Debunking the Exploding Mic + Left-Wing Murder in UK

My name is Charlie Kirk. I run the largest pro-American student organization in the country fighting for the future of our republic. My call is to fight evil and to proclaim truth. If the most important thing for you is just feeling good, you're going to end up miserable. But if the most important thing is doing good, you will end up purposeful. College is a scam, everybody. You've got to stop sending your kids to college. You should get married as young as possible and have as many kids as possible. Go start a turning point USA college chapter. Go start a turning point you would say high school chapter. Go find out how your church can get involved. Sign up and become an activist. I gave my life to the Lord in fifth grade. Most important decision I ever made in my life and I encourage you to do the same. Here I am. Lord, use me. Buckle up, everybody. Here we go. Noble Gold Investments is the official gold sponsor of the Charlie Kirk Show, a company that specializes in gold IRAs and physical delivery of precious metals. Learn how you could protect your wealth with noble gold investments at noblegoldinvestments.com. That is noblegoldinvestments.com. All right, welcome, everybody. It's the Charlie Kirk Show. It's July 22nd. 26. We are here at the Y Reefi Studios in Phoenix, Arizona. Honored to be with you all from sea to shining sea. And we get off with a bang here. We have Congressman Brandon Gill, who is one of the biggest, most exciting rising stars in the conservative ranks. And man, did he have a field day yesterday? Talking about the Smithsonian. and white supremacy and all kinds of fun things uh congressman welcome back to the show it's great to have you as always can you just tell our audience what this was even about first of all Yeah, thanks for having me. This was about the Smithsonian as an American institution that has been so deeply and thoroughly ideologically captured by the left. For the past several years, the Smithsonian has been pushing left-wing exhibits, left-wing ideologies. They've infused their entire museum, really, with a form of sort of cultural Marxism that looks at history through the lens of migration and through sexualism. and through things that have nothing really seriously or directly to do with history. And that's been a problem. And you can see that practically in exhibits that they put up where they'll show pictures of a man wearing bondage gear, you know, showing off all kinds of sexual fetishes, where they will promote, you know, the transgender Guatemalan activist, illegal alien who's trying to sway American elections, but then downplay are found. fathers. I mean, this is the kind of stuff that has gotten into this museum. And our goal in Congress is to oversee this institution and ensure that American tax dollars, especially dollars that are funding this or being well spent and that this institution is actually promoting American interests. Okay, so that's a great premise and a great setup. And I completely agree with your starting point that this is a captured institution. So any changes to bring balance to it?

They act like President Trump and the Trump administration and you guys in Congress are a bunch of fascists for trying to actually present something that isn't, you know, completely demoralized about the history of America. And that was the tell for me when I saw these clips coming through yesterday. And I have to say, and I want to compliment you on something because it's a very difficult needle to thread as a congressman. You are a clip machine. The team is telling me that like all over social media. Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, X, your clips go viral all the time. But I don't perceive any bit of you that's necessarily trying to do that. You don't get excited. You're not being brash. You're not being loud. You're not doing what Jasmine Crockett does and like taking on some, you know, Southern accent. You're just being direct with the facts. And I love these clips. So I'm going to play a couple for them and have you react on the other side. Satu. Would you say that the goal of history is to be objective? You know, I think that there are many goals of history, and certainly as you collect as we do, examine evidence, create scholarship. Is objectivity one of the goals of history? We strive to be objective and nonpartisan. That seem a little bit concerning. It certainly does to me because as part of this white supremacy document that your organization has promoted, objectivity is a... core in defining aspect of white supremacy culture. Do you think that it's the goal of the Smithsonian Institution to promote white supremacy culture? Are you promoting a white supremacy culture at the Smithsonian? Am I promoting a white? Ma'am, is this a difficult question? I love this. I'm not normally a big fan of congressional hearings, but you really make them something, Congressman Gill. So I remember, I recall what a lot of... what this hearing was sort of referring to, that white supremacy culture document that the Smithsonian had on their website where they say showing up on time, working hard, all these things are white supremacy. So we're almost two years into the second Trump administration here. So is, am I correct in understanding this stuff is still all over the place there? Can you lay out for our listeners? What is going on at the Smithsonian today? Is this stuff just still embedded? Yes, yes, it is. And that's the problem. It's that the people who are running the institution like Director Hardegger are still there and are still calling many of the shots. The original white supremacy document that the Smithsonian Institution had promoted, they then rescinded at one point and replaced it with another document that said basically the exact same thing. Objectively offensive things like objectivity is evidence of white supremacy culture, politeness, things like that. I think most Americans would find just beyond absurd. And the point of the questioning there was to kind of highlight that. I mean, for so long the left got away with labeling anybody as racist or as a white supremacist based on any possible...

assumptions they could make or any possible groundwork. So saying somebody is polite, for instance, under a left-wing worldview was evidence that they're a white supremacist. So you just ask these leftists just very directly whether that is what they believe. And I think it really exposes and highlights how... insane this is and that you know to a certain degree i don't think they even believe some of this stuff whenever they're kind of confronting you called him on it you said is it nice to be polite is it important she goes yes Well, then why is that? So are you a white supremacist? The list is obscene. And I remember covering this. And to Blake's point, I thought we were done with this. The fact that I'm hearing now from you that it's still embedded in these institutions shows that how successful their long march has been. We win a landslide victory electorally in. November 2024, and this stuff is still embedded. It's so difficult to get this stuff out. Is this another case where technically the Smithsonian is independent and nonpartisan, and so it's been 100% politicized, and it's very difficult to undo? Is there something we can do to fix this besides humiliating these people in Congress? Yeah, the Smithsonian, it's governed by what is supposed to be kind of a nonpartisan board. There are a few members of Congress on it, and some of whom have been very helpful with us in this. in putting together these materials. But Congress does have the power of the purse, and we do give them money every year, so we've got leverage over them there. And there are other ways that we can exert influence on the institution itself. And I think that that begins with exposing some of this rot. I think that obviously Director Hardig should be fired. But this does show that, you know, we like to talk about woke as dead. And that sounds good, but really woke is just kind of dormant right now. This is an ideology that the left is so married to. And you see that in DEI, and we've got a DEI hearing in about two hours. But you see the left is so married to DEI and other forms of wokeness that they're not just going to give it up because the law tells them to or because it's unpopular. This is something that we're going to have to keep fighting on. That's so important, Congressman, that it's just dormant. And it's especially in these places like the Smithsonian because these people get into these positions. They're like barnacles. And most people aren't thinking about who runs the Smithsonian, but they can just sort of go quiet, wait for the administration to turn over, and then out come the pride flags again if they win in 28. Of course. And people need to understand the Smithsonian is basically, you need to think of it as an appendage of the academy. These are all academics that run these things. And so if you ever do anything to offend their sensibilities, I could see if you actually made real changes at the Smithsonian, they will all boycott instantly and say, the Smithsonian's been ruined. It's too pro-America. It celebrates our history too much. It doesn't talk about, you know, how Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner, nearly enough. It's so obscene. I got to get to some more of these clips. And then I do want to hear about this DEI.

