Immigration Bill Passes, Trump's Grip On Republicans, John Bolton To Plead Guilty

Senators voted all night on immigration enforcement. They passed the bill after 18 hours of voting, but voted not to block the president's agreement with himself for a $1.8 billion fund. What happened to Republican objections? I'm Michelle Martin. That's Steve Inskeep, and this is up first from NPR News. How much distance is really opening between the president and lawmakers in his party? A few Republicans are breaking with Trump over the war in Iran, his anti-weaponization fund. and his pick to lead national intelligence. Also, what are the terms of a plea agreement for John Bolton?

The president's former national security advisor and longtime critic admits to charges of mishandling classified information. How does his case differ from others against the president's enemies? Stay with us. We've got the news you need to start your day.

This message comes from Schwab with the new Schwab Teen Investor account. Canes can gain hands-on investing experience and build positive money habits. It's an account co-owned by you and your teen, so you can monitor and engage with the account while your teen learns how to invest and manage money. Learn more at Schwab.com. This message comes from Ali. Looking for more targeted support from your supplements, new Ali precise probiotics are formulated to go beyond general gut health, with options designed to support areas like skin, stress

response, and metabolism. Get precise with your probiotics and choose support that aligns with your needs. With thoughtfully selected ingredients and specific benefits in mind, Ali helps make daily wellness feel more straightforward. Find Ali precise probiotics at a Walmart near you. This message comes from IXL, providing an online learning environment intended to keep student skills sharp over summer vacation. The platform covers core subjects and adapts to each child's pace.

Receive 20% off at IEFEL. The Senate has passed a bill overnight that funds immigration enforcement. It took them 18 hours. It was almost a party-line vote. Just one Republican opposed. Lawmakers failed to approve amendments blocking President Trump's agreement with himself to establish a $1.8 billion fund. Democrats were outraged by the agreement. Many Republicans said they were to, but most voted to block amendments that would displease the president. NPR congressional correspondent Barbara Sprunt has been up just about all night. Barbara, good morning. Hey, good morning, Steve. Okay, I want to talk about the amendments, Michelle mentioned, but what is the underlying bill that just passed? Right. So if we cast back to earlier this year, Senate Democrats blocked funding the Department of Homeland Security over concerns about the way it was conducting immigration enforcement, specifically after federal agents killed two protesters in Minneapolis. Eventually, at the end of April, after a long shutdown, Congress funded the department everything

except immigration enforcement, and Republicans decided to use a budget tool called reconciliation in order to fund that, to fund ICE, to fund Border Patrol, in a separate bill. And this is that bill. It would fund those agencies for three years. Three years for the rest of Trump's presidency, Congress wouldn't have to vote on it again. This is a thing the president really wanted, and Democrats took the opportunity to offer amendments to that. What happened? That's right. Well, you know, it's interesting. I mean, in this voter-rama scenario, both parties can offer amendments, get the other party on the record on various things. And the thing that was most interesting to me were these amendments where there was

crossover support. You know, there was some Republican support for an amendment to restrict funding for President Trump's ballroom, another one of his big projects, for example. But the subject that came up again and again was the Trump administration's earlier proposal to create that nearly $2 billion settlement fund you were mentioning to pay out supporters who say they've been persecuted by the government. There was a proposal from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer to prevent that creation altogether. It failed. But three Republicans, including senators in tough races in Ohio and Alaska voted with Democrats. Another proposal would have redirected the money from that fund to fraud enforcement. That had more Republican support. And Republicans writ large voted against an amendment that

would prohibit payouts from any weaponization fund to people convicted of assaulting law enforcement on January 6th. Eight Republicans did join Democrats in voting for it. Okay, all those amendments failed. The bill did it get to be so difficult? You know, in large part because of the White House. There was bipartisan pushback at that anti-weaponization fund. The acting attorney general said it's not going to move forward, which seemed to satisfy senators. But then the president told reporters he didn't actually know if it was scrapped or not. And he said that knowing that there are these Republican senators who are uncomfortable with the idea. So this moment for congressional Republicans is about passing this priority after all this time. But it's also a moment where there's

