12/12/25: Trump SHOOK After Indiana Loss, Beef Price Fixing EXPOSED, Iranians BRACE for New Attacks

This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed Human. Summer is here. At orderly meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings. Whether you're celebrating the nice weather, starting a new chapter, planning a vacation, or simply looking ahead to what's next. This season can be the perfect time to invest in yourself and your health. If you've struggled with weight loss and are curious about GLP1 medications, orderly meds can help you learn about your options. Through a simple virtual process, you can connect with licensed medical professionals who can determine whether treatment may be appropriate for you. Getting started is fast, convenient, and happens online from the comfort of home. This summer, consider a new approach to feeling your best. Visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast to learn more. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward. Compounded medications are not FDA approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details. Thinking about selling your car, get a real offer worth real money from CarMax, then take seven days to think it over. That's it. No haggling, no hassles, no pressure. Get all the details and a real offer today at CarMax. Want to drive? CarMax. You want your master's degree. You know you can earn it, but life gets busy, the pack schedule, the late nights, and then there's the unexpected. American Public University was built for all of it. With monthly starts and no set login times, APU's 40 plus flexible online master's programs are designed to move at the speed of life. Start your master's journey today at APU.APUS.edu. You want it? Come get it at APU. Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here. Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election, and we are so excited about what that means for the future of this show. This is the only place where you can find honest perspectives from the left and the right that simply does not exist anywhere else. So if that is something that's important to you, please go to breakingpoints.com, become a member today, and you'll get access to our full shows, unedited, ad-free, and all put together for you every morning in your inbox. We need your help to build the future of independent news media, and we hope to see you at break- breaking points.com. Good morning, everyone. Friday, December 12th. How's everybody doing? So far, so good. Got a big gymnastics meet for my youngest today. So nerves are running high in our household. Huge. Good luck. Yeah. She, yeah, she, I'm kind of annoyed because, I mean, she's eight years old, right? She's not at like a super high, she's a good competitor and she's on the team. It's not like a super high level of the sport. And we have to take off school for the meet. Like, that's kind of crazy to me. That's crazy. Right? Yeah, that is crazy.

A bunch of these girls that do gymnastics really seriously, they are homeschooled just so they can like train enough for the sport. I don't know. I mean, you guys know I was like high level athlete and that still is insane to me. But anyway, so good luck to Ida today. And good luck to everyone being homeschooled. Everyone being homeschooled. Good luck to you as well. Big show. Big show today. We got double guest here in the first hour. First of our guests, we've got Barack from the Lever, who's talking to us about meat, burgers. Why your five guys burger is $100 every time you go in and buy it. The meat market. And then Ryan, who's our next guest after that? We'll have Hind Hassan. She wrote a piece for DropSite yesterday about a documentary that she helped produce with Al Jazeera, where she traveled to Iran to talk to people who had been, who were basically survivors of the 12-day Israeli war there, interviewed the foreign minister on camera, which is quite rare. More than 1,000 people were killed. And she'll talk about, you know, what the after effects have been and how likely people there think another attack is to come. And that's a spoiler quite high. Really? Interesting. Yeah. We also have more, the time person of the year has been anointed. We're really excited to celebrate them. And we also have some Disney characters moving into Sora AI. But first, Crystal, why don't you start us with this map from Indiana? Yeah, so, you know, Trump has been pushing for a bunch of red states to redistrict and make their maps more aggressively gerrymandered so that Republicans can pick up seats as they're not feeling super great about just like, I don't know, appealing to voters. So they're trying to do as much as they can to mess with the maps in order to give them a more favorable landscape. Texas went along with it sort of immediately. Then California retaliates. That's sort of like a wash. And they've been making this big push with it. Indiana in particular. You've had, I think JD Vance went to the state. They've been lobbying these people. And then they outright resorted to threatening the entire state if the Republicans there, it's a very Republican-dominated state, don't go along with their plans for this redistricting. And so yesterday, the redistricting plan, after all of these threats, we're going to pull all of your federal funding. These lawmakers are getting individual threats and swatted and, you know, pizzas sent to their house and the whole bit. So full pressure. campaign from the grassroots all the way up to the president, the Senate Republicans in Indiana and the Indiana Senate soundly rejected this new, more partisan gerrymandered map. So there's a lot of interesting dynamics. Emily would be probably better position than me to speak to. But I mean, Indiana, obviously, this is the home of Mike Pence. Mitch Daniels has figured in the rhetoric here. There's sort of like an old line.

like more standard traditional conservative Republican that still has a lot of sway in the state of Indiana. And then you also have just, you know, when you redraw these maps, there are going to be incumbents, even Republican incumbents, who are kind of on the losing end of that. Like they may be redistricted in with another Republican incumbent. Their district may go from being like super duper safe to like. pretty safe, but it's about to be a really landslide bad Democratic year. And, you know, if you're in one of these districts that they're being most aggressive with, you may not be super excited about it. And then I think there's also just a natural human reaction of like, don't tread on me reaction. Like, who are you to tell us the way that we need to operate in our state? So, Emily, what did you, you know, what are some of the dynamics that you thought were important here? And then, I mean, the last thing I'll throw around is like, this is also a moment of extraordinary weakness for Trump. In terms of the, you know, the long breadth of his political career, I think you'd have to look back to post January 6 to see a moment when his sort of hold and dominance of the party is as weak as it is right now. You've got. I mean, the right-wing influencers are just like ripping each other to shreds. Marjorie Taylor Greene is out there doing her thing. You have some chunk of the base that is unhappy with everything from foreign policy to the lack of focus on domestic issues. And you also have just, this is man is basically a lame duck at this point. You know, you took a massive electoral loss in the off-year elections. And so there also is a little bit of like, okay, we're realizing that Trump is not going to be the guy here. for the party forever. I think there's a really interesting counterfactual as to whether this would have happened in Trump's first administration. If we were, you know, 10 months into Trump's first administration, would the Indiana Republicans have listened to them? So Trump is right now saying the co-pe here is that he didn't really try that hard. It wasn't really that big of a deal. He wasn't paying that close attention to it. I really want this. Really? Yeah. Yeah. That's the co-capping right now. I didn't even watch a stupid map anyway. Andre Carson's great. I love Andre Carson. The line is, I think they're saying it just, it would have just been gravy. I think that's what Playbook had this morning. It would have just been gravy. But, you know, if you've covered state lawmakers ever in particular, you know, like the worst way, the worst way to try to get them to do something is to be like a federal government, national. pressure campaign and to try to tell them like, we're bullying you around. That, first of all, it makes them look terrible to their constituents, even if they're conservative. And second of all, they hate it so much because they already feel, kind of looks down upon as state lawmakers. So if you're trying to do a pressure campaign, nationalizing it and turning it into. like this Roy Cohn rigamarole, which is totally how Trump was doing that. It completely backfired. And the reporting actually suggests that. But I think also if you just look at it, if you look at what the state lawmakers are saying, one of the pro-Trump state lawmakers was saying that, yes, they did threaten federal funds because that was sort of in dispute. The lieutenant governor. Right. The lieutenant governor indicated that.

