"An unprecedented combination of callousness, incompetence and surrealness"

After an exquisite summer, you deserve your beauty rest. This Labor Day, save it to $1,000 off select Beauty Rest black mattresses and adjustable bass sets featuring pocketed coil technology for our most advanced motion separation. Visit beautyrest.com to find a retailer near you. You know that thing where you get an amazing pair of shoes at a really great price and want to tell everyone about it? Yeah, so do we. Here at Designer Shoe Warehouse, we'll give you something to brag about. Like the latest styles from brands you love, or the trends everyone's obsessing over. Or shoes that make you feel like, well, you. So go ahead, show off a little. Buying shoes that get you have prices that get your budget. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. DSW. Let us surprise you. Hi there, everyone. It's 4 o'clock in the East in covering a presidency that is every single day summed up by its... unprecedented and unparalleled combination of callousness, incompetence, and surrealness. Donald Trump and his administration have managed to outdo themselves today, likely endangering national security, his own staff, and the journalists whose job it is to cover all of them in the process. Alarming new reporting finds that Donald Trump used his own staff and White House journalists as decoys amid security threats from Iran. having them fly out of Turkey on the Old Air Force One while Donald Trump flew out on a separate unmarked aircraft. Donald Trump pulled this off by being smuggled in a catering truck, if you can just let your brain try to picture that, to his separate unmarked aircraft. Washington Post, who broke this news, reports this, quote, Trump boarded the old Air Force One jumbo jet in view of the television cameras. He was secretly shuttled minutes later to a smaller plane, an Air Force C-32A via an airport catering truck typically used to load meals and other supplies pre-flight, according to a U.S. official and corroborating material reviewed by the Post. That made Air Force One a decoy with media and some White House staff aboard. The maneuver meant that Trump's actual location was concealed from the American public and many senior U.S. officials for hours. Weeks later, it remains unclear how widely the administration has disclosed the operation. The Washington Post found pool footage showing Donald Trump boarding Air Force One, a catering truck then pulls up to the plane and moves over to what we now know was the plane Trump ended up departing Turkey on board. Both planes then landed in the UK, and Trump was then secretly moved back onto the old Air Force One to keep up the ruse.

He then disembarked in full view of reporters and boarded his Qatari-donated Air Force One, the big fancy one, to return to Washington. At the time, it was reported that Trump would be leaving Turkey on the old Air Force One rather than the Qatari Air Force One due to security threats from Iran. What is new here is that we're now learning for the first time that Trump flew on neither aircraft. In fact, he departed on the third plane. Trump vehemently denied the reporting about the reasons behind the first switch that we knew about at the time when pressed by reporters on the ride back to Washington. Reporters who were unaware, they had just been used as decoys by the President of the United States. Watch that with this new information in mind. Which? What was the security? Is there in the process to change like? Send this one in. So that the airport space here was in the same exact line. So you're saying there wasn't a security concern? To know how they have it was. Well, yeah, because you're probably on a dangerous leg because of the sleaze bags that we have to deal. Same thing that Iran was possibly. I'm talking about it. If they asked you to close the witness, probably they didn't ask it and close Biden. But they did, I wouldn't have done it. These are sick people. So I could see something like that. I didn't know they did that, but I could see something. Were you friends any credible friend by and all of the time? I'm number one on their list before you. But if I go, you go. So perhaps somebody want to change professions. If I go, you go. When he said it and knew it wasn't true, right? He'd just been shuttled off the plane that the press he's talking to right there were on. So when he says, quote, if you go, if I go, you go, he knows he's lying. An elaborate, elaborate fabrication. A lot of unnecessary steps there are taken to sustain the lie. In a statement to the New York Times, the White House said, quote, they use every tool at our disposal, including distraction and misdirection to address threats against the president. Donald Trump engaging in an extraordinary act of deception as the latest proof that he's lost complete control of the war with Iran is where we begin today. With New York Times White House correspondent Maggie Haberman. She's the author of the bombshell bestseller regime change. She confirmed the operation for the Times after the Washington Post first broke this story. She also is one of the journalists who first reported about the security threat. And one of the reasons we know about it. Also joining us, Ned Price is here. He served as an official in both the State Department and the CIA. And with me for the hour, former assistant special agent in charge at the FBI, National Security and Intelligence analyst Michael Feinberg's here. Maggie, just untangle this web of perhaps a legitimate security threat. Let's give them the benefit of the doubt.

