Birthright Citizenship Decision, No Boys in Girls' Sports, New Laws on the Books

Congress is actually going to move very quickly now that this order has happened. Now, understand that I would normally say, well, that's the ruling, but I will 100% say, you got this wrong. The 14th Amendment was not written so that Chinese nationals could come here and have a baby that would be born on U.S. oil and become a U.S. citizen. It wasn't put here for illegals that crossed the border illegally and have a baby here in America get to keep their baby. That's not why the 14th Amendment was written. need Stephen Miller to tell you here he will. There is no possible reading of the 14th Amendment that applies to foreigners with foreign loyalties, foreign citizenship, foreign obligations, foreign everything. That's exactly it. This was originally written because a slave needed to be, they needed to recognize the slave as a citizen and there it came, the 14th Amendment because it was about recognizing the freed slaves as also U.S. citizens. And that's where it started. Started. No, no, no. That's what it is. And that's how it was written. And now it is being abused in my own honest opinion. And what this ruling does is leave the floodgates open. And we're going to talk about it at 720 this morning when it comes to birth tourism because it leaves the door wide open for that. It leaves the wide door open for the half a billion dollars that Lee County hospitals had to pay for illegal births and illegal immigrants inside their hospitals that weren't covered. But it gets deeper. than that, because when you have something like a birth tourism baby or you have a baby that is born on U.S. soil, but the parents aren't U.S. citizens at all, this child becomes a citizen, gets all the rights of a citizen, and let's talk long-term effect. Because I like to think long-term. It's not about a Band-Aid that's just going to help me now. I want to get some stitches, and I want to get past this and move on and heal forever. And when these birth-right citizenship kids, they turn 21, you know what happens next, right? 21, they get to sponsor other family members to come on into America. And it's that chain effect, there's that chain migration that will just continually affect. And it's got to be stopped because just like... It was just said it's not for foreign influence or foreign citizens. It wasn't written for that. And I've said it once, I'll say we are in need of a new amendment. We are in need of a couple of new updates to the Constitution, i.e. amendments. I'm glad that that's where you're going, Jason, because I think that this ruling kind of defines the path as to where we can go next on this particular issue.

hands down the ability for Congress to be able to act on this. And yes, it does block one tool in Trump's toolbox on this immigration crackdown. Fine. But this also, but this will allow Congress, maybe we revisit the Save America Act and we add definitions for this in it. Or like you said, we approach the amendment process of the Constitution, which is far more substantially difficult to get through, but would indeed have long-term implications just like this. Jamie Van says Congress is working on it. Fundamentally, what we're talking about is fixing a problem the Supreme Court created. We also want to look over the long term at undoing that problem to begin with because, again, this was only a five to four decision. Right. And I think that that's what you have to do. I think that's your game plan. I certainly hope so. And for me personally, I look at this particular ruling and I say, you've got to attack it from every angle. All right? You do. You have to go after this from every angle. Kind of like when Trump put the mail-in ballot rule. He's trying to put the mail-in ballot rule through the post office, you know, trying to circumvent anything. I'll just put a rule says that they can't accept ballots. And we're done. Huh, see how that works? That's the way I believe you have to do this from every angle. And now the DOJ is even getting into birth tourism. Check this out. Justice Department leadership is directing U.S. attorneys to prioritize the investigation and prosecutions of birth tourism schemes. In a memo to federal prosecutors, Assistant Attorney General Colin McDonald says the DOJ will hold accountable those who engage in unlawful conduct like false visa applications. A majority of Supreme Court justices. blocked an executive order from President Trump that was intended to prevent automatic citizenship to children born in the U.S. the parents in the country illegally or temporarily. Chief Justice John Roberts concludes the 14th Amendment ensures any person born on U.S. soil is a U.S. citizen. At the White House, Jared Halpern, Fox News. No. Yeah, they, this one they got wrong. But again, the Supreme Court ruled the way. They ruled as it written. Let me ask you something. They ruled it as it's written. Do you think Amy Coney Barrett? Maybe one of Donald Trump's greatest regrets. Absolutely. And I'll prove that coming up in the next segment. And I will definitely prove that. It might be the biggest rhino in the history of rhinos. And I'll talk about that coming up. Let me do the math for you. So everyone understands how serious this is. 225,000 to 250,000 bursts per year to illegal immigrants. Quarter of a million. 20,000 to 26,000 through birth tourism. Now we're close to 300,000 when we're going there. It continues to go up when you start adding in the people that do chain migration and how vague also get. And that number reaches close to a half a million. Now, you're talking per year, not over time.