Yeah, and whether or not it actually happened, the White House is also being cagey about that. They're now like outright saying, yeah, no, that was on the table. The federal funding was on the table. So it does look like a very significant setback in terms of like the future of Trumpism. I don't know how that counterfactual shakes out in Trump 1.0 if this would have happened. Because either way, it seemed like it was just the clumsiest push to try and push back against Gavin Newsom. So Gavin Newsom gets his redistricting. Okay, we're going to do it in Indiana, deep red state. It's coming. We can play your game too. And that was clumsily done from beginning to end. Yeah, and 9-0, I think, also feels just wrong to people. Like, Maryland is going to try to do it to try to completely blank out Republicans. And there's just something I think where we're like, wait, zero? Like, you know, because I just looked it up. Trump won. 59 to 40 basically in Indiana. But that's, you still have 40% of the state is democratic. Like to have zero is a little crazy. But Crystal's point I think is key that like, so if you, if on average they won by 19, that means if you drew it out perfectly and you split Indianapolis up into these four districts, which is what they were trying to do, plus then the district up by Michigan, or by Lake Michigan, you. then if you did it absolutely perfectly, everybody would be a plus 19, you know, relative to 2024. But with people angry about the redistricting, angry about the economy, and angry at Trump, and watching Nashville, the Nashville race, which was plus 22, be too close for comfort, you've got then nine candidates who were like, okay, it's plus 19. And in a normal year, I would cruise. But, ugh, I am not feeling super good about this plus 19. So I think they'd rather, I think those seven guys would rather just be comfortable. Like, they have no chance of losing rather than nine people who have some tiny chance of losing. This is also, well, two hilarious things here. One, Indiana might lose federal funding before New York City, which is just. Absolutely comic. The magic of Zohran Mamdani. Can you believe that? If I'm Zohran Mamdani, I'm on the phone now, like, hey, if you're not spending that money in Indiana, like, we will call them the Trump bus lines. Just saying that Trump child care. But clearly they don't want to own, clearly they don't even want to own that they pushed that hard. So they're not going to take the money from Indiana because then it would look like they cared about Indiana. Just just quietly take the money. Just and make Indiana just keep calling. Like, hey, the money's not here yet. Where's the money? Where's the money? Oh, it's common. Don't worry about it. We'll get back to you. Sorry. Boysmell was full. The other point is they went after. So far, so far they've had setbacks in, what, Ohio, Utah, Kansas, and they're struggling in Missouri.

So they were looking to, like, run the table on a whole bunch of seats here. Yeah. And they're, they're, and Florida's not going to go until next year. Well, in Florida, there are some issues there because they actually have in their state constitution provisions against partisan gerrymanders. So they actually have some of the more sort of stringent laws on the books, apparently, about partisan gerrymanders. So they have to like. So they have to deal with that. And, yeah, and potential court challenges there. And then you mentioned, so effectively, so Gavin does his redistricting, Texas does their redistricting. The courts have now said Texas's map is okay, even though there was a question about that. Those are effectively a wash. Right? I think it's five in California for the Dems, five in Texas for the Republicans. Assuming that's another one, I don't know the details, but that's another map I might be a little nervous about, given how hard Latinos are swinging against Trump. Right. So, you know, I'm not sure that everybody there should be super comfortable about the way they drew their map, assuming this new Republican coalition that may have only been, you know, kind of flash in the pan, you know, for Trump specifically kind of a deal. Anyway, putting that aside, Democrats in Virginia. are looking at a gerrymander, Maryland, as you said, Ryan. And again, there are some, like, Democratic resistance in Maryland. Not everybody is on board. The governor is on board, for sure. So anyway, none of that is guaranteed. And then, yeah, Florida is a place where that would be a big prize for Republicans. There's a lot of seats they could gain there. I don't remember exactly the number. But that's also one where they have the state law issue that they're going to have to contend with. So I don't know. Right now it's pretty up for grabs who's going to ultimately win out in the redistricting wars. Steve Bannon gave a quote to Politico saying like Republicans are in deep trouble because he feels like they need to net at least 10 or so seats to have even a prayer at holding onto the House in the midterms. And currently they're not really on track to be able to achieve that. And what's... Oh, go ahead, Ryan. What's so remarkable about, by the way, and this came into relief. I was talking to my daughter last night when she was asking me, who before Trump in the modern era was like the most unpopular president ever. And I said it was probably Bush. And she asked like, why? And I told her, you know, well, he tried to kill Social Security and that blew up in his face. Then the Iraq war was going really badly. And then there was this flood and this hurricane in New Orleans. And so all these things were going terribly for him. And it made me realize, again, something that I'd forgotten that Trump hasn't had anything bad happened to him, which is, it's been a remarkably kind of lucky run. of his first year. There haven't been any, like, significant, you know, obviously there have been, like, some small crises here and there, but there's been no financial crisis. There's been no disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan. No pandemic. There's been no pandemic. There's been no pandemic. There's been no earthquake. There's been no, the hurricane season was the lightest have been. There haven't been, you know, fires are not breaking out everywhere. Like.

Things are going pretty calmly around the country and around the world. There's an Epstein-shaped hole in that recount, though. This is all artificial stuff. So he has done this to himself. There's no external pressure that is driving his approval rating into the ground, is my point. It's all coming from. It's all him. It's all him. There's going to be something. Like, there's no way he goes four years without. external disasters hitting him. So to go into those disasters at 30% is uncharted territory. Yeah. So I searched Trump's true social account. There's some Twitter accounts that repost his true socials. Here is him not really caring that much about India. This is back on November 25th. He's not going to read all that, buddy. It looks like you care. It says, yeah, it's a little acminy. It's giving acmen, a very important initiative, a very important initiative. This is like, if you're listening to us, this is like probably 150, 200 words. He says, All kinds of stuff. That's just one post. I'm sure there are more. But yes, it's, he didn't really care that much at all. Didn't really. Here's another one. Yeah. They lost Republican. They straight up lost Republicans in the Indiana Senate. Like, even if Democrats had not been able to vote, they lost a majority among Republicans. There's another post. Trump getting told no by state senators. There was actual violence done to these people too. We shouldn't forget that. Like not just threats of violence against them. There were some like actual like acts of like violence done toward them to try to pressure them to implement this map. And they told this guy no. But it wasn't that important to anyone. It was only so important that he riled up his base into threats and violence against lawmakers to get them to fold to his desires. But it wasn't really that big a deal. We must keep the majority at all costs. Republicans must fight back. I'll be strongly endorsing any state senator or house member from the great state of Indiana that votes against the Republican Party in our nation by not allowing for redistricting. If this is not trying too hard. I wonder what it would look like if he was, if he had really gone all out. Yeah. Should we take a look? Can you pull up Griffin this Trump approval rating? Because this speaks to what Ryan was just mentioning about where he is because, I mean, it, look, I'm. all the polls are going to be slightly different, but pretty much everybody has an overall downward trajectory here. And this is specifically on immigration, which, you know, immigration crime were seen as his two strongest issues. I think they still are his strongest issues. But even there, you are, you were seeing a dramatic decline and he's underwater on both of the issues where he's supposed to be, you know, allegedly the strongest. And there was a lot here in terms of just how far.