this increasing tension and conflict with the White House. And I don't think that's stopping anytime soon. Although it seems that the tension is resolved again and again with Republicans just obeying. I just want to note, Barbara, back on Monday, our own Eric McDaniel told us that as many as 30 Senate Republicans who are ready to vote against Trump's fund. And then we get to actually voting. And one amendment had just three Republicans voting for it, leaving it shy of passing. There were other amendments that never had quite enough votes to pass. Are Republicans still trying very hard not to cross the president, even on this fund

that they really didn't like? You know, I think there's at least a handful of Republican senators this morning asking themselves that same question, Steve. You know, some of those GOP amendments that were craft. were made in a way to be as attractive as they could be to the full Republican conference. And as you said, we saw them fail to meet the threshold time and time again. And Pierce Barber's Front. Thanks. Thank you.

The congressional Republicans who challenged the president's agenda this week broke with tradition. Most Republican lawmakers said little about military intervention in Venezuela and Iran, troops in American cities, sweeping immigration crackdowns, the dismantling of agencies, and the consolidation of power in the executive office. Now there are small signs of pushback against the president who's been the dominant force in the Republican Party for a decade. NPR's Frank O'Donius is covering this. Franco, good morning. Good morning, Steve.

I want to emphasize small signs of pushback, but what's happening? Yeah, a few examples, I mean, for the last couple days where Trump may have pushed the envelope a little bit too far. I mean, one was when Trump tapped a housing agency official, Bill Pulte, who has no experience and intelligence being tapped to be the acting director of now. National Intelligence, a position charged with coordinating more than a dozen intelligence agencies. I mean, Bill Pulte is better known for going after Trump's political enemies. I mean, one Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina called him an incendiary attack dog on CNBC. Trump also announced that he'd like to nominate his former personal attorney, Todd Blanche, his attorney general.

It was Todd Blanche, who championed that very unpopular anti-weaponization fund that you were just talking about with Barbara. I mean, critics called it a slush fund. for Trump supporters who felt victimized by the government, including those convicted of January 6th crimes on top of several Republicans who balked at the fund in the Senate. I mean, just one more example, Steve, in the House, four Republicans joined with Democrats to rebuke Trump over the war in Iran. Yeah, and that's a rare one where enough Republicans actually voted for something that would pass.

Why are some Republicans finding their voices? Well, I mean, it comes down to politics in a bit of the calendar. I mean, Trump was obviously never really a consensus building. he always led through fear of retribution, and his ability to kind of unify these swaths of the Republican Party, as well as bring it to the fold. New voters was the reason he won in 2016 and 2024. But we're in a definitely different period right now, even from just two years ago. Much of that is due to the war in Iran that Trump initiated.

And polls show Americans, including some Republicans, are souring on the president's leadership, particularly the economy. I mean, gas prices, as we've reported, have risen to more than $4 a gallon. and that's making everything more expensive. Just as the midterms are coming. Yeah, exactly. And all this plays into the midterms. I was talking with John McHenry,

a veteran Republican strategist. He told me it's normal to accept a little distance from the president at this point after the primaries. Part of what's going on, though, is that we are largely through the primaries where the president can do the most damage to people who cross him within his own party. And moving on to the general where I think some people

either feel a little bit more vulnerable or feel like they need to, you know, in a year that doesn't look great for Republicans right now, want to establish their own record. Is the president a lame duck then? Well, I mean, I think that's a little bit early to say. I mean, he's come back so many times before after the 2020 election, after the January 6 riots. And frankly, Steve, a lot could change in the next few months, especially if the war in Iran ends and gas prices go down. I mean, Trump could be looking better politically if the economy improves. NPR's Frank Ordonez, thanks so much.

Thank you, Steve. John Bolton agreed to plead guilty. John Bolton once served as President Trump's national security advisor. He later became a tough critic of the president. His plea for mishandling classified information would resolve the criminal case that Justice Department brought against John Bolton last year. NPR Justice correspondent Ryan Lucas has the uncons. classified version of this story. He's in our studio, Studio 31. Ryan, thanks for coming by.