We just have to kind of see what Congress's approach is here. The vice president said that they're going to work on it. Congress has, I mean, not been the most reliable Congress for the Republicans, at least the Senate anyways. But I hope that somebody like Byron Donalds's will kind of take the lead on this, start putting some language on a document so they can start talking about this debating and clearly finally defining this definition and implementing it, hopefully, if we can get it through the Senate. Absolutely. Absolutely. We'll take your calls on this and more coming up after the break. 239, 479, 5592. Plus, the other Supreme Court ruling that has been made here at the end of this session has everything to do with something I was hoping would get through. It did get through. Now we can remove it from the Save Act and make the Save Act way more defined. It gives us way more leverage. I'll explain that coming up next. You're listening to a daybreak right here on 925 Fox News right all along.

Science Department at 925 Fox News have reached a consensus. The 5 at 835 is always happening. Listen on the daybreak podcast anytime, anywhere. Our scientists also want you to stop asking why it starts at 837. Welcome back to daybreak. Here on 92-5 Fox News, right all along. All right, so birthright citizenship inside the Supreme Court ruling. I got Chuck from Pontagora, Chuck. I haven't talked to you in a minute. Go ahead, Chuck. Who do you blame? I blame the French. Oh, why do you blame the French? Well, you know, there's this whole site. If their heat wave is our problem, then you're right. Then this Supreme Court ruling is their fault. I'm going there soon. I've got nothing negative to say about them ever. I've even listed my job as unemployed so that no one would think I actually am a conservative talk show host overseas. No joke. I legitimately did not put that down. It asked for it. It asked for what I do for a living. And I was like, oh. Because I'm going overseas for those who don't know. And it's wild to think. But you're right. Let's blame France. I like that, Chuck. The Supreme Court also ruled on boys and girls' sports. And here is the ruling from Fox News. West Virginia and Idaho laws banning transgender girls and women from female sports teams do not violate the U.S. Constitution's equal protection clause. More than two dozen states have similar laws, and the court's decision will likely settle disputes in those cases as well. Writing for the majority, Justice Brett Kavanaugh lays out an interest in states protecting biological females to ensure competitive fairness. The court's conservative majority joined Brett Kavanaugh. The three liberal justices signed on to an opinion. agreeing in part and dissenting in part with the majority. At the White House, Jared Halpern, Fox News. This is a win, but it's not the end of the fight. What this says is that your zip code decides whether or not you're allowed to play. A trans man is allowed to play into a woman's sports. And the zip code should matter. We need federal regulation. You need to get this to the federal level. This needs to become law. This needs to become something that we all vote on. We make happen. And it gets into law because of the fact that it shouldn't matter on zip codes. It should matter whether or not you're biologically a boy or biologically a girl. And that is what this ruling does do. It does define whether or not you are a boy or a girl. And it does give leverage for people who want to fight against it in the blue states that are all for California, which I hope someone does.