and then a rather unparalleled deception involving White House staff and press. And, oh, by the way, subpoenas for five New York Times journalists in the middle of all this. Just unwind and unpack all that for us. We put it that way, well, thank you for having me. And it's my colleagues and I confirmed what was pretty much noncham reporting from the Washington Post and the tip our hat for them. But yes, you know, what looks like one thing at the time. The president taking an older Air Force one, you know, for old time's sake, in his words, the press only knew about this, the public only knew about that because he announced that he was doing it. And then they got questions. And then the White House Communications Director gave that statement about doing everything they can to protect the president, including misdirection and distractions and misdirections, which was a little strange. Then it turned out that, you know, within 24 hours of the New York Times is reporting about the fact that there had been a concern by government officials about the president taking the Qatari gifted jet, which does not have the same defensive capabilities. As the older Air Force One models, the reporters on the story, my colleagues, faced subpoenas, not subpoenas that were delivered through counsel, but FBI showing up people's homes, which is not normally how this is done, and subpoenas are not supposed to be the very first stop on the road in leak investigations. Those subpoenas don't exist anymore, but what now turns out is that the president wasn't even on that plane. Now, our reporting is that there was a credible threat. We don't know what the threat was, Nicole, so it's hard for me to assess what I don't know. I'm not an intel official. They deemed a credible, and there is reason to believe that they did. The behavior indicates that they did. But what then ends up happening is, and they are always going to put the president's safety first, what ends up happening is the press and some of his own staff end up on the older Air Force One, which does have defensive capabilities, which certainly would be safer than the Katari jet in that moment. The president could have in that clip that you showed where he was briefing reporters. on the Qatari jet that they got aboard and was flying from the UK base, which was deemed safer than the Ankara airport in Turkey, flying back to the U.S. to Joint Base Andrews, he could have said, we had a concern, we had a threat. I was on a separate plane. He could have told reporters off the record. The White House could have told reporters off the record. None of that happened. Instead, there is this gamesmanship where he's sort of taunting and saying, you know, if I go, you go. And that was not the case in that moment. Again, I want to stress, I understand that the federal government is rightly going to be more worried about the president than it is anybody else. But there are tradeoffs, and that was one of them. Maggie, I mean, do you now think that the subpoenas were...

to find out if you guys knew where he really was or if they were to ascertain. I mean, does it make you... wonder what the subpoenas were for in the first place? It's a good question. And I can't say that I fully understand it. You know, the Times was not the only outlet that reported some of this material at the time. Maybe there were subpoenas to other news outlets and we weren't aware of them. I don't know. But it mostly seemed to be from my understanding. And again, maybe there is more here. Clearly, there's always a lot more that we don't know when it comes to this particular government. But they are very good at creating these displays of openness. Jonathan and I wrote about this in regime change. And in fact, it's just a show. It's a spectacle. They're very good at keeping secrets when they want to. And this was one they tried to. But I don't know if the secret they were attempting to keep was this or if they were just generally trying to intimidate from further reporting in general. We know that this president likes secrecy and does not like information getting out of his government unless he sanctions it. It could be, you know, answer D, all of the above. I don't know. And, Maggie, I was on the other side of the relationship, but. I can't imagine a situation where you do not level up with the White House pool and the White House press corps that travels with you. Obviously, on September 11th, it was an extraordinary event, and not all the press went on with President Bush. He ended up in Nebraska. But they were not used as a decoy, one, and they were made aware of what was happening and why. So both the security threat. that the towers had been hit, the Pentagon had been hit, and there was an obvious threat to the president, and the fact that we weren't going to send them up in a plane so that whoever was attacking the country that day thought the president of the United States was on it when he wasn't. I cannot fathom that practice, and I wonder if it makes you rethink, or your colleagues rethink the relationship with this White House. I think we're pretty clear that this White House doesn't like the press. And beyond that, does not really think much of the public's right to know and doesn't see the press as anything more than a means to an end for what President Trump personally wants. And I don't think that that is new here. I think that that has been pretty consistent the whole time for this presidency. I think in the first term, I think you did have people who at least recognized some role of what government is supposed to do. And they do at times have that. I don't want to, you know, suggest that this relates to every single thing. Not everything is, is completely binary. But in this instance, you know, and there have been others, to your point, it's not unheard of that there would be some kind of Sutterfuge involved to try to keep a president safe. But presidents, to your point, traveled, President Bush traveled with reporters, albeit a slim down press pool.

