National Review: The Editors
National Review: The Editors is a critical right-leaning show focused on scrutinizing political figures and cultural issues.
What This Tone Is Based On
The tone scores on this page come from analyzing how this show covers each political figure it mentions. Below is the breakdown of how many of those reads were positive, neutral, or negative.
Net media tone Very Negative across 177 figure-in-episode tone reads (not audience/impressions).
How National Review: The Editors Differs from Other Shows
Compared to 180 outlets · Sep 2025–Aug 2026Overall this show runs marginally more critical than the rest of the media — mean tone -0.21 vs the media's -0.14.
- Graham Platner-0.28more critical vs. other showsShow⤓ -0.72Other shows⤓ -0.4410 eps
- Donald Trump-0.09more critical vs. other showsShow↓↓ -0.34Other shows↓↓ -0.2512 eps
Delta = this show's tone toward the figure minus the average across all 180 other tracked outlets that covered them ≥3 times, Sep 2025–Aug 2026.
Positive = friendlier here; negative = harsher.
Editorial Identity
The editorial fingerprint of this right-leaning politics show — who it elevates, who it goes after, and where it breaks from the pack.
National Review: The Editors is a right-leaning political show that takes a critical stance on a wide range of political figures and issues. The show is particularly focused on cultural and social issues, often discussing them with a skeptical tone. It also covers topics related to national security and election integrity with a significant lift compared to other media outlets. The show tends to scrutinize both domestic and international political figures, often highlighting perceived failures or controversies.
The show is notably critical of figures such as Graham Platner, Zohran Mamdani, and Donald Trump, covering them more harshly than the media average. It also frequently critiques cultural and social issues, as well as election integrity and government ethics, often highlighting perceived shortcomings or controversies. The coverage of Vladimir Putin and Kamala Harris also tends to be more negative than the media average, reflecting the show's critical editorial stance.
National Review: The Editors distinguishes itself by its heightened focus on culture war and social issues, as well as Russia and Ukraine, covering these topics significantly more than the average outlet. The show's framing often combines policy and character analysis, providing a mixed approach that scrutinizes both the actions and the personalities of political figures. This critical lens is applied consistently across a range of issues, setting it apart from more neutral or favorable coverage found elsewhere.
Who National Review: The Editors boosts and attacks
Tracked figures split by this show's average tone toward them, each with the clips behind the call — tap a quote to jump to the audio.
National Review: The Editors's prime targets are Graham Platner, Donald Trump.
“Trump has been trying to argue that the culprit is these vandals.”
“a failure that goes directly to the top to Donald Trump.”
“I was shocked and scandalized when the war was launched at 3 a.m. in the morning on a Saturday. You know, with an announcement by President Donald Trump in his white MAGA cap.”
“Graham Platner as a guy who was, let's say, at minimum, neo-Nazi curious.”
“I don't know if I can count the number of shoes that have dropped on the Graham Platner campaign. It's a full payless outlet at this point.”
“It's going to be hard for Democrats to find a candidate as damaged as Graham Platner.”
Thin sample — 22 analyzed episodes across these figures; treat the split as directional.
Coverage Volume
Transcribed episodes per week — last 26 weeks
Sentiment Trajectory
Average weekly tone toward figures — green favorable, red critical
Whose coverage is ramping up — and dropping
New attack lines forming: Hasan Piker (0→3 eps, tone -0.47). Cooling on Donald Trump, Elon Musk, JD Vance.
“Across N days” = distinct days behind the recent count; a single burst means it’s concentrated in ≤2 days — treat as one story, not a trend.
Top Issues National Review: The Editors drives
Top Issues ranked by lift — how much harder this show pushes an issue than the average outlet. ≥ 1.25× over-indexes.
National Review: The Editors pushes Russia & Ukraine hardest — 2.1× the average outlet's rate of coverage.
Show organizations & places →Organizations & Places They Focus On
Recent Stories
Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez referred to the current 'woke moment' as 'crazy' and suggested that voters should focus on what candidates are saying now rather than their past statements. This has sparked debate about accountability and the implications of past positions on future political viability, especially in light of the upcoming elections.
A public debate erupted over the rising cost of burritos, with claims that they now cost $20, reflecting broader concerns about affordability in America. The discussion highlighted generational divides and the impact of inflation, with some attributing the price increases to lifestyle choices like food delivery services.
As the 2026 midterm elections approach, Republicans are facing significant challenges, including scandals involving candidates and a general dissatisfaction with the current administration. Analysts draw parallels to the 2006 midterms, suggesting that the GOP may be in for a tough election cycle if current trends continue.
In a surprising turn of events, candidate Abdul El-Sayed narrowly won the Michigan Senate primary, defying polls that predicted a larger victory. This win is seen as a significant achievement for the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and the Bernie Sanders wing of the party, indicating a shift in the political landscape beyond urban areas.
Reports indicate that the U.S. military is facing significant shortages in long-range precision missiles and interceptors, raising concerns about the country's readiness for ongoing conflicts. Leaks suggest internal dissatisfaction within the White House regarding these shortages, which could limit military options in future engagements.
Jason Ardey, a young black professor at Cambridge University, faces allegations of plagiarism and fabricating aspects of his biography. Critics argue that the university's support for him reflects a troubling trend of prioritizing diversity over academic integrity, raising questions about the standards in academia.
Spain is experiencing a significant immigration crisis as tens of thousands of migrants attempted to cross into the Spanish enclave of Ceuta from Morocco. This influx has been interpreted as a geopolitical maneuver by Morocco to retaliate against Spain's diplomatic relations with Algeria, highlighting issues of Spanish governance and border enforcement. The situation has sparked intense debate about immigration policies and the broader implications for the European Union.
The immigration crisis in Spain has led to various political reactions, with some commentators framing the situation as a consequence of leftist policies under Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez. Critics have drawn parallels to past migration events and suggested that the crisis reflects broader failures in immigration management. The discourse has also highlighted divisions within the European Union regarding border security and immigration policy.
Francesca Hong is emerging as a prominent candidate in Wisconsin's gubernatorial race, leading in polls despite her controversial positions, including calls for police abolition. Her rise reflects a broader trend of progressive candidates gaining traction within the Democratic Party, raising concerns among some about the implications for the general election. The political landscape in Wisconsin is becoming increasingly polarized, with both parties struggling to appeal to moderate voters.
Senator Rand Paul has obtained Anthony Fauci's diaries, which contain significant revelations about the origins of COVID-19 and Fauci's public statements. The diaries suggest Fauci was aware of the lab leak theory and the unsanitary conditions of wet markets, contradicting his public denials. The discussion highlights the implications of Fauci's actions and the public's trust in health officials during the pandemic.
Ukraine is employing innovative strategies, including drone technology, to counteract Russia's military advantages. The discussion emphasizes Ukraine's resilience and adaptability, as well as the importance of U.S. and European support in their efforts. The conversation also touches on the implications of the war for global geopolitics and the future of Western alliances.
The discussion centers on the political maneuvering surrounding the filibuster and the SAVE Act, with critiques of President Trump's approach to legislative pressure. The conversation highlights the challenges of passing significant legislation in a divided Senate and the implications of potential changes to the filibuster for future governance.