Okay, this one, okay. This is a longer clip, so I apologize. It's 50 seconds, but it's about Mickey Mouse. Mickey Mouse, a beloved American icon. We can't even enjoy Mickey Mouse anymore. Sot for. Is Mickey Mouse racist? Mickey Mouse is not racist. It's not racist. According to the Smithsonian Institution, one of your exhibits referenced Mickey Mouse is representing, quote, vestiges of longstanding traditions of blackface minstrelsy. Would you describe that as racist? No, the historical trajectory of the origins of Mickey Mouse. tie directly. So Mickey Mouse is rooted in racism. Is that your testimony? No, sir. It's rooted in minstrelsy. And you don't think the blackface minstrelsy is racist? It had certain unobvious racial overtones that have been well documented. Do you think that that's problematic that also has those racial overtones? It's not for me to determine what's problematic. It's determined to me what's accurate. Is that right? Yes. Sorry. I hope they have our mics muted because we're just sitting here laughing the whole time. So he's a giant racist cartoon, but it's not for me to say he's racist. He's just racist. And you pressed her each time she tried to qualify it and sort of lose you in the language. You just kept pressing it. It was brilliant. And I think that's why these clips are so powerful is because you're exposing the absurdity of the academics, the academy, and the way that they do this, the way that they undermine it with their little word. games uh your reaction watching yourself back congressman um well you know it's it's amazing she'll go down the road of you know we don't uh I'm not going to make any kind of normative judgment about Mickey Mouse being racist or not. Whenever the entire Smithsonian Institution makes moral judgments about our country and about all the perceived sins of the white man and the people who have run this country, I mean, that is the Smithsonian Institution today. But, you know, it's, again, it's another example of just how ridiculous this stuff is. I don't even know what it means to say that Mickey Mouse. is rooted in blackface minstrelsy. I don't, you know, honestly, I don't even know where they got that from. I think to most normal people, Mickey Mouse is just a cartoon that people like to watch whenever they're five years old and is kind of an iconic American figure. But for them to turn that into and try to slander kind of an iconic and very wholesome, by the way, part of American culture. I think rubs most people the wrong way. And it just does not withstand any scrutiny at all. And I think that's what I was trying to get there. I mean, if you're going to say Mickey Mouse is rooted in racism, then defend that. Explain to the American people why you think Mickey Mouse is racist. And by the way, I hope that Democrats embrace this stuff. Because if they do, we'll continue to win elections every single cycle.

Yeah, that's a really good point. And it breaks my heart on some level that they've gone so insane. And I don't even want to play these. Okay, I'll play one. The Jasmine Crockett stuff is, I don't know how you sit through these hearings with this guy. And I know she's going away. But still, let's just, I don't even, I'll just pick one because I know they're all obscene. This, well, this is short. So we'll give her a short one. Seven. Thank you, Mr. Chair. Welcome to the Republicans' white pride rally disguised as a congressional hearing. So speaking of DEI hearings that you're having, Congressman, I shouldn't lead you down astray like that. I mean, this feels beneath the office. I think as an American that still has... Respect for office holders, I still say Mr. President, Mr. Vice President. Even when Joe Biden was in office, I called him President Biden. Some people didn't like to do that. This breaks my heart as an American to see how she's so debasing the office that she holds. Yeah, it really is sad whenever you take a step back from this. I mean, we're holding a hearing on political bias at the Smithsonian Institution. And the best that Jasmine Crockett has to say is that this is somehow a white... Pride rally, which is an absolutely bizarre. I mean, if, you know, what we're saying is that you shouldn't have pictures of men in bondage gear in a history museum that's open to children. You know, the connection between that viewpoint and white pride is pretty... pretty far away from each other. But, you know, it will probably get more of that today at the DEI hearing. I mean, at some point, you know, the left genuinely doesn't have anything to respond to. They know that they can't go into a hearing and argue that you should have, you know, extremely sexually explicit material in a children's museum because nobody's going to be on their, like normal people are going to be against that. They know that, you know, slandering Mickey Mouse or calling all... polite people, white supremacists is insane. So they kind of just fall back on Republicans or holding a white pride rally. I mean, it doesn't really have to make any sense, but that's where they go. So one of the central promises, I think if you could say this, the spiritual promises, it was around the campaign of President Trump in 2024 was this. getting rid of DEI, extracting it from our institutions. So what specifically is you're hearing about today and give yourselves in Washington a scorecard of how we're doing so far two years into this? Yeah, the hearing today is with the president of the American Bar Association. Now, the American Bar Association is relevant because they set accreditation standards for law schools across the country, which means they have a lot of influence over, one, what admissions looks like at law schools, and they've been using that influence. to promote DEI, and then, two, the type of curriculum that law schools promote. And they also, if you're going to be a member of the ABA, you have to be a part of a continuing education series. All of those things are infused with leftism, especially with DEI. And that's what we're going after. And the reason that we're going after this is I believe that the president has done a phenomenal job of being very clear, through executive order, legally saying that DEI.

racial discrimination is illegal in the United States, and they've been going after universities that are still engaging in racial quotas and racial admissions processes. But it goes back to the same concept that these... Racial quotas and affirmative action in DEI is something that is so ingrained into colleges and universities and into the ABA that they're not just going to change that overnight. It's going to require constant pressure. And what we want to do is we want to expose the ABA, but I think that there are legislative solutions that we can propose after this hearing that can reduce the ABA's authority over law schools. And I think that's something we should pursue pretty aggressively as well. Yeah, it's a game of whack-a-mole because what you'll do, what they'll do is they'll change the name of their DEI program. We've seen lots of universities do this. And they'll use different words. They're experts at changing the meanings of words. That's one thing we know. Congressman Brandon Gill, thank you, my friend. And congratulations on just making a difference. You're doing great work. Please keep it up. And we'll talk to you again soon. If you're about to turn 65 and you're already on Medicare, this message is for you. Charlie cared about America's seniors. He was outraged that so many were paying too much for their Medicare coverage and getting less than they deserved in return. That's why he partnered with Chapter, and we're still partnered with Chapter. Chapter's licensed advisors search every Medicare plan to find what's actually best for you. The call is 100% free, no pressure, just... honest help. Seniors save an average of $1,100 a year with Chapter. They've already helped hundreds of our listeners enroll in better plans and they can help you too. So if you're nearing 65 or already on Medicare, make the call today. Dial pound 250, pound 250 and say Charlie Kirk to make sure you're in the best available plan. That's pound 250 and say Charlie Kirk or go to askchapter.org slash Kirk. We got Tyler Boyer, C-O-O of Turning Point Action in studio. Very excited to have him in the Y-Refi Studio. So if any of you caught our election stream net last night, you'll understand just how intimately aware of the details Tyler has been. As Andy Biggs had a historic win last night, this is great. Throw up this graphic, Tyler. This is the clean sweep graphic that we have. I just sent it to you. The clean sweep graphic. And congratulations to all. I don't know if that's the right one. So this is our federal races last night. So it just kind of, I mean, we'll hit the clean sweep once it comes up here. But we had a clean sweep of all turning point endorsed candidates statewide last night. Won their races. I don't know if we can throw that one up. The statewide's behind Andy Biggs. Andy Biggs had a historic night last night, really showcasing how the Republican Party can come together in a state in a conservative way. You know, again, that's one of the points that Charlie made. We showed those clips last night pretty regularly that, you know.