After 9-11, presidents have taken reporters with them, including this president in his first term, into war zones. Reporters end up making an agreement beyond the understanding of good faith with White Houses that we will keep this off the record until we land or until we are in a specific spot. And then the public is informed. What this speaks to is this broader idea of secrecy, which is a huge hallmark of this government. In a way that personally, I have never seen with a federal government or frankly, any other. Ned, let me pull you in because you had a job more recently than I had a job in sort of whether you liked what the press was reporting about your boss or not. When they travel with a principle, you are, I mean, Maggie used the word good faith, but you are bound to sort of return them safely and or, in a minimum, be transparent when there are threats. But this putting... the second Air Force one into the sky as a decoy. And then the elaborate, I mean, Donald Trump is someone who refused to go to a cemetery when it was raining because he didn't want to mess up his hair. And the thought of him climbing into a catering truck, I mean, suggests that the threat was real. And we don't have any reason to doubt that. And it is also true that if it was that real, that he switched planes twice and climbed into a catering truck, the press and the staff had a right to know about it. Absolutely, Nicole. Look, both when I was working at the White House and more recently at the State Department, we would always tell our traveling press for that, look, there may be tension in this relationship, there may be occasional acrimony, but we're. part of the family. You're part of the family. We're responsible for your safety and your security when you're traveling with us, whether that's to cover the president, the Secretary of State, or anyone else. And listening to both you and to Maggie talk about what transpired on the way back from that summit, I'm reminded of a sort of set of Russian nesting dolls of lies. It was a lie inside of a lie, inside of a lie, starting with what struck so many of us as odd at the time, the idea that President Trump would fly back on the legacy Air Force One so that the troops in the UK could gaze up at the splendor and majesty of the gift he had just received from the royal family in Qatar. That didn't sound like this president, but... So be it. And there were subsequent lies, of course, the threat reporting regarding Iran, the fact that he traveled on this other military jet. But the lie that I cannot get over has been what really amounts to a weeks-long deception campaign that has also been targeted at the American people. Up until last night, and even to this very moment, even though they have suggested it after the Washington Post came out with this, the White House has still not said, has not been transparent about

how and why the president traveled back from that summit in Turkey. Nicole, you know this well. There is a way to protect the president of the United States, other senior government officials in a way that is consistent with longstanding norms, including the relationship with the press, and also our Democratic charter that calls for an informed citizenry cognizant of what our senior most officials are up to. You did it on 9-11. You did it when President George W. Bush traveled to Iraq for the first time on Thanksgiving. In 2003, just months after the invasion. I was part of it with President Obama when he went to War of Zones. President Biden went to Ukraine. Just as Maggie said, you go to extraordinary measures. But what you don't do, you don't lie to the reporters and you don't use them as unwitting pawns to propagate the seception campaign against the American people. That, Nicole, I think, is just unforgettable. Well, and Michael Feinberg, you don't then subpoena five journalists who get close. I mean, I'm still trying to wrap my brain around the timeline here. So Trump goes back to Air Force One and lies immediately after pulling off what he must have thought was a great scam, right? And again, I will not impugn the motive behind it, right? They had to protect him. We'll stipulate that. But then to wave to reporters like you were aboard. the original Air Force one, and then to go to the back of the plane and say, if I go, you go, like to put that much effort into telling the lie to reporters who could very easily have been taken off the record and would not have betrayed that confidence, is a new piece of information or looks new. I guess we had that tape at the time. But the second is, why were those five journalists subpoenaed in your view? I honestly don't know. It's very difficult to say this new information complicates every discussion we've had about the subpoenas since we first learned they were issued. You know I used to investigate this sort of stuff for a living. I am a bit more forgiving of media subpoenas, I suspect, than anybody else on this panel or anybody else in our audience, quite frankly. But the timing does look suspicious. If there was a legitimate loss of national security information, it would seem that there is a legitimate reason at some point to issue subpoenas in an investigation to find out how it was released. But as far as we know, these subpoenas were still issued just because the White House got embarrassed at the New York Times' reporting. We know this because it was reported on MS Now that Kash Patel was called back. to the White House as he was leaving town to take charge of the leak investigation himself now that was a bad idea six ways from sundays which we can get into if you want but this whole thing the whole national security apparatus of the united states right now is frankly a clown show and i think looking for rational explanations for why any

