6/29/26 - The Marxist-Islamist Alliance: A Threat to American Values

Hey folks, Mark Levin here. Before we dive into today's episode, I want to talk about my go-to gold and silver company. Monetary gold is over 25 years helping Americans understand physical gold and silver with an education-first, no-pressure approach, and support for IRA-eligible options. Monetary gold has a complementary guide. It's free to help you understand precious metals. Call them right now, 877 now gold, or visit mark lovesgold.com and request the free guide. Make sure to ask for details that... That's 877 now gold or visit mark lovesgold.com. Performance may vary. You should always consult your financial and tax consultant. Now let's get to the show. He's here. Now, broadcasting them from the underground command post. Deep in the boughs of a hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick and steel of a non-district building, we've once again made contact with our leader, Mark the Ven.

Thank you. There's 877-381-3811. 877-381-3811. It's wonderful to be back. I missed you very much. We spent the last week in Israel. We'll talk about that a little later, I promise. We'll talk about the Supreme Court cases. I promise. Iran, I promise. But before we do. You know, I got a phone call. I'm not going to get into detail. from one of the federal agencies and they said, Mr. Levin, I said, yes. I said, what the hell did I do? They said nothing. We came across something. We want to bring it to your attention. If you find anything weird happening on your internet, on your mail or whatever, give us a heads up. Okay, I'm giving you a heads up. You know who you are out there. They just blew out my entire email. They being Iran, of course. No, can you prove it, Mark? How the hell can I prove it? Everything was working fine. The show begins. We've had this problem from time to time. And, you know, they have their little urchins out there working away. And I've tried many ways to block this when I'm unsuccessful at it. Let me start this way.

I want to congratulate all the people who pat themselves on the head and pat themselves on the back on the Internet, that they have finally figured out this marriage between Marxism and Islamism that you and I have been talking about. How long, Rich? I don't even know. Years and years. We're not going to go back and bore you with the audio and so forth, but it was very, very lonely out here. I don't really care. And not that you will, and not that you should. But for reference, if you look at my last three books, American Marxism, which sold about 1.3 to 1.4 million copies. Or the Democrat Party hates America, where I explained the Democrat Party's role in this radicalism. Or my last book, On Power. All these books are intended to be basically chapters in a massive book, which, of course, you can't possibly read or I certainly can't write it that way. And what's going on now, America, is this. What's going on in your country? And again, we've talked about it, but I'm trying to figure out ways to highlight it and underscore it and put a marquee around it and so forth and so on.

This Marxist movement, this American Marxist movement, and I call it an American Marxist movement because it has been customized to America, that is Marxism. We've gone through the whole history of it until I'm blue in the face. The progeny of Marx, which is the so-called self-identified progressives, they are American Marxists. And you go back to Woodrow Wilson and several others that I've written about, and we've talked about in the past. They did not like the American system. They rejected the Declaration of Independence. They rejected the Constitution of the United States. And so they've applied this redistribution of wealth, oppressor oppressed, and on and on, all these approaches. Not because the people want them. Not because this is some kind of a bottom-up revolution. No, because the elitists want it. The ruling class wants it. And they've imposed it on us. and most of it through the Democrat Party. Because the Democrat Party has never really accepted Americanism, constitutionalism. It just never has, and it still hasn't. That's why the rise of so-called democratic socialists within the Democrat Party. That's why the rise of Marxists within the Democrat Party. That's why the rise of radical Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran supporting Islamists in the Democrat Party. You don't see it in the Republican Party. I'm not giving a pass to the Republican Party. We see other things. We see other things. We see the Woke Reich. It's not R-I-G-H-T. It's R-E-I-C-H. These are neo-fascists. These are authoritarian. And just like with Marxists, when everybody was calling them progressives and socialists, and I said, over and over and over again, on Fox, on this station. Radio. Stop calling them socialists. Stop calling them progressives. Stop calling them democratic socialists. Marxist, or if you prefer communists, call them by what they are. And now everybody does. And that's very, very important. Islamists. Stop calling them radical, Muslim. Start calling them this. They are Islamists. They self-identify as Islamists. They are jihadis. That's what they are. And they're in our country, by the thousands, by the tens of thousands. Since at least after World War II, there was a big push as Europeans came into this country, particularly from Germany, pushing this ideology of communism. Don't get me wrong, I've already explained. Woodrow Wilson and so forth embrace this. They embraced it. John Dewey embraced it, and they promoted it. But the more virulent kind, the 1940s, 30s, 40s, the Frankfurt Communists and so forth and so on, they imported it into the United States. They imported it into the United States. Look, Marx and others, Marcuse. German. It's not Americanism. Because Marxism rejects the Judeo-Christian belief system. It rejects all religion. It rejects all social institutions, even the nuclear family. That's why these radical teachers' unions and their school boards want to make decisions about your children without your parents.

Mark specifically says in the Communist Manifesto, you've got to break that social chain. And religion, he says, is mysticism and gets into the way of advancing the people and on and on and on. And then we have this Islamist movement. So how did this happen? It happened because whether it's the, when you look in Europe, the labor parties, the liberal parties, the left-wing parties in Europe, our Democrat Party in America, they laid the way. for the importation into this country of the third world. That's what they did. Immigration is supposed to be about bringing people into the country who will benefit the citizens who are here, not to transform the country, not to destroy the country, not to change the makeup of the citizenship of this country. Yet those are the three reasons we have open borders when we do, which Trump has shut. But I fear the damage has been done. And they exploit our due process rules, our Bill of Rights, our constitutional system while attacking them. That's the beauty of their revolution. They can use the greatness of the American system to destroy the American system. And so the Marxists paved the way for the Islamists. Now, you might say, but Islamists, they believe in Allah and Marxists don't believe in a guy. Of course you're right. But they have a single enemy, the same enemy, and it's the West. It's us. They'll work out the details after they destroy us. They'll kill each other. We've seen it before. But that's not where their heads are at. Their heads are at. Number one mission, you must destroy the West. You must conquer it. For the Marxists, you must destroy it. For that ideology, for the Islamists, you must destroy it for their political religious ideology, their fundamentalism. Because Americanism, not nationalism, populism, and all the other isms. Americanism is not an experiment. I hate when people, the American experience, it's not an experiment. It's truly the only humane way for a civilized people to survive. That's what it is. That's what it is. Now, these have converged on us. The Marxists monopolize our universities and colleges, particularly those that are considered Kay Ivey League. And the hiring of, I've written about all this, but everybody can't read the books. I'm explaining it. The faculty hires the faculty now. It's completely incestuous. And so you have almost no conservatives, almost none. Academic freedom, they call it, which of course is the opposite. It's brainwashing, it's propaganda, it's strong-arming, it's thuggish. And so you have more and more young people born in our own country, in our own country, who hate it. because they're indoctrinated. And if they're not indoctrinated in school, they're indoctrinated online with foreign governments and bots and all the rest of it. They are relentlessly, relentlessly hit with this. So if you're Joe and Sally and you work all day and you come home and your kids go and say, you go, what the hell's going on? It's because they're being brainwashed when they're not under your tutelage. They're being brainwashed.

They're being brainwashed online. They're being brainwashed in social circles. And then you have the Islamists who are being imported into this country. And because of our horrendous immigration laws. And you watch what the Supreme Court does tomorrow. You watch what it does with birthright citizenship. And I'll get to that in a minute too. This is a strategic effort by a political, ideological, fundamentalist, religious cult. That uses immigration strategically. That uses population location strategically. That has figured out how to exploit our primary and general voting systems. That has figured out how to exploit our Bill of Rights. It makes it a thousand times harder to remove them than to bring them here. That's why there's a war on ice. Not because they're wearing masks, for God's sakes. They all forced us to wear a mask five years ago. Now all of a sudden, now all of a sudden it's frightening to everybody. These two, what you might think are divergent ideologies, but the means justifies their ends. They're together like a hand in a glove when it comes to the destruction of the Judeo-Christian belief system and the Enlightenment principles that make this such a fantastic and wonderful society. But then we have a third problem that's converged here. And it's the woke-right neo-fascists. You know who they are. I've been a war with them for what? A year and a half. Again. warned over and over and over don't do that mark you'll hurt your listenership you'll hurt your viewership you'll hurt your sponsors and then the and then the quizlings behind my back keep it up mark you're doing a great job you're doing a great job who do nothing and say nothing now i think we all realize That they are attacking Christianity. They are attacking Judaism. They are anti-Semitic. They are pro-Vladimir Putin. They're pro-Sheria law. That's who these people are. Some of them are hanging into a Republican position to the administration, into the media. We know who they are. We know who they are. You're here because you want to know what's going on, and I'm here to tell you what's going on.