he has fallen. And the biggest area that's a major issue for him is the economy. His overall approval on the economy is now 31%. 31%. And that's going to be a disaster for any president. But this president in particular, you know, his whole thing is his brand, right? That's what he's best at. He's best at creating this mythology around him and creating this brand image. And for a long, long, long, long time up until literally this year, his brand was, I'm the businessman. I understand the economy. I'm going to make you. you and your family better off. And now that brand is completely toast. And to Ryan's point, I mean, to, you know, the whole. the whole concept of they're they're blaming, trying to blame Biden. But not only are you a year into your administration, but you were so aggressive in all of the moves that you made on the economy. Like the idea that this is Biden's economy at this point after post-liberation day is absurd to people, right? Even a lot of Republicans are like, No, it's not Biden's like we are where we are. And then the attempt to gaslight everybody and say, no, the economy's a plus plus plus plus, but also if there's problems, it's Biden's economy. You know, on something like the economy, like you have your own independent experience of this. He cannot work his reality creation, distortion mechanisms nearly as effectively in that area as perhaps he can and some others. And let's just take a look before we. Like, leave. Let's take a look at this. Trump in the Oval Office last night. Rejected the congressional maps for the redistrict in that state. A number of Republicans voted against that redistricting effort. You have spent a lot of time talking about this. The vice president traveled to Indiana. What's your reaction? Well, we won every other state. That's the only state. It's funny because I won Indiana all three times by a landslide. And I wasn't working on it very hard. It was nice. I think we would pick up two receipts if we did that. You had one gentleman the head of the Senate, I guess, Bray, whatever his name is. I heard he was against it. He probably loses next primary, whatever that is. I hope he does because he's done a tremendous disservice. I think of it, it's a great place. I love the people there. They love me. We won in a landslide all three times. Tremendous not to love. And then you. There's no reason for doing it. It's a nice tie. And the Democrats do it to us, so I can't imagine that they do it. It's different than us. I wasn't very much involved. But there's a man named Bray as a, I guess, head of the Senate. Was that Bray? Is that the name? Bray? And I mean, I'm sure that whenever his primary is, it's, I think, in two years. But I'm sure he'll go down.

All right. So it's not that we weren't working very hard on it, but it was, quote, a tremendous disservice. And this, to Crystal's point, is the branding challenge of Trump going forward. The economy is an A plus, plus, plus, plus, plus, but consumer sentiments are at record low. There's a lot to, not record lows, probably, but pretty low. And so there's a lot for the branding master to maneuver here going forward. Yeah, and I was just looking at another poll that just came out in terms of like people's, you know, what people are prioritizing. No surprise. Majority people say either prices and inflation or jobs in the economy. Only 3% are saying border security. 9% are saying crime and public safety. 7% are saying immigration. So, you know, and this is where Venezuela factors into this as well, where the vast majority of the public and things like 70% of the public are like. No, I don't want to do regime change in Venezuela. What are we doing here? And it's not only the opposition to the action itself. It's also the sense of like, hey, we have some. situations here that we feel like you should maybe be focused on rather than murdering random people in the Caribbean and doing another foolish foreign adventure regime change war. You know, just ask Biden and Kamala Harris how it goes when people feel like you are more committed to warmaking than you are to their own lives and their material conditions. So, you know, I think that's that's another. That's another factor that is playing in here that is probably not going to benefit them over the short or long term. And he took another loss last night that is actually very relevant to this. House of Representatives, which is still Republican-controlled, voted to reject Trump's executive order on, what, artificial intelligence? Or no, it was on rolling back. No, no, no, it was sorry. It was on the labor rights, is that one? Yes, he was about the rolling back to union protection. So Trump issued an executive order that was like hostile to organized labor and workers. And they voted to roll that back. And so, you know, a bunch of Republicans crossed the aisle, I think 20 Republicans, 19 who are facing. you know, tough re-election campaigns and won who's retiring, joined Democrats to overturn this executive order. So, like, he's losing his hold on the party in a way that, as you said, is, like, reminiscent of just a few weeks after January 6th. Mm-hmm. One more thing to throw in here before Brock joins us is, according to MS now. I don't know how amazing their sources are, and Marjorie Taylor Greene denies this. But sources tell MS now Marjorie Taylor Greene has been gauging support for a motion to vacate while long-shot bid to oust Speaker Johnson. Marjorie's approaching members to get to nine who will oust the speaker. And, you know, I mean, this is direct shot at Mike Johnson, not necessarily Trump, but like Mike Johnson is not his own independent person out there. He's been Trump's puppet doing whatever it is that Trump wants him to do in that slot. That's been his whole purpose and role.

You know, the other thing I saw is she she posted this herself, so this isn't something that she denied that she's going to, she's thinking about signing on to. any discharge petition that comes up, even if it's something she disagrees with. She's like, these things should get a vote on the floor. Like, they should get a vote on the House floor and if people disagree with them, then vote against them. But what is it with this not being able to vote on things and members not being able to express themselves? So I'm so for it. I'm just sad she's resigning in January. I want her to stick around. Yeah, I am too. But if she wants to do a motion to vacate, she can definitely find enough people to do it. It's like everyone is mad at Mike Johnson. The moderates are mad at Mike Johnson. Maga is mad at Mike Johnson. He has a very thin margin, obviously. So the motion of vacate, basically Kevin McCarthy's entire conference was happy with him, except for like Matt Bill Gates and a posse of friends. And so because of where the margins are right now. You know, it's just a question of if they care enough. Who are the people, Emily? Yeah. Who are the people who would be most likely? I mean, you think it. Why are people so mad at Mike Johnson specifically? Like, is there been a key central failure that they're all pointing to? Yeah, I mean, during the government shutdown. Everyone was home in their districts and had lots of time on their hands and just was like getting really, really mad at Mike Johnson and felt like he wasn't prioritizing the like actual action type stuff. He hasn't been getting them to like do things and they feel kind of idle and frustrated. And so I think you would have... You'd have some, like, Freedom Caucus types, and then you would have, like, Brian Fitzpatrick from Pennsylvania, a kind of moderate type who's been speaking out against Mike Johnson. Now, would he actually vote in the discharge position? You probably, if she made a serious push, some of these, you know, there's 20 people who are considering announcing their retirements, according to Jake Sherman. So what do they care? They'll do a motion to vacate if they want to, you know, make a point about Mike Johnson. So. I would think for the moderates, for anybody who's in a swing district, too, they'd see it as an opportunity to, like, separate themselves from a party that's unpopular. You know, same function. Then in the past, like, voting against Nancy Pelosi would have served. I don't know how far it gets you, though, because. Most people see that the problem is not really Mike Johnson, you know, outside of like the, you know, insular Republican infighting, they see the problem as being Donald Trump and Mike Johnson is just there to like do his bidding. But I do think a lot of, you know, some people who are in districts that are vulnerable would probably feel like, oh, this is an opportunity for me to show that I'm not like the rest of these people on my own person. I'm independent. I'm voting against the party in some key ways and use that to kind of try to bolster an independent brand.

Yeah, like I tried to get healthier subsidies. Yeah. Yeah, right, they might get that next week, right? They might. Yeah, that would be, do you think that has a chance of passage, this, this deal that is coming together with House Republicans? Yeah, and this is the flip side of what we were talking about with Trump. operating as a Roy Cohn-style political figure, where sometimes the arm twisting is a disaster and it backfires because people take such umbrage with it, especially in politics, treating them like it's mafia time. And then on the other hand, sometimes it twists arms. And Trump is able to like sweet talk plus strong arm. gets it done. So I think he's really not used to it not working. I feel like that's what happened in Indiana. What is the deal look like? Because I saw the Republican talking points and it was extremely vague. Was it what's a year extension? Yeah. Of the of the Obamacare subsidies? Right. Like through the election, basically. Yeah. Which would be. That'd be huge for everybody who's staring at those bills right now. Yeah, who's already gone through the marketplace and looking at the premium spikes. And then if Democrats take the House, you know, they'd be in a position to defend the subsidies in the next spending package. What about these 2K tariff checks? I was promised a tariff check at some point, Emily. Is that still on the table? They have conceded that that was made up. Ah, damn. What they, what they meant is that. The beauty of Trump's A++-plus-plus economy and his beautiful tax bill. That it feels like we all got a check. It's going to feel like you got a $2,000. Trump has suggested that it's actually branding. It's $2,000 in vibes. In vibes. Your bank account is a mindset. You just send a vibe check and sign it. That is literally a vibe check. And then, like, fine print it says this is not redeemable for actual money. Well, they would do that, but. Doge fired the bureaucrats that might have been able to send down those checks. Sorry. You just have to imagine it. You're going to get a truth social post. You can get an AI slot video about it. Yeah. Summer is here. At orderly meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings. Whether you're celebrating the nice weather, starting a new chapter, planning a vacation, or simply looking ahead to what's next, this season can be the perfect time to invest in yourself and your health.