given step is taken is a little bit of a fool's errand. I'm probably the only person on this panel who would defend what the White House did in this particular set of circumstances with the decoy. But that doesn't mean I'm going to defend the ham-fisted way in which Trump got in the press pool and started just mouthing off in the narcissistic way he normally does about how he's the center of the universe and anything that happens to him happens to everybody. There's just an element of maturity and sobriety that every other president in the history of the United States has had that he lacks. And we can psychoanalyze why that is, but if I was a reporter in his press pool, I wouldn't be giving any credence to a single word that comes out of his mouth. Yeah, I mean, Maggie, do you think this changes the relationship? I mean, I think you're more clear-eyed than most. You've been covering him longer the most, but do you think this changes the relationship between the president and the press that travels with him and covers him? I think the relationship between the president and the mainstream press in this term is already pretty bad. And it is largely because this president has used a number of different tools to engage in a bullying campaign across industries. Again, something Jonathan might write about in our book, but one of them is media. And he has used an outside effort, which is suing different outlets. And he has used levers of government power to try to impose. you know, some kinds of constraints on various media. We're still seeing that happen. And so I don't think that there is anybody who's especially surprised that President Trump and a lot of his aides don't love the media. They've already taken control of the White House press pool. The way the press pool is made up is very different than it was when you were there, Nicole, or when I was there in term one, it just is it is a fundamentally different thing. But what I do wonder is whether This gives pause in general to outlets that have been excited to be on Air Force One, you know, aren't part of the rotation that often, but are paying to be part of the pool this time because, you know, outlets do have to have to pay. They pay the rate to travel. I just don't know, but I think it is really hard. You hit on the issue that I think is complicated here, or not even complicated, but is the main underscore, which is. The credibility gap, you know, there is, if you are not honest about any of this, if you engage in this deception, which again, as I said earlier, there are tradeoffs to protect a president. We do understand that. But if you do this and you are not at all candid with the reporters who are traveling aboard, you don't tell them at the beginning, you don't let them know and ask off the record, you don't tell them once you're safe and let them know, then it makes it very hard when you are.

telling lies about matters big and small to get, you know, any kind of credibility and to have people believe you. The main one that that's happening with right now is the Iran War, where the president continues to insist all is going well, and the U.S. has plenty of munitions. That's just not true. But again, it goes back to the point of what he thinks the public has a right to know. You know, there are fewer and fewer opportunities to ask him questions, to ask Karoline Leavitt questions, to ask the Pentagon questions. And none of that helps an informed public. Yeah, I mean, I have to see get a break, but I want to press all of you on what is underneath all, I think, of the attacks on the press, which is the fear of the truth seeping out. Now, Iran already knows it, but I think Trump thinks he can keep his hardened base of supporters from finding out that most national security officials think we are either losing or have lost the war with Iran. We'll have that conversation next. Also ahead for us. Trump's new Attorney General got right to work yesterday using every bit of power he has to shield Donald Trump from accountability from just about anything he does or says on the job. What Todd Blanche's first act. would do to keep private and away from congressional scrutiny. We'll bring that reporting. Plus, the same Justice Department hopes to make life very, very difficult for one American, despite Janine Piro's big box of evidence suggesting that American did nothing wrong. We'll try to explain. And later, more on our top story and that very credible threat. to the president's safety and the means that the White House went to to keep it all under wraps. Former CIA director John Brennan joins our coverage and The Washington Post reporter who was first to report this news last night. We'll get to all that and much more. When Deadline White House continues after a quick break, don't go anywhere.

