New Report: Documents Shredded at Jail After Epstein's Death

In a country that never stops moving, reliable energy is essential. People need oil and natural gas for heating, transportation, and everyday items like clothing, cell phones, and contact lenses. Behind the scenes, one of America's largest pipeline operators, energy transfer works all day, every day, to transport the energy that our communities depend on. Energy transfer invests in modern infrastructure as technologies like AI drive greater need for reliable natural gas. Learn more at energy transfer.com. Burlington knows you cannot forget Mother's Day. And be real, texting your sibling to add your name to their card isn't enough. Instead, head to your newly refreshed Burlington, where it's easier to shop for deals that'll make Mom proud. Find fragrances from perfume to candles or opt for a brand name bag. Plus, your store had a glow up, so it's more fun to shop for those special women in your life. Mom is Wow upside down after all. Burlington, deals, brands, wow. Welcome to the Beat. I'm Ari Malbert. We have a big show, including Maya Wiley and Molly Jong-Fast, coming up. We begin with the Trump administration's mixed signals, formal public claims that they are in talks with Iran, which many people think could be a good thing if it leads to an off-ramp. But they're also today preparing to deploy thousands of paratroopers to the Middle East. And that's the news. You have basically conflicting signals at best. Some critics say, potential contradiction on this war policy. 3,000 troops will have the ability to parachute behind enemy lines. Reporting that officials caution a decision to put boots on the ground on Iran has not been made, the journal reports, but deployment opens the door to Trump for what they are calling strategic options. Another 5,000 troops, a force that is comprised mostly of Marines, are also en route to the region. Iran fired on Israel today. We can show you that footage. This is some of the impact in Tel Aviv. Four injured there. There's also overnight footage, Israel intercepting Iranian missile strikes. A reminder that this is still very much a multi-country regional war. Trump is facing the kind of blowback in the country that suggests this remains an increasingly unpopular war. But he's also facing blowback from the worst kind of critic, if you are a sitting president, and one that is rare and taken seriously. His own former defense secretary, Jim Mattis, telling the nation, apparently because he thinks it's important to publicize this, and that is itself a decision that most Pentagon veterans take very seriously, that, quote, We're in a tough spa. I can't identify a lot of good options. And he noted the lack of strategy.

What we're seeing is a situation where targetry never makes up for a lack of strategy. Now, some of the strategic outcomes early on, unconditional surrender, regime change, we're going to dictate who the next Supreme Leader is. Those were clearly nonsense. Those were delusional. Delusional nonsense. Those are the words of someone that Trump relied on to try to shape. war policy. Mattis is of course referring to something that everyone has been discussing since the very first days of this announced war. Would regime change really work? And if not, are we ending up in the same or worse place when you look at a younger Khomeini, quite literally, now running Iran? Now Trump has suggested that maybe this regime is different enough to comprise regime change. Nobody takes that particular claim seriously. The president has made some claims that are just not factual amidst this war. The new Supreme Leader is the son of the former Supreme Leader. He is described by all parties in the region as a more hard-lined version of his father. Now, Trump says the war is, quote, already won. But that again is just... war talk. Iran has now choked up 20% of the world's oil supply. Gulf countries are getting hit by missiles, and there is a real question about the president's credibility. Trump says there are productive talks. One diplomat tells us Iran is not ready at all to enter negotiations now, and the level of trust towards the U.S. is basically at a negative. Other Iranian officials see it as a kind of trap, a journal reporting on that aspect. And in the past hour, we saw a story across the wires from the New York Times reporting the Trump administration has sent a 15-point peace plan to Iran. It was unclear how widely the plan delivered by way of Pakistan has been shared among Iranian officials and whether Iran was likely to accept it as a basis for negotiations. The Times reports. Now, there are many people in the United States and the Middle East who would like to see this war wind down. Indeed, there is more interest in winding down the war and its current economic and energy consequences, which were sparked by the U.S., then... any larger sort of deal. In fact, we've seen reporting out of Israeli intelligence that they just don't think regime change or a public Iranian uprising is now at all likely in the offing. The politics at home are also a big counterweight. If Donald Trump is actually looking at the plans I just mentioned in the reporting, more boots on the ground and those kind of forces, which lengthens the war going into the midterms, he will be facing an even more skeptical public. and a very scared Republican Party going into those midterms. I want to bring in former Governor Howard Dean, former DNC chair. He was a presidential candidate who ran on an anti-war platform, famously pushing the Democratic Party against the Iraq War on that issue back in 2003. Welcome back. Thanks very much.