Good morning, Steve. What were the charges against John Bolton? So, look, John Bolton was indicted in October on 18 criminal counts for retention and transmission of national defense information. And the allegations in the indictment date to his time as national security advisor, as you said in Trump's first term. Now, prosecutors say that John Bolton regularly took handwritten notes about what he was doing on a daily basis as national security advisors, so things that he was hearing in meetings with U.S. intelligence. officials, military officials, or in talks with foreign leaders, and then he would send that very sensitive information, some of it highly classified, to two family members, either in

text messages or in email. And I will also say that FBI agents discovered digital or printed copies of some of that at his home. Okay, so lots of evidence to back up the allegations. What is the agreement then? So first off, it's important to say that this is a tentative plea deal. It would still have to be signed off on by a judge. But a person's familiar with the matter tells me that Under the plea deal, John Bolton would plead guilty to a single count of retaining classified information. He would also face a fine of a little more than $2 million. And he could face anywhere from zero prison time to up to five years in prison. But that is much, much less than if he had taken this case to trial and been found guilty.

Now, a judge, as I said, has to still approve any plea deal. And ultimately, it's the judge who's going to decide on John Bolton's sentence. Now, I reached out to the Justice Department. It declined to comment other than referring me to a. court notice scheduling a rearrangement for John Bolton at the end of the month. And that is something that often signals that a plea deal has been agreed to. People will remember the back story here. The FBI searched President Trump's residence when he was out of office a few years ago. He was found to be keeping classified information on a stage in a bathroom. The case against him was thrown out

by a judge that he appointed. Now, is there some irony that Trump's Justice Department that he closely controls would pursue John Bolton over classified information? Well, look, John Bolton has said that he thinks that he is being targeted for political reasons, for being a very outspoken critic of President Trump. That is John Bolton's view. But look, former prosecutors, former senior intelligence officials, who I have spoken with, think that this case against John Bolton has real legal merit. The investigation, it's important to say, began under the Biden administration.

It continued under Trump. The indictment is 26 pages long. It has detailed allegations in it. And it's important to say that the process that led to John Bolton's indictment was normal. And that is very different from, say, the first prosecution of former FBI director James Comey or New York State Attorney General Letitia James. Remember, they were indicted last year after Trump publicly called on the Justice Department to go after them. Career prosecutors thought those cases were weak. They were overruled. And ultimately, those cases were tossed after court found that the prosecutor who secured them was unlawful. put in place. So the list of the president's perceived enemies who have been targeted by the Justice Department is long. And one of the side effects of the Justice Department that is seen as targeting political enemies is that even when an investigation is legitimate, it can be perceived by the public as being driven by politics and revenge. Ryan, thanks for the insights and for going through the differences there. Really appreciate it. Thank you. And there's Ryan Lucas.

And that's a first for this Friday, June 5th. I'm Steve Inskeep. And I'm Michelle Martin. Today's episode of Up First was edited by Kelsey Snell, Rebecca Meshler, Anna Yucananov, Mohamed El Bardisi, and Taylor Haney. It was produced by Zieg Butch and Mia Dumas. Our director is Christopher Thomas. We get engineering support from Zo Van Genhoven. Our technical director is Carly Strange. And our executive producers, Jay Scheler.

We hope we'll join us again on Monday. This message comes from Rosetta Stone and their newest language learning experience, Rosetta Stone Sapphire. Get unlimited access to all 25 Rosetta Stone languages and Sapphire learning tools. Visit rosettastone.com slash NPR and receive 20% off. This message comes from Prolon. Want to look and feel your best this spring? Prolon's five-day fasting-mimicking diet is a clinically developed nutrition program

with the goal of promoting fat loss while protecting lean body mass. Developed at USC's Longevity Institute, it aims to assist the body in entering a fasting-like state that helps reset metabolism, target visceral fat, and support healthy metabolic markers. Get 20% off plus a bonus gift when you subscribe at prolonlife.com slash NPR. This message comes from integrative therapeutics, makers of cortisol manager, named best overall aschraganda supplement by Vogue.

Use code Stress 2026 for 20% off of cortisol manager on Amazon.com.