After an exquisite summer, you deserve your beauty rest. This Labor Day, save it to $1,000 off select Beauty Rest black mattresses and adjustable bass sets featuring pocketed coil technology for our most advanced motion separation. Visit beautyrest.com to find a retailer near you. Hi, I'm Angie Hicks, co-founder of Angie. And one thing I've learned is that you buy a house, but you make it a home. Because with every fix, update, and renovation, it becomes a little more your own. So you need all your jobs done well. For nearly 30 years, Angie has helped millions of homeowners hire skilled pros for the projects that matter. From plumbing to electrical, roof repair to deck upgrades. So leave it to the pros who will get your jobs done well. Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find a pro for your project at Angie. Hi, it's Sierra Miller. I can't wait for you to check out my new collection of shoes and accessories at Designer Shoe Warehouse. If you love shoes as much as I do, then trust me, I got you. From cute sneak arenas to the perfect flip-lops to stunning heels. These shoes are all style, no drama. It's a girls' girl's summer, and DSW has just the shoes. Shop the Sierra Miller collection right now at your DSW store or DSW.com.

I'd like you to address speculation that you're leaving Ankara not in the new Air Force One because of security concerns involving Iran. You've spoken today twice about them possibly assassinating you and possibly being successful. Did that concern have something to do with you? Well, I speak about it a lot because, you know, the life of a president is very dangerous. It's a very dangerous profession. No, I'm number one on the kill list for... Iran. They're lovely people. I'm number one. We're back with Maggie, Ned, and Michael Feinberg. Ned, what's so jarring is the, and I guess people that have covered him forever are accustomed to this, but the weaving of lies. with things that are true enough, right? I mean, he is because of the Salmani hit in his first term. He is targeted by Iran and because of this war, I'm sure the threats are more acute. But so were Mike Pompeo and Mark Millie and all these other people who he took security away from. It is this dissonance that I think all this reporting has revealed from Trump himself. You know, Nicole, one of the many takeaways from this reporting for me at least was is the casual way in which this White House lies to their audiences, including most importantly to the American people on things both small, minute, trivial, but also very, very big. They have a tortured relationship with the truth across the board. Think about this for a second, Nicole. Imagine a world in which the White House just went out and essentially told the truth. And they handled a situation like this in a way that their predecessors did. They brought in a small press pool. Maybe they confiscated their phones. They say the president's going to do this. You'll come with them. You can report when it's all said and done. It might have been a story for a day. But instead, they chose to engage in this deceit and this subterfuge. And now they're facing a firestorm. And one of the ironies that I couldn't help but think about is that the reporting from the New York Times that landed them in such hot water with these subpoenas, it was all predicated on a lie, actually. all these outlets focused on the safety features of the new Air Force One, the gift from the royal family of Qatar. Yeah. Because we were all under the impression that the president. had to fly legacy Air Force One because he couldn't fly that Air Force One. And in fact, that wasn't true. So picture this Earth 2, where the White House had been truthful all along. They would not have had to contend with all these stories about the new Air Force One. It would have been a story that the president had to engage in these extraordinary security tactics. But I think people would be understanding because we all wouldn't have been victim to this deception campaign ourselves.

Yeah, let me read you, Michael Feinberg, especially with your sort of unique perspective on national security issues and not sort of being in the press or... having it to be your top priority to protect the press. Let me present this to you from the Washington Post. Because the press was seemingly in the dark about the operation, Garrett Graf, a journalist and historian, said that the event that is probably unprecedented in modern presidential history, that the White House would lie to the press corps in its entirety. about where the president is. That is a new rubicon that's being crossed. The breach was not merely one of journalistic access, according to Graf, knowing that this was a series of actions that the White House and the military took precisely because of a threat that they were deeply worried about makes it all the more egregious that the press was kept out of the loop he added. There is a thing that I think people have spent decades trying to understand, and that's, you know, this relationship to the press when you're covering someone who is threatened. Sometimes that closeness to the threat, outsiders, I think, believe. can make you less subjective. My point being that it might have benefited the White House and the president if the press knew just how grave the threat was. They always do the wrong thing times 10. And I wonder your thoughts on this now very public example, not just endangering the White House staff and the White House press by putting them on a decoy plane, but what looks like a very elaborate effort. And we don't even know. I mean, this is really sort of day zero plus 12 hours. We don't even know what they'll do. to try to hunt down the source of the story we're talking about now. Yeah, so I could actually hypothesize a situation where this all makes sense and through which we could defend what the Trump administration did. And that would be if the way that they got the information about the threat to Air Force One and about the threat to Trump was an ongoing continuous stream of reporting of some sort that they had to protect long after this flight. because of ongoing value to U.S. national security interests. Now, that would justify not briefing the press after the plane had touched down. It would justify not telling them anything off the record. It would be well within the norms of national security work. But the fundamental problem is that as the other panelists have brought up, and as Maggie has documented time and time again,