I see what the issue is. So they're thinking that heap lost and the graphics were wrong. Why don't we start there? No, it's a clean sweep. It's a heap. Heep won. Heep is up 11,000 votes right now. I should say. He's winning right now. Obviously, there's still more votes to count. There's two spots in that particular race. That's the confusion. Yeah, so let's, let's back up. So hopefully we can throw up the graphics because we'll be able to explain to the audience if the graphics up. But Andy Biggs led the ticket in a historic fashion. He is trending towards 75% of the vote. That's unbelievable. Just so you everybody understands. Andy Biggs outperformed incumbent Governor Doug Deucy in 2018 by... nearly five, six points. That's incredible. So, yeah, because he did face a primary challenge. In a real primary fight, too. Yeah, and a real primary fight. And, and Doug Deucey's primary opponent in 2018 was much weaker. I would argue than David Schweiker. David Schweiker was kind of historically known in Arizona. This is kind of just between the tea leaves here of the election as one of the most proficient election guys in Arizona history. He won against an incumbent Democrat to get into Congress, a former mayor. way back in the day, it was a different CD. So he's been known as a political genius, kind of iconic for a long time. It's been a long fall from grace, obviously, for David Schweikert. A lot of people last night said he made a terrible, terrible mistake by stepping down running for CD1 because he had the CD1 race. He could have just run for re-election, and he would have had all the support in the world. But, you know, Sometimes politics gets the better of people. He decided to run. We tried to tell him like, hey, you know, Andy Biggs is very popular. He's a very popular guy. And again, that was showcased. Down ballot, everything else was also showcased. So every person that turning point at a statewide level endorsed. That includes Alex Colleton for Secretary of State against the former AZGOP chair, Gina Swaboda, who had been endorsed by Trump for other things. Kimberly Yee, who was the top vote getter in 2022 for treasurer. She is running for superintendent. She actually knocked out an incumbent Tom Horn, who people had some concerns with him protecting school choice. Andy is going to make that a hallmark of his run. Elijah Norton, who's been a longtime backer of turning point. State treasurer. Former treasurer for the AZGOP. And the last one that we were kind of waiting on was Dr. Ralph Heap. So Corporation Commission is part of what sets the rates for the other big utility company in Arizona. In the left, we've talked about this a lot on the show.

There's APS, which is the other one in Arizona. So Arizona's really just two big utility companies. They set the rates for the other big utility company. They're one of the largest influencers in politics. So I cannot state this enough. Arizona Public Service APS influences elections more than any other singular entity in Arizona. And they had their guy, they usually back the incumbents. It's the safe place to be. The two incumbents were running that were Republicans are running together. And Ralph Heap was a Freedom Caucus guy, obviously the dad of Justin Heap, we mentioned this yesterday. It's the Maricopa County recorder. Who's super conservative, who's helped clean the voter rolls, do all those things, move Arizona in the right direction. He was running, and a lot of people were like, ah, there's no way that he has any kind of chance. He was endorsed by Turning Point. He's the only guy that we endorsed for Corporation Commission, and it looks like he's on a very clear pathway to be the second. Winner. Highest vote getters. But there's two winners. So that was the confusion. There's two. And so he's on his way, which means that all of our statewide candidates had a clean sweep. Warren Peterson running for AG, running against the incredibly politicized, terrible Chris Mays, who has done nothing but go after Trump, obviously. Gone after you. And for the audience that maybe isn't aware. She, you know, came after Tyler and the alternate elector schemes that stretch multiple states, right? You go back to 2020. There was a legal question of what was going to happen with the lawsuits, you know, and we didn't know. So they had to do alternate electors in case the lawsuits proved to be a successful. The quick, the quick, you know, recap of that is 2020. Yeah, they had screwed with elections so much. Nobody had any kind of faith following that. If you remember, there was about five or six states that, again, at 3 a.m. Yeah, serious questions. Clip from Trump to others, all within thousands of votes. So thousands of votes gave us Joe Biden. And, you know, Adrian Fontes, who is the Secretary of State that Alex Colleton is running against here, was at the tip of the spear of that because he was trying to send force, send everybody a mail-in ballot during COVID, which is illegal. And the courts shut him down. So you have three highly, you know, verging on criminalistic, you know, type Democrats that are running in Arizona. You have Katie Hobbs, who's under investigation for corruption today for pay-to-play schemes. So she's used her office to profit her friends. Number one. And she's under investigation by Chris Mays, who's the AG. who's attacking political opponents, including us, for obvious reason. She would love for us. She would love for me to be in jail right now so that we couldn't run an election against her. You know how insane that is? And then third, you have Adrian Fontes, who's literally one of the most progressive...

voices for a secretary of state in america trying to hijack mericopa county he was the mericopa county recorder got booted out of office by voters after one election because he did so many things to screw with the elections in arizona that people naturally organically removed him from office they put in stephen richer he was not very much better now we have just in heep so within four election cycles we have four different recorders in mericopa county but Adrian Fontes is that third so Arizona now has it locked in three conservative warriors to take out those three ultra-progressives. Huge. And this matters for the rest of America because the way that Arizona goes, this election is the way that America likely goes in 2028. Yeah. And the big, I think, reveal last night. with all of this is there was an ongoing question. We played these clips last night from Charlie talking about, you know, Andy Biggs is a known conservative, right? And the prevailing wisdom in the state of Arizona is that you needed to run a moderate in order to coalesce all the different, you know, wings of the Republican Party in this state. Well, guess what? Andy Biggs just had a historic, unifying primary victory. Exactly. And that tells you everything to know about where we've come. And I think it's worth emphasizing that because we've seen candidates who get the base very excited, but they can have an edge to them that'll make other people mad and you get a very disputed primary. Whereas Andy Biggs, he gets the base excited and they were excited and he sweeps to victory by 60 points. Nobody's upset because he's a gentleman. He's a stand-up guy. He's been in this state for decades. He's proven to. I guess all different factions of the party that he is a man of integrity, that he is a conservative, that he means what he says. And he's not braggadocious. He's not... brazen he's not like you said that edge like he's just a good strong man uh that and people believe him when he says what he's going to do so this is a huge turning point uh pun intended for the state of arizona because we've never seen the republican party this united around any single candidate and i think that is a testament to Andy Biggs's campaign that's a testament to charley and a testament turning point actions work in this and really that's not just here in arizona i mean that is true in arizona Like within the last 40 years, Andy Biggs did something historic yesterday. But this is true across the country. There is not a gubernatorial candidate that had more broad-based support, I would argue, this election cycle that had a competitive primary against that person in any state. Like you look at deep red states with people, incumbent governors. I mean, you have incumbent governors that had real strong primary challenges. We just saw this in South Dakota. The incumbent governor. what basically had one of the toughest challenges and wasn't even the top vote getter in the primary election. You have numerous examples of this. Andy Biggs is unifying and he's bringing everyone together and we're going to work and march towards November together. I love that. Hi, folks, Andrew Colvette here. I'd like to tell you about my friends over at Y Reefi. You've probably been hearing me talk about Y Refi for some time now.