Of course they're attacking Jews. Of course they're attacking Israel. Of course they're attacking Christian Zionists and evangelical Christians. What holds this country together is the Judeo-Christian belief system. The Marxists don't believe in the Judeo-Christian belief system. The Islamists don't believe in the Judeo-Christian belief system. So we're under attack. The Constitution protects us from them. So it's under attack. The Declaration of Independence, which we're about to celebrate on July 4th, lays out in the most concise, brilliant form imaginable, what we're all about. And they're incompatible with Marxism and Islamism. As I used to explain to Charlie Kirk, as I used to explain to anybody who would listen, they're incompatible because they seek to destroy us. They seek to destroy us. More when I return. I'll be right back. March 11.

If you missed out on gold in 2020, if you missed the rally in 2025, it's not too late. Right now, gold is sitting about 20% off its all-time high earlier this year, so you could buy it at a discount. The fundamentals that drove gold over $5,000 an ounce, they're still strong. It's a limited commodity. You can't just print more of it. Gold often remains your hedge in times of inflation war and political uncertainty. So get diversified and add gold with monetary gold. For 26 years, monetary gold has helped Americans own gold and silver in a tax-sheltered retirement account like an IRA or a 401K. Five stars on the Better Business Bureau and Consumer Affairs. Visit mark lovesgold.com or call 877 now gold for a one-on-one consultation. That's 877669. 4653. Plus, get a free guide to owning gold. At mark lovesgold.com or call 877 now gold. Performance from a very consult your tax and financial professional. By the way, I told you Hamas wouldn't be disarmed. It's faced to the so-called peace plan, and they're not disarmed. And they're not going to be disarmed. I like the plan they came up with in Lebanon. Thank you very much, but Hezbollah is not going to be disarmed. And I told you that too. I also told you that the Iranian Islam or Nazi regime needed to be eliminated because it's going to be impossible to contain it otherwise. Certainly pass this administration. Well, now you see how it conducts itself, and it's not going to stop. I come under attack relentlessly by frauds, phonies, and buffoons who just click their heels and salute rather than respectfully raise issues because they should in order to help the administration and the people in the administration. Trying to silence me, which is never going to happen, never, is not a policy. telling us to cheer for this team or that team, that's not a policy either. Arguing for what's right, that's the policy. And if we have generals who say we cannot defeat the Iranian regime, those generals should be fired and replaced with other generals. Just as Abraham Lincoln needed to replace generals who said this civil war could not be won. If we can't beat Iran, what the hell are we going to do about China? I'll be right back. Thank you. If you missed out on gold in 2020, if you missed the rally in 2025, it's not too late. Right now, gold is sitting about 20% off its all-time high earlier this year, so you could buy it at a discount. The fundamentals that drove gold over $5,000 an ounce, they're still strong. It's a limited commodity. You can't just print more of it. Gold often remains your hedge in times of inflation war and political uncertainty. So get diversified and add gold with monetary gold.

For 26 years, monetary gold has helped Americans own gold and silver in a tax-sheltered retirement account like an IRA or a 401K. Five stars on the Better Business Bureau and Consumer Affairs. Visit mark lovesgold.com or call 877 now gold for a one-on-one consultation. That's 877669-4653. Plus. Get a free guide to owning gold at mark lovesgold.com or call 877 now gold. Performance from a very consult your tax and financial professional. Mark Levin on the front line of Liberty. Call in now 877-381-3811. The counter-revolution to the American Revolution is in full force. It can no longer be dismissed or ignored, can it? For it is devouring our society and culture, swirling around our everyday lives and ubiquitous in our politics, schools, media, and entertainment. Once a mostly unrelatable fringe and subterranean movement, it's here. It's everywhere. You, your children, and your grandchildren are now immersed in it, and it threatens to destroy the greatest nation, I should say, ever established, along with your freedom, family and security. Of course, the primary difference between the counter-revolution and the American Revolution is the former seeks to destroy American society and impose autocratic rule. The latter sought to protect American society and institute representative government. That is the first paragraph in my book, American Marxism, which I wrote five years ago, and many of you purchased, and I hope read. Remember? Oh, yes, let me get to this here. One moment, folks. There we are. Let's talk about this word equality. Actual equality. What precisely is meant by economic equality? What do we mean? To what extent can it be imposed upon a population of unique and diverse individuals? And by what means and methods shall it be imposed? How do we measure when economic equality has actually been achieved? How do we ensure that it indoors from one generation to the next? It's not economic equality in the eye of the beholder? And what effect will economic equality, whatever it means and however enforced, have on the economic growth opportunity and well-being of the general society? And over 190 countries, including communist regimes. Where does economic equality actually exist? Now, the questions are endless, yet profoundly important to addressing this whole notion of economic socialism and Marxism. And what about the owner versus the worker paradigm? The owner versus the worker paradigm is not a rational paradigm at all. Frequently, the line or distinction between an owner and a worker is ambiguous if nonexistent. Is a person who owns a small retail shop or a plumbing store or whatever or an online business who is self-employed, an owner, a worker, or both? Most people would answer both. Is a worker who invests in stocks issued by a publicly held business, say through a pension plan and employs him and who purchases stock through their own investments and so forth? Are they an owner in these businesses? Are they just a worker?

The answer is yes, they're both. And why is it assumed as a matter of empirical fact that employer is exploiting his employee in a capitalist economic system? For example, who is better off employees working for American businesses larger and small, or those working in slave labor conditions in North Korea and Cuba and Venezuela? Or let's look at communist China. Chinese citizens are not free to change jobs. They are assigned social credits based on their strict compliance with governmental dictates. They must worship China's brutal dictator Xi Jinping as a supreme leader. Religion is all but banned. The judicial system exists to enforce Communist Party orthodoxy. There exists an extensive network of concentration camps and so forth. For most cogent people, this is far from the idyllic nirvana promised by Marx's propaganda, especially university professors. So what do they mean exactly by equality? It's a slogan. It's a slogan. It means nothing. And Republicans and conservatives don't know how to respond to Democrats who keep pushing this slop. Socialism. Marxism. Crazy. The mode of production of material life conditions the social, political, and intellectual life process in general, said Marx. It is not the consciousness of men that determine their being, but on the contrary, their social being that determines their consciousness. And Marx argued in this vein that the economic relation and social context in which the working class exists limits the worker's ability to transcend her or his socialist situation. Most obvious in this fallacy is the assertion that our nation exists in some kind of a caste or class system that our entire existence is determined by our economic condition and a given moment in our life and that there's no ability or hope in transcending this supposed condition. Yet in a relatively free society where relatively free economic system, the opposite is true. Indeed, the examples of individual mobility up and down the social and economic chain are infinite. There simply are no static economic or social cast or class systems. That's not to say that social snobbery and the like is non-existence, which occurs in every society. But nowhere does an impenetrable caste or class system exist more profoundly than in communist regimes around the world, where a party and governmental aristocracy lead lives that the populations they lord over can never hope to enjoy. This is good stuff, Mr. Producer, that I wrote here. No wonder this was the biggest seller of the year. Why can't people respond to this? I hear Democrats even come on TV, some of them on Fox, and they go on about, well, people understand what the price of gasoline is, and people understand, well, then it's hard job for people to understand the bigger picture. Gasoline lines, bread lines, food lines, in line to get a doctor, in line to get life-saving treatment.

