4/20/2026 THE SIMON CONWAY SHOW Hour 2

All across the great state of Iowa it is, the Simon Conway Show, before we do anything else, how about we give you the word for this hour to win a thousand dollars. I give you a word. You take the word to the website of whatever radio station you are listening to. You enter it where it's very obvious. You sit back, you wait for the phone to ring. If the phone rings within the hour, you have to pick it up. If it's us on the other end, you just won $1,000 in this nationwide contest. That's how it works. The word for this hour is rich, R-I-C-H- Rich. This won't make you rich, but you love $1,000 in your hand if you win it. So good luck and do it right now. Okay. You know, the Democrats are very reluctant to come on this show. And the ones with backbones, they come on this show. We've very recently had Dr. Megan, whose last name always escapes me. There you go, Cinebus. And, in fact, we like her a lot so much that we actually went to a comedy show with her and her husband, me and Mrs. C. And dinner. And dinner. She's a really nice lady. Yep. We have had our auditor, Rob Sand, on the show, very frequently. He's the one that's counting. He tells me 48 times the 49th time will be next week. He's already booked. See, that's just like an auditor. Yeah. Sarah Trone Garrett, however, does not want to come on. And maybe it's because of stuff like this. Let's go talk to the Deputy Communications Director of the NRCC. And her name is Emily Tuttle, somebody I've known for a long time because she used to do comms right here in Iowa. How are you? Hi, Simon. Thanks for having me. You're very welcome. You describe her as a wolf and sheep's clothing. I've asked her on, as I have asked, all the Democrat candidates on this show numerous times. I don't get a no. I just get ignored. Well, that is a disappointment because not talking to your audience is obviously a missed opportunity, but not a shock given what she said, what she's done, and how she's proven she will betray Iowans every step of the way if it means she can push her extreme agenda. So you've described her as a wolf and sheep's clothing. Explain yourself. Explain yourself, Emily! Yes, of course. Well, you know, she's been pushing her background as a minister, but over the past few weeks, we've been able to uncover some of the crazy things she said from calling Christian schools, segregationist academies, and white enclaves, from linking public displays of faith to political violence, calling Iowa two white, two Christian and two male. She's even defended a Wiccan prayer, which...

is basically defending witchcraft that was performed on the Iowa State House floor. And then most recently, the news broke today that she actually performed her very first wedding for a pair of Satanists who obviously are rejecting the Christian faith. And, you know, I don't know many pastors that are willing to defend doing a Satanist wedding. But, you know, it seems very out of touch and out of step with the faith. humanity for sure um and maybe that's why she doesn't want to show up because i would absolutely ask her about it yes i mean i wouldn't want to have to defend that and she picked she wasn't just uh part of this wedding she picked the the scripture that was read she knew that they uh were satanist they they didn't hide it they openly disagreed with her and her other pastor she was working with at the time so It was an active decision to involve herself in that. And I don't blame her for not wanting to try and defend that to Islands. But unfortunately, she's going to have to. It is certainly fascinating to me that there are so many of them that completely ignore us. And I do mean completely ignore us. But they tune in. They're listening right now, Emily, I promise you. And the reason I know that they're listening right now is frequently we see press releases that quote this show. Sometimes they include audio from this show. It's remarkable that they do that over and over again, but they do do that over and over again. And so they're listening. You've got a message for them? Well, my message would be, you know, to stop pushing your extreme left-wing agenda instead of fighting for Iowa families. I mean, Zach Nunn, who's obviously running against Saratron Garriot, has done everything in his power to put Iowa families first. He's a veteran, Air Force veteran. As I know you know well, Simon, and he's a proven fighter and, you know, not wasting his time on some of this. anti-Iowa rhetoric that's honestly very disappointing from Canada. The congressman will be on the show tomorrow in actual fact, so we'll talk to him about this and some other things as well. And we would love, absolutely love, to talk to Sarah Trone Garrett as well. We would love to have her on. But as I say, they just ignore us. They don't say no. They don't say we're not coming on. They just ignore us. And it makes me wonder what they're hiding. I mean that sincerely. I pose that question repeatedly on X when I asked them to come on the show. Because here we have, you know, Rob San, like him, love him, hate him, disagree with him. I don't care. He comes on and he has never said I can't answer that. Ever. So he's been on, he's about to be on a 49th time next week. And the last time he was on, I asked him straight up, I say, because it was just after the State of the Union. And I said, you know, the president made a direct appeal to everybody who thinks the first job of government is to defend Americans and not illegal aliens, stand up. And I said to him, would you have stood up? And he said, not only would I have stood up, I would have applauded.