If you've struggled with weight loss and are curious about GLP1 medications, orderly meds can help you learn about your options. Through a simple virtual process, you can connect with licensed medical professionals who can determine whether treatment may be appropriate for you. Getting started is fast, convenient, and happens online from the comfort of home. This summer, consider a new approach to feeling your best. Visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast to learn more. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Orderly meds.com slash podcast. Because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward. Compounded medications are not FDA approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details. The future won't wait, and neither should you. That's why American Public University offers master's programs designed for momentum, affordable, high quality, and flexible so you keep moving forward. With career-relevant programs in business, health care, education, IT, and more, you can gain skills you can use right away and the confidence to power your next move. American Public University, made for what's next. Learn more at APU.apus.edu. Hi, Ryan Reynolds here for Mint Mobile. Are you looking for a beach read this summer? May I suggest your big wireless bill? It's got suspense, mystery, a slightly flat, emotional arc, and a shocking twist where you realize you've been overpaying the entire time. Fortunately, though, Mint's story is better. Every plan, $15 per month a month. Even unlimited. That's it. Happy ending. Zero tears. Give it a try at mintmobile.com slash switch. Up front payment of $45 for three months, $90 for $1 for $1.20 per month. Taxes and fees extra. Initial term only greater than 50 gigabytes may slow when network is busy. C terms. Well, I think we've got our guest, Brock, here from the lever. Let's let Brock in. Brock, what's going on, man? Hey, folks. How's it going? Good. Great to have you. Yeah, thanks for having me on. Yeah, of course. So can you give us your last name pronunciation? Yeah, yeah, sure. I was not going to try Crystal. I wasn't going to. That's totally fine. It's frog. Rayhor? That's pretty close, actually. Yeah, it's Rehor. So it's a check last name. The H is silent. Yeah. It's been getting butchered since I was a kid. No worry. He's, but yeah. Excellent. Well, you're just so iconic. You only need the first name. That's it. That's right. And you wrote an iconic article here. We've got it up. The secret algorithm behind your $20 burger, according to multiple lawsuits, data analytic firm Agrostats has quietly enabled the nation's largest meat processors to coordinate price hikes and wage suppression for decades. Tell us a little bit about this story, Brock. Yeah, sure. So. This started when I saw this, I saw a little bit of information come out about how there was this ongoing class action lawsuit. And some of the country's biggest poultry processors had been colluding to suppress their workers' wages. And so I write a little, you know, good newsletter for the lever every week. And so this was one of the items that I was including on this. But...

When I started looking a little bit further, I saw this information about this company, Agrostats. I had seen that, you know, some places have done coverage of this firm before, I think Mother Jay Jones, the American Prospect. A couple of sources have covered the technology more broadly. But nobody was really talking about this settlement. So in lieu of a financial settlement, Agrostats agreed to redact some of the wage information. in a way that, you know, allegedly was like satisfactory for the plaintiffs for the workers. But I wanted to look a little bit more into it. And when I started talking to... Industry insiders and legal experts, the overwhelming consensus seemed to be that, well, no, the settlement isn't actually going to change anything substantive in the industry. And it sort of follows a broader pattern, which I think is pretty interesting. I spoke to this independent rancher, Mike Calacrate, who I think summed it up pretty well. I also talked to Claire Calloway of the Open Markets Institute, and both of them kind of landed on the same. general pattern that is going on with price fixing more broadly in the meat uh in the meat packing industry and it's sort of you know these companies are always able to settle um and often what happens is the settlements that they pay out are less um than they got in their ill gotten gains and a lot of the time they don't actually have to give those gains back so It's perfectly rational for these companies, you know, just pursuing profit maximization. It's perfectly rational for them to continue price fixing. And what's happening is nothing's being done to change the underlying conditions that enabled price fixing in the first place. And that was sort of the broader takeaway that I came with this. But I also think it's pretty interesting because I think with everything going on with RealPage right now, algorithmic price fixing is sort of... a hot button issue. It's a pretty, pretty salient political issue, especially with, like, New York and California, trying to update their state antitrust laws to account for sort of algorithmic price fixing. But what's interesting is agorstatts, it's been around for 40 years. And the technology, I think, I'm not going to attempt to explain the differences in the technology. But from what I was able to gather from people I spoke to, the technology works. pretty differently, but it's the same idea of this third-party intermediary used by companies to exchange sensitive information. And obviously, again, I think I can't overstate this. This is a problem that exists beyond algorithms. It goes beyond third-party intermediaries. This sort of standard smoke-filled room price fixing is still definitely also going on a lot. But it was sort of interesting. that Agrasats, this firm in particular, wasn't really getting a lot of coverage and people weren't really talking about, well, like, well, what's going to happen after this settlement? Like, you know, they agree to redact the information, but are they just going to be able to continue?

sort of existing and sorry go ahead so effectively you know i was just going to say so effectively you started writing this as like a piece of good news like oh look there's this class action lawsuit and they forced a settlement this will improve things and then as you start to dig into it you come to realize the settlement is actually a strategic tactic from the algorithmic price fixing company to make sure they don't have to admit any wrongdoing and they can just sort of like pay the fine and just consider that a cost of doing business. And it also did, you just mentioned Real Page. It also did very much remind me of that story, which we have covered extensively here as well, where effectively they thought that they could get around. you know, antitrust and anti-competitive laws by doing it through a newfangled way. Like, since we're doing the collusion through algorithms, it doesn't really count anymore. And, you know, I'm sure the mechanism is a little bit different here, but what you effectively point to, and again, this is all alleged and they deny, blah, blah, blah. But what you point to here is just like with the... algorithmic rent price fixing some of the information that landlords were able to glean was basically like you know what you'll actually be more profitable if you jack up the rent so high that it is beyond and above market prices and you keep some units open So effectively, like, reducing supply, you keep some units open because people just literally can't afford it. You will actually be more profitable that way. And in a similar way, in the meat processing industry, what they've also realized is that by constraining supply. and jacking up the price, they're going to be more profitable. So, you know, we've had, there's, there's a lot of factors that are going into both why the prices are so high, why the cattle herd right now is so low. There are various factors that go into it. But if you look at the overall structure of this market, the ranchers are getting screwed, right? Their margins. We've talked to Mike Callagrate as well. Amazing guy. Shout out to him. Go check out Ranch Foods direct. Ranchers are getting screwed, right? They're not making. They're not making much, if anything, they're underwater. So they're not building out the herds because they can't afford to because there's no margin in it for them. Consumers are getting screwed. And companies like Tyson's are racking up massive profit margins. So just from looking at that structure of the industry, you can see the way that this consolidation of power has allowed them to set the price. and suck all of the sort of benefit out of the market to the detriment of the ranchers and to the detriment of the consumers. And you filled in with this article an important piece of the puzzle of how exactly they are colluding and working together allegedly to be able to effectuate that outcome. Yeah, yeah. That's definitely another thing that I.