I try to be fair in covering what we're hearing. And if some of those reports are true and happened, you might find it off ramp that a lot of people would welcome. What do you think of what we're hearing out of the Trump administration and what would be best going forward? I think Mattis is the most sensible person, and unfortunately Trump didn't see fit to hire him again, probably because he was sensible. Trump's got himself in a real jam. His characteristic, principal characteristics is he does things without thinking about what the consequences are, and now we've found out. I personally don't believe we're going to send 3,000 paratroopers. on the ground in Iran because we're going to get absolutely slaughtered. The Iranians are a serious power. And I agree, the one thing I agree with Trump on is they're a despicable group of people that are running Iran, and they have taken advantage of their own people and suppress them and produce all kinds of horrible human rights. violations, including sacrificing 7,000 of them in his punishment for the recent uprisings. So it would be great to get rid of them. But when you're going to do something like that, you actually have a plan, have to have a plan. And Trump never had a plan, and now he's stuck. What a surprise. It's why he went bankrupt five times when he was in the real estate business. You get out over your skis, and now you're stuck. You mentioned, Mattis. I have a little more of what he said in public. Take a look. I think it would be very unlikely that this regime would break right now. It is murky right now to understand what we in the military call the commander's intent. We've heard all sorts of things, frankly. It's going to be a darn difficult problem. Your view of that point and that sometimes the original problem remains the largest problem, which is we don't have a defined objective. which makes it harder to define when we leave. Yeah, we never, I mean, the president never made the objective clear. Maybe he did have a defined one, I doubt it. The problem without having a defined objective is he doesn't have a defined plan. And, you know, Iran, I would safely say, is what I would call a middle power. They have a lot of missiles. They have a pretty good army. It's run by a group of crooks called Abasi, who are basically terrorists. and everybody is terrified of them, including, I think, the Army to a large extent. So, you know, you just don't go and start dropping missiles on them without a plan for what you're going to do when you need more than that. And Mr. Trump never had such a plan, and we're going to get on the show. quickly find ourselves on the short end of this, and that's what he's looking at now. I would be shocked if he sent 3,000 troops in, not because our troops aren't great, but because it means the end of the Republican Party's grip on power for sure.

Right. And then you get to the point that he wants to treat this like the famed real estate deals we hear so much about or the tariff deals. And his allies, and we talk to people, as you know, I've had a lot of Trump officials on this show. One of the things they say a lot, Howard, is, well, you've got to understand. None of it needs to be true. But he's unpredictable, and he's speaking to the spread of options, and people will react to that. And that... works as far as it goes. It seems to fail if the Supreme Court takes most of the tariff options off the table. Because now you just had a lot of mess for a year, but you don't have that option. And you're raising the point that while anyone might root for the U.S. to have the greatest leverage, we had an ambassador on Dennis Ross, who talked about how having military in the background and not having to use it helps diplomats. But are we crossing teeteringly close? to actually looking like the country that cried wolf if it doesn't want to send those people in, and he's still seeking an off-ram because we need a fifth more oil. Well, look, I mean, if this president had any vision other than whatever he happens to be feeling at the time, he would not have made this mistake because he would have looked at Iraq, the second Iraq war, which was based on full pretences and nonsense and the damage that it across this country, caused this country, and then he might have looked at it of Afghanistan, which bogged us down for years and years. I think, and I have always said this, that the invasion of Afghanistan by the United States was justified. they had trained terrorists who murdered 3,000 Americans and brought down the world trade centers. But you can't do this without a long-term plan. And if the really good minds in the military who were in charge of Afghanistan couldn't come up with a long-term plan, I don't see how the people who Pete Hegseth is fired can possibly come up with a long-term plan for this, especially now that they've- You think Trump has buyers or they don't know what to do. What's that? You think he has buyers remorse now, knowing how the last four weeks have gone? I doubt Trump ever has remorse for anything. He's not that kind of a person. His problem is he just doesn't think about what might happen if he does A, B, C, or D. And so he just picks that something out of that. Now, Howard, that's sweeping. That's a sweep. You think he never goes back to the store and says, I tried it on. I want to return it. I've never heard him publicly admit that. Look at all the times he's been convicted for fraud and rape and everything else, and he's still not remorseful about that. He's been convicted by a jury. I always have to civilly liable in New York, not criminally convicted. civilly liable for a hell of a lot of money in New York, some vast amount of millions that none of us will ever, his victim will probably never see either. But this guy, look, this guy's been convicted. He has no shame. And remorse is not in his vocabulary. And he does this stuff without thinking about it. And that is a mistake, especially if you're talking about committing American troops to the middle of a fairly good-sized nation with a well-trained army.

