"A presidency engulfed in twin crises"

I'm Lindsay and even before my diagnosis, my hands were full as a mom and an investigator. After treating my HR positive, her to negative early breast cancer, I wanted to do everything I could to try to keep it from coming back. So I talked to my doctor about a treatment plan that included Kaskali. Kisgali ribocycly's 200 milligram tablets with an aromatase inhibitor is for adults with HR positive, herd 2 negative, stage 2 or 3, early breast cancer with a high risk of coming back. Kisgali may cause serious skin reactions, liver problems, and low white blood cell counts that may result in serious infections. life-threatening lung problems, and abnormal heartbeats can occur. Your doctor should test your heart and blood before and during treatment. Tell your doctor if you have new or worsening cough, chest pain, or dizziness. Before taking Cascali, tell your doctor all your medical conditions, medicines you take, and if you're breastfeeding, pregnant, or planning to be, as it can harm an unborn baby. Common side effects include nausea, headache, and tiredness. Lindsay is a real patient, compensated for her time. Learn more at cascali.com. In the U.S., there's a break-in every 26 seconds. But when intruders step near, Simply Safe home security steps up. Stop. This is SimplySafe. Police are on the way. Using AI alerts, U.S.-based live agents help deter break ins. Simply safe, no long-term contracts. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at Simplysafe.com slash SXM or with promo code SXM. Outdoor deterrence requires a Simplysafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at $49.99 a month. Visit Simplysafe.com slash licenses for alarm licensed information, Tennessee 2012.

Hi there, everyone. It's 4 o'clock in New York. Donald Trump's presidency is right now engulfed in twin crises, a ballooning national security crisis and an unprecedented political civil war within his own political movement. Having plunged the United States of America into a war with Iran without speaking to the country directly or honestly about that war's objectives or the war's timeline or how it would be measured for success. Donald Trump's own Secretary of State has revealed that the United States of America was essentially dragged into war by Israel. We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action. We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces. And we knew that if we didn't preemptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties and perhaps even higher those killed. And then we would all be here answering questions about why we knew that and didn't act. Marco Rubio's comments right there sent shockwaves across the political spectrum. Here's how the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, Mark Warner, summed it up. There was no imminent threat to the United States of America by the Iranians. There was a threat to Israel. But if we equate a threat to Israel as the equivalent of an imminent threat to the United States, then we are in uncharted territory. Now, as I said, the reaction is not tied up in the typical partisan confines of our normal political debates. On the right, the reaction was more swift and more furious. Even Steve Bannon has questions. Watch. If we knew that Iran was going to be attacked and they would attack us, Is there no coordination in this? I think that has to be explained. Our government's job is not to look out for Iran or for Israel. It's to look out for us. What is happening to the man that I supported, you supported, the man that denounced what happened in Iraq, the man that said no more foreign wars, no more regime changed. And we're a year in, a year in, and we're in another war, and we've got American troops being killed. Doing cleanup on aisle 9, Donald Trump listened to what he had to say. Did Israel force your hand to launch these strikes against Iran? No. No, I might have forced their hand. You see, we were having negotiations with these lunatics, and it was my opinion that they were going to attack first. They were going to attack. If we didn't do it, they were going to attack first. I felt strongly about that. It was my opinion. Again, Senator Mark Warner said after a briefing by the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Defense and the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs and the CIA Director, quote, there was no imminent threat to the United States by the Iranians, end quote. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, The war shows no signs of de-escalating. Quite the opposite. More than 800 people have been killed across the Middle East, including six United States service members. The U.S. embassies in Saudi Arabia and Kuwait have closed after Iranian attacks. The U.S. embassy in Lebanon is also closed. In the last few hours, a drone struck the U.S. consulate in Dubai. No injuries have been reported. The Trump administration is urging all Americans in the Middle East right now in 16 countries in total. Look at that map.