Ladies and gentlemen, those don't exist in America. There are imperfections. There are hiccups. There's this. There's that. There's mistakes. We got it. But those are exceptions to the rule. You need to step back and look at what you have that you're about to lose. You want to go to a grocery store. You can go right now. You got anywhere from a 7-Eleven to these huge stores. You can go to a Costco. You can go to... A Walmart, depending on where you live, you can go to a Publix or a Wegman or a giant or shopwright or whatever. And we take it for granted. Don't take it for granted. And the vast majority, if you're getting a car to go there, don't you? Don't take that for granted either. And the fact is, the lowest gas prices are in red states, not blue states. Why? Because blue states tax the hell out of your gasoline. The cost of living in New York City is through the roof because of New York City government and because of their policies. Now you're going to have rent control freezes. Yay, that's great for about six, eight, ten months for the renter. But wait until pipe breaks or wait until there's an electrical issue, or wait until this or that or something has to be done. At the same time, they're increasing the cost of insurance. They're increasing the cost of property taxes. They're increasing the cost of... of sewer, you know, care and so forth and so on. So if you own a brownstone and you're leasing it out and so you're not going to be able to afford to keep it up. You just can't. I mean, ladies in general, these are the policies of Fidel Castro, the people there are starving. They don't have toilet paper because you cannot have ideologues that have never produced a thing. Making all the decisions about how you're going to live through slogans. Affordability. You want affordability. Create tremendous growth. Create tremendous opportunity for businesses, small and large. You'll have more and more commerce. The prices will always go down. It's crazy. How many lives have to be lost? How many people have to be sick to prove this ideology? Crazy. And then Islamism. What is with these governors? Particularly these Republican governors. And as far as I'm concerned, DHS, with the help of the Department of Justice or any of the department. should be working full-time, overtime, all cylinders, full go, pedal to the metal, locating these imams, start there, and if they shouldn't be here or need to be denaturalized because they're promoting terrorism, Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, get them the hell out of the country. And if you have to hire 50,000 more immigration lawyers, then do it! There's nothing more important. And if you're a governor and you're allowing people to get these zoning approvals for these massive centers, which are nothing more than fortresses, segregated centers that are intentionally put where they're put, intentionally segregated, well, don't permit it anymore. Don't permit it anymore. Do something about it.

And if you have to hire more people to fight it, then hire more people to fight it. These school boards, this group CARE, which is a Hamas front group. Why isn't CARE? Nationwide. A terrorist group. Why is it that certain states like Florida and Texas have done it? The administration needs to put care. on a terrorist watch list, on a terror organization list. It is a group tied to Hamas, for God's sakes. Why is it the Muslim Brotherhood, the mothership of all these terrorist groups, including Hamas, Islamic jihad? Why isn't that in the United States of America put on the terrorist list? Because of Qatar? And let me ask you Republican state legislators and governors, where you actually have a majority and control all the elected branches of your state. Why aren't you cutting substantially funds from colleges and universities that only hire an overwhelming majority of these leftists and Islamists? Why aren't you doing something about it? You have the power of the purse. Do something about it. Stop sitting on your asses and... Crying crocodile tears. It's time to act. That time is now. And let me tell you something, ladies and gentlemen, if the cost of a gallon of gasoline went down to 50 cents, what would the Democrats be doing? What would the Marxist Socialists be doing? Anybody know? They'd be massively increasing taxes on it. They'd be pushing climate change. They want to drive up the cost of gasoline. So you're going to listen to them when it comes to affordability. Those of you who live in Democrat states and Democrat cities, is it affordable? If it's so affordable, why are so many of you leaving as fast as you can? And I'm talking about Democrats going to red states. I'll be right back.

With Donald Trump back in office, one of his biggest adversaries, top Democrat Dick Durbin of Chicago is leading the charge to derail President Trump's agenda at every turn. And now Dick Durbin has a new scheme. A government takeover of your credit card. Right now, Americans have thousands of credit card options, all with equal, strong security. But Senator Dick Durbin's plan could result in less security. That means more risk for your credit, your identity, and your financial future. Dick Durbin's bill isn't about helping consumers. It's a giveaway to corporate... which could shift costs onto you while putting your rewards and fraud protections in jeopardy. We've seen Dick Durbin's failed policies before. His last big banking regulation backfired, leading to higher costs than fewer benefits for American families. Tell Republican senators stop Dick Durbin's government takeover of your credit card before it's too late. Learn more at guardyourcar.com. That's guardyourcar.com paid for by the Electronic Payments Coalition. And as you know who've listened to this program over a period of time, what Zohran Mamdani's doing in New York is he's trying to depopulate New York of as many Jewish people as possible. He wants to turn it into a Dearborn Michigan or a Patterson, New Jersey. Folks, you don't have to mark my word for this. I know what the hell's going on. I'm way ahead of everybody else because I study this stuff. I research it. I know what I'm dealing with. So he wants to depopulate New York as possible. And articles are coming up. Jews get out of New York, you know, for their own safety. It's over for Jews in New York. I'm reading them right now. So it's working. It's working. And it's not that you can't blame them, but that's what's taking place in New York. New York is going to be a Dearborn Michigan. It's going to be a Patterson, New Jersey. It's going to be a London, if you will. And this is underway right now in less than six months. Or give a few weeks. Maybe it's been six months, but not much more. That's what he's done. A couple of Supreme Court decisions, two big ones tomorrow, particularly the birthright citizenship case. I'm very worried about that because I'm worried about Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts. There could be others in there somewhere. But Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts weren't even good. on the ballot counting. Let me cut into that very quickly. Five the four decision, the three leftists and John Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett, as usual, against the originalist constitutionalists, the four of them. Basically, the RNC, among others, said Mississippi and these other states, they do this post-counting after election day. That should be unconstitutional when electing federal officials. The federal government has some saying this. We're talking about congressmen and senators and the president, the vice president, depending on the cycle. And the court said, well, the language actually as to any federal authority is fairly ambiguous. It's kind of left to the states. And, of course, Carl Rove, among others, thinks that's a great thing. The... dissenting made the strong case and said hey look we're talking about federal officials here and of course there are times when the feds step in to address issues and here especially when it comes to federal officials and so this idea that you can count votes after the elections over is unacceptable as a federal constitutional matter

Now let's set the record straight. There's no argument over the choice between peace and war. But there's only one guaranteed way you can have peace, and you can have it in the next second. Surrender. Mm-hmm. It's like people that say no boots on the ground. Ever? Well, then let's disband the Army in the Marine Corps. What's the point? So you can never have, quote-unquote, boots on the ground? You can never send in the... The infantry or the Marines? Is that the deal now? That's suicide. That's ridiculous. So is that the J&S, Jewish News Service International Policy Summit last week? A very nice news service. A great one. I think you would like it if you'd check it online. Here's part of what I said. Cut two, go. Number one. My perspective on Iran has never changed. It hasn't changed since I was old enough to know what that regime was, 1979. So my view on that Islamist Nazi regime has always been that it's an Islamist Nazi regime. That's number one. You know, Khomeini wrote a book. The great Bernard Lewis, he went and he dug it up, and he had it translated into English. It was in Arabic and Farsi called Islamic Government. Don't run out and buy it. I don't want to make it the number one book on Amazon. But it sits on my desk. And I'm probably the only person who talks about this regime that's ever read. what the founding father of the regime has ever said. And it is brutal. And it is evil. And it is vicious. And I seriously doubt any of the media that covers this issue ever read the book either. We also have something called experience. Edmund Burke said experience is one of the most important things a person can focus on. What's our experience with this regime? Our experience with this regime is that it lies, it cheats, it's never adhered to a single agreement, verbal or otherwise, and that it seeks to destroy humanity. That is, any individual, a group of individuals, or any country that does not adhere to its political, religious ideology, which is based in the 7th century. Most faiths go through something called a reformation. And many Muslims have done through a reformation. Islamists don't. And so what they believe, to put simply, is in a catastrophic, worldwide war, where everything and everyone is to be slaughtered, destroyed, tortured, rape, until there's complete compliance with their political... faith ideology. That's what they write. That's what they say. That's what the imam say. If we would spend more time having English translators or here Hebrew translators of what they say, I think more people would understand the context for what's going on. Also, we have a lot of people whose history goes back about three minutes.

particularly a lot of young people who aren't all that interested in history. They don't remember 9-11, many of them weren't born. They don't really know much about the Holocaust, except what they're told by some of the Jew haters. And so they're lacking history. The effort to communicate with them is not there, but it needs to be there. If this regime in Iran could, it would murder every single one of you sitting in this room. Every single one. Every woman in this room, they would rape you. Every single one. If you had grandchildren here, they would murder them. They would slaughter them. Every single one of you here. Because you're Jews or your Christians or you're just not one of them. This is very important to understand. And so we had seven presidents before Donald Trump who knew what I'm telling you, and that they wouldn't take the steps necessary to confront this regime. In fact, some of them actually subsidized the regime. One of them, Obama insured. that they would have a pathway to a nuclear weapon. I don't need to hear the debates about it. I've read the deal. I know what it says. It's that simple. Then we have Biden, who was literally allowing tens of billions of dollars to flow into the regime because he wasn't enforcing all the rules that had been placed against them getting money. And... allowing them to sell oil surreptitiously, the Chinese and so forth. So about $150 billion or more poured into that regime when they knew that they were moving toward nuclear weapons. They have manufactured thousands of ballistic missiles with the help of the communist Chinese. Anybody who was in this country over the last 12 months, Over the last six months, knows what ballistic missiles can do. They can blow out entire communities. They're the size of a yellow school bus. And not a single one, not a single one of those safe rooms you have in your house or your apartment, you do a thing about it. It will blow that off the face of the earth too. These are not your typical missiles. And with a nuclear warhead, you have an intercontinental ballistic missile. And our intelligence, and the Israeli intelligence didn't know, that their ballistic missiles can now reach the capitals in Europe. And with a little bit more information from the communist Chinese or the Russians or the North Koreans that access, it will reach the continental United States. It is a very serious matter. Because if they were to fire 3,000, 4,000, 5,000 ballistic missiles at one time at this country, you can't defend yourself. It would overwhelm any system that exists. And that also applies to any European country and to my country, the United States. The issue of ballistic missiles is critical. The issue of Hezbollah is critical. Hezbollah...