Well, and the larger question you're getting at is whether we have a defined foreign policy or a series of emotions. because emotions, if you think that he cannot use facts, reason, logic, and the extraordinary intelligence capabilities of our government and the Pentagon to figure out what's best for the American people in the military, if you can't do that, if it's an emotional thing about I can't go backwards, I can't back it down, I can't look a quote-unquote a certain way, then yeah, there's going to be a lot of heat on this next couple weeks because the oil situation, according to many, is untenable. Howard, our lead-off guest, thanks for being here tonight, sir. Appreciate it. Coming up, we look at the use of ice at the airports, one Trump ally saying this is a, quote, test run for the midterms. We also have a report on the bags of shredded documents that were found and that were apparently secretly attempted to cover up coming out of the Epstein jail just days. After his death, a big Miami Herald bombshell, and I have that for you tonight. It's really interesting. It draws on the files. Maya and Molly are here. We're back in 90 seconds.

This is a Monday.com ad. The same Monday.com helping people worldwide getting work done faster and better. The same Monday.com designed for every team and every industry. The same Monday.com with built-in AI. Scaling your work from day one. The same Monday.com that your team will actually love using. The same Monday.com with an easy and intuitive setup. Go to Monday.com and try it for free. Yes. The same Monday.com. There's a lot of news to cover. Money. The economic fallout from the war. Is it temporary? Power. Is this White House for sale? Politics. What is your message to the country right now? Money power politics with Stephanie Rule. Weekdays at 9 a.m. Eastern on MS. Now. We're seeing lines, delays, confusion, and some say at times chaos in America's airports. We have Donald Trump now deploying ICE agents to some of the hub airports. Now, the assertion from the administration is that this is supposed to, quote, assist TSA agents who are overburdened during this partial shutdown. That may be. There are also reports that ICE's presence is not speeding up security screenings. They are not exactly part of TSA. So there's a limited amount of actual... operational support they can give. Some ice agents have been seen sort of just roaming the halls of the airport. Here's a photo that shows one aspect of the story. Let's take this in full. You have the lines. That's in Atlanta's airport there, stretching all the way outside. You don't want to be in the line out there. You might not make your flight. And then you have an agent. And again, this is more of a criticism or a question about U.S. policy than this particular agent, because he's there under orders. But he doesn't seem to have much to do, so he's on his phone while people wait outside. Now, the White House posted a video of an agent passing out water and saying, look, they can help do things for people. Here's what passengers are saying.

I think it's very, very, I don't know what to say. What should I say? I think it's scary. Why should I be there? Are they helping? You saw people bracing themselves, like, what the hell is going on here? And there were a lot of people who were taking pictures and sort of watching them. They were just milling around. They weren't even doing anything. I don't just sort of chatting. I don't know what their function was. One reason they are milling around is while they have broad enforcement authority and they're armed and they can work to do certain things relating to immigration customs enforcement, which of course you can say broadly relates to what happens at any airport or border crossing, they are not part of the TSA screening system, so they don't actually deal with travelers' identification. They can't help speed up the screening. Now, the orders from Trump has left some ICE offices scrambling to figure out what to do. And there are critics who say, given the recent history of how Ahis has operated, there are questions here about intimidation. And then you have the wider discourse, if you will. Donald Trump saying this. We put ICE who are a very high level. I mean, they really are a high level group of people. And they love it because they're able to now arrest illegals as they come into the country. That's very fertile territory. If that's not enough, I'll bring in the national guard. The president is sort of musing is the nicest way you can put it. We don't know whether ICE loves it, and it doesn't matter how federal employees feel emotionally about this type of assignment anyway. But what he's getting at, what he's sort of musing and pretending is as if they are doing ICE enforcement of immigration customs. apprehensions at the airports. And we can just tell you in the early days of this, we haven't seen a lot of that. So even Trump's defense isn't really borne out by what's happening. Then there is the cratering approval for this range of policies. I've told you, I will always tell you how things really are. And I can remind you that in the past years, we have seen approval for two things that Donald Trump has done domestically. Immigration enforcement. and his sort of big claims to deal with high prices during the campaign people liked both of those things i can update you tonight that the polling now has crashed on both of them On the prices, people don't think he's delivered, and on the ICE tactics, people oppose what they see as extreme violent efforts. So keep that in mind when a Trump White House veteran, Steve Bannon, says they're not deterred, they're going further, and he outlines a plan that could be unconstitutional for how to use ice at the midterms. We can use what's happening with these ICE helping out at the airports. We can use this as a test run as a test case to get really perfect ICE's involvement in the 26 midterm election, sir. Yeah, I think we should have ICE agents at the polling places.