We are all in with these guys. If you or someone you know is struggling with private student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call. Maybe you're behind on your payments. Maybe you're even in default. You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore. Why Refai will provide you a custom payment based on your ability to pay. They tailor each loan individually. They can save you thousands of dollars and you can get your life back. We go to campuses all over America, and we see student after student who's drowning in private student loan debt. Many of them don't even know how much they owe. YREFI can help. Just go to YREFI.com. That's the letter Y, then, refi.com. And remember, YREFI doesn't care what your credit score is. Just go to whyrefi.com and tell them your friend Andrews sent you. All right, Tyler, we got to hold the House. That is what the midterms is really all about on some level. I mean, I like our chances in the Senate a little bit better. We can focus on that too. But the House is the real question. And with less swing districts, kind of narrows the focus of where we need to be looking at. So where are you looking at right now? We start in Arizona. Yeah, so there's critical states. And Blake's pointed this out numerous times because the left started this entire war on redistricting. which started with Gavin Newsom, which is probably going to sink his political career, because if the Democrats lose the House this year, I think everyone's going to blame Gavin Newsom permanently. Probably forever. I'll go in the history books that Gavin Newsom became kind of the patsy for them on this. But once California started redistricting, all these other states started redistricting. So basically it eliminated. swing districts in every other random state. Basically, swing districts in any state that is not currently itself a hotly, like a divided swing state, which Arizona is. And the reason for that is because the only states are left. that half-swing districts are swing states themselves because the voter rolls are so close that there's no way for the right or the left to gerrymander their way out of it. Yeah, to manipulate their way out of it. So that's left. Arizona with two swing districts, which. We have an independent redistricting commission. We didn't redistrict. Nothing changed. But we've had those two districts that are on the verge, which was CD1, Jay Feely one last night. We like Jay Feely. Jay's awesome. He'll be on the show probably this week to talk about his race. He is well positioned. He had a really strong night. Everyone kind of agrees that he's a great candidate. And then you have Juan Siskiamani in CD6, who's also a great man, great dad, Hispanic heritage. great on the Mexico-US border, great Republican defending the board. He's one of the only Republicans that is a huge race. A border. Literally this race, I've just had this feeling that the house is going to come down to this race. I don't know why I feel that way, but it really, really could. And that's kind of how things trended out for 2024, too, if you remember. People are really watching these races. Then you have Iowa. You have Zach Nunn.

And you have Marionette Miller Meeks who are in their respective districts. And then... Do you remember Marionette Miller Meeks barely eking out that... What was it? In 2020. It was like 10 votes? Yeah. So we actually went out. We were one of the only organizations that did a Super Chase event, did a Super Saturday style event for Marianette Miller Meeks. She ended up winning by just a handful of votes. And so everything matters in those races. You then have... Derrick Van Orden in western Wisconsin, who the left is running a DSA-style candidate that's trying to be masked as this cutesy little, you know, young woman. Derrick Van Orden, this was Wisconsin 3. Yeah, Wisconsin. That is the race to watch. That is probably, in my opinion, going to be the determiner. I think that's actually a bellwether race. to watch. If we win that, I think we win Congress. If we lose that, I think we lose Congress. You then have other races and other swing states. So Michigan, you have the son of the sheriff, Bouchard, who's running to replace John James, who's running for governor. And then you have a race that was watched very closely that we actually participated in the last time in CD7. with Tom Amy Coney Barrett. Tom Amy Coney Barrett, who replaced Elissa Slotkin, who ended up winning. So this was how crazy last election was. Trump wins Michigan. Elissa Slotkin wins Senate. And Elissa Slotkin, the person that follows Elissa Slotkin, what do you call that? Successor. Successor. Yes, successor. Loses and the Republican wins. and cd7 so michigan is michigan's all uh over the place but michigan has to make up their mind it's very interesting because right now if they uh if the democrats nominate ds a supported social supported Abdul El-Sayed you have a real opportunity to see that I mean this will be the heart and soul of Michigan this time which is do you do you elect a normie Republican which Michigan is kind of known for for for many decades or do you nominate a socialist a socialist back candidate and and that is on its way Wisconsin We mentioned Derrick Van Orden, but you also have a really important governor's race there right now. And the DSA is supporting a candidate named Hong. She's like this little girl, totally DSA. I mean, she is full-throated, out in public, not even trying to hide it. Socialist. And Tom Tiffany, again, kind of normy guy, very similar to Andy Biggs in races. So. Both Freedom Caucus guys, both kind of normie. Tom Tiffany's great. Awesome guys. But they're really from their state. They're really representative of their state.

And then you have some other races, obviously, that are across the country. We're focused on New Hampshire. We think that New Hampshire is one of the most underrated Senate races with Sununu. You have a congressional district that's there that's right on the cusp as well with Anthony D. Lorenzo, who just got endorsed by the president, who's running for the same seat that Caroline ran for. uh love it caroline love it in new hampshire so and then so we got but that you're talking about new hampshire we got it we got to we got to get sununu We've got to get, and so that's New Hampshire, got to get Sununu elected, AZ. We've got to get Andy Biggs elected in Nevada. We've got to protect Joe Lombardo. Joe Lombardo is running for reelection as really one of the gyms of the RGA. He won, remember that flipped that seat. It was very close. Very tight. Last time. Yeah. Didn't we lose the, we lost the Senate? Adam Lacksall, barely lost, and Joe Lombardo barely won. And so this is really important for the future because, again, Nevada, Arizona, and Wisconsin are all on the same tracks with Senate races. There's no Senate race this year. Right. So you have three governor's races that you hope to win because there is no Senate race. And they're not, all these outside groups aren't dumping $100 million into each. Yeah. So that gives us a better opportunity because Dems have basically unlimited money, which is. another conversation for another day. Okay, commit 100, 10 seconds. Yeah, so pitch tpaction.com slash 100. You can sign up, you can pre-register now. We're going to be announcing this soon, but we need your help in Arizona, Nevada, and New Hampshire, but Arizona in particular, we'll have thousands of people out here with hotels and everything else. Yeah, you get a free hotel. All you get to do is talk to voters. It's a great, it's a great deal. TPaction.com slash 100. Thanks, Tyler. Clean sweep. if you could go back in time and buy oil before the world relied on it would you of course you would Anybody would. So why aren't you buying silver right now? The people who recognized oil early didn't just make money. They got ahead of one of the biggest economic shifts in history. And today, a similar opportunity is unfolding with silver. Silver is more than a precious metal. It's a critical resource used in solar panels, electric vehicles, defense systems, AI infrastructure, and the massive data centers powering that digital world. While demand keeps growing, it's still affordable enough that the average American can start accumulating it right now. That's why investors are turning to silver to protect against inflation and to own one of the world's most important strategic resources. Don't be the person who looks back in 10 years and says, I saw it coming, I just didn't act. Visit noblegoldinvestments.com slash kirk and learn how easy it is to own physical silver. That's noblegoldinvestments.com slash kirk. Own the metal. The future depends on.