is much like their front SS operation. And there's a couple hundred thousand of them, and they're very heavily armed. Even though we pounded the hell out of Iran and their military, there's Hezbollah. Hezbollah has killed and maimed thousands of Americans. Thousands of Americans. Our Marines, our sailors, our servicemen, our embassy personnel, as well as maybe thousands of Christians in Lebanon. God knows how many Israelis they've killed. They exist for the same reason Iran exists because they were created by Iran. They are Iran. There's only one country that has gone into Lebanon. to fight Hezbollah. Not a European country, not my country, Israel. That's the only country that's gone in to Lebanon to kill Hezbollah. And I'm very upset about this. Israel is killing commanders and leaders of Hezbollah who killed my people that have bounties on their heads. And they don't even get a thank you note. All right. That was from comments I made last week in Israel. We'll be right back.

America doesn't stand for 250 years as a beacon of hope without the brave men and women willing to put their lives on the line to defend it. And to honor those patriots, pure talk, and its customers will raise $250,000 for America's warrior partnership by the end of July. Now, this is an unbelievable foundation. It stands on the front line of helping to prevent veteran suicide by covering the basics, housing, access to VA benefits, transportation, counseling, the tangible things that give veterans a hand up. When you switch your cell phone service to Pure Talk this month, you'll have an opportunity to round up to support America's Warrior Partnership. Pure Talk will match that donation until the total donation hits $250,000. So get unlimited talk. Unlimited text. unlimited high-speed data just 3499 a month folks and be proud to partner with a wireless company that shares your values and was founded by a veteran himself and that's pure talk go to puretalk.com slash levin that's puretalk.com slash levin to switch to my favorite wireless company right now pure talk again that's puretalk.com slash levin

Yes, the AOL email is dead. I can't get it starting. AOL's not having any issues. And so I'm having issues with external forces. I have no doubt about that. And I'm not kidding. I'm not a conspiracy, not as you well know. I was warned about it and it has occurred. So I'm using a different device here. It's a little more. Difficult on the fly, but nonetheless, let's see here. There it be. George Soros. Look, there's a lot to get to in no particular order, but I think they're all related in one way or another. When I was gone, I saw this in the New York Post the other day. George Soros and son Alex have funneled a staggering $103 million at the midterm so far on track to shatter spending record. Now, a couple of things. Apparently, certain billionaires are good billionaires because you never hear Bernie Sanders or any of the Marxist bastards attack George Soros or any of their funding sources. So certain billionaires are okay. Certain billionaires are not okay. Apparently, that's the way it works. Meanwhile, Miriam Adelson,

multi-billionaire her husband Sheldon are big Republican donors and she apparently I read has donated somewhere around 40 million dollars for the midterm elections now you'll notice the Jew haters hate her guts they attack her all the time you got a bloated buffoon like Steve Bannon a felon by confession Ripping off little old ladies to try and raise money, he says, to build a southern wall. This clown. He got a federal pardon from the president, but the state, they charge him, and he chickened out like the coward that he is. He didn't want a real trial. Please, please don't. Please don't. They don't have an orange jumpsuit enough for me. Besides, it was very uncomfortable last time I was there if he got my drift. Couldn't take a shower or anything. Really, Third Reich, Steve. Keep attacking this woman who gives money to the GOP, gives money to the Trump campaign, and tries to offset some of these billionaires on the left. And she takes more heat from the woke Reich neo-fascists. Then does George Soros, or Alex Soros, it's disgusting. And yet, there they are, pouring as much money as they possibly end, right? Supreme Court had another good ruling today, but it'll very much upset us tomorrow as my guest on this birthright citizenship. Look, I don't want it to. If I'm wrong, great. I'm not, you know. Nostradamus here, I'm just guessing by the makeup of the court. If they do the right thing. Here's what they should do, okay? Here's what they should do. And maybe they'll do it, but I doubt it. Here's what the court should do. Number one, they should say there is simply no constitutional basis for birthright citizenship. They'll quote that decision in the late 1900s, which is BS. It has nothing to do with illegal immigrants or something else. They'll twist the line. I've seen it all. Nobody has studied this more than I. Nobody knows more about this than I. And Hans von Spakovsky, the two of us are the worldwide experts on this, okay? So we know what all their arguments are going to be, and they're all bogus. So they may want to get the result and twist it, and then this will seriously ruin the country, make it almost impossible to reverse course. I don't mean to upset you, but that's how big it is. But here's what the court could do, okay, to deal with the nambi pambies. And I actually mentioned this to you months and months and months and months ago. I've been writing about this forever because I knew it needed to come up. The court could have ruled or could rule, who knows? Look, anybody who got citizenship from birthright citizenship from this day backwards, we're not going to remove them from the citizenship rules. There could be millions and millions of people. But going forward, no more birthright citizenship. So these Chinese mills and all the rest of it, people coming in here, Islam is coming in here, having children and so forth and so on, no more. So they can cut the proverbial baby, the Solomon baby in half and do it that way, perhaps.

But I don't even see them doing that. We'll see. I hope I'm wrong. Look, they know what they wrote. The decisions are done. Nothing I say can influence them. I hope I influenced them earlier on. But who knows? There was a case called the Slaughter Case. And when you think about it, we have 100 years of precedent that says a president... effectively can't fire somebody who's appointed to an independent agency, which never made any sense. Now, does anybody know why that doesn't make sense? Because we have three branches of government, not four. Congress can't create, even with the consent of a president, an independent agency. Independent of what? Of all the branches. No, you can't do that. You can't create a fourth branch of government. Again, something I've been arguing about for, oh, 50 years. And the court said today, I believe it was six to three, that in fact a president has the right to fire individuals at so-called independent agencies. And then in a squirrelly way, but it protected this woman, you see, over at the Fed. Well, she didn't get through process. She wasn't standing on her head. They didn't write with the right pen. They didn't do this. So for now, we're going to leave that one alone.

Here's the president on this. Cut eight, go. Ms. President, the Slaughter case, the Supreme Court just affirmed your right to fire the heads of independent agencies. Should we expect more fire as a result of this rule? I don't think so. It gives me the right. And not me. It gives a president the right to do what the president should have, the right to do. And it's very interesting. It's a big ruling. It's been going on for almost 100 years. They've been working on this. And, you know, that it comes down at my term is a very great honor. But it bestows additional powers or maybe the same power on the president. The president has the right to do this. And that has to do with a lot of agencies all throughout the system. Let me just say this. This man is incredibly intelligent. Look, he's not a practicing attorney, a constitutional, but he's laying out the facts. This is right. Presidents of both parties have said, we have a right to fire these people. They're part of the executive branch. This was a great decision for America. America doesn't stand for 250 years as a beacon of hope without the brave men and women willing to put their lives on the line to defend it. And to honor those patriots, pure talk, and its customers will raise $250,000 for America's warrior partnership by the end of July. Now, this is an unbelievable foundation. It stands on the front line of helping to prevent veteran suicide by covering the basics, housing, access to VA benefits, transportation, counseling, the tangible things that give veterans a hand up. When you switch your cell phone service to Pure Talk this month, you'll have an opportunity to round up to support America's Warrior Partnership. Pure Talk will match that donation until the total donation hits $250,000. So get unlimited talk. Unlimited text. unlimited high-speed data just 3499 a month folks and be proud to partner with a wireless company that shares your values and was founded by a veteran himself and that's pure talk go to puretalk.com slash levin that's puretalk.com slash levin to switch to my favorite wireless company right now pure talk again that's puretalk.com slash live in Mark Levin, the research arm of conservative media. Call in now 877-381-381. A little bit more here, a lot more actually. And so this birthright citizenship issue, the president's concerned about, I've been concerned about for decades now, and all of you should be worried about it. Here's what he had to say about that. Cut nine go. Birthright citizenship is next. What are your thoughts? And will you accept it if it rules against you? Well, I guess I have to accept. It's the Supreme Court. So I'll accept. I think it's very bad for our nation. We're the only nation that does it. No other nation does that birthright citizenship. No, not even close. Some did it. They ended it. It's tremendously destructive. It's extremely costly. I don't know. It's up to them. But in terms of for the good of the country, it would be great if they didn't allow it, it would be great. But I can't tell you, the slaughter case was the big case today. That was really a big case because it gave strength to presidents and strength to the presidency, a very important case. It's been going on for almost 100 years, thinking of that, and this was the ruling that really topped everything by a lot today.