that at least the DOJ alleges is that these companies are, you know, agrostats in the same way that you, that you pointed out with Real Page, it is getting these companies to artificially constrain supply. And I think that's a really important thing to focus on when we're talking about these. To that point, Brock, why don't I play the... Griffin, if you have it handy, go ahead and play it, but if not, I can pull it up. The Pete Ricketts response to Dana Osborne. Here, I'll pull it up. This is, and I think Crystal's kind of alluding to this, that, you know, Tyson closed. So Tyson closed this processing plant. A couple of announced the closure of this processing plant in Lexington, Nebraska a couple weeks ago. And Dan Osborne, the independent Senate candidate, has been making the case that it's a violation of the Packers and Stockyards Act, which says that you cannot take action with the intent to or with the effect of manipulating the price. And what they're trying to do here, it appears, is both manipulate the price that they have to charge. or that they have to pay to ranchers to get the cattle because, you know, if ranchers have fewer, you know, processing plants to sell to, then they can charge less for their cattle. And then as they reduce the supply that they're producing, they can then charge more to the customers. And so Osborne has been saying, The feds need to step in here and actually crack down on this criminal wrongdoing. And so Pete Ricketts was asked about this. He's a billionaire who's running against this independent mechanic. And his answer is just so mealy-mouthed. And I think it shows everything. So yeah, so let's go back to Pete Ricketts. Independent Mechanic versus Independent billionaire. I think he inherited most of his money, too. I've got my team taking a look at any allegation of wrongdoing with regard to how Tyson is going about this process. And, of course, what I have said in the past is that I've talked to other employers with regard to finding jobs for the people who are being displaced. I have talked to Donnie King, the Tyson CEO. about making sure that that facility can continue to be used for job creation, and that I'm really treating this like a natural disaster, that it's locally executed, state managed, and fairly supported. So we'll continue to support. Natural disaster. And the local officials. It's an act of God, really. As they work to mitigate the issues associated with the shutdown. Amazing, like a natural disaster. Yeah, exactly, an act of God. Because he sees these CEOs as gods. And so they're acting together. They've brought about a natural disaster on this town. And he's hoping that they can continue using it for job creation. Like, what are you doing? Like, what are you talking about? Anyway, Brock, how does this fit into your reporting? Yeah, sure. So I think like we were sort of alluding to a little bit earlier.

I think the closure of this, could you remind me of what percentage of the beef supply the closure of this market would? Oh, yes. So it's 15% of Nebraska's beef processing and it's 5% nationally. Like so like one out of 20. And also like I think we should acknowledge for like. This is just an awful industry. And if we could like move away from it and move to something more humane and that would be better. However, this is what we got. Yeah. So we have one out of 20, one out of 20 cattle that get butchered at this processing plant. Yeah. So I mean like I think again, this sort of follows the general trend. I mean. This is both going to be obviously very detrimental to consumers, the people buying the beef. That's a very substantial amount. But I think also it's important maybe to think about how propped up these rural towns become when a plant like Tyson moves in. I mean, when there's 3,000 or so workers in this plant in a town of 10,000, the local economy becomes entirely reliant on this one plant. They can build a data center and then do more of the AI computing at the data center. Both the jobs that will bring. Yes. Dozens. Both of the jobs that will bring, yeah. Yes. Yeah. And so it's fascinating to see the Republicans try to push back on this because the Republican billionaire is just, you know, he has thoughts and prayers. And I don't think that's going to cut it for this town. And Osborne has been going in on this the last several weeks. He looks like he's going to run his entire campaign on this because it's such a perfect proxy for how we understand billionaires to be rigging the economy against regular people, both the workers and the consumers. And I think it is, it is such, sorry. No, go ahead. I think it is such a salient issue on both sides of the aisle. I mean, something that I. sort of mentioned in my article was that, you know, maybe like a month or two ago, even the Trump administration has sort of tried, maybe it's more opportunism, but they've tried to kind of capitalize on how much anger there is around price fixing. And in the meat industry specifically, I think Trump called out in a truth social post. Again, he didn't name any names, but he called out foreign-owned meatpacking companies. But again, I think... And a lot of the people I spoke to tends to be of the opinion that this is maybe more rhetoric than anything else. I think it's important to note that the Trump administration, they did accept, I think it was a $5 million donation from Pilgrim's Pride, which is a subsidiary of JBS, which is a Brazilian-owned company. And shortly after that donation, again, there's... I don't want to, like, assume causation or anything. But shortly after that donation, JBS, this Brazilian company, was listed publicly in the New York Stock Exchange. But I do think it really speaks to, you know, regardless of where you are on the political spectrum, there's these issues carry a lot of political weight and even just talking about them. It's a, yeah, it's on a lot of people's minds right now.

Summer is here, which means we all want to look and feel our best. A gLP1 may be right for you. Visit orderly meds.com to learn more about which gLP1 you could be eligible for. Getting started is fast, easy, and happens virtually through telemedicine from licensed professionals. Check it out for yourself. Go to orderly meds.com slash podcast. That's orderly meds. Taking care of yourself feels great. Compatid medications are not FDA-approved eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website. for details. You want your master's degree. You know you can earn it, but life gets busy, the pack schedule, the late nights, and then there's the unexpected. American Public University was built for all of it. With monthly starts and no set login times, APU's 40 plus flexible online master's programs are designed to move at the speed of life. Start your master's journey today at APU. APUS.edu. You want it? Come get it at APU. Discover a spectacular island destination with crystal blue seas, endless sunshine, and the cool Bahamian breeze. Bahamara, located in Nassau, Bahamas, offers your choice of three luxury hotels, the richly refined Rosewood, the playfully hip SLS, and the stylishly modern Grand Hyatt. With over 45 restaurants, bars, and lounges, Bahamar serves up delicious dining from world-renowned chefs. like Daniel Ballude and Marcus Samuelson, nightlife venues like the new John Batisse Jazz Club, and the Caribbean's most luxurious casino. At Baja Mar, you'll find every pleasure under the sun and one-of-a-kind experiences for the entire family, like Baja Bay, our 15-acre lush tropical water park, interactive wildlife experiences, including our daily flamingo parade, world-class golf, tennis, spa, and so much more. Visit bahamara.com today and discover a vacation destination where memories are made for a lifetime. Bahamara, life spectacular. Yeah, well, and Pete Ricketts is not just, you know, a very, one of the wealthiest members of Congress. He also has received... according to Osborne, I haven't double-checked it, but according to Dan Osborne, $70,000 in campaign contributions and support through hard and soft money from Tyson's directly. And I think there used to be a bit of a Republican-based assumption that what was good for these companies was going to be good for them in these individual towns. And I certainly saw this in West Virginia where they're, you know, from the antagonism of the mine wars, they're shift into this like frenzy. of coal campaign where the idea that is actively pushed from Chamber of Commerce types and from Republican elites and that is bought into in a lot of ways from the base voters themselves is that, okay, if these companies do well and we like just support them and give them their tax cuts and let them do their thing, then that is going to be good for my town. They're not going to leave my town. They're not going to screw us over. This is what we've got, to your point, like this is all we have in this town. So we better keep them happy. And I think that that illusion has been completely destroyed at this point. So, you know, for me, this issue, obviously it's very visceral for people because...