This is an administration and a person who lies as if it is as natural as breathing air. So we can't grant any of them the benefit of the doubt or look at things under the light most favorable to them simply because they've never given us a reason to trust them. Yeah, Maggie, quickly, there's a little detail in your reporting that I want to ask you about. You write a pool report noted as the plane took off, quote, we've been advised to keep our window shades in the press cabin closed. Do you know if that was for security or so that no one would see him in this catering card? I believe, based on our reporting, that it was the latter, Nicole. And that night, when that pool report came in, it really stayed with me. I said something about it publicly that night. I've talked about it with other people. At the time, it seemed like it was an indicator that there was a serious threat. Because, as you know, when planes flying to, say, war zones, presidential aircraft, the window shades come down. And it's so that they're not targeted. So if anything, it seemed like it was, you know. underscoring what kind of a threat this might have been. And that might be the case, but I don't believe that that is why the window shades were down. I think the window shades were down so that the reporters could not see the catering containers moving away. Because if you look at that picture that you're showing, the press cabin is at the back. I mean, you know this. I'm going to tell you that you don't know. The press cabin is at the back of the plane on the right-hand side, nearish where that second container is. But it would be very hard for the president to have walked to that container because he would have been seen. So I think this was just to keep anybody from peering out the window as this was all taking place. Right. It's also a lot of luggage and food to load to the front of the plane, which is really just where, right? Like that, it just wouldn't go there. And folks that travel at the president know that. It would be... The kitchen is at the back of the point. Yeah. Correct. And the only passengers up there are the pilots and the president. So it's a lot of stuff to put right there. Um, endlessly interesting. And we're so glad we got to talk to you, Maggie and to you, Ned. Thank you so much for joining us today to both of you. Up next for us, Todd Blanche giving Donald Trump the legal cover. He's been after for nearly a decade issuing a new order allowing Donald Trump to keep his conversations private, what that looks like and whether it'll hold up to legal muster. That's next.

Hi, I'm Angie Hicks, co-founder of Angie. One thing I've learned is that you buy a house, but you make it a home. For decades, Angie's helped millions of homeowners hire skilled pros for the projects that matter. Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find a pro for your project at Angie.com. The Serta Labor Day sales event is here. It's the unofficial end of summer, which means shorter days and longer nights. So fill them with perfect sleep night after night. Save up to $800 on Serta Perfect Sleper X mattresses and adjustable base sets. See how the Q4 support system helps relieve aches and back pain. Limited time offer. Visit Serta.com to find a retailer near you. Perfect sleeper, perfect sleep night after night. At DSW, we ask the important questions. Like, what shoes are you going to wear? Whether you're prepping for wedding season, festival season, or just planning the ultimate vacay, the right shoes can make or break an RSVP. So own the moment. You've got big plans and we've got just the shoes at the perfect price, of course. Get ready to get ready with designer shoe warehouse. Head to your DSW store or DSW.com today. And let us surprise you.