We now have a very troubling tale out of the UK. And Blake has been all over this keeping me up to date as details emerge. At first, it seemed like it was a random murder. I'm not sure. I don't know if I ever thought it was a random murder. I would agree with you. The police tried to suggest it was a random murder. And as details unfolded, you were the one who kept pointing out to me, hey, Andrew, we need to pay attention to the story. It bears striking resemblance, at least in some ways. to what happened to Charlie. Exactly. And so here to help us break that down is a British guy that we love and we have on the show, because it is a UK story. Alan Bakari, he's with the Foundation for Freedom Online. He's a great guy, great expert at all things digital. So, Alan, welcome back to the Charlie Kirk Show. Hey guys, good to be back on. Allum. Thanks for joining us. Well, let's just dive right into this. I don't think the story's gotten the attention in the U.S. that it ought to. And I think that's partly because your own country's press is determined to not let this get too large. Tell us, tell our viewers, who was Ann Whitacom, if I said that right? And what happened to her? What have we learned over the last few days? So Anne Whittaker has been a fixture of conservative politics in the UK for many decades since the 1990s, in fact. She wasn't a particularly well-known figure in recent years. She wasn't highly visible as she was perhaps in the 2000s and 2010s, but she was still regularly... on British TV. She would advance conservative positions. She was known for being a staunch, unwavering social conservative. She opposed things like gay marriage and abortion. And because of this, she was often a popular hate figure amongst, you know, liberal UK talking heads, our version of late night comedy shows, that sort of thing. She's not someone you'd be a... And as we've, what happened in this story is she was, it's now emerged. She's been murdered. She was murdered by a, by what appears to be a radical communist. We're just now getting more details about this, the suspect, the, the person who's been charged in his political viewpoints. He attacked her at her home. She was alone in, in her home in, in the English countryside. And. And it's interesting, as you guys were talking about, how the police initially responded to it. They didn't initially suggest it was politically motivated. They suggested it might have been a robbery gone wrong. And the other thing they didn't do, which is very important, is they did not release the name of the suspect who has now been charged for many, many days. And now it appears like all of his social media has, if he had social media, it's gone like this. It's been scrubbed from the internet. So it's making it very difficult to find out, you know, for the public to find out information about this individual. Yeah. So.

What we now have learned, and correct me if I'm wrong, but this individual obviously went out of his way, traveled some distance to commit this murder. The weird part about it for me is that this first point you made, that she was sort of known as this staunch social conservative, against gay marriage, against probably all the trans insanity. Do we have any indication yet that this is what animated... her alleged killer here? Well, we certainly know a little bit about him. We know he had strong left-wing sympathies. There was a video circulating on social media earlier today. I'm speaking at a communist meetup some years ago. And, you know, various far-left literature was discovered at his house. Not even that, Allum. I'm looking at this is the sun, so I know it's a tabloid. Maybe they get ahead of themselves, but it says... Allegedly they had newspaper clippings of Nigel Farage and Reform, like, pinned to his wall. Like, you're thinking of, like, the meme from, what is it, the officer, like, always saying? Yeah, it sounds like a lunatic, basically, like pinning newspaper clippings to the wall of a guy you don't like. Almost like a hit list. Yeah. Yeah. That's terrifying, actually, because Nigel, as we know, is the leader of reform, which is the largest right-wing political movement in the UK. So this guy is almost fantasizing about his hit list, is what it would seem. It does seem that way. And this goes to like another point that Nigel Farage has made is that he's had to pay for private security. And I believe the UK Home Office only recently offered to give to up his security level, partly because of this murder, this murder of Anne Whitacom, who was also, by the way, a reform spokeswoman. So she was part of Nigel Farage's party. There's been some speculation that Nigel Farron, that this person would have preferred to target Nigel Farage, but his security was so good, was too good, so that, you know, Anne Whitakam was sort of an easier target. And also, Anne Whitcomb is the sort of person you'd only really know about, if you're like very plugged into politics, which this person certainly was. I'm just looking at the details in this case. Like in addition to it being to pray drove a very long distance, clearly was fixated on this person. The murder itself is horrifying. It's not coming out, bludgeoned her to death 21 times in the head with a hammer. This is a almost 80-year-old woman. She was out of politics. Out of politics. Well, she was on TV, but yes, she was not a member of parliament for the last 15 years. Right. It just... I'm thinking of like the equivalent. It would be the equivalent of someone in America, Phyllis Schlafly. She died a while ago. But if, you know, when she was in her old age, if someone had driven across the country to break into her home and murder. It reminds me of the White House correspondence dinner where this guy was in California. And he, what did he take a train and all this other stuff? Like goes all the way across country to go and try and shoot up.

where the president is at in the White House Correspondents Center. I mean, when you see that type of distance traveled, you know that there is a fixation on a particular target. You have to be motivated uniquely for this person. I think that's right. And I think, you know, Anne Whitcomb was some of, was one of these people that if you were like a far left, you know, a far left lunatic, she would be one of the people that you'd think of, who would come to mind as like a one of the most, you know, one of the most right wing people in the country, perhaps. You know, Nigel Faris might be more prominent. But if you're like a true political obsessive, you know, she's someone you might have known about. And as you said, the distance he traveled. clearly points to this being a targeted killing. And what he also said goes to the wider point, right? This is now a transatlantic international trend of political assassinations. Three assassinations attempts on the president, including during the campaign, the assassination of Charlie, of course. And there's so many other incidents of violence that we've been seeing in the United States, you know, attacks on ice facilities as well, on government buildings. And now it's crossed over to the UK as well, it seems. And on top of that, what stands out to me, she's most known as a social conservative. Now, correct me if I'm wrong, but social conservatism isn't that strong in the UK. She opposed abortion, but you guys have... liberal abortion laws that are not likely to change, even if reform were to win. You guys are not going to repeal gay marriage. At least in the U.S., social conservatives have won elections recently, but she was an outlier. This guy fixated on and just murdered her. I just can't get over how horrible this is. And then the police dragging their feet to say. The lack of outrage. And I mean, candidly, when we talk about these connections to Charlie's case, You had Tyler Robinson go from southern Utah drive all the way up to Orem. So this is a pattern. Almost the exact same distance, I think. Yeah. In both these cases. Over three hours. Yeah, I mean, which is just very weird, actually, in the UK. It's not like a road trip culture in the UK. You end up taking the train. It just, there's a lot of stuff here. And the real offensive part is just the media blackout, the silence. You have to go to social media to see anybody reacting to this in any sort of like with. You know, enough outrage that it deserves. We just got a great video of Anne Whitacom, the woman who was heinously murdered. We're getting it loaded ASAP. Oh, I think it's ready to go. It's her talking fittingly enough about the importance of freedom of speech and not getting triggered or upset by it. Clip 12. Now, only two sorts of people are pose free speech. And they are at opposite ends of the scale. Snowflakes. and totalitarians. Nobody has the right to live their lives being protected from offence or from insult or from hurt feelings. It is an occupational hazard of living in society. And if you really can't take it, become a hermit.