The court refused to look at the trial, the case, $5 million awarded to this woman who accused the president, E. Jean Carroll of assault. And I'll tell you why I think he's telling the truth, because he's furious. He's not hiding. He's angry about it. And I think the trial was a disaster. My humble opinion, I just think that's too bad. That's too bad. Let's see here. We have this issue again in mail-in ballots. And I want people to understand something. Those of you who are my age already know this. But for younger people, and by younger people, I mean like 40 and under. You never had this kind of voting before where anybody could get a mail-in ballot just because they were too damn lazy to go and vote. I remember when I was growing up in Pennsylvania, but also I remember as a young man in Virginia, the only way you could get an absentee ballot and submit it or a mail-in ballot is to sign a form under the penalty of perjury, Mr. Producer. And under the penalty of perjury meant you had to be disabled in some way or sick or on travel, something of that sort, vacation, so you wouldn't be in town. You didn't get a mail-in ballot or absentee ballot simply because you wanted to vote in that method. And the Democrats have been pushing the edge of this envelope for decades and decades and decades. That's why in a lot of these states, these Democrats states, it's same-day, same-time registration. Well, of course, you can't check out somebody same-day, same time, not at a precinct. If you ever worked at a precinct, if you ever voted, most of you, at a precinct, you know that's not possible. And so they built the system to legalize all kinds of potential fraudulent activities. Can you prove it's fraudulent? No, because you made it legal. It's crazy. But not really. When you think about who these people are, I guess it's not so crazy, is it? No, not really. And then they say, well, it's a big day for the people's right to vote. There's, you know, these mail-in ballot, big day. That's just fantastic. No, it's not. It's a lousy day when they do that. I told you Zohran Mamdani is trying to depopulate New York City, particularly of Jews. He wants to create a Dearborn Michigan, a Patterson, New Jersey, basically a London. And that's what he's doing. He's targeting the Jews in New York City. He wants to force them out and turn it into an Islamist city. Can you imagine? But it's happening right before your eyes. They did it in London. They've done it in Paris. They've done it in New Jersey. They've done it in Michigan. And they're going to do it elsewhere.

And they're going to take over these Democrat strongholds, first and foremost, because the Democrat Party is not wanting to fight against them, but wants to embrace them. And that's what they're doing. So Zohran Mamdani is on ABC this week, and he's asked, he won't say whether he believes Israel is a Jewish state or not. Let me explain something to you. You have people out there like Pier Moron and others who want you to believe you can be anti-Zionist without being anti-Jewish. It's an impossibility. Zion is Mount Zion. I've explained this before. It's effectively the birthplace of Judaism. It is the indigenous home, that area of the world, the whole land, the indigenous home of the Jews. for nearly 4,000 years, long before there was anything called Islam, even long before there was Christianity. So when people say, I'm a Zionist, that means I'm Jewish, and I believe in the home, the indigenous home of the Jews. Now, there's, by my count, 57 majority Muslim nations. Do they have to defend their faith? Do they have to defend the fact that they are Muslim nations? Not one of them. Not one of them. So here he is. He's on ABC this week. All these week Sunday shows. Cut 13. Change that. Cut 14. Go. And the idea of a Jewish state, Israel is a Jewish state that's in the charter. That's the way it is now. Do you support that? I've said time and again that I support the state of Israel as a state with equal rights. I believe that any state that... What he's saying there, he'll support Israel, period, especially if the Palestinians take it over. So that's all he's saying. That's what he's saying. Now, if you're Catholic, you believe in Rome, right? Mr. What is Rome? Is that a country? The Pope. Where does he live? Right. We called the Vatican. Does anybody ever say, you know, the Vatican is a Catholic, there shouldn't be Catholic? Anybody ever say that? Does anybody ever say Qatar is a Muslim state and it shouldn't be a Muslim? I mean, who talks? America is a majority Christian country. Is it not?

What he's trying to say there is he believes in the river to the sea. He wants the Jews removed by hookah, by crook. That's what he believes. His wife was ecstatic on October 8, 2023. Full on for what Hamas did to those Jewish kids, full on. And those families in the kibbutzim, all for it. What was posting for? Well, she's not a public. He always has an answer. The Marxists always do, but they're always frauds. Go ahead. I think any state that privileges one religion over the other is one that I can't tell you I support whether it be a real. Really? That's hilarious. Really? Okay. So all those Muslim countries he can't support. This one tiny Jewish, folks, there's 15 million Jews in the world. There's 2 billion Muslims. There's 57 Muslim countries, one tiny little Jewish state. Most of the Christians in the Middle East live in Israel. What's going on here? Seriously, America. This is sick. This is incredibly absurd. 0.02% of the world's population, a tiny piece of geography. There's no question it's historic indigenous land. Islam is the third of the big three faiths, pushed out the Jews and the Christians out of all these other countries, out of all these other countries. And he dares to say, I can't believe in, you know, one country that prefers one faith. Here's the amazing thing. Whatever faith you are in Israel, Live your faith. Nobody's stopping you to live your faith. Not there. I want you to try it in Dearborn, Michigan. Patterson, New Jersey. Look what he's doing to Jews in New York City. Is this a joke? And I've told you this for years and years and years. If you hate America, you hate Israel, if you hate Israel, you hate America. Now, the woke-right neo-fascists will pretend that that's not the case. But they hate America, too. They're always... They're always trashing us. You know, on the holidays, they'll pretend that they're super patriots, but they're not super patriots. They don't believe in our economic system either. They're always whining about capitalism. They sound very much like the, excuse me, economic socialists. We'll be right back.

America doesn't stand for 250 years as a beacon of hope without the brave men and women willing to put their lives on the line to defend it. And to honor those patriots, pure talk, and its customers will raise $250,000 for America's warrior partnership by the end of July. Now, this is an unbelievable foundation. It stands on the front line of helping to prevent veteran suicide by covering the basics, housing, access to VA benefits, transportation, counseling, the tangible things that give veterans a hand up. When you switch your cell phone service to Pure Talk this month, you'll have an opportunity to round up to support America's Warrior Partnership. Pure Talk will match that donation until the total donation hits $250,000. So get unlimited talk. Unlimited text. unlimited high-speed data just 3499 a month folks and be proud to partner with a wireless company that shares your values and was founded by a veteran himself and that's pure talk go to puretalk.com slash levin that's puretalk.com slash levin to switch to my favorite wireless company right now pure talk again that's puretalk.com slash levin

By the way, it's always great to be back. I want to thank you folks very, very much for being here with us. President about communism. He knows communism, boy, and he really hates it correctly. So cut 17, go. Mr. Mr. Red, Zohran Mamdani said in an interview this week that he was open to being the poster child for socialist candidates. Are you worried about more socialist candidates across the... Well, I think it's a big threat to our nation, actually. Because it's not socialism, it's really communism. They use the word social Democrat because it sounds so nice. It's really communism you're talking about. I think it's the biggest threat to our nation. There is, maybe since our founding. That includes World War I, World War II, September 11th. It includes the Pearl Harbor attack. I think this is the biggest threat to our nation. People will smile when I say that, but the smart people are going to say, you know, he's probably right. It's basically introducing communism into the United States of America. There's never been anything so dangerous. He's 100% right, and I would add, of course, Islamism. There's no getting around it. They're working in tandem right now. The Marxists throw open the door. Their influence in the Democrat Party opened borders to massive third world migration in the United States. No vetting. And, of course, the whole point is what? The whole point of immigration is to improve the existing society and the lot of the existing citizens, and that's not what's going on here. Immigration has been used as a tool for revolution. And the Democrat Party, with its influences by these American Marxism, as I've written a whole book and we've talked about, they opened the gate and then flooded the Islamists. Because we're now in another... Listen to me, this is important. This is another Islamist crusade. They're conquering the rest of the world. Uh-oh, what happened, Mr. Producer? The email looks like it's back. Let's see if I can actually open one. No, can't even open the damn thing. But it's back! Yep, your mail is temporarily unavailable. Yeah, I've been hit. So that's what's going on. You know, next hour we're going to have our friend on from the Reagan Institute and Zachheim, because Axios is a left-wing, really diabolical, so-called news operation. I don't know why the White House feels the need to... to go to them or to have the president interviewed there. But a completely misleading headline over what the Reagan Institute found and learned, and I want you to hang in there. We're going to talk about that and much more because it's very important. We'll be right back.