Hours after being sworn in as the country's attorney general, Todd Blanche, seemed to do more lawyering for Donald Trump. He crafted a new structure scheme aimed at giving Donald Trump another form of immunity and potentially an ability to avoid accountability from Congress should voters give Democrats control of the House and or Senate. The Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel has issued an opinion. that would allow Trump to claim executive privilege over communication between him and private advisors. The opinion also extends to direct advisors, communications with outside advisors. Okay. The move is intended to wall off a massive amount of communication and potential evidence. from congressional scrutiny, just 84 days ahead of the midterms, when Democrats are looking increasingly likely to take control of the House and the power of subpoena. The opinion is almost certain to be challenged in court in yet another stress test for America's justice system, where the Supreme Court could likely be asked to weigh in by the Trump administration. Joining our coverage, former Department of Justice, pardon attorney Liz Hoyer's here. She's now the host of the podcast. Is this really legal? Michael Feinberg still here. Liz Hoyer, is this legal? It's a great question, Nicole. This really stretches the boundaries of any prior interpretation of the scope of executive privilege. There are two presidents who have asserted this privilege unsuccessfully in the past. One of them is Richard Nixon in Watergate scandal. And the other one is Donald Trump in 2021 when he was trying to prevent Congress from obtaining records related to the January 6th insurrection at the Capitol. So this is not an unlimited. privilege. It is, in fact, a narrow privilege that courts have recognized under Article 2 of the Constitution, but it has never been determined to apply to people who work outside the White House as private advisors to the president. I think that what matters here is not whether this legal interpretation survives at the end of the day. The administration is really just looking for a way to tie up cases in court when they don't want to turn documents. It is very likely that this will be litigated and may go all the way up to the Supreme Court that could take years and that could give the government cover for a couple of years to prevent having to turn over documents that are potentially embarrassing and detrimental to the interests of the president and his allies. Michael Feinberg, what I thought was interesting is that it's clear that even on Earth, too, they know the Democrats are going to take back control of the House and likely the Senate. The other thing that I thought was interesting is that they're acknowledging and putting it into writing how interconnected the president is with outside advisors, which to me is code for business interests. Yeah, I don't think we should discount that this came out of the Office of Legal Counsel. The Office of Legal Counsel, even when DOJ was operating under its apolitical norms,

up until really the past few years, or past year and a half, frankly, the office of legal counsel was always the most ideologically sympathetic office within DOJ with whomever the incumbent in the White House was. They're essentially in-house attorneys who give the imprimatur of DOJ on the constitutionality of the president's proposed actions. They're essentially an in-house law firm. And I know there are many alumni of the office that would disagree with me on that. But OLC is notorious for being a rubber stamp for what the president wants to do. And we see now with as malevolent and underhanded an administration as this one is, how very dangerous that can be when there aren't any norms left at all. Yeah. That's true. The DOJ story is so bleak. It sort of has to be tracked and followed closely to be believed. But that is most certainly true. All right. After the break, there's more. What might be the next step, the next thing that the Trump White House will ask Todd Blanche to do? Well, a blatant abuse of power is really all that's left. We'll explain.

The Wall Street Journal has brand new reporting on how Donald Trump and his Justice Department have not yet given up on their attempt to prosecute former U.S. Olympian David Hearn to cover up for the embarrassing fiasco that was the failed renovation of the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. According to that new reporting in the Wall Street Journal, White House officials have asked the Justice Department to consider a new prosecution of the man accused of vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool, according to people. familiar with the discussions. Norm Eisen co-counsel for her and said a new prosecution, quote, would Marco Rubio shocking first, bringing back from the dead a case that the DOJ lost by its own admission, that it lacked the evidence to convict. This would add another bizarre turn to a sad chapter in the DOJ's history and further harass an innocent man. All of this comes ahead of a hearing set to be held next month where the presiding judge in the last case will decide on whether to dismiss Heron's charges with prejudice, which would mean that the Justice Department could not charge him again for the same alleged conduct. Donald Trump has used posts on True Social to call for U.S. Attorney Janine Piro to revisit the case. We're back with Liz and Michael. I mean, we saw Liz Janine Piro. carry in a white box ostensibly full of something to prove whatever it was her decision was here and not bringing the case. The lack of evidence was the assumption. Your thoughts on how much is already in the public arena about how there is no evidence of any criminal conduct on the part of David Hearns. Yeah, it would be very difficult for this case to be brought back with any type of legitimacy. Janine Piro made the case in a very detailed 20-plus page motion to dismiss that the reflecting pool was already badly damaged and that the government could not prove that Mr. Hearn caused additional damage exceeding $1,000, which is the requirement for a felony based on the evidence that exists. It is really quite scary, Nicole, to know that they're even considering. going back to this case, Donald Trump's vanity is so great and his need to save face is so great that he has now put one innocent man in the middle of this situation as sort of the scapegoat to make good on his promise that vandals were the ones who actually damaged the reflecting pool. It is a very scary development for all of us. It's something that every citizen should be worried about, the idea that we could be targeted or scapegoated simply to allow the... president to save face without any legal basis. The fact that his appointed U.S. attorney in D.C. has said that the evidence doesn't support this should end the matter right then and there. What does it suggest, Michael Feinberg, that for all the attention and focus on known political or perceived political enemies, people like Jerome Powell or James Comey or Letitia James, here's an ordinary American who happened to be by the reflecting pool while Donald Trump botched his attempt to turn it. What was it, American flag blue? What question should we be asking about what other ordinary Americans are being attacked?