Any American in any of those countries is being urged to evacuate. The same government is not offering any means by which to help them evacuate. The BBC reports that somewhere between 500,000 and 1 million Americans live in that region, and they have been left stranded by the Trump administration. The U.S. Embassy in Jerusalem said this, quote, The U.S. Embassy is not in a position at this time to evacuate or directly assist Americans in departing Israel. Democratic Senator Chris Murphy tweeted this, quote, so the State Department is forcing everyone to immediately leave the region, but is also refusing to help people leave the region. The strike itself is illegal and disastrous, but their lack of readiness for what comes next is unforgivable as well, incompetence everywhere. After a significant backlash, the State Department announced today that it is facilitating charter flights from the UAE, Saudi Arabia, and Jim Jordan. Adding to the tensions, Donald Trump announced a few hours ago that the U.S. may deploy the Navy to escort ships through the Strait of Hormuz. That's the narrow channel through which one-fifth of the world's oil supply goes through. Iran has threatened to attack any ships across the strait, sending oil prices spiking. Donald Trump's war against Iran, a war of choice, turning into a cascading, economic, political, and foreign policy crisis is where we start today. And Applebaum is here. She's a columnist for the Atlantic, also joining us. Retired U.S. Army Brigadier General Steve Anderson is here. Plus, Washington investigative correspondent for the New York Times, Mark Mazetti is here. And with me at the table for the hour, the president of Media Matters for America, Angelo Carrizona is here. Mark Mazetti, you were here on Friday with some incredible... reporting about the three rationales that had been offered up as potential predicates for war in Iran were untrue false and I think the last thing I asked you was are we going to war tonight or this weekend and you said I don't know just tell me how we got here Well, right. As we said last week, the administration was in this sort of 11th hour mode of trying to sell the idea of why there needed to be a war now. And it centered around the idea that Iran was on the brink of having a nuclear weapon and on the brink of having missiles that could hit the United States. And as we discussed, the intelligence didn't support that at all. It was unfounded. The claims were unfounded. So it was... clear you know it's clear now that this was done at the very end when there was a preparation for a strike uh... over last weekend the interesting thing about uh... Marco Rubio's claims that you uh... you showed a clip of about him saying that ultimately iran uh... united states moved because they were afraid iran would strike first because Israel was about to strike, right? This was not just a off-the-cuff remark he made. It's the same logic that he used with the gang of eight last week when arguing about, you know, the possibility of a war and why it might be necessary. The Democrats at the time in the gang of eight, as we reported, saw this as circular logic, and Marco Rubio repeated it yesterday, and as you say, drew a lot of criticism for it.

Anne Applebaum, let me ask you, I think you were also here at the end of last week, and we talked about how Europe has changed because of the political vacuum America created in Ukraine and beyond Trump's, to put it generously, indifference toward NATO. What is the response from our allies about America's Secretary of State essentially saying, we are at war? because we're responding to what Israel was about to do. So alongside not explaining to Americans what the war would be about, the U.S. also didn't explain to allies. I think it did warn some allies, so people were aware that there might be something happening in the Middle East last weekend. But there was no effort to build support for the American position. There was no effort to get... European countries who have actually had a lot of interaction with Iran and who know Iran well and who have troops or military capabilities in the region to be involved, that includes France, Britain, Germany, and others. The suddenness of the announcement actually led to the Spanish government refusing to allow Americans to use bases in Spain. It's almost impossible for Europeans really to react in a consistent way because they weren't included in the conversation. And so mostly they're staying on the sidelines. I would hope that at some point down the road, some will start to offer help with some kind of Iranian transition if we ever get to that. That's something Europeans know about and could do. But the lack of building consensus, allies, process, expectations. I mean, that's not just an American. domestic issue, it's also an issue with the countries that who could, as I say, be helpful to America in a crisis. General, let me show you what Trump is saying and what he's had to say has not really meshed up totally or or narratively with what the Secretary of State has had to say. But let me play for you what what Trump has had to say. What's the worst case scenario that you have planned for in Iran? Well, I don't know if there's a worst case. I guess the worst case would be we do this and then somebody takes over who's as bad as the previous person, right? That could happen. We don't want that to happen. You have someone in mind right now, because you've said all the people you did have in mind have been taken out. Well, most of the people we had in mind are dead. So, you know, we had some in mind from that group that is dead. And now we have another group. They may be dead also based on reports. Your thoughts about where we are as a military and where the conversation with the country stands right now as being led by Donald Trump. Well, I mean, this is obviously turning, I think, into a major disaster. But the point that he was making about taking out senior leaders, I mean, I remember very vividly my time in Iraq. You remember the decks of cards that we had with all the bad guys listed, you know, from the Asia stage to the two clubs, whatever. And how every night we were trying to take out bad guys, senior leaders in the Iraqi military.