With Donald Trump back in office, one of his biggest adversaries, top Democrat Dick Durbin of Chicago is leading the charge to derail President Trump's agenda at every turn. And now Dick Durbin has a new scheme, a government takeover of your credit card. Right now, Americans have thousands of credit card options, all with equal, strong security. But Senator Dick Durbin's plan could result in less security. That means more risk for your credit, your identity, and your financial future. Dick Durbin's bill isn't about helping consumers. It's a giveaway to corporate... which could shift costs onto you while putting your rewards and fraud protections in jeopardy. We've seen Dick Durbin's failed policies before. His last big banking regulation backfired, leading to higher costs than fewer benefits for American families. Tell Republican senators stop Dick Durbin's government takeover of your credit card before it's too late. Learn more at guardyourcar.com. That's guardyourcar.com. Paid for by the Electronic Payments Coalition. He's here. Now, broadcasting them from the underground command post. Deep in the boughs of a hidden bunker somewhere under the brick and steel of a non-district building, we've once again made contact with our leader. Mark, the men. Hello, America. Mark Levin here, our number, 877381, 381-1-871-8-1-8-1-8-1. All right, we got some interesting callers. I wasn't going to go this soon, but I like them. Let's give it a shot, then we may swing back. Let us go to Trey, Duncanville, Texas, the great WBAP. How are you, Trey? I'm doing well. It's a little hot out here, but it's okay. It's going to get worse. It's going to get worse. The next few days is going to be brutal all across the country. I survived the summer of 1980, so it's not going to be too bad. Yes, sir. I wanted to call and say thank you for taking my call. I called you a couple months ago about this issue of the mail-in ballots. And I think I'm going to preface this to say I'm a strong Trump supporter. I agree with him on virtually everything. I've been a supporter of his against Ted Cruz when they ran against each other in the 2016 primaries, and I garnered a lot of enemies, my fellow Texans, because I supported a New Yorker against a fellow Texan. Okay, however, I do disagree with this mail-in ballot. I think the Supreme Court was right. And the reason why I'm saying this, because I'm a survivor of foreign air fatal car crashes. And I do not want anything to jeopardize my ability to vote. I don't care who is. Well, how would it stop you from mail-in voting? Well, I have fallen by the rules of every election. I know, but if you, but under the, under the old system, under the system he's talking about, you would make that point and you'd be allowed to do a mail-in vote. We're talking about people. who are fully capable of voting. Maybe instead of voting, they decide to go to a movie. Maybe they're going to get a steak sandwich. Maybe they're doing whatever they're doing. And the problem is it's much more difficult to keep track of that kind of voting for, you know, to protect against fraud than in-person voting. And so I don't, I'm not sure how that would negatively affect you.

I'm just concerned because any time there's changes, sometimes it hurts innocent people. No, but it would be, no, no, no, you're changing it back, and I don't see how it hurts innocent people. If you're disabled or you're sick or you're out of town on business or you're on vacation or something like that, those are understandable reasons. Again, for most of our history of voting, those were allowable reasons, but you have to have a reason. You can't just say I want to vote by mail. Well, I appreciate your explanation. I've just, I've gone through this process of filling out all the forms and documentation. I'm just concerned when there's a change. There's not all the forms and documentation. Typically, it was a half a page form. You explain, you give your name, your address, you fill in the blank, why you are using mail-in voting. under which category and you sign it and you turn it and you mail it in well i had doctors documentation too just on reserve just in case so i'm just saying it's just kind of concerns me that that's all and i do have concern i have well you won happy days are here again Well, I also have a concern about some of these Republicans that are not wanting to do away with early voting and and I think well hold hold on now You're just basically supporting all the Democrat voting systems you want to get a you don't want to have early you don't mind early voting you don't mind mail-in voting again Why do you need early voting? Well, I've worked for Dallas County Elections Department for a long time. There's thousands of people who vote legally. Why do you need early voting? It makes it easier for the people to vote, who are legal to vote. Why does it make it easier for people to vote? You have an election day and you vote on election day. Well, we can also draw a parallel with income tax. I mean, people can pay their taxes early, file early. It's not, but hold on now.

pay their income taxes early because they want their refund early otherwise they're not paying an income tax I see no parallel there either you have an election day you show up an election day and you vote we've been doing it in this country since almost the beginning all these changes came in the last 30 years or so at the behest of the left and so the goal isn't to make voting easier it's to make it easy and trackable not easier, easier because it makes it tougher and tougher to keep track of these things. Look, we're seeing it. There's no reason it should take three weeks to figure out a primary in California. But I've asked you, why do you need early voting? I don't understand it. Well, I think it's a benefit to people who want to vote early. Okay, it's a benefit to people who want to vote early. So we might as well vote on Christmas. It's a benefit to people who don't have to go to work. But that's not what we do. We have a national day of voting on federal elections. It's been that way since forever, and there's nothing wrong with it. It's not about always making things easier for people to do what they want to do. It's not hard. People die for the right to vote, and they have died for us to have the right to vote. It's really not that hard to show up and vote. If people are that lazy, well, then I'm sorry. I just don't give it damn. Thank you for your call. This is the mentality, America. It just drives me crazy. Does it not you, Mr. Bedici? It's so bad. The psychology is, well, it's easier to vote, and why shouldn't you have a mail? What are you talking about? It's easy to vote now. You go on election day and you vote. No, but I want to do a mail-in. I'm busy. I got all kinds of stuff. No, you don't. You have a right to vote. You can take off from work to vote and then go back to work. I don't understand. We need early voting. What the hell is early voting? Well, I'm going to be out of town. Okay, then do a mail-in ballot, an absentee ballot. That's what that's for. This system was perfectly fine before. Now it's a disaster. Oyo, yoy. Let's go to David, Alexandria Virginia, the great WMAL. David, how are you? Mark, I'm fine, sir, and I had the pleasure of meeting you at the On Power Book signing at the Reagan Library, even though I was 15 minutes from the rest in books signing. Thank you. Really? Fantastic. Thank you. Oh, God, it was great. But, you know, in-person voting, you can vote early a month ahead of time, a week ahead of time, or the day before, or the day of, but once the day of hits, it's over. If you want to vote bail-in, vote... A month ahead of time, a week ahead of time, or a day at a time. But once the day hits, it's over. I don't understand why that's over. Look, they have a whole string of things they've done. Harvesting after? Go back. Oh, look, they'd have a ballot. They haven't voted. So in California, they can still vote. I mean, I'm not buying into all this stuff. It's ridiculous. And you have people voting a month early? What if something tragic happens in two weeks before the election? It doesn't even make any sense. Why are people voting early?

I don't understand what that is. What's that all about? I want to get it over with. Well, too bad. Well, I'm going to be out of town. Well, then do your absentee ballot. Anyway, that's where my head is. What do you got, David? Anything else? The reason for my call is on Father's Day, my daughter gave me a gift. The New York Times book, a coffee table book, about every election from 1960 to 76. And it's the front page of every newspaper. All right. And in 1864, the day after the Lincoln election, November 9th, 1864, Lincoln was declared the victor. This is 162 years ago. Lincoln was declared the victor the day after the election. But now you have an election in a city like Los Angeles, and it takes weeks with all the technology and all the advancements we have. And to me... Because they build it into the system. It's not that we're not capable of it, but people... ballots are sent out to every address where somebody was. Well, obviously people move and they change and so forth. So that's a big area for potential fraud. It's built into the law that they can count these ballots. I think it's a week or longer after the election. In some states, you know, if they're not signed or they're not dated right, they still accept them. So you have all these things going on. which purposely makes it take longer to count. You're talking about here we have a civil war going on, and the next day they say that Lincoln is the victor. If they had all these procedures in place or options in place that we have now, we'd never have known who the hell the victor is there for a month. It wouldn't have known. It's ridiculous. Anyway, that's good to know. Thank you, my friend, David. We'll be right back. Mud Lovin.