Yeah, and the other precedent I think here that this sets too. And I actually think that this was a good decision to hand control to the states. I always prefer states have more granular control over policy. Now, this particular issue is obviously something that we have to we have to. investigate more closely because okay if it's if it's allowed in your state in your state competitions um i don't think that those athletes should be allowed to compete across state lines in any competition if they're going to break the rules uh in one game they shouldn't be able to change the rules to play in the other game so if you're going to isolate it down to states and districts okay that's your prerogative but i think that this should also create restrictions on those types of athletes you know i say 100 percent it needs quick swift legislation if you want to do it on the state level fine I'd like to see it universally across the board federally make it make it so that it can't be that way but you know it does hand the power back to the states but I believe though each here's what it does if I'm in a state that allows it and I don't like it I can sue and win now That's right, because you have a legal precedent that you can sue upon. So it will eventually become federally around the world because you can fight it with one person. Or it will be struck down state by state over the next few years. I imagine there will be packs and legal councils that come and start fighting this fight. Now, what's the question you asked me during the last segment? Do I think Amy? Connie Amy Coney Barrett is Donald Trump's biggest regret. I don't know. Listen to what she had to say. Here's audio, actual audio, from the Supreme Court hearing. Listen. You're just drawing the line based on biological sex and saying that trans girls can't be on the girls team in an age group that's prepubescent. The record in this case does not support the notion that males lack an athletic advantage at six years old. That's about as early as the science goes from what's in the record. And even at that age, males have about a 5% athletic advantage over girls in most situations. Trans girls can't play in girls sports. Is she calling men trans girls? Is this a conservative judge that was appointed by our president and now is calling men trans girls? Rhino! This is the issue with these, particularly these judges, they'll play the game to get there. They're mouthpieces. And it should be, and real basically, here's what I'll say. They were right in their ruling on the birthright citizenship. It's how it's written. If they are following how it's written in the 14th Amendment, it's written loosely, and it will qualify for that. And if you follow how it's written, constitutionally, all of that is legal and that is the issue. Okay, that's where the core of that issue is. Now, let's go straight into this. This is about boy and girl. You're born a boy, you're born a girl. That's the way it was meant to be. Sports have always been divided because of the advantage you just heard of when it comes to the stats. And when you have a judge who is up there now, obviously throwing opinion.

Not according to the Constitution, not according to how life is. This isn't an opinion. This is where we didn't put you there to give us your political point. We put you there to define what everything truly is. The colors of the flag, red, white, and blue. A boy is born a boy. Yeah, we put you there to interpret the law. And now you have someone who's up there going, well, trans girls can't? What is it trans girl anyway? Is that a girl who wants to be a girl? I'm not sure what a trans girl. I don't even know what it is either. It just takes too much mental bandwidth to process all that terminology that the alphabet mafia loves to toss around. But a great win. Riley Gaines had great things to say about it. She had a great reaction to it. Here's what she had to say. I feel absolutely vindicated. I feel, of course, excited. I feel optimistic about the future. But I think... The feeling that I feel the most of is vindicated, right? I think not just myself, but most people, especially those with, with, you know, large platforms who have taken the stance that Michaela and Jen and myself have taken over the years, we. Oh, I'm sorry. She's been fighting this fight for a long time. For a very, very long time. I think she might be one of the original pioneers of the movement. And feeling vindicated is what she should feel. But she also said what I said. The fight's not over. It's not even close to being over. It shouldn't be based on your zip code. It should be based on whether or not you're a boy or a girl. What this is is the table's turning, right? This is the opportunity. Now we can go on the offensive. Well, there you go. Those are your two rulings inside the Supreme Court. We are going to read. visit the birthright citizenship and the birth tourism angle coming up at 720 coming up next don't get arrested new law is going to effect today big ones some some small ones too there's no reason to worry more more day break next on 92 5 fox news

92-5 Fox News. Welcome back to daybreak here on 925 Fox News. I'm your host Jason Jay Jones, along with producer Rob. July 1st, we've got new laws that take into effect today with the national conversation being about chaos and ideology of the Supreme Court rulings and a lot of pandemonium, as I like to say. We're doing some improvements, doing the right thing for parents, for citizens, for the back to the basics, if you will. Probably my favorite thing right now. If I had to name all these laws, and there's a hundred of them, I'm only going to go over a few during this segment, would be the requiring cursive writing in schools and posting Washington and Lincoln's portraits in our schools. Now, you go, why is that so important to you? Well, because right now, as we speak, my son who has gone to a private school in second grade can write cursive. My daughter, who is in 10th grade going into 11th grade, has never been taught cursive. So she can't write it then? And doesn't. What else can't she do? Yeah. She can't read it. Right. Because some of the, I mean, she could probably put it together, honestly, but it would be a struggle because you haven't been taught it. You don't even understand you. It just looks like scribbles. Right. And like shorthand would look to anybody who's never been taught short hand if you don't know what that is 1957 called. So when you. Sit here and think about this particular rule. Now you can read the Constitution. This was put in place by Common Core influences like in 2010 took it out of the Constitution, this cursive deal, or out of the rules and out of the education system. They did that to try to separate the youth from being able to understand the freedoms of America. I don't think they packaged it that way. They packaged it as, well, this is no longer a really relevant way to communicate. Everybody's using computers and phones and types. Typing devices now. Typing would be a more sensible time investment. But was there an underlying motive that you just put out in the open? Perhaps. Teachers unions had that motive. That's where it was. Speaking of teachers, if you're a DNF school, but you're a great teacher, there is now a new law that bonuses for high performing teachers and lower performing schools being blocked, it stops it from being blocked by the unions and everything. And this is good for those struggling schools in the hard areas that have good teachers. And it doesn't reward a teacher just because they're in some certain school. And it only rewards those.