al-Qaeda and the like. And I remember the impact on the ground was pretty much negligible, that every time that they killed a bad guy, another one would jump up. These are not stupid people. They've known that this attack was coming for quite some time. We had an 86-year-old Khomeini that was leading this country. who had cancer and he knew that his days were numbered. They had at least four levels, I believe, appointed of the succession plan. So, you know, to think that these people are going to be taken away or we're going to execute regime change merely by killing off the top 40 or 50 senior leaders in the IRGC, I mean, that's pretty rich to go to that, to make that kind of an argument. These people are smart. They are dug in. They're well-equipped. And they're going to hold out for quite some time. despite the fact that they've lost a lot of senior leaders. The military has done a superb job. I'm very, very proud of that. But Donald Trump is taking advantage of their incredible competence and their ability to get the job done because they've been taught to respond, yes, sir, when a civilian leader gives a command. And they've done it very, very well. But what he has essentially done is he's turned America's military into Trump's militia to execute his plan. And his, you know, to feed his ego, make him look like the tough guy. This is not going well. It's only going to get worse and we're only four days into this. Trump's latest public communication about where he will use the military is to deploy the Navy to lead ships through the Straits of Hormuz. What risk does that present to the men and women of the Navy? Well, a tremendous risk, obviously. I mean, if they're going to go into the Persian Gulf, a very small area and a 21 mile straight to Hermes, as we pointed out earlier, I mean, they put themselves in tremendous risk. You know, there are land mines, or there are mines in the sea that have been placed out there. And, of course, they do have a Navy. Donald Trump claims that we degraded quite a bit of it. But there's lots of threats that the Navy will definitely encounter in trying to support the movement of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Let me come back to what Marco Rubio has put before the Congress and the country. This public narrative that we went to

respond to what would be the response from Iran knowing that Israel was going to go. It presupposes that we had no sway or no influence over what Israel would do, which if that is the sworn testimony, Secretary of State, that's shocking in and of itself. But this is where the most dramatic rupture is within Trump's movement. since I've known you, since I've laid eyes on you, just here having these conversations. And this is a tweet from right-wing influencer, the Daily Wire host, Matt Walsh, quote. So he is flat out telling us, we are in a war with Iran because Israel forced our hand. This is basically the worst possible thing he could have said. Yeah, that's, I mean, that's an important point to consider, because one of the things that Marco Rubio did is that there was a bunch of people that were... tepid, but they were still saying, look, I'm not sure I'm here, but they're not full-throat attacking Trump or the Trump administration, like Walsh. When he said that, he basically kicked a hornet's nest because this has been a major fault line in the larger MAGA coalition for a while. That big dust up back in October between Nick Fuentes and the Heritage Foundation that created that pile on where all these right-wingers then started picking aside, where JD Vance had to essentially say, no, no, we're going to let the Gwaters in because he couldn't say no. We're not going to let them out. It was all because of this. How much power and influence do we actually want Israel to have over our politics? And then separate from that, how much tolerance are we going to have for the mere perception of that, that narrative thread? And what Marco Rubio said is he confirmed for a large part of the Manga Coalition, something that they've been saying for a while, the Alex Joneses of the world, the Nick Fuentes, the Matt Walsh is, that actually this is all about Israel. and that Trump was not really, Trump did not have his hand on the wheel. The sort of the strong man that you've been fully supporting and carrying all this water for, back filling all the lives for, he wasn't the one that made this decision. We are now doing it for someone else. And that, created, that opened up a massive fault line. And, you know, they had been percolating beforehand. There was already tension, but that was a difference maker. And there's no way to walk that back. He can claim that wasn't what he was saying. It's too late because there was a perception that was percolating, a feeling. They had been soaking in that narrative for such a long time. That is where the growth has been. in the Maga Media has actually been around that threat. The reason that the Groypers and these other figures have so much influence is because they always tie everything back to that. Candace Owens ties everything back to that. And so that is the major sort of theme. And they're America first is what they say they are, but at the core, they're isolationists. And this fear, you know, it not only fuels anti-Semitism and feeds into that, but also runs against their isolationist tenancies. So what Marco Rubio did was not just validate and confirm and for them one of their biggest fears, but he basically said, this is now the fight. This is actually what this fight's about. And so now when he's calling the question as to whether or not we're going to, that they're going to tolerate Trump being as closely aligned with Israel as he's been. I mean, Mark Vizzetti, this, this.