Folks, Mark Levin here with a new episode of On the Frontlines, my original podcast series and partnership with the great international fellowship of Christians and Jews. This week's episode, Nations Under God, comes at a remarkable moment, America's 250th anniversary and a decades-long friendship with a state of Israel that remains as vital as ever. Joining me is Yalel Eckstein, the great president and CEO of the International Fellowship of Christians and Jews. as we explore how this alliance was built. From Truman's recognition of Israel to the leaders and moments that shaped the partnership rooted not just in strategy, but in shared faith and values. We'll look at how that bond is endured through the decades, why it still matters in a time of global uncertainty, and what's at stake if the next generation forgets the history and principles behind it. On the front lines isn't about looking back, it's about understanding what must be carried forward. Find the latest episode of On the Frontlines on the Mark Levin show podcast feed wherever you get your podcast. Subscribe now and join us on the front lines of freedom, faith, and fellowship. Roger Zackheim is the director of the Ronald Reagan Institute in Washington. It's a fantastic place, largely because of him. And there was an Axios headline. I'm not a fan of this website. It's radical left. And I don't know why the administration leaks to it or the president interviews with them. I just don't. It's a very disreputable operation. And it uses the Institute's survey. to say that the Republican Party is starting to turn on Israel. Actually, it's had two headlines. The Republicans are souring on Israel. The GOP is souring on Israel. Roger, what did your survey show? And why would they use a headline like that? I can't explain what Axis is doing. It's actually their own article at the bottom, you know, made quite clear that the GOP wasn't souring in Israel, yet they clearly were clickbaiting or something by not captioning that at the top. And our surveys, I pointed out in my post, shows just the opposite. I mean, it's pretty remarkable that Republicans overall believe that U.S. security and... prosperity is tied to the security of Israel. I mean, it's 75% of Republicans. And what I think Axios is trying to get at was that the president's base of support, which of course not just Republicans, but it's MAGA Republicans somehow is declining. And that is just dead wrong. It is, in fact, the opposite because our survey actually looks at... We're self-identified MAGA Republicans what they believe. And when it comes to thinking U.S. security and prosperity is tied to the security of Israel, MAGA Republicans rolling at 80%. So the outperform other Republicans. MAGA, which is really the conservatives who backed president, former Tea Party, who backs the president, MAGA Republicans, really one and the same, I argue.

support Israel 75% of the GOP generally and they run with a headline that says Republicans are souring on Israel and you called them out right away correct I mean because I had our survey right there and I saw what they were putting in their I mean in their in their actual report they're referencing other polling as well Which also reflects that Republicans are not sounding as well, but again, that wasn't what you would see unless you scrolled all the way to the bottom. And I want to say one other thing, Mark, if it's okay, about MAGA Republicans, because as you're aware... We've been looking at MAGA Republicans since 2023. And we've seen consistently that they're great supporters of Israel, that they want to be engaged in the world, they want to lead with peace and strength. But the critique I've received, or question at least, is, well, we're the young MAGA Republicans. You know, that 18 to 29 demographic, the so-called group that, you know, is being persuaded by the Tucker Carlson's of the world. So we went ahead and look deeper into that, Mark. And guess what? They also... overwhelmingly support Israel. They're at 63%. So a super majority of MAGA from 18 to 29 are big supporters of Israel. They believe that U.S. security and prosperity is tied to the security of Israel. That, I think, is also a really important point that people don't appreciate the narrative tells you something else. If people want to find that survey, where do they go? You just put in your browser, Reagan Institute Summer Survey, and we'll pull it right up. Reagan Institute's Summer Survey. But I also notice, Roger, that the so-called Woke Reich, R-E-I-C-H is what I call them, the Woke Reich, they keep warning us that the Republicans are this and the Republicans are that, and the Republicans are souring on Israel, and so forth and so on. And then we hear it regurgitated by their likes in the media and so forth. It's just a narrative. Here's my question to you. When you consider the amount of money Qatar spent in this country to trash that country, when you consider, I think as Sam Harris put it, and I don't normally quote him, but he's been pretty sharp lately. When you consider there's 2 billion Muslims and 15 million Jews, when you consider all the propaganda overwhelmingly against that tiny country and the people there, you're telling me the Republicans, and especially MAGA, are holding firm, and that includes young Republicans. 100%. It's not just about holding firm. They outperform pretty much everything else. I mean, to the tune of 8 out of 10. And here's why I think this is a case. Certainly people want to be supportive of Israel. They realize Israel is a democracy.

It's as Secretary Pete Hegseth refers to Israel, a model ally, think about what they did with us in Operation Epic Fury. But people know that if you are anti-Israel, you're anti-American. The values of freedom of democracy, of standing up for self-defense, those are American values. And so it's not a far cry from someone who is burning the flag of Israel. They're going to burn the U.S. flag too. And that's what's going on here. And we see it, don't we, with the Marxists, the Islamists, and the woke right that keeps trashing our country too. But you have other things that you've found, too. Because I just posted something that said, okay, if we're never going to have, quote unquote, feet on the ground, in other words, we're never going to have ground forces. Wait next because the Marxist, Islamists, and the woke right, are going to demand major slashes in the army and the Marines and so forth and so on, which you would do if you never believe we should have boots on the ground, right? I mean, one goes in hand with the other, right? It's a proxy. Saying that you don't want boots on the ground is a proxy for saying we don't want America to be strong. We don't want to have a strong military. And once again, on that score... those pockets either the far isolationist right or as you're referencing the democratic socialist of america which effectively socialist and communists i don't know why we parse uh in terms of the title that's what they're for they are totally uh out of sync with the rest of the country because when we ask those surveyed okay you want to be engaged in the world you know america American foreign policy is about engagement in the world. What should they do when they engage? You know, what are the principles? It's remarkable. It's a huge, broad agreement around foundational principles of a strong U.S. military. They believe, these respondents believe, to the tune of 82%, 90% Republicans, 76% Democrats want a strong U.S. military because they believe it's essential to peace and prosperity. What that reflects to me, Mark, is that... All these people making noise and these dark blue pockets in parts of Brooklyn, New York are actually a narrow slice of their overall American population and even the Democratic Party. So pretty much it has stayed relatively strong going back to Reagan. So these people who want us to believe that we're a nation of isolationists that... Never ever boots on the ground. We're not encouraging it. We're just saying it needs to be an option for any military to have an opportunity to actually win. They're wrong and we're right. Is that right, Roger? Amen. All right, brother. Thank you for coming on the program. The director of the Ronald Reagan Institute, Roger Zackheim. We'll be right back. You didn't start a business just to keep the lights on.

You're here to sell more today than yesterday. You're here to win. Lucky for you, Shopify built the best converting checkout on the planet. Like the just one tapping, ridiculously fast acting, sky high sales stacking, championed at checkouts. That's the good stuff right there. So if your business is in it to win it, win with Shopify. Start your free trial today at Shopify.com slash win. If you want to talk to Mark, we have two numbers for you to call. For regular Americans, call 877381-3811. For liberals, call 877-381 3811. Here comes Mrs. Levin. How are you, Mrs. Levin? You've got to get near the microphone so people can hear you. But I'm so shy. Do your best. You can do it. Oh, my goodness. Good evening, America. Good evening America. And it is the week of July 4th, celebrating 250 years of our blessed country. Okay. Well, thank you, honey. You're very well. All right. There she goes. Mrs. Levin is more popular than Mr. Levin. And it's a good reason for that. Go ahead, boys. The dogs follow her everywhere. It's hilarious. The two guys. Ronnie and Toby. There they go. Anyway, there we have it. Where was I, Mr. Producer? I was getting calls, yes? Okay, let's do this. Is this the updated list? You know, I'm working off the iPhone. Okay, you're going to have to tell me in advance because I really am only working with... It's so weird.