So? Well, I can tell you Sarah Tromgari, it wouldn't have. I mean, her voting record in the state house has proven that alone just this past few months. They voted to let illegal immigrants have access to taxpayer-funded benefits, which is, you know, that exact waste, fraud, and abuse and not standing up for Ireland that Sarah Trongary has proven she'll do every single time she gets the opportunity. Well, I'd absolutely love her to come on. She can answer that question for herself and tell us whether she would have stood up. I would love it too, Simon. I'd love for that. Yeah. The bottom line is they all come out there. And by the way, both parties do this. And they say, I want to be the congresswoman, congressman, senator for all Iowans. And then they won't talk to half the state. More than half the state, actually. The majority of the state, they won't even talk to us. So it's hard to take them seriously when they do stuff like that. It is. And, you know, like I said at the beginning, you've got a great listener, you've got awesome people listening and paying attention to what you have to say. And I think it's a great resource that all candidates should be using, like Zach Nunn is tomorrow, which will be a great interview, I'm sure. Yep, we'll have a good conversation with him. And he doesn't shy away from questions that we have through him either. All right, Emily, thank you very much for coming on. I thought it was an interesting topic. You know, I'm ordained. Emily, did you know that? I didn't. Would you perform a Satanus wedding? I would not. I did the online thing, by the way, just so we're clear. But I have performed a wedding in the state of Iowa, and no, they were not Satanus. So there you go. All right, Emily, thank you very much. I appreciate you. Have yourself a good and safe rest of the day. We will talk again soon, right? Thanks, Simon. Talk to you later. Thank you. There you go. It is very interesting to me because all the candidates all say the same thing that they want to represent the whole state. The people that come in here, even though they may have differing political views, are the only people I can accept that from as an honest comment. Because if you won't take questions from someone who might disagree with you on some stuff, That does not tell me the kind of thing I want to know, which is you actually do want to represent all Iowans. You don't, do you? But you don't. You're also rude, by the way. You don't even have the courtesy to say, nope, not going to come on. Just ignore me completely. And I know you're listening. So come on. Let's talk about it. 517. This is the Simon Conway show. All across the great state of Iowa, it is the Simon Conway show. You know, there's a lot of serious stuff around, and we like to, like, pepper the show with little, what I like to call, mental health break stories. So you'll be pleased to know that scientists... That's the best part. Scientists have settled the long-running debate. What do you think that debate is, Mrs. C? Oh, gosh, this could be anything. It could. Yes, it's which way should you face in the shower?

that's that's a study that they wasted money on well apparently apparently they've cured cancer i guess right i must have missed that announcement but i didn't know that i was in dire need of knowing which direction to face so which way do you face in the shower mrs c towards it or away from it well it's a shower to bathe your body yes so i face all directions so you rotate i do rotate i'm like a chicken Dave, Paul Allen, news anchor. Which way do you face in the shower, sir? Yes, I also rotate. I believe that I start facing forward, then kind of rotate. I believe, doing the math here in my head, I believe I go counterclockwise. Counterclockwise. That's right. If we're getting specific about the rotation. Well, it is science, Dave. That's right. We're being scientific. Yes. Very much science. So I begin by facing away from the running water. I wash my hair, typically, that's the first thing I do, once I'm in there, and then also rotate. But if you say where, which direction do I predominantly face, I would say away from the water. Which direction, Dave, do you predominantly face? Because science wants to know. Yes, I think predominantly I face away. Okay, so you and me, similar. Mrs. C, do you predominantly face towards the water or away from the water? Towards directly in it. Okay. And I hold my breath. Okay. Well, then, you know, I mean, we are about to, in theory, get a new shower at home and one might come from above. Literally like a rain thing. So then I just have to look up. I don't... Anyway, have you been doing it wrong this entire time? That is the question. Mm-hmm. Oh, are we about to find out if you're right or if I'm right? No, we're just going to tell you what science has for you. Okay, who does science say is right? Well, I'm getting there. Still got a couple of minutes. So they posted about it. They posted about it. And the posters garnered 1.8 million views. I don't fancy a waterboarding, said someone. So I will face backwards. I like to breathe too much. Others, however, disagreed. I love lots of those. Facing the water, it's like a warm hug. Warm hug, okay. Scientists, however, have settled the debate. There's really weird pictures, by the way, of people in the shower wrapped in towels. Looking shocked. Well, yes, you're wearing a towel. I would be shocked.