It is such a shock to the system, I think for Americans to hear, that we have launched a war against Iran with sort of a paragraph from the wildly unpopular doctrine of preemption from the Bush era, of which I worked in that administration, but only to follow and be led. by Israel's foreign policy decisions. Is it true that we had, I mean, did we have any capacity to influence or weigh in with Israel? I mean, just tell me, with all of your knowledge of the U.S.-Israeli relationship, where does that relationship stand? And is it, as Marco Rubio describes, they were doing this with or without our approval or our buy-in. And so we had to strike Iran at the same time. To what? I mean, just fill in the blanks of what Marco Rubio has said publicly, so I understand. So we did a story that published yesterday that got into basically what led Trump to war. And it kept coming back to Benjamin Netanyahu. where if you go back to late December, Benjamin Netanyahu makes a visit to Mar-a-Lago. And during that meeting, he kind of plants the seed of an idea of that Israel was probably going to have to strike Iran sometime in the first half of 2026. He would like American support. He would like protection. But Benjamin Netanyahu was basically saying, we're going to need to do this. And over the weeks that followed, as Trump was taking this sort of circuitous path, is he going to protect the protesters, is he going to knock out the nuclear program throughout, or cut a deal, right? Throughout behind the scenes, there was this push increasingly by Benjamin Netanyahu that led to what we now see, which is a joint U.S.-Israeli military operation. Trump was not getting any advice of his own advisors against doing this, but he was getting strong advice from Benjamin Netanyahu that he needed to be part of that. So Benjamin Netanyahu kind of filled the vacuum there. And the one other thing I think it's important to say is that Trump came off the operation in Venezuela in early January quite confident about how quick and easy U.S. military force can be. And I think got into the idea that, well, maybe something as clean as Venezuela can be done in Iran. So it's these combination of forces that kind of led us to where we are right now. It's important to note, though, since we've been covering Marco Rubio so closely, Marco Rubio described the operation in Venezuela as a, quote, law enforcement operation. So, again, all these public discrepancies, they may well be singing kumbaya from the same sheet privately, but publicly, Marco Rubio and Trump do not seem to be emphasizing or saying similar things. I want to share with all of you with some reporting in the Wall Street Journal about...

Trump's openness to supporting armed militias inside Iran. I have to sneak in a break before I do that. Also ahead for us, Donald Trump's Secretary of State Marco Rubio is right now, once again, publicly defending the U.S. strikes against Iran. He's briefing senators. We'll talk to Democrat Ruben Gallego when that briefing wraps up to see if his message is consistent with what he said publicly yesterday. Plus, days before the U.S. military operation in Iran began, FBI director Kash Patel's politically motivated firings included agents specializing in Iranian counterintelligence. We'll talk about that reporting. And later in the show, an unbelievable moment on Capitol Hill. when a Republican senator called for the resignation of Kristi Noem comparing her disastrous decision-making in Minneapolis to the murder of her 14-month-old dog cricket, something we have covered here extensively after she reported on it herself in her own book. We'll play you that stunning moment. All those stories and more when Deadline White House continues after a quick break. Don't go anywhere today. There are moments that define who you are and who you're becoming, and when those moments arrive, what you drive should rise to meet them. The Range Rover Sport commands attention from the very first glance. Every line, every detail, engineered for impact. Inside, refinement takes over with sculpted 22-way heated seating with available massage and a 13.1-inch touchscreen that puts everything within easy reach. But the Range Rover Sport isn't just about luxury. It's about uncompromised performance, too. Delivering a powerful, agile drive that feels as confident as it looks. And with nearly endless ways to personalize, from interior finishes to wheels to unique colors and accessories, your Range Rover Sport becomes unmistakably yours. For those who expect more from every moment, there's a vehicle designed to meet it. The Rangerover Sport. Exclusive offers available now. Explore further atrangeover.com. In the U.S., there's a break-in every 26 seconds. But when intruders step near, Simply Safe home security steps up. Stop. This is SimplySafe. Police are on the way. Using AI alerts, U.S.-based live agents help deter break-ins. Simply safe, no long-term contracts. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at Simplysafe.com slash SXM or with promo code SXM. Outdoor deterrence requires a Simplysafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at 4999 a month. Visit Simplysaf.com slash licenses for alarm license for alarm license information, Tennessee 2012. Yo, it's Jay Uso from WWE, and I'm Jimmy Uso. Chumba Casina and WWE are a hype for the biggest event of the summer. Summer Slam. I know I can't wait. There's nothing better to do while we're waiting than playing Chumba Casino. Sign up today and you could win a VIP experience. With Chumba Casino and with WW4 SummerSlam. So what are you waiting for? Play Chumbo Casino and enter for your chance to win. Let's Chumble. Only available in permitted states, no purchase necessary, see terms and conditions for details. VGW Group would be prohibited by law 21 plus sponsored by Chumpa Casino.