I think that's, I think that, was that literally in the Oxford Union there? The same place Charlie would have been speaking. Yeah, she stood right there where Charlie stood. There's a dark irony to that there, of course, because she says occupational hazard is you might hear things. But now in Britain, the occupational hazard is she spoke bravely for unpopular views that she believed in. And this guy, throw up that photo of him holding the candy again. Jack would be having a field day with this. He's got that smile. He's probably one of those guys who would say, kindness is everything. Have you ever tried not being a crappy person? Love is love. And it sounds like he went and committed a depraved murder against freedom of speech. I just can't get over that. I'm a really woman, too. By the way, I just love her. I have to say I just love her. She is everything I love. I can tell I would have loved her. I describe myself as an anglophile, actually. I mean, I can't stand England nowadays, but. But I love the British culture, and I love the history of England that spread it all across the world, big fan of it. They are the absolute best building blocks for a civilization. It makes me so sad that she is an inheritor of that. Britain had women like that, and you can see her, and she makes such a great argument. She can present herself so well, and they chose something radically different. So I want to take this Zoom out, Alam. I feel like this is just the latest horrific crime that has... a political valence to it in Britain. We already had that murder of that young man who was stabbed to death, Andy Novak, and Henry Novak. And all of this, what's the overall situation? You guys have a new prime minister, Andy Burnham. Are we still, are we hopefully trending towards positive changes in Britain? My understanding, you can correct me if I'm wrong, is that Burnham is not going to correct the trajectory of Keir Starmer's falling government. No, I don't think he will, and he's already U-turned on some of his proposals. He wanted to raise the tax-free income cap, and then he backed down on that, probably because of pressure from permanent bureaucrats at the Treasury. And, you know, he said he's going to scrap a digital ID scheme. He's not really going to scrap. He's going to rename it. I think he's going to be very limited in what he can do. I'll tell you what concerns me. This murder happened to a reformer spokeswoman are conservative. before, you know, while reform is not even in government, there's no right-wing party in government right now, it's the left-wing Labour Party. I worry what might happen if reform actually does win the next election, how violent the response will be. We saw how the election of Donald Trump kicked off a wave of violence in the US with the attacks on.

on ice facilities, on Tesla, on the fire bombings of Tesla stores, all of these things. It's interesting that we're already seeing violence directed against reform officials, reform spokespeople. when they're not even in government. So there's probably going to be at least two or three more years of Labor government in the UK. And I wonder how this will escalate if reform maintains its lead in the polls and wins the next election. And I know you guys live tragically in a totalitarian nation, the Brits. Is there any... Anything that these lawmakers or these prospective reform in government people could appeal to to defend themselves? Can you get a gun if there is a chance someone will break into your home and try to kill you with a hammer? Can they obscure their address or something? I mean, it's obscene that this guy found her too, by the way. Yeah, it's pretty difficult to buy a gun even for self-defense in Britain. Nigel Farage obviously has security, but there are so many other people in Reform and on the right to lower down the ranks and won't have that level of protection. Maybe they should now. It might be a good idea. But there's the level, the response to the killing as well is what's disturbing. So many people were celebrating it on social media. There was a very muted response in the press as well, partly because of that delay in the police confirming whether or not who the suspect was initially and what his potential political motivations might have been, or not confirming even initially that it was a premeditated murder. And this meant that there was a series of days that went by when the picture wasn't exactly clear. And that sort of gave the media and gave left incommonated the space to just ignore the story or just have a muted response to it. And especially with the trend of violent attacks continuing in the US, we saw that attack on the ice facility in New York just a few days ago. You can see this trend continuing, unfortunately. I'm looking now. I just searched. I basically just searched Whitacom on X, and I'm finding there's freaks on Blue Sky. Heather Herbert is going back to sleep. I don't know if that's her name, but she says some, it's a link to the murder, and she says, some good news for once. I hope it was an extremely painful death. There is something wrong with the left. There's something very wrong with the left in the UK. And we're grateful you came on. We... So many Americans, we care about the fate of our mother country, the country that birthed so many of the liberties we value in America. But we can tell that the clock is ticking towards midnight to save this country because there's a lot of very bad people doing very bad things.

We don't have that many people like Anne Whitacom. Yeah. Alan, thanks for joining us. We appreciate the insight here. And yeah, we pray for safety of everybody in the UK and in the U.S. We have the same problem. Alan, talk to you soon. Thank you, guys. For nearly 3,000 years, Homer's The Odyssey has shaped Western imagination. It tells the story of Odysseus as he faces monsters, shipwrecks, false comforts, and impossible choices on his long journey home. As one of the foundational works of Western literature, Homer's epic is more than a mythology, it explores permanent questions about courage, duty, loyalty, family, leadership, temptation, and the search for home. In one of the epic's defining moments, Odysseus rejects the offer of immortality from the goddess Calypso, choosing instead the long and difficult journey home. His decision reveals one of the central themes of the Odyssey that a life of duty, family, and home is greater than a life devoted to comfort or glory. Achilles chose glory. Odysseus chose home. That's why Hillsdale College has released its newest free online course, The Odyssey, taught by Professor Benedict Wayland. The course reveals why Homer's masterpiece remains one of the greatest works of Western literature. Find this free course at Charlie for Hillsdale.com. That's Charlie for Hillsdale.com. Read the classics, study the West. The Odyssey from Hillsdale College. Go to Charlie for Hillsdale.com. All right. Without further ado, I want to bring in a guy I'm just getting to know, and I'm really impressed by him. And he's a former Army Ranger sniper. He's an explosives expert. His name is Matt Tardio. He is also the host of Speak the Truth podcast. So he goes into a lot of the detail we're about to go into now on his show. So please check it out. Matt, welcome to the show. It's great to have you. Thanks for having me. So just as a starting point here, and then we're going to get into the meat of this, we're going to be talking about some of this evidence. And we're going to be talking about what Rob O'Neill has said publicly. He is a SEAL Team 6 that was involved in the shooting of Osama bin Laden. So, you know, we have a lot of respect for his service to our country. We're not attacking that. But he's basically raising issues or questions he has about Charlie's assassination. As a starting point, establish your background, your CV. Why should we listen to you as an expert on these things? So I did, you know, I spent about 16 years in the military before I was medically retired, started off my career in the infantry, was Ranger qualified, was a sniper section leader in the infantry, and then went to the Special Forces selection and became the United States Army Green Beret. Got SF sniper qualified while I was there. I have roughly four years of combat. In total, underneath my belt, missions against al-Qaeda, ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Iraq, you know, things like that. I'm seeing places like East Africa, Middle East and Ukraine before people even knew where it existed.