That's Mr. Steve Bannon's question, no word from the White House, over whether that's actually something they want to explore. We're joined by New York Times writer Molly John Fass, host of the Fast Politics Podcast, and Maya Wiley, former STNY Civil Prosecutor, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. Welcome to both of you. Thank you. Molly, what do you think? Ice helping or herding at the airports and to ask the serious question, why not? just reopen the government fully so we wouldn't have these lines. Yeah. And a stark contrast is that ICE has lots and lots of money. They have billions of dollars because of the BBB. TSA not getting paid. So I think it's really important to realize like this is not popular and people don't like it. The optics of it are very bad, but it's also. reminding people that there is this paramilitary force that a lot of them know about because of the killing of Renee Good and Alex Preddy, who are now in airports wearing bulletproof vests, a lot of them carrying some, you know, things that are weapon-like, if not guns, and are there just milling around. And I think that... Already this is not popular. And I think that seeing more of it in airports when they're not actually speeding things up is going to be worse. Yeah, Maya, in your government roles, you've done oversight of police and law enforcement. And when law enforcement works great. They're closer to firefighters. And people say, great, they're here. We need your help. And when law enforcement under policy or direction are not doing their job or become the danger, people get scared of them. What does it tell you that just they might not be the most partisan civilians in the world? People just trying to make their plane look up and they're scared. They should be. Why do we know about ICE? We have seen them gleefully violate people's rights, use excessive forces. We've seen them use literally rubber bullets and other projectiles against ministers who are peacefully protesting in a public space. We have seen them actually go after elected officials because they're just want to do an inspection, which is lawful. of a detention facility where people are reportedly having their human rights violated. I'm saying this because people are rightly fearful of abuse of power and excessive force. And the reason we're even in this situation, back to Molly's point, TSA workers are paid roughly $41,000 a year. I go to a church, the church I attend, I see one of my... fellow parishioners, when I go through TSA, guess who's on that saying, hey, Maya, someone who goes to my church? These are people, but you know what we've done? We've actually said, we're going to gut the federal government, create, and literally 300,000 unemployed people who are black women, by the way.

And then we're going to say we will create the single largest law enforcement agency in the country bigger than every other federal law enforcement agency combined. And there are a lot. And then we're going to say, but we don't want them to be accountable. So we will let TSA these neighbors, these parents, these workers not get paid so that we don't have to say that ICE has to show you a warrant. Right. So that we don't say that ICE. can't racially profile you. And by the way, none of that money is going to pay for judges or hearings. So we don't want them to have to be able to be responsible for due process or responsible for excessive force. And no other law enforcement agency gets zero accountability. Yeah, you laid out. You say it very clearly. I think people can make up their own minds, but it speaks to the problem. The Democrats wanted to use this funding, use their powers. People say, are they fighting or not? Well, they're fighting on this. even if it becomes controversial because people who are less informed just go, I don't like what's happening at the airport, to say that they want these basic pieces of oversight. And they have gotten progress because you had to draw it out of Minnesota and you had a change of DHS leadership. Molly, I want to go to the politics of it, as they say, because on late night, Trump's idea of, oh, I'm going to throw ice in there and it'll look, quote, you and upset you. I mean, there's a certain level of sophistication to this lacking. But it doesn't necessarily be working the way they planned. Here was late night. Somehow Trump has found a way to make the airport even worse than it was. An elite squad of civil servants who've been through rigorous training with impeccable qualifications. I'm just kidding. He's sending ICE. One DHS official told CBS, I have no idea what we're doing. And neither does he. So welcome to the club. Ice isn't trained on X-rays. No surprise. They don't really seem to be trained on anything, actually. You know, and Molly, as I mentioned, there's a lot of folks who are just following their rules, and this is where they're told to deploy. Right. But this wider idea that the White House clearly had of, oh, you don't like ICE, you're holding up the funding. Now we'll put him where the lines are. Doesn't seem to be helping them. Yeah. And I. I want to point something else out here, which is that Donald Trump and Kristi Noem were very – Kristi Noem, who's no longer in her post, were very insistent that these ICE officers needed to wear masks because otherwise they would be doxed. Now they are in airports not wearing masks. Not identifying themselves. Not identifying themselves. San Francisco. Not wearing uniforms. Right. But not wearing masks. And I think it's a really good point here because –