I can't think of anything more dismissive and arrogant than this president not directly addressing the American people and explaining this war more thoroughly. Well, good morning. This is not a so-called regime change war, but the regime sure did change. Oh, for God's sakes. I stand corrected. We're back with Anne, General Anderson, Mark and Angelo. There's been so much over the last 13 months that people like John Stewart have talked the country through, in part because of their unique courage at the moment when so many powerful people have capitulated from law firms to universities to business leaders, civic leaders, and elected officials. But this lack of... believing that a conversation with the American people, especially, especially the families, the kids, the parents, and the members of the military is an outlier. The New York Times had some great reporting on Sunday that even with the fracturing of our media system, it is completely unprecedented in our country's history and really around the world for a leader not to address the country when he takes the country and uses the military. to wage war. Now that six service members have lost their lives, so six families will not see their sons or daughters or moms or dads again, that feels even more negligent in terms of our leadership. What do you make of that as part of a pattern or practice of how Trump sees himself as an autocratic leader? So one of the strange things about Trump's presidency, and this is actually even different from some dictatorships. I mean, there are a lot of dictatorships before they go to war would do a propaganda campaign, as the Russians did, for example, before attacking Ukraine, they would spend months talking about the enemy and so on. But Trump's method of leadership is often called personalist. He does what he feels like in any given moment. His main aim is to win the current moment, whatever that is. So whether it's a confrontation with a journalist or whether it's a confrontation with a foreign enemy to be seen as the dominant person or the dominant figure in the room or the conversation or of the moment. And it looks like that's what he did here. In other words, there was no... particular plan. There was no clear goal. But he felt that this was a moment when he could demonstrate his dominance and he could win somehow. Of course, he doesn't win. Then he'll walk away and say he won anyway. But the consequences of that for Americans, for anybody in the Middle East, and actually for Iranians, you know, the Iranian people don't seem to have been at the center of this. of this operation at all. There's been no attempt to think about who might rule Iran next or how the Iranian Democratic opposition might come to power or might at least have influence inside the country. You know, instead he's speaking about, oh, well, there were some other military leaders. There were some other members of the Islamic Republic who he imagined they would take over as in Venezuela. So it's this personalist way of running the country. You know, there's no policy process.

There's no presentation of different points of view. There's no consideration of alternatives. There's no internal debate inside the White House. And then there's no external debate in the country. There's no public debate. There's no debate with Congress. As I've already said, there's no debate with allies. In other words, there's no attempt to create any kind of consensus or movement or agreement, even if it's a minority consensus. And that's very unusual, actually, not just in American history, but anywhere. I mean, the whims of an individual leader would make these life and death dramatic decisions without any input from anybody else, which is certainly what it looks like from the outside. This is very strange, and it's likely to produce very erratic and unpredictable outcomes. General, even Trump's, I mean, to Anne's point, Trump has told us that, quote, most of the people we had in mind to run Iran are dead, end quote. It suggests that regime change is not their goal, because if he also killed all the people that he, quote, had in mind to run Iran are dead, they were close enough to the Ayatollah to have been in the same blast radius. And so what have the military families been told they are doing? Well, that's a very good question. I don't think they really know what they're doing. There have been no real clear-cut military objectives. I mean, regime change is not something that the military does. I mean, that's done in our lexicon of things that we can do. There's lots that we can do and lots that we have do. But the military, and then back to my point about, you know, Trump's militia versus America's military is that he's found in the military people that salute smartly and say, yes, sir. to almost everything that he asked him to do. He asked him to have a parade in Washington, D.C., and they say, yes, sir. They asked him to deploy National Guard troops to Los Angeles and Portland and the southern border. They say, yes, sir. They sent him down to Colombia, to Venezuela, to grab Maduro. execute a mission down there superbly done, superbly executed. Yes, sir, once again. And here we are. Now we're in Iran. And I'll tell you what, I mean, I remember what Marine buddy of mine reminded me, what General Zinni had said back in 2007. He said that if you like Iraq and Afghanistan, you're going to love Iran. It's three and a half times the size of Iraq, 92 million people. It would take... 500,000 troops and six months to deploy if we were to have some kind of a ground invasion. So we need to know what we're going to do. The military families deserve to know that, to know that. Unfortunately, you know, Donald Trump never served in the military. In fact, he tried to avoid it five times. you know, President Bonesfurs and all that. He's never had a family member. He doesn't know what military families go through in the sacrifices. There are like over 50,000 American families now back in the United States that are on pins and needles waiting to see what happens to their sons and daughters in the Middle East. He doesn't understand that and it's really, really sad.