So you've got a pretty impressive resume there, and you understand ballistics, you understand explosives. So I'm going to play this clip. There's actually two clips because he's done it twice. It's gone on Newsmax, and he said the following, SOP 14. It's not like I'm out there saying big lie or a conspiracy or someone did it. I'm just saying this thing looked shady off the bat. I mean, just I've killed people closer than I saw the camera. And I've never seen a shirt move like that. That looks like an explosion to me. I'm a CEO Team 6 sniper. I'm asking a lot of questions. No one wants to answer him. Okay, so that was a couple months ago. The clip gets dredged up on social media as if it was breaking news, but it was actually a couple months old. So he got asked about it again on Newsmax. This was just yesterday, SOP 15. I don't think Charlie Kirk got shot the way they're saying. That's all. As a sniper with a bunch of kills up close and Jack having, I don't do the research on this either, but Jack has zero. So let me be the man in the room for a second. He looked off. It looked off. It seems like a cover-up. That's it. I'm not saying who did it. I don't mean, if their guy did it, as a sniper, someone with kills, I saw that happen. Wow, that looked off. I don't like re-watching it. I knew Charlie Kirk. This isn't fun for me, but I'm not going to just see something and have a bunch of people with no experience really killing people telling me that I'm wrong. I'm not wrong. Matt. Is he wrong? Yep, he's wrong. Yeah. And, you know, I understand where he's coming from when I first saw it as well. I had originally thought the shot ended up coming from behind. And then I immediately ended up withdrawing my statement within a couple hours based on everything that's coming out. I have any experience in shooting people. That's not an excuse for saying that I haven't seen anybody's shirt come up like that. Most of the time, that's not exactly what you're paying attention to when you're in the middle of business. But yes, he is dead wrong in all of those statements that he's making. Minus that, you know, it looks off. But once you understand terminal ballistics, you start to understand what actually ended up happening after that. And, you know, going through military sniper courses, you get a lot on internal and external ballistics. What the projectile is doing inside of the rifle once it leaves the rifle and it's flying through the air. But once it ends up going over and impacting your intended target. that's where things start to get a little bit of wonky. And there is not a lot of information that's out there on it, but there is also a lot of information out there if you know where to look, specifically when it goes down to these types of rifle cartridges and what ended up happens when they impact flesh. So, Matt, let's dive into that because a lot of the weird theories, they've kind of taken two, I'd say the core strands, people essentially claiming. The bullet, the 30-odd-6 round would not be capable. It would have to leave an exit wound. And so, therefore, the wound that killed Charlie could not come from that. And then also people, again, they're fixating on T-shirts and how it moves. Exploding mics or whatever. Exploding microphones would do this. So.

I guess that's what your post on X that we saw dove into. Can you dissect some of the the science, the unfortunate grisly science here of why we can be confident that it was a bullet acting the way a bullet would that caused this all to happen? Yeah, so we can go ahead and we can get rid the exploding microphone theory right off the bat. That got revived by man, goes by name of John Bray, thoroughly debunked them. People are welcome to go over to my ex profile and take a look to work. At the end of the day, even half a gram of petting, the amount of petin that's in there in a shaped charge, explosives work. equally, right? They're basically omnidirectional when they end up going off. And that little half gram of petin ends up exploding into a gase space of about 400 cubic inches instantaneously at over 8,000 meters a second. That means that little plastic microphone underneath the shirt would have instantly been gone long before anything ended up reaching his neck. It had blown a hole in his shirt easily the size of that microphone. And there'd be clear signs, clear signs of some damage to his tissue. So that within itself. didn't happen. All right. We can we can just start off there. A shape charge is not a magical charge. It's been around since the late 1800s. All right. And it's been it's been studied ever since. It's used in RPGs. It's used in lots of different things in the defense industry. If there was a way to focus all the explosive energy into a single, you know, jet that that doesn't have any sort of opposite and equal reaction, right? Newton's laws of physics that we're talking about here. Please let me know and also allow the people in the fields of physics to know that as well because you are introducing a fourth dimension. So, yeah, and when we start talking about the actual projectile itself, okay, the one of that we believe he used, it hasn't came out wholly in the court of law yet. So this is speculation, but it's, it's well-based speculation based on the photographs that ended up getting shared in his pretrial. Those most certainly appear to be Remington 150 grand Corlock ammunition. That particular projectile for the 30-on-6 has been around since the late 1930s, all right? It doesn't use modern-day bonding. techniques. It's got a soft lead point and it's got a thin copper jacket that wraps around it. The reason you have to have that thin copper jacket is because that lead would basically be disintegrated if you were just shooting it out at the barrel at the velocities that we shoot these things out. That thin copper jacket also helps create a seal. And it's actually, you know, if you were to take that projectile on measure, it's actually slightly larger than the bore of the barrel. So it gets squeezed down that barrel and it slightly deforms it. And as it's being squeezed down that barrel and it slightly deforms it. You know, you have an issue that goes into the actual overall balance of the projectile itself. These elongated projectiles are very front heavy as opposed to back heavy. And no matter how much we'd like to, we can't perfectly balance these things out. So with the improper balance along with it being squeezed out the barrel, you end up getting what's called yaw that happens when this projectile is flying through the air.

that yaw causes it not to spin in a tight spiral like a football but kind of to slightly wobble at the nose and depending on where that wobbles out when it ends up impacting the target that creates you know different effects in terminal ballistics now this projectile itself is designed to essentially mushroom out is the term people like to you know bring up it's designed to mushroom out at soft point the reason they do that is so that they expand and it creates more drag you know soldiers whine a lot about the 556, the green tip, the armor penetrating rounds that we have that were standard for the military for a very long time. Just zipping right through guys. I've shot people with them and just watched them fall down and get right back up. The reason is because you're just punching holes in them. It's essentially taking an ice pick and going in it. There's no energy transfer. So the reason you have these is because that they create much more energy transfer by opening up and biting into more meat. That projectile itself that we just saw those pictures up that's up on the screen. End up opening up the moment it comes into contact. Yeah. Yeah, bring that up. There we go. So here we can see that that copper jacket that has opened up. Now, with the study that was done back in the 1960s of over 5,000 casualties from World War II and from Korea, they ended up determining that Yaw ends up being the most distinguishing factor in terminal ballistics overall. And within... within just three inches all right within just three inches of flesh and this is using full metal jacket rounds not ones that mushroom out and create more drag within just three inches of flesh it can actually tumble up to 90 degrees so you have that very thin copper jacket as it's mushrooming out and then it's just going to rip apart and we're also talking about lead here lead it is a very soft metal In general, when it's just room temperature, it's soft. You can pick away at it with your thumbnail. When you shoot that thing down a barrel, it starts superheating it from the friction of the barrel. And as it's flying through the air, all the friction from the air also gets that round really nice and warm. It gets really hot. Once things start to heat up, they start to become a little bit more malleable, particularly lead and brass and copper. So when that stuff ends up hitting. all right it's it's not hitting with the full strength as it would if you were just sitting there tapping at room temperature it's actually a little bit more malleable all of that ends up creating that jacketed yaw that that goes that that energy dissipation that ended up taking place that full stop within the neck 100% is proven within this one photograph right here of how that went down I just want to say to the audience, I'm sorry that we're talking about this candidly. We talked about it a lot during the preliminary hearing. It's an unfortunate thing that we have to do because there are, and again, I'm not trying to disrespect Rob O'Neill's service. I have a great respect for his service to the country. But this becomes fuel that is then taken and they run with it. And next thing you know, Erika Kirk's being accused of something heinous. Okay. So we have to deal with the actual science and the facts. And we have to have responsible people like Matt who know this inside and out. And our experts on this topic shed light on it and debunk this stuff as it comes up. It's like whack-a-mole. I mean, we have to emphasize this. The goal of a lot of people pushing this is they want Tyler Robinson to get off because they have all of this out there in the miasma. And someone will get on the jury and be unconvincible.