Well, I think at the risk of sounding like I'm lapsing into hyperbole, what this shows us... is that every single American should be afraid of what this administration is trying to do. There has been zero evidence proffered to the public or to courts thus far that show Davy Hearn did a single thing wrong or took a single action related to what the government originally accused of. The government itself said in dismissing its complaint that It did not have all the evidence at the time it brought the charge, and when the Department of Interior did put over everything that it knew, that there wasn't anything to convict Mr. Heron. And the president didn't like that outcome, so he ordered DOJ to try again in a misdemeanor court instead. And it's important to note this isn't just the norm of a U.S. Attorney's Office not re-inditing somebody that's being broken. It's the norm, which is more important, that the president should not get to choose who goes to jail based on his wins. And the fact that this is not just being considered, but being argued in public by the president himself. shows how far we have backslid as a democracy, frankly, but also how just manifestly unfit the president, his attorney general, and his U.S. attorneys are for the offices which they now hold. This is an utter disgrace on the entire history of the department. Ms. Sawyer, thank you for joining us today. Michael Feinberg, thank you for spending the hour with us today. After a break, Donald Trump claims his tariffs are good for America. The new reporting shows they may be benefiting, oh, wait, him, this time in the form of a heavily jeweled ring. We promise we'll explain next.

If you own a small business or someone you know in Love owns a small business that's been impacted by Trump's tariff obsession and regime, there might be a new solution. You could give Donald Trump an 18-carat gold ring. That's what Belgium did, at least their diamond industry. Just a few weeks later, Trump approved a tariff exemption worth billions of dollars to wait for it. Belgium's diamond industry. According to new reporting from our colleagues, David Rode and Lily Becker, Democrats in Congress say the ring, quote, appears to be a cartoonish bribe. They sent a letter to the Belgian diamond industry's primary trade organization and the jeweler who designed the ring, warning that those responsible could face criminal penalties under United States federal bribery laws. When asked for a comment, White House spokesperson claimed that diamonds are exempt as part of a previous agreement. But our review of that agreement shows that there is no mention of diamonds. Now, if you're wondering just how big and gaudy this ring could be, here's what the head of Belgium's diamond industry went with. It's a ring that's the size of a watch featuring 321 diamonds, 56 sapphires, 13 emeralds, and six rubies. Its surface includes a gem-encrusted presidential seal, and its sides feature diamond-encrusted T emblems and the numbers 45 and 47 rendered in a Superman style logo. Remember when he wanted to show us he'd survived COVID by revealing a Superman logo. Turns out they read newspapers around the world, especially in Belgium. We'll keep you updated on that story. After the break for us, the reporter who brought us this big bombshell reporting we started the hour with Trump's secret trip inside a catering truck and the secret plane and secret flight and elaborate ruse that he in the White House. went through, went to keep it all into wraps. The next hour of Dublin White House starts after a quick break. Stay with us.

Hi, I'm Angie Hicks, co-founder of Angie. And one thing I've learned is that you buy a house, but you make it a home. Because with every fix, update, and renovation, it becomes a little more your own. So you need all your jobs done well. For nearly 30 years, Angie has helped millions of homeowners hire skilled pros for the projects that matter. From plumbing to electrical, roof repair to deck upgrades. So leave it to the pros who will get your jobs done well. Angie, the one you trust to find the ones you trust. Find a pro for your project at Angie. com.