Other shows +0.00
    23 eps
  • Elena Kagan+0.27more favorable vs. other shows
    Show +0.26Other shows -0.01
    11 eps
  • John Roberts-0.26more critical vs. other shows
    Show↓↓ -0.32Other shows -0.07
    28 eps
  • Pam Bondi-0.19more critical vs. other shows
    Show↓↓ -0.35Other shows -0.16
    29 eps
  • Amy Coney Barrett-0.16more critical vs. other shows
    Show -0.18Other shows -0.02
    19 eps
  • Keir Starmer+0.03more favorable vs. other shows
    Show↓↓ -0.21Other shows↓↓ -0.24
    44 eps

Delta = this show's tone toward the figure minus the average across all 163 other tracked outlets that covered them ≥3 times, Sep 2025–Aug 2026.
Positive = friendlier here; negative = harsher.

Editorial Identity

The editorial fingerprint of this left-leaning politics show — who it elevates, who it goes after, and where it breaks from the pack.

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick is a show that delves deeply into the intersection of law and politics, often scrutinizing the actions and decisions of judicial figures and their impact on American democracy. The show is particularly focused on issues of government ethics, corruption, and the rule of law, frequently highlighting perceived abuses and ethical lapses within the judiciary and government. It operates with a critical lens, especially towards conservative figures and policies, while offering a platform for progressive legal perspectives.

Who it champions

The show champions figures like Ketanji Brown Jackson and Adam Schiff, presenting them more favorably than the broader media landscape. It also strongly advocates for issues like abortion and reproductive rights, which it covers extensively compared to other outlets, reflecting its commitment to progressive legal causes.

Who it targets

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick is notably critical of conservative judicial figures such as Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Brett Kavanaugh, often questioning their interpretations of the Constitution and ethical standards. The show also targets issues like government weaponization and election integrity, framing them as areas of concern regarding the erosion of democratic norms.

How it differs from the consensus

The show is an outlier in its critical stance towards figures like Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, contrasting with more neutral or favorable coverage in other media. Its focus on the rule of law and government weaponization is significantly more pronounced than average, highlighting its dedication to scrutinizing legal and ethical dimensions of governance.

53 episodes · 60 figures · Sep 6, 2025 – Aug 8, 2026 · updated Aug 20, 2026

Who Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick boosts and attacks

Tracked figures split by this show's average tone toward them, each with the clips behind the call — tap a quote to jump to the audio.

Amicus With Dahlia Lithwick is a reliable ally to Elena Kagan; its prime targets are Samuel Alito, Pam Bondi, Stephen Miller.

Attacked · 9
+3 more

Coverage Volume

Transcribed episodes per week — last 26 weeks

Sentiment Trajectory

Average weekly tone toward figures — green favorable, red critical

Whose coverage is ramping up — and dropping

Cooling on Amy Coney Barrett, John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh.

“Across N days” = distinct days behind the recent count; a single burst means it’s concentrated in ≤2 days — treat as one story, not a trend.

Show organizations & places →
Organizations
Supreme Court54
Department of Justice37
Senate26
ICE23
Slate Plus22
House of Representatives21
Amicus Plus18
New York Times17
Congress15
Places
United States41
White House25
Washington DC19
New York16

Recent Stories

Proposed Court Reforms
Neutral2026-08-08

Jamel Bowie outlines his vision for court reform, advocating for a more expansive and representative judiciary. He suggests reducing the Supreme Court's jurisdiction and creating a National Court of Appeal to enhance accountability and reduce the concentration of power within the Supreme Court.

By the People | Now It’s Your Turn
Public Ownership of the Constitution
Positive2026-08-08

The episode discusses the concept of popular constitutionalism, emphasizing that the Constitution belongs to the people rather than being solely interpreted by the Supreme Court. It highlights historical examples of ordinary citizens asserting their rights and the importance of active public engagement in constitutional matters.

By the People | Now It’s Your Turn
Critique of Supreme Court Power
Hostile2026-08-08

The discussion critiques the Supreme Court's increasing power and its role as the final arbiter of constitutional meaning. The conversation suggests that this concentration of power has led to public passivity and emphasizes the need for Congress and the public to reclaim their role in interpreting the Constitution.

By the People | Now It’s Your Turn
Historical Context of Constitutional Rights
Positive2026-08-08

The episode references historical movements, such as the abolitionist movement and the fight for civil rights, to illustrate how ordinary people have historically shaped constitutional meaning. It emphasizes the importance of grassroots activism in asserting rights and influencing legal interpretations.

By the People | Now It’s Your Turn
Supreme Court Recognizes Marriage Equality
Positive2026-08-01

The Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling recognizing that the Constitution guarantees marriage equality, striking down bans on same-sex marriage in 14 states. This decision, authored by Justice Anthony Kennedy, marked a significant victory for the marriage equality movement, culminating a decade-long campaign for LGBTQ rights.

By The People | Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Backlash Against Marriage Equality
Hostile2026-08-01

Following the Massachusetts ruling on same-sex marriage, there was a swift backlash, with voters in 11 states proposing ballot measures to ban marriage equality. The movement faced significant challenges, losing 30 consecutive ballot initiatives, highlighting the ongoing struggle for public acceptance and legal recognition of LGBTQ rights.

By The People | Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Political Strategy for Marriage Equality
Positive2026-08-01

Mark Solomon and other advocates developed a strategic approach to garner support for marriage equality, focusing on grassroots efforts and political engagement. They aimed to change public perception and secure legislative victories, which were crucial for building momentum leading to the Supreme Court's eventual ruling.

By The People | Two Steps Forward, One Step Back
Obergefell and Its Implications
Neutral2026-08-01

The Obergefell decision in 2015 solidified marriage equality as a constitutional right, reflecting a significant societal shift. However, the ruling also raised concerns about the ongoing struggle for LGBTQ rights, as advocates emphasized the need to continue fighting for acceptance and protection against backlash.

By The People | Two Steps Forward, One Step Back