Hi folks, Andrew Colvette here. I'd like to tell you about my friends over at Y Refi. You've probably been hearing me talk about Y Refi for some time now. We are all in with these guys. If you or someone you know is struggling with private student loan debt, take my advice and give them a call. Maybe you're behind on your payments. Maybe you're even in default. You don't have to live in this nightmare anymore. Why Refai will provide you a custom payment based on your ability to pay. They tailor each loan individually. They can save you thousands of dollars and you can get your life back. We go to campuses all over America, and we see student after student who's drowning in private student loan debt. Many of them don't even know how much they owe. YREFI can help. Just go to YREFI.com. That's the letter Y, then refi.com. And remember, YREFI doesn't care what your credit score is. Just go to whyrefi.com and tell them your friend Andrews sent you. Okay, so we have this clip here, Matt Tardio, former Army Ranger sniper, four years of combat experience, an explosives expert who has, I'm so grateful to voices like yours, Matt, because you have stepped into the breach when you didn't have to. Nobody made you do this. I didn't even know you at all. I reached out when I saw your analysis on bullet yaw and things like this, explaining. The ballistics behind this and the signs behind it. But you have done a brave thing. And I just want to thank you for that, genuinely. And I think it's so critically important. We've got this B-roll from a guy named Valhalla, I guess, who's a, you're aware of who this person is. I'm not. He's trying to emulate, I guess, the angle, the trajectory, the caliber of round with a pig. Why don't you explain what we're about to see and what you actually think the takeaways are from this? Yeah, so I actually had a phone call with his name's Nate. So I actually had a phone call with Nate the other day and talked to him specifically about this. Nate's stance on this, contrary to how everybody likes to spin it, is he actually does think that there is a chance that it could have stopped in the neck, particularly after doing this. Now, this animal itself has been gutted. All right. It has been gutted prior to. It was freshly killed, but it has been gutted. Within the neck, it's missing a lot of fluids, okay, that end up going in there. And it's also missing a lot of, um, How do you want to say internal parts that would have normally been in there when he ended up shooting it? The one big takeaway that he ended up saying, actually, in my opinion, goes to validate the paperwork that I actually ended up publishing, which shows within the first four inches. And you're going to hear this out of Nate's mouth, you know, at some point this video, if you guys go watch it. Within those first four inches, it actually ends up dissipating most of the energy within it. Now, that's without the fluid. And fluid dynamics is actually one of the most important things that goes into internal ballistics or excuse me, terminal ballistics.

to end up striking the target. Now, the one thing that Rob O'Neill had stated was he didn't understand how Charlie's shirt could have puffed up like that. And I believe his exact statement was the vapor trail could have possibly caused the shirt to puff up. But the clip that I ended up sending to you earlier with the timestamp does, in fact, show the air displacement from that projectile flying through the air. When it ends up striking that pig's neck, you will see it puff all over the grass over behind the pig. All right. So I guess our team actually stripped out some of the audio so we could react to it live. So I don't know if we can put this up, but it's the B roll here. And I think they added a slow most. This is him up on a, on some sort of lift. And he's shooting down with the 30-od six. I think he's trying to emulate the angle that would have been, you know, at the low C center down into the amphitheater. And he's shooting the pig. And so you're, you're. drawing our eye specifically to the moving, the rustling of the grass. And what is, repeat again, what, what is your takeaway from that as a terminal ballistics expert? So, all right. So when you start talking about, you know, sniping long-range shooters, they've all seen this phenomenon. And for you guys that haven't seen this, It's something that's called spotting trace. It's not a phenomenon. We know it's happened. The bullet's cutting through the air. It's displacing air as it's flying through the air. As it's doing that, it's pushing it out of the way. Okay, air can actually compress. Okay. And it can compress to a point to where it actually can start fires, believe it or not. And so as that bullet's cutting through the air, that's what it's doing. And it's pushing and it's moving it. When you're getting shot at those bullets are flying pretty close to your body, you can feel them going past you, the air being moved. And so what you're witnessing is that projectile goes and it impacts that neck, is that air is still moving, you know, and being pushed by that projectile up into the point of impact. Once it does so, It's still in motion, right? Again, we're arguing with laws of physics or they are. Okay, that projectile still in motion, so is that air. It just doesn't magically stop when the projectile ends up impacting its intended target. So that air then goes and it hits and it flows almost like water around that neck. And what ends up happening, believe it or not, that air can actually compress as it's going around because it's hit, it's hit a certain object and it's allowing it to flow around. And that air will actually continue to compress until it comes out the other side when it dissipates. And that's actually what happened with Charlie Kirk shirt. So, yeah, again, I hate even, we're not going to obviously show any of those images, but that seems to be their central critique. So we know that air compresses, by the way. Anybody who's flown on an airplane knows that as like an object's moving forward, it pushes the air out. That's what creates the pressure underneath the wings that gives a plane. It's lift, right? Yeah. So we know that air moves. It's, you know, it's not this invisible thing. It actually has mass. This, I wanted to go back to this write-up. And by the way, Matt did a phenomenal write-up. I just want to give one small.

graphic warning at the end you're proving it's a gunshot wound and there is a frame and I just I want to say so if you look up this report the science is excellent and it is a refutation of a bunch of this stuff that's floating around so I just want to give a if anybody looks that up I just want to Fair warning. And I understand why you did it, Matt. It has an image of Charlie being shot. Yeah, but just a still frame of it to prove that visually it looks like exactly what you're describing here. And I understand why you did it, Matt. I'm not mad at you. Yeah, yeah, exactly. It's hydrostatic shock. It's what it's extrapolated in ballistics gel, which people like to point to. And I can tell you that ballistics gel is not equal to human flesh. And I think that's the next important thing that we've got to address is it's just not equal. Okay, go there. But yeah, fair enough. That's why it's there. Yeah, ballistics gel is an equal. Yeah. Okay. I mean, we're a little short in time. It's going to take a hot minute to be able to get that out. But 120, I'll say this. Yeah, go ahead. No, you go for it, Matt. The floor is yours. All right. So, 124 grain, 9 millimeter hydroshock ammunition penetrates roughly 12 to 15 inches. of ballistics gel. The 30-od-6 core lock ammunition goes through about 16 to 17 inches of ballistics gel. One individual I saw that got shot in a face with that 9mm round. Okay. And again, it's 12 to 15 inches versus 16 to 17 inches. Okay, a penetration of ballistics gel stopped within this guy's skull. All right. It didn't exit his face. It went into his cheekbone and then it stopped within his head and roughly estimating, you know, just a couple of inches of worth of penetration on that. So 12 inches of ballistics gel, a couple inches of human flesh. Yeah, they're not the same. Matt Tardio, please check out his stuff. He's doing great work and he's a brave fighter for truth. Speak the truth is his show. Thank you so much, Matt. And thank you to the audience for bearing with us as we correct the record. It's important. For more on many of these stories and news you can trust, go to charliekirk.com.