Let me read one more piece of reporting. Wall Street Journal reports Trump open to supporting armed militias in Iran, according to U.S. officials, quote, Trump is open to supporting groups in Iran, willing to take up arms to dislodge the regime, according to U.S. officials, an idea that could turn Iranian factions into ground forces, at least rhetorically backed by Washington. Trump spoke Sunday with Kurdish leaders, officials said, and is continuing to engage with other local leaders who might leverage Tehran's weakness to make gains. The Kurds have a sizable force. along the Iraq-Iran border. Israel has bombed positions in Western Iran, leaving to speculation that it's paving a path for a Kurdish advance. Donald Trump has also not ruled out, quote, boots on the ground. And Marco Rubio has testified to, quote, the worst. bombing as being yet to come. Marco Rubio is right now briefing the Senate, and we will have one of those senators join us on the other side. But there is certainly more public rhetoric that suggests escalation. is what is ahead, as opposed to a Maduro-style one-and-done kind of operation. Mark Mazzetti, does any of your reporting suggest that this is what was considered by any sort of formal NSC process? Oh, I'm not sure there was much of an NSC process. It was very opaque to us that the decision-making had actually any kind of process. Certainly, President Trump was briefed on military options. But, I mean, even this report you just quoted, this question of, you know, what they're considering now that the war has started about what the end game might be, it sort of certainly gives the impression that this is to a degree being made up. as they go along. And, you know, just look at what the last five days that brought us. On Saturday, you heard President Trump in his video message. He didn't say regime change, I don't believe, but he certainly left the impression that this is the goal of the mission is to change the leadership. And then that was certainly considered an unpopular. option by many after it was announced. And yesterday you heard Marco Rubio try to go out and narrow what the objectives were. He had said four specific things. It's missiles. It's the nuclear program. It's the proxy militias that Iran uses and it's Navy. Okay. So they're trying to say this is narrowly focused and once they achieve these objectives that it's over. However, again, as it's just been said, This is now, the can of warrants has been opened, and so the question is just how much the U.S. and Israel are going to have to own the outcome. Yeah.

That is a question. Ann Applebaum and Mark Mazetti, thank you so much for your time today and for starting us off. General Anderson and Angelo stick around a little bit longer. After the break, as we've mentioned, Senator Ruben Gallego will join us on what he's learned in his latest briefing, where the Trump cabinet is briefing members of the Senate on the justification for war with Iran. We'll be right back. In the U.S., there's a break-in every 26 seconds. But when intruders step near, Simply Safe home security steps up. Stop. This is SimplySafe. Police are on the way. Using AI alerts, U.S.-based live agents help deter breakins. SimplySaf, no long-term contracts. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at Simplysafe.com slash SXM or with promo code SXM. Outdoor deterrence requires a SimplySafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at $49.99 a month. Visit Simplysafe.com slash licenses for alarm licensed information, Tennessee 2012. Yo, it's Jay Uso from WWE, and I'm Jimmy Uso. Chumba Casina and WWE are hype for the biggest event of the summer. Summer Slam. I know I can't wait. There's nothing better to do while we're waiting than playing Chumba Casino. Sign up today and you could win a VIP experience. With Chumba Casino and with WW4 SummerSlam. So what are you waiting for? Play Chumbo Casino and enter for your chance to win. Let's Chumble. Yeat. No purchase necessary. VGW Group Void were prohibited by law. CTNCs, 21 Plus, sponsored by Chumba Casino. Have you ever wanted to share your opinions with MS Now about our TV programs, podcasts, live events, and more? Now's your chance to have your voice heard. Join the MSNow Insights community at MS. Now slash insights.

Most people feel, I'll tell you what, I have never had more compliments on something I did. People felt it's something that had to be done. So if we have a little high oil prices for a little while, but as soon as this ends, those prices are going to drop, I believe, lower than even before. I mean, every now and then the truth seeps out. We're back with General Anderson and Angelo. As soon as this ends, prices are going to go back down. That might be true. But it is also true, as he said there, that, quote, will have high oil prices for a little while. The pressure on the American people from his tariffs... even before the Supreme Court ruled them illegal. The pressure on the American people from his lack of interest in dealing with inflation, the pressure and the people feel will now also be felt at the palm. Yeah, and I think the fact that he acknowledged them is revealing in a significant way because it shows partly how we're in this mess, is that why he acknowledged that is because that's the coverage on Fox News. So if you look at Fox News, they're all acknowledging that the oil prices are going to go up. Now, they're spinning themselves in Nass to try to run sort of cover for their audience. You know, Ainslie Earhart is saying, well, you know, they're going to go up, but they were so low to begin with that that's okay. Which isn't true. You know, Maria Barter-Ruma saying, well, you know, but we're a rich country. We can find a way to deal with it. Or Jesse Waters. Trump was basically quoting what Jesse Waters was saying. You know, Jesse Waters glibly acknowledging that prices are going to go up, blah, blah, blah, but saying, don't worry, in the end, it's all going to balance out, because the prices are going to end up even lower, and so the average is going to cut in your favor. Trump obviously lashed onto that defense, which is that somehow there's going to be something you get out of it. But part of the reason we're in this mess is because he's been pickled in the narrative about Iran from Fox News since 2010. You know, I mean, they're the ones that were driving toward this war. They're the ones that really wanted this. They were the ones that advocate. And he just not looking at Joe Rowland. He's not looking at what the podcasts are saying. That's his worldview. That is the lens to which he sees the world. Whatever is happening on his phone from these random phone calls and then what he sees on Fox News. And, you know, he's just not connected to the zeitgeist in the way that he was anymore. He's not looking at what's happening in these online spaces. So that's it. And he relies on that. So when it does break through, he then acknowledges it and responds to it or incorporates it into his thinking. But it does sort of show you that the fact that they're on this early about it. already sort of teeing it up that this is going to happen, shows that they are worried about the political ramifications here, in some ways, are trying to do them a favor by getting in front of it. And I think that's the significant part ahead. General, I'm not suggesting causation, but I do want to cover aggressively the correlation between Fox News's aggressive coverage of the rising gas prices and Donald Trump's decision today to deploy the Navy to escort ships through the Straits of Hormuz. Your thoughts? Well, I mean, obviously you're talking about a president who really doesn't care about military service, soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines, and doesn't understand the risks that are intended with conducting operations. We've already had six soldiers killed, and he kind of...