They are the whole, you know, all of these excuses ultimately were not real. They cannot wear masks. They should be identified. They should be held accountable. They should go under the same scrutiny as every other part of the federal government. Well, we have you here both as a lawyer and a former candidate. There's been a lot of Republican attacks on vote by mail. And then you say, okay, well, is it secure? Can you do it? That's what some people ask and people want to learn. They're wondering why they're hearing so much hype about this. I have a New York Times headline here. Trump calls mail in voting, cheating, and just voted by mail. His mail vote comes as he torpedo negotiations on the shutdown and demands, of course, this new legislation that would make it harder to vote the way he just voted. I'm curious, Maya, if you think that. matters. Oh, of course it matters. It matters because it shows the utter hypocrisy. Yeah. But it also, like so many things that we have sometimes heard from this president or from his camp, it's more about what they think benefits them in politics, not in politics in terms of earning voters, but in terms of the process and creating more difficulty for voters to vote who they think may not vote for them. You know, the most participation we've had in a long time was in 2020. Sadly, it was because of COVID, but what we did is we actually expanded mail-in voting. People with disabilities, people who were elderly, voted in higher number because we had made it easier for them to access the process. That's a good thing. And every research study shows, yeah, it's safe. It's worked in states have been doing it for a long time. So this really isn't about a problem. It's a huge tell. Molly, I don't want to get in trouble saying this because you talk about what people eat. Everyone's got their own thing. But I know a story about a, I'm not going to name them, but a prominent person who requested a vegan option at a group dinner. Right. And then they got, and this was prepared, one of these type of dinners. And then they got there and ordered a cheeseburger after the organizers had created these other vegan options. And someone was saying to me, like, this is the height of what what Maya and I call. Hutzpah. And it's one thing if somebody really has a mail and voting issue and then they don't vote by mail and you're like, okay, again, respecting, okay, you have a perspective and you're carrying that out, even though we've reported on the way this works, you have entire states that use only vote by mail. And the president has celebrated state victories in those, in some places where they are. But. To say not that you choose to be vegan, but that you expect other people to be vegan and fund your vegan edicts while you eat a cheeseburger. Come on. Yeah. And look, Donald Trump, you know that he wants the Save and the Save Act because he's worried about the midterms. Because every time you ask him about the midterms, he says, we need the Save Act. And even Mike Lee, you know, we have the wrong people voting. We need, you know, have this pass the Save Act to save the midterms.

That is not how democracy is supposed to work. Yeah. And I don't want to get too meta, but we have to wonder whether PETA will come after me for this segment. We only time will tell. I've asked Molly and Maya to stick around. We have more fun and some important stuff coming up. We have a question of whether there is secret intelligence being abused. to profit in these new evolving betting markets. It's actually a huge war corruption story. If you haven't heard about it, that's coming up tonight. And the bags of shredded documents that have been revealed in the Epstein files, a big enough deal that U.S. attorneys were frantically saying, and we have the emails to show you ASAP, can we get in there and get the bags of shredded documents? If you haven't heard this story, it's a doozy. Molly and Maya on that next. Monday AI agents took over my work. And I absolutely love it. Chasing deadlines, writing status reports, updating stakeholders. Agents handle the daily grind now. They live inside Monday.com. So they see the full picture. My work, my team, the whole company. And I don't have to worry about the data. It's safe, which means I'm free to focus on the big stuff, knowing everything runs smoothly in the background. It's completely shifted the way we work. Create your own AI agent in minutes on Monday.com. There's a lot of news to cover. Money. The economic fallout from the war. Is it temporary power? Is this White House for sale? Politics. What is your message to the country right now? Money power politics with Stephanie Rule. Weekdays at 9 a.m. Easter on MS. Now.