One of the markers of whether you're making it or not is whether you can afford like a stake every now and again. And for so many Americans now, the prices are just so out of control that that is just not even remotely a possibility that's completely off the table, both literally and figuratively at this point. So when you have some sort of insight into, okay, well, why is that? Who is, what happened with this specific market? Who is screwing you over? You know, I think people are very receptive and very open to the understanding that these giant companies are colluding, allegedly, in specific ways using now high tech, but it's the same, you know, same as getting in the smoke-filled room and doing it that way. It's effectively the same mechanism just through like a tech smoke screen. That that is a significant part of the puzzle of why it is. that you're getting screwed in this particular way. And on the electoral level, and then Brock, we can leave you with the last word, Pete Ricketts looks like the guy who's doing the colluding and the screwing. Like, you couldn't have a worse candidate to me if you're, like he looks like your CEO. He looks like the guy who's going to saunter through the plant, you know, with a like crisp hard hat for five minutes, walk out and then close your plant. Like, he just looks like that guy. And so when he's like, I'm going to do everything I can for these workers, you're like, are you? Are you really? Not so sure. It's like Danny Warbucks. Anyway, any last thoughts? Yeah. No, no, I think that pretty much does it. But thank you all so much for having me on. I really. I actually do have a Brock. I have a McDonald's-based question. Me and Crystal are famously McDonald's eaters on the show. We love going to Mickey D's for a little fast food. But there is something incredibly undignified about paying like $16, $17 for a McDonald's combo. Is this kind of price ficting, like affecting burger chains like nationwide? Like is this why? It's so expensive in McDonald's these days. I mean, I don't know if I want to necessarily say that that's the only factor that's at play. But from what is alleged in these lawsuits and from what a lot of the sources that I spoke to said, this is definitely one of the factors that's contributing to rising prices in beef, which would probably then translate to higher prices for burgers and McDonald's. Taco Bell too. Fantastic. Yeah. Oh, Taco Bell. Kills me. No, there's no beef in Taco Bell products, luckily, though. That's down here. Don't be a hater. Don't be a hater. Brock, thanks for coming out. Where can we find you? If people want to learn more about you, follow your journalism. Sure, yeah, yeah. My Twitter is just my name with no caps and no spaces. Brock Rehor. Yeah. It's surprising that was available. I'm glad you could get it. Luckily, yeah. Stiff competition. Link will be in the description. Thanks for joining us, Brock. We'll catch you later. Thanks a lot. I appreciate you having me on. Bye-bye.

Yeah, of course. And guys, make sure you subscribe over at the Lever. If you are able, they have actually a lot of really great reporting out always, but specifically right now they also have a scoop about Google paying a bunch of legislators to go on some trip like state legislators to try to woo them with regard to data centers and fueling sort of that propaganda. They've been doing a lot of great work on AI, is it an AI bubble, all of that sort of stuff. So give our friends over at Lever News some. love. And Ryan, who we got now in the studio. Hind Hassan, joining us from London, who authored a recent piece, well, created a documentary for Al Jazeera, did a piece for us over at Dropsite News, which I encourage people to go and read the aftermath of the 12-day war between Israel and Iran. The documentary itself, which aired on Al-Zera, if you don't mind, we'll just play, let me just throw up a... a little clip of it, and then, and then, well, first of all, Hind, welcome to Bringing Points. Thank you for joining us. Thank you for having me. Pleasure to be here. And so let me pull this, let me pull this up. Pleasure. Just play a little bit of this so people get a flavor for the reporting that you did, that you and your team did, and then we'll discuss this. Thank you.

In Iran's largest cemetery, mothers cry out for children who will never answer. In June 13, 2025, Israel launched Operation Rising Lion, striking nuclear and military facilities, as well as devastating residential neighborhoods across Iran, killing hundreds of civilians. Among them, 12-year-old Amir Ali and his father, Raza. Well, you know, I'm two of the best of the best of them. He said. Amad of my, he left, to his abyss. You know, look at all. You know, look at all, see, these are young. The U.S. bombs made, tofing does, doshmanie by Israel did, what did? The U.S. backed Israel's war, joining the offensive on the 10th day by striking Iran's nuclear sites with some of the biggest bombs in the world. President Trump called it a spectacular military success. And when you were talking to people there and going around the country, what... What did you think you would find going in and what surprised you about the aftermath of the attack? Well, we've covered for fault lines and vice before I was at what's with Al Jazeera and fault lines. We've covered wars. in different parts of the world. And wherever you go and you cover these stories of conflict and you speak to the victims of those war, there's not a story that isn't devastating. But when it comes to Iran, we're not short of hearing about the politics behind it all. We're not short of hearing about the nuclear program, what the US thinks, what Israel thinks, what the Iranian government thinks. But I think... What we really wanted to do is focus in and give a platform to those victims of war so we can hear from them the impact of this war because all these wars are fought by politicians. We want to know what impact it has on the people, on an individual level and really just given the space to be able to talk about that. And the, what... I have done so many interviews with people who have lost loved ones and nothing prepared our entire team for hearing these stories in Iran. Every single person on that team, every time we spoke to someone, our translator was crying, the producer behind the screen was crying. It's just very difficult to not be able to feel that emotion with the people that we were speaking to. And it really hammered home just how devastating it is that regardless of what people think. in terms of politics and ideology, that the victims of war is always the most vulnerable in society. And, you know, they're always the children that we heard about who not only lost their lives, but also are currently struggling with the impact of it and the injuries that they've obtained. I think what we took away from this is just how...

how much of an impact this had on people in Iran and also the risk of what another war, the risk of another war and what impact that would have on people as well going forward. What do you think it was that real quick? What do you think it was that made it so that this hardened crew, this team that's been around the world and seen, you know, the ravages of war was so extraordinarily affected by this? I wonder if it's partly it's that. You know, Iran, even though they're getting, you know, constantly threatened with attack, you know, it's generally been living at peace. Whereas, you know, a lot of war-torn areas, like they can count the months in between conflicts. And then a new conflict comes and it becomes not a way of life, but like less of a shock when the new conflict breaks out. Whereas with this, quote-unquote, 12-day war. You know, one day there's peace and the next day it just bombs are raining down everywhere. And then all of a sudden it stops. What was it that, that like shook your team so much? Well, first of all, we worked with local Iranian producers as well on the team. Whenever we report, we always work with local journalists. It's the only way that we can really tell the stories as well as we can. And the local journalists that we were working with, they lived through the war themselves. And actually, even talking to them, when we weren't filming and talking about the possibility of another war, you could see how afraid they were of that possibility. the memory of those bombs going off nearby and hearing the explosions in Tehran during the war and living through that, it was still impacting them. And the idea, I remember when we were on, we were in the car one day and there were news reports coming in that Israel might be planning another attack within the next few months by the end of the year and the team, the Iranians that we were with, when you're journalists, you just talk about things. Oh, have you seen this post? Have you seen this tweet? Have you seen whatever? But the response that we had from the Iranian journalists who were in the car and how afraid they were hearing that was flippantly saying, oh, Israel could attack again. And their response as humans who live in the war, who will be the people who experience whatever happens, it kind of humbled us a little bit and made us remember that this is real for people. They were so afraid of it happen again. It also hammered home what had happened in Tehran, that this was for the people who lived there, the bombs were going off in the middle of the city, in the middle of the capital. And I think also in terms of, so for them going and hearing from Iranians who'd experienced the same things as them but had suffered so much more, that was hugely impactful. And also... Iranians, they have, obviously every country has, you know, the people have their own ways and Iranians have a very, very poetic.