teachers that perform well in those low performing schools. And that's how you fix the problem of a low performing school. You give incentive to the teachers that are willing to sacrifice and go to a place where they have to work harder to teach the curriculum than they would have to say at an A-plus school. Yeah. Where the students are just smart. Yeah, I think that's a great one. Let's incentivize getting the better teachers in the places that need the help. A lot of people are worried about data centers. Data centers, there's a now SB4-84. That's right. It's from passing increased power cost onto the regular customer from these large power AI data centers. And it also requires an independent study of economic land, water, and energy and public health impacts on these facilities and allows local government to keep the tech. under wraps until a year during review. Now, here's my issue with this. this is pushing data centers straight out of Florida. They don't want to come here and be a part of the regulation. And before anybody says, I don't want data centers. Yes, you do. The money, it just needs to be regulated like it does by not passing on the water bill to the consumer. I love that. But when you start making it harder for them to come here with the studies, which I agree with the studies, you need to know where they're going to impact and where they're not going to impact. But I think they're going to push back and be like, we'll just go somewhere else. Yeah. And that's a lot of money. That's a lot of jobs. Like people think that, well, AI is going to kill all the jobs. Well, who do you think maintains all those computers in those data centers? Right. Entire team of engineers and technicians. And then you have, I don't want a data center in my backyard. Have you looked what's in your backyard lately? Have you looked at how many power lines just cross over the roads? Everywhere. Go hanging everywhere. Have you really looked at the... outlying part of before you debate that have you looked now if you're living way out in the country in the middle of nowhere uh and you love your country view i get it but i mean we have water towers in every part of the of the city and nobody complains about the big old eyesore that's not like they look pretty yeah it's you can't put them underground either we are at sea level the only one that looked pretty we tore down The MAG one. RIPI. Right. I feel bad. Actually, it was old. It needed to come down. It was dangerous. And then... By far the one. Senator Jonathan Martin sponsored this bill, and that's House Bill 445 Missy's Law. And this law revokes bonds for individuals convicted of serious, dangerous crimes, arson aggravated, assault, child abuse, kidnapping, sexual battery robbery, carjacking homicide while they wait for sentencing. So if they are already a convicted felon on any one of those crimes, they are automatically denied bond. Yeah, I think there's another small win here too. HB1217 prohibits net zero policies in local government, which...