There are many different stories about Jeffrey Epstein and the government response to his case, but this one is a real doozy. The Miami Herald's Julie Brown, he might have seen on this program, has an absolute bombshell about the Epstein files show there were an unusual number of bags of shredded documents removed from Epstein's jail just days after his death. That alone is... Suspicious. A corrections officer, though, was so concerned that they called the secret FBI tip line and said they'd, quote, never seen this amount of bags of shredded documents coming out to be put in the dumpster. The officer was concerned about the after-action group that came in to look into the death. Just to tell you how this works, usually investigative teams do not immediately shred documents and evidence they collect evidence. The FBI records state that the caller found it, quote, suspicious that an after-action team charged with investigating would be shredding huge amounts of paperwork. That is an understatement. A corrections officer later wrote a memo to the FBI saying you might want to investigate why those employees are destroying wreckers. And jails sometimes use inmates for certain physical tasks. The herald reporting, an inmate at the jail was told to take bags of shredded material to the rear gate, throw them in a dumpster. The inmate said, reportedly, quote, they're shredding everything. On top of that, the files show that there were whistleblower accounts, a letter to a judge, and U.S. attorney's staff, who also viewed this as suspicious, at the very least, a potential crime or obstruction at most. Molly and Maya are back with us. When you hear that the feds and investigators are the ones doing the shredding, what does that tell you? Something ain't right. That's my formal legal opinion on the matter. Now, this is really a, how can I say it? An astounding story. Astounding to have investigators actually, first of all, any time you're shredding a document in law enforcement, you're supposed to be doing it pursuant to a document policy. You have a retention policy about what you keep, how long you keep it, how it's stored. So the mere fact that there's just this like massive amount of shredding happening in and of itself is odd because it's obviously not happening in the regular course of just a document retention policy that you have, that you're handing them over to inmates to take out the to the trash. And even the inmates going, this isn't normal. I mean, I don't even know what to say then this. stinks to high heaven. And, Molly, we've covered the jail part of this, even if there is not documented foul play regarding Epstein's death, which is something that Congress now thinks is a valid question to investigate. We already know there were two corrections officers who were indicted and the charges later dropped. There were questions about malfeasance and hiding whether rules were broken.

Again, even without foul play, you had a high-profile detainee. You failed to do the checks. There was video failure. There were other questions about financial misconduct. So as someone who's covered this story, when you look at this, that the government's first instinct was to hide tracks and... basically destroy evidence. What does that tell you? Yeah. Look, it's the largest, if we just pull back for a minute, largest sex trafficking case that we know of probably in American history. Todd Blanche says more than 1,200 victims, children, girls. And we have a government that at every point, either act suspiciously or acts negligently, at every point you have, you know, they never searched sorrow ranch. Huh? They didn't, you know, in the dump of the documents, they're missing 302s. You know, you have victims saying, I know I sat for interviews. Where are they? Right? We have videos. We have transcripts. We have all sorts of stuff that we know is missing from the victims. We have Thomas Massie with a list of 230 names, okay, that the victims have put together. So, I mean, it's just there's so much smoke here. It's. And it's so suspicious. Like, what? I mean, how is that possible? And the U.S. Attorney's Office, we know from the Epstein files, had emails, as I mentioned in the setup where they said, well, maybe we can go get the shredded docs. We can look at this. But ultimately, it was minimized over to the watchdog, the inspector general, which does reports, but Maya, they don't actually pursue crimes, which means it was very quickly downgraded as not potential obstruction. Does that seem right to you or a problem? Well, you know, look, I really hesitate to make a, to have a legal opinion on something from news stories. Let me just state that, right? So, and I, and I. I can just get out of here. Yeah, you can leave. No. You can't be a news story. Well, I mean, because you know, the one thing you know when you have any kind of legal case is there's all kinds of information. No, I appreciate it. The press does not have. Right. And it would be unfair to have a legal opinion in the absence of having access to more information. It stinks to high heaven, to Molly's point. And this goes back to the fact that there should be really aggressive transparency here. I do want to say this because. coming from the civil rights community, we have been complaining about deaths in custody for a long time. And half of the deaths in custody are suicides, half. Right. And half of those are people who haven't done what they're supposed to do as employees in those Bureau of Prisons. And so to your point, we don't know what the motives are and we don't know all the facts. It's wrong. It happens all the time. To a lot of people who don't get news coverage, we should care about that. And we should be asking for aggressively bipartisan oversight of this. I do want to say that it is critical.