flew it off as well, this happens during war, and there'll be probably more to follow. I mean, it just shows that he's totally out of touch with what goes on in military lifestyle and military service. In fact, any kind of service. He's all about service of himself. And whatever can get him power and glory is something that he's going to pursue. And if he can use the military, you know, as competent and as professional as they are, if he could take advantage of that and show the world what a tough guy is, he's going to do it every single time, despite the fact that it's totally contrary to the things that he ran for president on, you know, eliminating those forever wars and doing something about the price of gas. cost of living in America. These are all things that he doesn't seem to really care a win about anymore. And he's completely contradicted himself by virtue of this unprovoked war that he's initiated in Iran. It just brings to mind something he also revealed about himself and his foreign policy. He recently said in an interview with my colleague, Joe Scarborough, about Iraq that, quote, I would have taken the oil. So he does not disentangle another country's natural resources with the use of the U.S. military. Brigadier General Steve Anderson, thank you so much for starting us off today and sticking around for most of the hour. We are grateful. Quick break. We'll be right back.

A closed-door Senate briefing has just wrapped up with Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Dan Kane, and CIA director, John Ratcliffe. As the Trump administration continues to shift its public story about the reasons for attacking Iran and their timing for doing so, or what happens next. We want to bring into our coverage, Democratic Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona. He sits on the Homeland Security Committee and was Marine Combat. veteran who served in Iraq. Senator, I know it's a busy day and that you zipped out to the camera to talk to us. We're really grateful for that. We wonder if you could just take us through what you heard. Well, look, there's a certain amount that I can't say it's into the classified in nature, but I can tell you what I did not, you know, come out feeling better. Number one, there is still without any dispute, the fact that we ended up going into this action, going into war, because we had to follow our, you know, subordinate allies lead when it came to Israel. That is very, very concerning. especially considering on timing, considering on what the repercussions of that are. Number two, I still don't know what the end game is. There still is no clear indication what is success, what is victory, what is Iran going to look like when this is done, and what the timetable is. And I think that's also very concerning. We should all be concerned because we have been very clear, you know, I think the American public has been very clear, that we don't want another forever war. And we are currently engaging into something that is... potentially going to just keep on evolving. And again, you know, who ends up paying for this are the men and women of this country that serve us and the whole public right now because, again, government is distracted for what they really should be doing, just focusing on what people are worried about, it's the cost of living and everything else that's really hurting every day Americans. Can I just throw out for you some of the things they've said publicly and ask you if you heard these contradictory things or if they were able to narrow them down?