lamenting way of telling stories or talking about what happened. And that came across when we were speaking to them about their loss and the way that they spoke. You saw there at the top of the report, we spoke to Syed, who is the grandfather of Amir Ali, a 12-year-old who was killed alongside with his father, Reza Pahlavi. And just the way that he says, there's a clip that comes later, he said, I pray for martyrdom. I wish God would take me because I miss him so much. And you can see that in the way that he spoke. It wasn't just, you know, the people behind the camera who were breaking down, listening to these stories. Every single person that we spoke to broke down. Because even though this war happened months ago, the impact that it's had on them, it's so raw right now. And you can see that it's going to be, it's going to live with them forever. It's impacted their lives permanently, it's changed their lives forever. And I think that that was really what, you know, how that impacts it. Just to say also, it's not uncommon for when we go out on the road and we film and we speak to victims for us to find it very difficult or to cry. I think with a lot of journalists, we have this idea that we need to be. that neutrality means to not be moved, whereas I actually don't agree with that. If you're telling the stories of the victims of war and you're dealing with a power dynamic and you're giving them a platform to be able to speak, I think humanity and allowing the viewer to be able to relate to that person on camera and you being able to relate to the person that you're speaking to. It's not an accountability interview this. This is somebody who suffered through something. I think that's actually very important. And when you have that sort of relationship, it really comes across on camera. And I was going to ask more about the reporting process, too, just what it was like to be in Iran. If there's anything, you want to add just about being a journalist in Iran, were people eager to talk? Was it hard to find anyone? Or were people really, like, very pleased to be able to tell their story? But, yeah, as a journalist in Iran, trying to cover this, any difficulties? any process stories that might be interesting? It's not easy to get access to Iran. It is very difficult to go there as journalists and to report. So, you know, we worked for a long time trying to get this access. And, you know, we were very happy when we were able to go in. And then once again, once you're inside, it's not so easy that... you know, you can go out and report whatever it is you want. There are processes in order to be able to get access to certain things. Some things are easier than others. So, for example, when we want to speak to a victim of the war, that is a case of working with the local journalists, knowing who the people are that have been impacted. reaching out to them, seeing if they're willing to speak. There were some people who didn't want to speak to us. There were some people who would say, actually, we don't want to speak to Western journalists. In fact, Amir Ali's grandfather, at first, he didn't really want to speak to us because he said, you know, I've done it before and what I said didn't come across accurately, and I don't know what impact it's going to have, and I don't know what change it's going to have.

But we hear that from people wherever we go. When people have experienced something and they have been made victims, sometimes they lose faith in institutions or platforms or the media. We did face that a lot. And that definitely made us really determined to ensure that we are telling the story accurately and really doing justice to whatever it is that they were telling us. So that had its own issues. But I think it's very similar to wherever you go, reaching out to people and speaking to them, building that trust between you and the people that you're speaking to to to ensure that they are. happy and that you are having an honest relationship and you can tell their story as well as you can. The other places, for example, in the documentary, we actually managed to get access to Avian prison. Avine, you know, has been reported on many times before. It's the location of where anti-government activists or protesters or journalists have been reported to have been held is also the place that was bombed by Israel and resulted in the largest casualty as a result of an attack on the 11th day of the 12th day war, so right at the end. And so getting access to that. was very, very difficult and we were having to put in requests repeatedly over and over again. It looked like at one point we might not be able to get access and then, you know, we got the phone call saying be there at this time. Even when we went in, we couldn't just explore the prison grounds as much as we wanted to. But we were able to see one of the major bombed out sites of the prison. And it was left as it was. And we were allowed to roam about in there and have a look and, you know, go and look at the different floors and, you know, see what had been left in the impacts of that. And so, but it was very difficult getting in. And. When we finally managed to get in, we did have some freedom to be able to explore that area and to really try and understand the impact of that strike. And then afterwards, we actually spoke to, you know, one of the judges who works with the government on human rights. And we also put to him the allegations of human rights abuses in the imprisoned by the Iranian government. So we covered all angles. And also they were very happy to answer those questions. maybe happy is the wrong word, but they didn't put up any obstacles to us asking those questions or saying that we couldn't ask those questions and we did do that. So I would say definitely very difficult to get access to anything that is linked to the government. Another example, sorry, is there is a building, Shamran building, which was Shamran complex and that was bombed, one of the first places that was bombed in the first hours of the war. And it resulted in what the government tells us was around, I think,

I'd have to check this through the documentary, but you know, around 46, I think people killed in total and 24 of those being children. But that building was linked to the Ministry of Defence. And so getting access to that, for example, was difficult and we had to wait just to be able to go film on that site. And, you know, there were procedures and communications that we had to go through. But in the end, again, we were allowed to go there and film. and see what was left of this building that had been destroyed. That was the same building that Amir Ali's grandfather, Amir Ali, had been killed in. And I have a, maybe it's a silly question. And then unfortunately, after I ask my question, hear your answer. I'm going to have to jump because my daughter has a gymnastics meet today that I have to take her to. But my silly question here is, you know, as an American on Twitter, I'm treated to a lot of images of women in miniskirts on the street in Tehran in the 1970s. And I'm curious when you weren't reporting and doing your job, when you were just out and about in the city. as a woman, like, observing ordinary life on the streets. Like, what does it give Americans a sense of what is it like in Tehran right now? So this was my first time in Tehran. I'd never been before, and I too had just seen the images that were online. And actually, what I saw now surprised me. So we were advised that it was probably a good idea to wear the hijab. And you can see in the documentary, I'm kind of wearing a half hijab. I would say in Tehran, and we didn't go outside of Tehran, but in Tehran, most of the women either wore the hijab loosely. wore it around the neck or didn't wear it at all. And one of the very trendy young areas, hipster areas that we saw, we went there in the evening. It wasn't too far from the hotel. We saw a woman, I saw a woman, buzz cut in a crop top. walking around the streets of Tehran, which was just hugely surprising. Now, I'm told, you know, this is something, this is a recent development. It hasn't always been like this. But since the protests and then also since the war, there has been an easing up of people's freedoms, individual freedoms in Iran to be able to dress how they want. So that was definitely something that I saw. I was... really shocked with the amount. And it wasn't just like the odd person here and there, many women not wearing, um, not wearing hijab, which was, was something that, you know, was surprising for me to see, considering, um, especially what we've heard. Uh, but yeah, it was, it was, it was what was, also what's interesting. I do think this is important to say is that we spoke to a lot of people who were not fans of the government.

and people who supported the government. But they all said that they were united against the attack on Iran. So I think this is what we've heard from people. A lot of Iranians, you know, speculating and people that we speak to thought that perhaps Israel's plan was to create some form of disunity. inside Iran and to create unrest. And that didn't happen. Actually, a lot of the people there, whether they supported the government, they didn't support the government, were very, very united against outside aggression or the bombing of Iran. And once you're there and you speak to the victims and you see the impact, it's very, very clear. People were afraid. They lost loved ones. They lost children. And so... the feelings of politics were put aside. And in return, you had this unity against the bombing of their country. And that was something that came across with everyone that we spoke to. Wonderful. Last question for me, then. How was, and Crystal, thank you. Good luck. Thank you, guys. Thank you, Hans. Great to meet you. Thank you, guys. How were people talking about a... a follow-on strike? Was it, were they talking about it more as a looming weather event, basically? Like just, this is, like this is going to happen and we just need to kind of prepare for it and there's nothing we can do about it? Or was there any talk about ways that they could actually stave off some type of second attack? And did, and I guess related to that, there's been a lot of reporting in the last several days about Iran, Iran's quote unquote pivot to China. and kind of giving up almost. I don't know, but giving up isn't the right word, but putting more emphasis on the relationship with China rather than bending over backwards to try to get Europeans and the Americans to lift the sanctions and stop attacking them. Well, I think with the people that we spoke to, first of all, so the first part of your question, And of course, this isn't, this won't be everybody. These are just the snapshot of opinions that we got when we were there. And the people that we spoke to was almost like a kind of a psychological defense that they didn't want to accept that it was happening. It wasn't like they were, oh yes, this is definitely happening. We've got to just, you know, get through it. And it was more like, we don't want this. Right. We don't want this to happen. Please don't let this happen again. We don't want this to happen. And it's not, they've definitely psychologically, I don't think, want to accept that it would happen again. I think, you know, to emphasize the bombing that happened in Tehrana and the people that we spoke to for 12 days.