critical that we remember the true victims here. Yeah. And that's the women and girls. Yeah, exactly. Now I have to cut it. Molly and Maya, thank you so much on more than one topic. There are questions about whether somebody close to the Trump administration used the Iran war to do what amounts to insider trading on these new betting markets. Huge story. You got to hear it that's coming up. And we have a very special guest on the Trump administration shakeups. And is there an end game on those airport lines and the DHS shutdown? Oh We talked about the impact of this shutdown and what's happening in D.C. and the airlines and the airport lines and all of that. We also want to look at what the outcomes could be. And for that, you need someone who understands Washington in Congress. Sometimes these veteran tenacious reporters can be harder to come by, but we have one you've definitely seen on air before. I'm betting veteran reporter Scott McFarland. And a little bit of media news. He is now this week. the newly announced Chief Washington correspondent for the Midas Touch Network. That is a digital operation. We've had some of their reporters and pundits on this program, so might be familiar. He's been Justice correspondent at CBS News, an investigative reporter at NBC's DC station a decade long before that. He also contributed, we should note, to this network, in 20 and 21. He's led all kinds of coverage, including dealing with the January 6th Capitol attack, the federal Trump indictments, and the aforementioned Epstein case. New images showing the ferocity, the ugliness of the east front of the Capitol that day. It was a multi-front war, January 6th. This is an initial indictment of Donald Trump. His first federal case is in the Southern District of Florida, his second federal case right here in the nation's capital in Washington. More than six years after the death of Jeffrey Epstein in the federal prison, the mystery over how he died remains very much alive. McFarlane has received 20 regional Emmy and Edward R. Murrow Awards. Mr. McFarlane joins us now. Welcome. Ari, this is a nice treat. Thank you for having me. Great to have you. As I said, either everybody knows your work well or the thing that happens. Sometimes in this business, they go, I know him from somewhere. So you had big media news of your own this week. We'll get to that. But let's start with your view of Congress, this shutdown politics. Is there a breakthrough coming based on your reporting? let me drop a little sunshine on you because we all need a little bit of sun right now you starting to hear concepts of a plan Like, this is the way people talk when they're trying to end an argument that's been going on for a long time, like a softening of ground. Got a lot of that over the last 12 hours, Ari. Senator John Robert F. Kennedy Jr. of Louisiana said that they are just tired, tired of being here, and that often yields a breakthrough. And they do have some type of compromise. Democrats are hinting at it. Dick Durbin and Hakeem Jeffries told me, we're trying to get all the...

Eyes dotted and T's crossed, and there should be enough in there to satisfy Democrats. Republicans seem on board. The president seems on board. This is moving in the good direction. It's just a matter of whether it's hours or a matter of days. All right. Well, for anyone flying soon, that could be good news. I'm curious looking big picture at your Hill reporting. The old narrative was, well, Republicans, they never stand up to Trump on anything. There are changes to that, even if some of it depends on which issue. We saw the Epstein case, which you've covered, lead to a wholesale Republican rejection of Trump secrecy. We're seeing more concern about Iran, especially if it gets out to asking for more blank checks or ground troops. What is the state of play, in your view, of the Republican caucus in Congress, going towards the midterms, and being able to stand up to Trump? I think the bottom line becomes who has to distance him or herself to win a congressional district. And whether the Republican Party wants to acknowledge it or not, the Democratic campaign committee says there are 44, 44 Republican-held U.S. House seats that are in play right now. Republicans would quibble with that number, but that's a... big number, and to preserve some of those seats, they may need to distance themselves some way from the policies, if not from the president, who still has a stranglehold over so much of the Republican Party, and look for issues like, When they do get down to funding ICE, does that work in districts that Kamala Harris won in 2024 held by Republicans or those that are now embattled or endangered? There's going to have to be some distance built on something. If it's not ICE funding, is it something to do with transparency over Iran? Hasn't happened yet. Primaries haven't happened yet, Ari. Look for that 90-day spell before the general election and who's got to put some distance in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Minnesota, Ohio, or Virginia. I mentioned your big move here. You're at CBS, and people have heard a lot about CBS, especially with Stephen Colbert and the mergers and all that. You're going to Midas touch. What both in terms of journalism and in terms of digital distribution made you want to do this job, and will it be any different than your past? I'll note for the viewers. You said, Midas Touch and I have shared the same philosophy. You don't platform lies. You don't platform conspiracy theories. You don't whitewash history. There are some who hear that and think, oh, that's maybe a little different than what we've heard from CBS lately. Can I take you old school? Do I have permission to go old school on you here, Ari? Sure. Nice. Sam and Diane is the analogy I would bill for the cheers fans of the 1980s. It's two people who were kind of meant to be together. Midas Touch Network and I at some point were meant to be together because we share so many parallels in the issues we chase. I chased January 6th. They followed that closely. I've chased issues about political violence, threats to the separation of powers.