Senator, so can you hear us? Can you hear us? Can you say that? Yeah, now I can hear you. Yeah, I just want to, so Donald Trump has talked about, quote, boots on the ground. And Marco Rubio has talked about how the bombing campaign against Iran and inside Iran will, quote, escalate in the coming days. Is that, are both those things on the table? Well, certainly what I've been told is that they're not off the table. So, you know, that can be a concern right there. And again, part of this is that there is no real understanding of what victory looks like. They have a mixture of reasons of what we want to do while we're there. Now they've kind of landing on the reason why we ended up going. And the reasoning in terms of why they didn't have to come and get authority, you know, authorization from Congress before is because their interpretation of a preeminent attack is entirely based on this idea that if Israel had attacked Iran, Iran was going to attack them back and us. So therefore we had to go. in with Israel before the attack actually happened that would have been the counter attack to us. That is their definition of a preeminent situation that was able to basically go against, you know, standing policy of actually coming and talk to Congress. That is a very scary policy situation that they're making because it basically dictates our, you know, standing of whether we're going to go to war or not. and alleviate to other partners and other allies. I don't think any American wants to give that type of power to anybody else. I think especially in dangerous areas. And again, you know, we're burning through a lot of ammunition right now. At some point, we're going to start dragging in the ammunition from other parts of the world. What is that going to do to that? and what is this going to cost us? The amount of money we're burning through right now could have paid for a lot of health insurance, could pay for the food stamps, could have paid for it, to help people buy their first homes, whatever it is, but we ended up following an ally, a sovereign ally, into a situation that's just going to burn our time, our cash, our money. Did they describe this as a new doctrine that we followed Israel into war inside Iran because Israel was going to attack anyway and we had to attack also? I mean, does that extend, if Poland decides to attack Russia, will we follow Poland into war in Russia or if Taiwan decides to attack China? Will we follow Taiwan? Is it a doctrine that they've adopted or is it specific to Iran and Israel? No, I don't want to mischaracterize that this is somehow a new doctrine. You know, that that's not correct. But I will say that the reason they give us is exactly what you just, which mentioned, and it does scare me if this is going to be a consistent pattern and or logic that we're going to be that they're going to use in the Middle East. At this time it's Israel is the next time going to be Saudi Arabia or Qatar or one of these other countries that have, you know, long-term beef with Iran. I don't think that's what the American public wants. You know, when you talk about places like, you know, Poland, they are part of NATO, but it's very clear in, you know, our treaty with NATO and NATO countries that we do not have to, and Article 5 is not invoked if you are the offending country, if you're the invading country. That is, you know, so we could avoid situations like this where we end up being embroiled in other people's messes.

What would you want to hear if you were a family, military family right now, if your son or daughter or husband or wife or your dad were deployed? Why is it so important to understand both why we went, why we went, when we went, and what the end game and objectives are? Well, what I wanted to hear when I was in Iraq in 2005 is why am I here? What am I still doing here? What is the mission? And when am I going to be done? Or when is this mission going to be done? And right now, the president has not been very clear what the overall reasoning while we went. He has backtracked on, you know, in terms of the preeminent attack. vis-a-vis Israel, but his staff is not, his cabin members have not. We don't know what the timeline is of how long we're going to be engaged. We don't know what we can define as victory. And those are the three things that would really scare me because you already have, for example, sailors that have been on rotation or on board of ship for almost 10 months, right? Something that is unheard of. You know, they have not seen their families, have not been able to port at all. This is the kind of thing that is, you know, very deteriorating to a family. Like it's, you know, not only it's stressful, it's scary. You know, hearing from my mom, for example, from experience of her waiting to find out if I was alive or dead or when I was coming home, imagine what we're doing to families right now. And look, we already had six deaths. This is a very serious situation that we find ourselves. And the president needs to treat this in a serious manner by actually having a press conference. He's had more time talking to Mar-Lago, you know, rich dudes than he has to actually sit in front of the American public and explain what is going on and why we ended up going to. Iran. Your voice is so important right now. We really appreciate you taking the time to talk to us today. Senator Ruben Gallego, thank you. Thank you. Angela, thank you for spending the hour with me. We'll continue to call on you because I think it's impossible to overstate the sort of hot political war going on the right right now. We'll continue to rely on you to cover that. Thank you so much. We have to sneak in one more break. We'll be right back on the other side.

As much as we'd like to get home, we feel like we're not the priority and we'll just kind of keep hoping for the best when it's time for us. We definitely haven't gotten any information from our airline about flights. We checked in with the U.S. Embassy and all that they said was to shelter in place. I've been here since the 23rd and everything has just went left in the last, I would say, three days. So my main focus is just making it out. It's just a very out-of-body experience. And I just wouldn't wish this on anyone, honestly. Four days after the first U.S. Israel attacks on Iran, thousands of Americans are stranded in the Middle East. The Trump administration says it is now organizing military aircraft and charter flights and also urging U.S. citizens in more than a dozen countries to leave now, quote, due to serious safety risks using, quote, available commercial transportation. But the... Problem with that is many airports are shuttered and U.S. embassies are acting in survival mode. Amid attacks that Donald Trump warns could continue for days or weeks or, quote, far longer. Coming up for us, this sounds like a good idea. Kash Patel gutting, an FBI team with a specialty in tracking threats from Iran, that reporting behind the story when Deadline White House continues after a quick break. Stay with us.

Traditional home security only alerts you after a break-in, and that's too late. Simpli-Safe is changing that. Stop. This is SimplySafe. Police are on the way. We don't just alert. We stop crime before it starts. SimplySafe, plans starting around a dollar a day. Save 50% on your new system with professional monitoring at Simplysafe.com slash SXM or with promo code SXM. Outdoor deterrence requires a Simplysafe Active Guard outdoor protection plan starting at 4999 a month. Visit simplysafe.com slash licenses for alarm license information, Tennessee 2012.