is one of the more anti-WOKE laws that have just been signed as well, saying that local governments cannot use net zero policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or direct tax dollars for programs that advance net zero policies. So thank you, Tallahassee for that one and responding to Woke appropriately. So these are just a few of the laws that have now made their way into your law book here as of July 1st as they now go into effect. you are now dealing with these. Now, you know what else goes into effect is our Ron DeSantis. Let me ask you a question. Rob, Rob. If you had Thursday, Friday, and Monday off, and they were company holidays here at the station, I know we would all fall over, drop dead that that would happen. I understand that. But my question is, if it happened. The man down the hall, I was going to say upstairs, there's no upstairs anymore. Not anymore. Right. The man down the hall, right, comes down here and it's like, I've decided it's 250 years. It's 4th, you're off Thursday, Friday, Monday. You guys have a great five-day weekend. See you later. Now, I get it. We're doing a broadcast on the third, and we're doing something big on the 4th, so it wouldn't apply this particular year. But let's say it's next year. Okay, we're still here, obviously. And that happens. What are you doing? What's the first thing you're going to do? take three vacation days to turn it into like a nice 10-day break? Bam. Well, that's exactly what Ron DeSantis is. If they work for the state, they get off Thursday, Friday, and Monday. So they're getting a five-day weekend to celebrate Fourth of July and America's 250th birthday, which I love. That's exciting. But it makes perfect sense because I have not received a response from... anybody on the state all week. I've sent more emails, more text messages to try to get somebody to sit with us. And it's like a ghost town. They're all going on vacation. Tomorrow there won't be a damn car on the road on my way, and I might even leave 10 minutes later. I mean, it's like that. It's wild to see what's going on as we count down for the big weekend that's happening this weekend. And I'm real pumped up about our broadcast this Friday out at Biggie's Place on Fowler in Fort Myers. We're going to be there broadcasting live for our... kickoff of our America 250 weekend. We'll have the Freedom 250 coffee mug readily available for you. So you can see that right now if you're watching us on Southwest Florida CW6. The coffee mug, everyone who shows up. And I want to make sure, give me a little text message, a little RSVP and say, hey, Jason, Rob, Raj, I'm making my way out to Biggie's Place on Friday to hang out with you for the broadcast. I want to know, I want to talk to my veterans. If you're a city leader. you're more than welcome to make your way out. I would love to talk to everybody, but more importantly,

Talk to the listener. Talk to you. Talk to each and every one of you and get you to come by and sit down with us and have a conversation and bring us your photo for the time capsule. Because we are accepting those time capsule photos on Friday in person. If you didn't get a chance to email your veteran photo for the time capsule to time capsule at 925 Fox News.com, you can bring that to us Friday morning at Biggie's Place where we'll be from 6 to 9 a.m. with... Coffee cups for everyone. Yeah, it's going to be a good time. And man, when you are able to command a room, you are in your element. So if you've never been to one of our remote broadcast before and you really want to see Jason at his best, you should come out and you should join us and just join a crowd of patriots that are like-minded thinkers and celebrate America's 250. Do you know why you think that of me? Because to me... The story isn't with the elected or the candidate, because we're going to have tons of candidates to show on Friday. And come on out, candidates. This is your day. Yeah. All right. Come on out. All right. I'll talk to candidates Friday, too. Not all of you, but some of you. Not the good one's not. I'm just kidding. I'll try to be as fair as I can with the time and what we have available. But we were not going to be doing candidate interviews. Democrats all get on. If you're a Democrat, I will interview you. Absolutely. Absolutely. Come on down. You won't, but I'll still extend the invitation. There may be other couple surprises, too, that show up. The reason I do that, because the real story in Southwest Florida isn't within these elected officials. The real story is within the roots. It's within the people. It's within the people that are built this city, the people that were born here, the people that moved here and has spent decades here like myself and have made this our home. It's that story. Everyone has one, like the 100-year-old veteran that we had at the museum broadcast. Every story that each and every one of you have, that story makes Southwest Florida unique. And it's those stories that I like to hear. The little girl who... was late to her last day of school so that she could come and meet us because she's inspired by what we say. And it honors me that I inspired somebody to that level. So this Friday's broadcast, it's about you. It's about your stories. And I really want to hear each and every one of them. So come out and join us. Biggie's Place on Fowler and Fort Myers. Bring your veteran photos. Come hang out. Bring your whole family. Bring your Democrat neighbor, please. We'd love to talk to one, just one ever. Just invite him to breakfast and show up at Biggies. More daybreak coming up next. The Magam Minute. Hold on. The Maga Minute on 925 Fox News is presented by Provident Jewelry. Find them online at Provident Jewelry.com.