Breaking of Democratic norms. They pursue that. We have a lot of the same audience. We have a lot of the same interests. And no, we will not platform lying or misinformation or conspiracy theories, which does have its way of infiltrating a lot of the things we read, see, and hear each day. That's a type of place where there is no value in conspiracy theories. Yeah. And I'm running out of time here, but the final question is when you look at this media consolidation, you have a buyer now that's going to own CBS, CNN, HBO, Warner Brothers, and you have other elements in culture, too, not just news. Does that concern you for civic democracy or too early to tell? I think the rise of independent journalism is on. parallel thing are you see it how many people now have stood up their own unfiltered reporting audiences crave that they want what you do they want hopefully what i do speak directly one on one point blank conversationally and simply and explain the news there's no way any vertical integration can stop that yeah uh scott mcfarland making news of your own this week thanks for being here tonight thank you Appreciate it. I'm going to fit in a break. And when we come back, the story I mentioned, corruption in the betting markets and the war, that's next.

Turning to a report about the way we live now and alleged insider trading on Iran war planning. There were futures that surged suspiciously right just minutes before the president posted to social media about stopping what were planned strikes on Iran's energy infrastructure. Because of the way this works, we can't tell you who made these trades, only that they totaled over half a billion dollars. We'll show you the spike in oil futures. This is 6.50 a.m. Monday morning. 15 minutes before Trump posted. That volume is suspicious. The question is whether somebody used and abused inside even potentially classified information. Wall Street probing whether someone had advanced knowledge and how that would come about with the tight-knit circle of government and Trump officials that would be in the know. I wonder if we have a reduction right now in trust and that there is... A lot of speculation that we are at least perceiving that some people have an edge that we don't. We saw a significant selling of crude futures just before that announcement, just before we saw crude prices falter. We saw a significant purchase of S&P futures. That was an embarrassing moment. It was highly suspicious. One Democrat says this looks like mind-blowing corruption. The Trump administration, which, remember, fired and removed many of the whistleblower-type systems and the inspectors general who do independent probes of government misconduct. They have not yet announced whether they will look into this at all. It could literally endanger our soldiers. We'll be right back.

Thanks for spending time with us on the beat. I'll see you tomorrow at 6 p.m. Eastern. Snoring, gasping for air during sleep, daytime sleepiness. I'm Shaquille O'Neill, and this shouldn't be anybody's experience. Ask your doctor about Zepbound to her Zepatine. The first and only FDA approved prescription medicine for moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults with obesity. Zepbound is a prescription medicine used with a reduced calorie diet and increased physical activity to help adults with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea, OSA, and obesity to improve their OSA. Zepbound is approved as a 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 12.5, or 15 milligram injection. Zepound contains chrezepotide and should not be used with other chrezebitide containing products or any GLP1 receptor agonist medicines. It is not known if Zepound is safe and effective for use in children. Don't share needles or pens or reuse needles. Don't take if allergic to it, or if you or someone in your family had medullary thyroid cancer, or if you've had multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 2. Tell your doctor if you get a lump or swelling in your neck. Stop stepbound and call your doctor if you have severe stomach pain or a serious allergic reaction. Severe side effects may include inflamed pancreas or gallbladder problems. Tell your doctor if you experience vision changes before scheduled procedures with anesthesia. If you're nursing, pregnant, plan to be, or taking birth control pills, taking Zepbound with a sulfonal urea or insulin may cause low blood sugar. Side effects include nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting, which can cause dehydration and worsen kidney problems. Talk to your doctor. Call 1-800-545-97579 or visit Zepbound.lily.com.