destroyed so many people's lives and put the fear of God into a lot of people and the idea of just broaching this could happen again they want whatever can be done to avoid that that's not something it's like okay we need to get through this or this is the next time and I think they're very aware that if if there is another war it could be longer and it could result in more lives and We don't know what will happen then, you know, if what will be the aim and the goal? If you've already bombed the nuclear plants and you say that you put back the nuclear program by 10 years, what are you going to try and achieve from the next conflict? And is it to do with, you know, getting rid of the government? And if that's the case, that is a long and bloody war. And so people, I think they are. petrified of that happening and are hopeful and want a diplomatic solution. And actually when we spoke to the foreign minister, the Iranian foreign minister, we also interviewed the documentary. Every answer he gave to us any question we asked him, he ended it with, there is only a diplomatic solution. He said that over and over again. It's very clear that they do not want to go into another armed conflict. They do. Of course, as a government, they had to say over and over again, you know, we will fight back with everything we've got. We are prepared. We will take on Israel. If, you know, if they want to attack us, we will defend ourselves and we have the mean to do so. And then prefix it with, we think we would like a diplomatic solution. And to answer your second question, are they stopping bending over backwards for the US and pivoting to China? I think that's definitely something. You could see when we were inside Iran that a lot of the exports were coming from that direction, so imports from that direction. And also... Just like us. Yeah, yeah. And then we also, and then like in the conversations that we have with the foreign minister, he said that we do not trust the US as an honest negotiating partner. Again, that doesn't mean that he said, doesn't mean that we don't want a diplomatic solution we do and we want to emphasize that over and over again. But it's clear that they don't trust the US. It's clear that they don't have a huge amount of hope. Yeah, it's a it's a case of waiting to see what happens next. So interesting. So hint us on that the documentary is called 12 Days that shook Iran. You can find it on Al Jazeera English's YouTube page. People can read your summary over at DropSight. But. Thanks so much. And last thing, like, do you know what's next? You know, what investigation you're doing next? Can you tell? Or is it that under wraps? Well, first of all, thank you for having me. You know, great to be here with you all. And what's coming next? There's a few things in the pipeline for 2026.

I don't want to give away too much and jinx it because none of it has been 100% over the line, but look out for prisons and Brazil. Okay, there we go. There's words. Maybe interchange something, two separate things that are not in the same. Could be something different. Don't hold me to it, but there's always something in the pipeline. Well, I look forward to having you back when those come out of the other end of the pipeline. I look forward to it. Thank you so much. Stay safe. Thank you. So Griffin, Griffin, does that do it for this portion of the program or do we have anything else? You know what? We're running out of time. Let's move over to the second half, which you can find, of course. We haven't talked about weed. We can just let people know that Sager's. Oh. Yeah. Saga needed to get that in. Did it happen? It looks like they're rescheduling weed. Yeah. Oh, my God. which means that the weed shops will have access to banking. I've been talking to Sager. I think he's on to like a real genuine corruption angle. Like if you look at some of the movements of the... the weed penny stocks over the last couple of days. I'm shocked that there wasn't more integrity among the stock traders in weed companies. But it looks like the administration was leaking some information to some of these weed executives and that they were baking money off of it. But I guess not weed users because they would have never sent those emails if they've been smoking it. I want to get into that and a lot of other stories in the second half of the show. And Sager also sent us a manifesto or a rebuttal to the weed legalization that I'll have to bring up on the show as well. We're going to switch over to that now. You can go to Emily. Where can you go to sign up for? Breaking Points. Where do you go? You go to breakingpoints.com, of course, obviously. Why would you go anywhere else? BreakingPoint.com. Get that premium membership. Great Christmas gift. Great Christmas gift to yourself. Shout out, by the way, to all of the premium subs that came up to us after our reason debate, where, of course, as expected, we did wipe the floor with the wonderful folks at Reason. But so many breakers there. It was like, Ryan and I were looking around and were like, whoa, there are a lot of you guys. You guys showed up in force, so, and dropside fans. So, uh, eat at reason. Yep, join the club, breakingpoints.com premium subscription. Mm-hmm. And Ryan, what do you get for that premium subscription? Well. Soon, when I win the internal argument, you're going to get the Friday show live. It is. I am running up against some internal obstacles by the name of Griffin, but we're going to overcome them. The compromise folks is we're going to go live, but we're going to start an hour later. That's the compromise.

And actually, as a West coaster, that will, you know, you'll actually be able to see the sun when you wake up. So, okay, you know, I'll make that deal. Oh, okay, I love it. Sweet. Start an hour later. Friday show live for premium subscribers and then Monday through Thursday you get the show an hour early without without the ads unless YouTube just breaks their deal with us and like puts inserts ads into the unlisted link which sometimes they do and you know they're a monopoly and they can do that but you get it you get the show an hour early and you get you get the entire thing so that you can you know when you get to a segment where you're like really like You're covering this. You can just skip right through it and go to the next one. Yeah, incredible features there. And then, you know, ultimately you get to ask us AMA questions of the hosts. And finally, this one is more of like an invisible hand. But your guys' support allows people like Ryan to do crazy journalism, where they attack the biggest people in the world and out there dirty laundry. And that requires resources and requires lawyers on standby. It does. All that is another big, big support to us. So we'll see you all over there in the second half right now. Summer is here. At orderly meds, we know this time is a reminder that life is full of new beginnings. Whether you're celebrating the nice weather, starting a new chapter, planning a vacation, or simply looking ahead to what's next. This season can be the perfect time to invest in yourself and your health. If you've struggled with weight loss and are curious about GLP1 medications, orderly meds can help you learn about your options. Through a simple virtual process, you can connect with licensed medical professionals who can determine whether treatment may be appropriate for you. Getting started is fast, convenient, and happens online from the comfort of home. This summer, consider a new approach to feeling your best. Visit orderlymeds.com slash podcast to learn more. That's orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Orderlymeds.com slash podcast. Because every new season is an opportunity to take the next step forward. Compounded medications are not FDA approved. Eligibility required and determined by a licensed provider. Individual results may vary. See website for details. We learned how to love dogs from the dogs that loved us and waited for us to get home from school. They were the dogs that raised us. We returned the love with pedigree dog food. It was good then, and it's better now.

Every bowl has 100% complete nutrition, supporting six health essentials, and now it includes vitamin good bites, a nutrient boost your dog will love. Pedigree. Good then, better now. Big transfer news today. Who's moving? Me, to the couch, with Domino's best deal ever since they just added stuffed crust. Any pizza, any toppings now with stuffed crust for 999. It's a long-term contract with no release clause. Only 999? Yeah, that sounds like the move. I'm heading straight to Domino's. This is higher for some locations. Excludes Excel and specialty pizzas. Select this offer from 615 through 726. Online over. Size availability varies by crest type, max seven topics, six for hand in New York style crust. Minimum purchase required for delivery. Prices, participation, delivery area, and charges may vary. This is an I-Heart podcast. Guaranteed human.