Welcome back to daybreak on 92-5 Fox News. I'm your host Jason Jay Jones, along with producer Rob. Hey, everybody. It's Karoline Leavitt, Press Secretary for the White House. It's time for the MAGA Minute on 925 Fox News. I actually don't think the problem that they have is with the Save America Act legislation itself. The problem that they have, with all due respect, is that they're worshiping. dying institutional norms when the Democrats are in fact bragging that as soon as they get control, they're going to throw that stuff aside and make it so much harder for Republicans to even win elections. So what some of these Republicans are saying is they don't want to give up on the norm of the filibuster, this sacred Senate institutional norm that a few senators are obsessed with, including, of course, Mitch McConnell. The problem, Laura, is that Democrats themselves are saying the minute that they get power, the filibuster is going out the door. So unilaterally submitting and surrendering as Republicans, when Democrats are openly bragging that they're going to get rid of the filibuster, it's just handing your enemy a weapon that they're going to use to strike you down. It's absurd. It doesn't make any sense. But that's why we frankly have to get better senators in there in the future. All right, the first thing we got to do is remove the boys and girls' sports out of the SAVE Act. It's already now. It's there. It's done. It's in. The states will work it out. It will work its way through the system. It will become something that goes away eventually. It is on its way out with the Supreme Court ruling. Now we put the SAVE Act in is just voter integrity. Put it in the front of them. When they say they don't, we call them cheaters because that would be the other reason you wouldn't want voter ID. And then we kill the filibuster because this filibuster isn't in the Constitution. It's not a constant. It's a Senate rule. Yeah, it's a procedural rule that the Senate created and it should be killed because they're going to kill it. And if you don't do that, basically you're making a suicide pact. Like these, these standouts and I can't believe Mitch McConnell has, I mean, why is he still there? He should have zero influence whatsoever. Is he even there? Right. No, he's not. He's a shell of himself. That's my turn. Exactly. That's my, I can do a really good. You like my Mitch impression? Yeah. That's my Mitch McConnell impression. It's pretty good, right? It's real good. Right. It sounds just like it, right? I sound just like. That's the type of people we don't need in Congress. And even, I don't care, Republican, Democrat, Independent, Socialist, janitor, anybody that's cleaning the building that acts like that, it's time for to go. When you look too old to be a Walmart reader and you couldn't perform the job of a Walmart reader, you shouldn't be a lawmaker. Let me just go ahead and say that. That should be the prerequisite. Look at the lawmaker. Does it look like they could be a greeter at Walmart? If the answer is no, then they... need to go. I mean, that's the fact. And what he did is say this, this pack that these Republicans are taking a stance against some kind of sacred, unbreakable tradition is ridiculous. It's going to be removed if we lose the midterms, which, by the way,

I'm manifesting that we don't. We're going to break history. We're going to make big things happen. It's going to be great. We better start. I don't want to manifest bad things. Getting better by our playbook. Then they're going to do that first thing. That'll be the first thing they do. And we're going to be like, I can't believe you did that. And we're going to look at these holdouts like Mitch McConnell and we'll say, I told you so, and he'll go. Exactly. That's my point being. Like, he doesn't, he wouldn't know either way, which it goes. If they, if they don't get, like JD Vance says, aggressive with this, it's going to be a problem. And we're going to have to absolutely. stand up and fix that problem. It already is a problem. You can't pass anything. The Save Act, the filibuster stops anything. The Democrat. It was supposed to stop bad legislation. It was supposed to be there so that things that were really, really bad. But when 80% of Americans, one voter ID, you can't call it bad. You're calling it political. That's what it is. That's exactly what it is. Because. With 80% of Americans demanding this, this shows us how truly unproductive Congress is and how dysfunctional it is because the majority of the population says, yeah, we want this, but it's our fault, Jason, it's our fault because the people that we put in power are absolutely useless. And Congress is done working. They're not doing anything until they pass the SAVE Act. They're not, Anna Paulina Luna isn't even coming in. Yeah, she's like, call me when that one's on the table. Yeah, call me when that's done. When we get that done, we'll move on. And until then, I'm holding out with President Trump. And I think it's a power play and it hurts the country. If they're not going to kill the filibuster, that's the next move for the Republicans. Right. I think we have to. I think we don't take, don't make it personal. We have to make the laws. We have to guide our country. And we have to keep continually. moving around these obstacles. But just to stand back and all that's going to do is level the playing field for them to go ahead and take advantage of it. We have to be more aggressive than ever before. We have to continually fight. We have to get Mitch McConnell in the room and ask them a question so you can answer with. Exactly. All right. So there you go. I love my Mitch McConnell impression. Best Mitch McConnell impression I've seen in a long time. So the dangly carrot. Is that really what it is? And have we all just been bamboozled? Property text, the conversation we're talking about next on daybreak.