All right. Robert in Santa Clara, California, the great KSFO country. How are you, Robert? Great, Mark. You know, I'm out here in California. And a few weeks back, I heard Gavin Newsom wanting to go after the stepped-up and basis, which is basically 41 to 50 percent. Slow down. He wanted to go after what? getting rid of the stepped-up in basis, which is basically almost a 50% death tax on your home when you want to leave it to your kids. Let's slow down and explain to people what that means. It means everything. To a homeowner, go ahead, explain it. Well, the domino falls when the final elder or benefactor dies, and there's a change of ownership, and, you know, then it's 50% of confiscation. All right, let me slow you down. All right, the basis, ladies and gentlemen, when you sell your home. The basis should be the value. In other words, if somebody dies and you inherit the home, the home should be the value of the home then. And apparently what they're thinking in California is the value of the home when it was purchased. Is that it? No, you could retain that, but it currently, but it's been diminished down to one parcel. So if you had kept your first home and then wanted to, you know, leave, you know, have a little estate going, they're, it's full blown open to appraisal assessments, including your family business. They already ruined that with this Proposition 19 back in 2020, and people didn't even know what's going to hit them because a lot of people are low information voters. But he also wants to go after these wealth taxes, but he wants to take it national. Just like the buffoon in New York City, you shouldn't be able to take it. No, we heard that. Yep. Yeah, he wants to take 50% confiscation nationwide. This is who we're dealing with. These are confiscators, and they don't really care. And we're working all our lives to build something. And this is really outrageous. And it's getting not that much coverage. You know, Von Misi's made the point. We're all Marxists now. We all talk like Marxists, ask like Marxists. And I don't know about all of us, but too many do. And some jackass who wants to be governor decides to get in front of the hard left. It was talking about a 10% wealth tax, actually, which is outrageous and utterly unconstitutional, certainly on the federal level. You don't get to say, okay, you have that much wealth. Okay, here's a 10%. It's just, and it is so contrary to America's founding, life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You know, some states had life, liberty, and property. Because what's property? Property is the intellectual and physical manifestation of your labor. That's what it is. It's that simple. We're only going after the rich. Really? Well, the rich produce all kinds of things for us that we take for granted, whether it's iPhones, whether it's vehicles, whether it's the ability to get gasoline and so forth and so on. We can't all do that. But this is the idea, this is a dead idea, it's a dying mentality, and yet it is wrapped in populism. Go ahead. Final words. You know, like I said, he's going after the Howard Jarvis group out here, and I know you were interested in that as a young guy. And I've been following them, too. And it's like we're trying to avoid these confiscatory things. What do you mean he's going after the Harvest guys? I was a big backer of them.

Well, I signed the petition, but John Kripal had to actually get on and make a deal with to get it on the ballot. It's just to save the two-thirds majority and try to avoid these transfer taxes. All right. You're going too fast. I don't know who that is. Who had to get what on the ballot? What are you talking about? John Gerpaul is our advocate with the Howard Dreyer's Taxpayers Association. So we're trying to reverse what was the damage done by Proposition 19, which got it down to one parcel and even your family business wide open to excessively high market value appraisal assessment so you can hardly keep anything. So it's insane. The agenda is, so they were really picky about this. You know, John had to renege and say, well, we're going to try to preserve the two-thirds majority. And it still has to go up for an election because the money, we don't have the money. Here's the problem. Here's the problem. This is why we're not a democracy. We're a republic, but these states, they do both. A mobocracy and authoritarianism. They know that voters will vote to steal somebody else's property. They know that voters who never created businesses will vote against businesses no matter how small they are. They know they're going to vote against individuals keeping money for their families, like farmers and so forth, passing it on because they're not farmers and they don't care. They live in the now. Right here. Many of them are on the public dole. Many of them are ideologues. That's the Democrat Party. So you're taking from people who produce and create and so forth and so on, and you know the story, and the rest of America knows the story. The problem is now the Democrat Party is utterly shameless. They're disgusting. Thank you for your call. I think we ought to write a book called The Democrat Party Hates America. Do you like that title, Rich? I think that would be a great book. We have a lot of great callers here. Let me see if I can pull up another one here. Hold on one second. Do we have... Amman, Los Angeles, California, Sirius XM. Are you still there? Okay, who do we have? I can't see. Scott, Manhattan, Kansas, Sirius XM satellite. Go. All right, for your title of your book, it needs to be why the Democrats hate America. I can just give it out, lay it out there. But anyway, why don't we create... I don't know. It's about 350 pages. I feel like I laid it out. You might want to read it. Go ahead. My point was, why don't we create their boots on their ground by throwing millions of AK-47s and a trillion rounds plus... Plus explosive, plus Claymore, plus shorter fire stuff that it will blow up a small Toyota truck with a big donor. Why are we doing that right now? I don't know. Who's been saying that for three months? Well, why doesn't it get done? We're being played. One side says, Trump is being played. In the end... I'll tell you what, part of it is Recep Tayyip Erdogan. He doesn't want him armed. You know what? They say he doesn't like the Kurds. No, he wants to kill them.

but turkeys kill a lot of people of all backgrounds by the way the armenians four million of them but that aside for a moment this is the biggest play that we haven't played yet i don't get it either this was part of the regan doctrine that's what made it famous and effective to take out the soviet union to take out the russians and uh you know i don't get it I really don't get it. If they're going to be protesters, be protesters. If they're going to be patriots, they need weapons. I agree with you 100%. That's all it takes. I'm with you. They should have been doing this or getting ready to do this a long time ago, putting together the weapons that we only had 47 years to practice, you know. I know. We don't need our green beret in there. The Mossad needs to be in there. They can integrate with that society. Apparently the Mossad was ready to go with us, and we pulled the plug. Yeah. I'm disgusted with... how it's all come because the IRGC will say we didn't agree to that and the Comeranias will say well we didn't agree to that the biggest problem we have I think what you're getting on is this is a terrorist organization it's not a nation it's taken over the nation we're negotiating like we're negotiating with a sovereign sovereign we're not it's a terrorist organization that's taken over the nation and people don't know Iran is not a majority Muslim. All right, my friend. Thank you for your call. We'll be right back.

This is going to be an extremely busy month. I have to watch 104 soccer games. Follow the pregame, the post game, yell useless opinions at the TV. It's a lot. So I knew that when it comes to screening for colon cancer, the choice was clear. The Colagard Plus test. It can be used at home and can only take 15 minutes, so I can do it during halftime and not miss any action. If you are 45 or older and at average risk, ask your healthcare provider about screening for colon cancer with the Coligard test. You can also request a prescription at colagard.com. I misspoke, I want to correct myself. It is a majority Muslim. What I meant, it's not majority Sunni Muslim, to be more specific and to be accurate. All right, Mr. producer, who's on the phones there? XM satellite, Ross, St. Louis. Is it Ross or Ross? It doesn't matter. St. Louis, Missouri, you'll correct me. Go right ahead. It is. It is Ross. Thank you. You're shining light, Mark. I think I can put a few things together on the threat of socialism in less than 45 seconds. Yeah. So socialism always. appeals to people by saying you shouldn't have to pay that price or you're paying too much the people charging it are our evil fat cats we're going to remedy that everyone knows that if you reduce the price of something it's going to encourage demand for that good so what socialism will do is it will encourage overconsumption dovetailing with that is the idea that um capitalists are greedy right Greed is not a capitalist thing. Greed is a human thing. The difference is in capitalism, the capitalist system encourages that greed to be directed into productive output, whereas in a socialist system, it encourages greed to seek power. Socialists want power, capitalists want money. They create things to gather money that might be greed. It might be self-interest, whatever. But the socialist is as prone to greed as anyone. The difference is greed in a socialist system creates a lust for power. And that is why it's not just that socialism is a threat. We are at war. They're trying to use to create, to cause the government apparatus itself to deprive people of life, liberty or property. There is no due process. They will take. They will deprive you. It's the confiscatory point that the caller before said. They are trying to convert the institutions of freedom. into the institutions of confiscation under the color of justice, it is going to ruin everything. They will release locusts on the world because of the overconsumption. There is no productive output that is encouraged by socialism, and all it will create is a power-hungry class that races to come. This is outstanding, what you're saying. Very, very good.

I appreciate it, very well put, very succinctly. I've made the point that capitalism is nothing but commerce, voluntary commerce, nobody invented it. You know, communism has been invented, the whole notion of materialism, the dialectic, and so forth and so on without getting too technical. The point is it's a very defective view of mankind and the market system, and as a result, people have lost their lives, 100 million of them. trying to impose that what is commerce it's an organized system of exchanging goods and services for money or other goods and services that's what it is nobody invented it is a spontaneous activity among and between human beings that's what capitalism is we salute our armed forces police officers firefighters emergency personnel our truckers ice The men and women in Ukraine, the men and women in Israel, the men and women in Iran, and you, the American people, I'm very thrilled to be back and blessed by you. See you tomorrow.

Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Are you looking for a beach read this summer? May I suggest your big wireless bill? It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat, emotional arc, and a shocking twist where you realize you've been overpaying the entire time. Fortunately, though, Mint's story is better. Every plan, $15 dollars a month a month. Every plan, even unlimited. That's it. Happy ending, zero tears. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Up front payment of $45 for three months, $90 for $1,000 for 12-month plan required than 50 gigabytes, may slow when network is busy. See terms.