And there's someone there with a camera. I'd be shocked too. Uh-huh. So first of all, what do we as a nation do? I know you want to know, right? 44% of us face towards the shower. 43% of us face away from the shower. 5% say, I never have showers. And 8% of us say, they don't know. What? How do you not know? Anyway, so that's what we actually do. Now, the, the, the, the, the study, the co-founder of the Harley Street skin people say dermatologists generally advise showering while facing away from the water. Hmm. Go on. It helps prevent shampoo and conditioner from running onto your face which can clog your paws. It also limits direct exposure to hot water on delicate facial skin, helping to protect the skin barrier and reduce dryness and keep the complexion calmer and more balanced. All right, hang on just one second. Oh, well, you're airing. Whatever you're saying is airing. It's a caller who wants to comment on the showers. All right. We've still got one more minute because there's another consultant dermatologist who disagrees. Alternating your position is, in fact, best for your skin. So in other words... You rotators are the ones. Okay. Now remember we're talking about showers. That makes me right. Remember we're talking about showers there, Carl. You're on the air. Keep it clean. Keep it clean. Come on. Well done. Thanks for taking my call, Simon. You're welcome. I mainly face and then I face to the left, but... what I've ran across years ago and love. If you have a showerhead that's on the flexible hose so that when you start out, it's hooked up and it's fixed. Especially when you go to rinse off, you can spray it all over from every direction. Showerheads on hoses are amazing. And that's what I wanted to say. All right. So get one on a hose according to Carl. Thank you, Carl. Appreciate that. We know more about you now than we need you to. But you have a great rest of the day, brother. Bye. Anyway, so I just love the fact that science got involved. That's perhaps my favorite part of the whole story. Does science say anything about taking a shower that's so hot your skin melts off? I have not got that deep into the story, but I would think that would be bad. Well, that's you. As a non-scientist, I would think that would be bad. Uh-huh. You like the water boiling. I like a hot shower. I do. Yeah. There's a hot shower and then there's lava. I'm just glad this study didn't say that the 5% who say they don't take any showers at all, but that percentage is too low. That would have been the real shock of this whole thing. I'm also interested in the 8% who don't know which way they face.

You know, we won't get into the whole Epstein stuff. I knew that it couldn't possibly go anywhere anyway, and it's not all because of the Trump administration's fault or anything else. It has to do with legal issues and so on and so forth. Yeah, and the statute of limitations, et cetera, et cetera, which is what I'm actually going to come to you in a minute with the Russia, Russia, Russia. Is there a statute of limitations issue with that? There is on certain issues. So, you know, most of these kind of, I think they're called non-capital federal felonies. This would be perjury, obstruction of justice, bisoned violations, all that stuff. You know, they've got a five-year statute of limitations from the offense. the date the offense was committed. So, you know, those you can't really pursue. But I think that what he's going to have to do and what opportunity you have is, you know, conspiracy to defraud the United States. Yeah. Because that's a continuing offense, right? So it doesn't start running into the last overt act happens in further into the conspiracy. So this has been one of those key arguments from, you know, CIA director, John Ratcliffe and others. So, you know, it's concealment and... document suppression. They're saying they found all these burn bags. So look, I mean, I think that if they pursue that route, then, you know, the statute of limitations won't be up. And of course, we know that there were certainly two and more people that were conspiring to carry out this poop. We're talking to Drew Allen. He is the author of Clinton Hoax, Obama Coo, the declassified story of the Trump-Russia delusion. Now, for those of us who were around at the time, it was so obviously garbage that it's amazing to me that it got any legs at all. Yeah, it was. And one of the chapters in my book is called The Problem with the Premise. And for you, like, I think what you're talking about, this is what was my thought when it was happening is, okay, we're being asked this simple question. Are the Russians and Vladimir Putin better off with Trump in office or, you know, Clinton? And the evidence in reality obviously said that the Russians were better off with Clinton. I mean, she's the one that helped orchestrate the sale of our uranium to, you know, a Russian state-owned entity. They're the ones that went over there with the big red reset button that they mistranslated to like overcharge or something like that. And they were trying to, you know, reset relations with Russia. So they were always stopped on Russia. Of course, Russia famously invaded Crimea under Obama, and he did not do a thing. He put some virtue signaling sanctions on them. So, you know, the Russians never had a better ally, you know, since the Cold War, obviously, than the Obama and Clinton's. And so the idea that they would want Trump in there, the great disruptor, over Clinton, was preposterous. It truly is preposterous, in fact. That is a great word. What they tried to push on the American people. What's even more outrageous, frankly, is the number of people that believe it. Still, to this day, by the way.

Well, and that gets into this probably likely DOJ pursuit of, you know, conspiracy to defraud the United States because, you know, you had a lot of people out there, Adam Schiff and others who were on cable news constantly. Eric Swalwell was one of them too, who was constantly saying that we have the evidence. We have the goods. You know, we can't tell you about it, but we seem to classify. We know it was garbage. So they're still out there making those types of claims. So, you know, there are people out there that tell me that are legal minds. I'm not a... a legal scholar per se. You know, I'm an expert on what, what, on the Trump, Russia collusion hoax turned a coup. But, you know, these people have told me, you know, these are the types of things that keep this conspiracy alive because they're still out there doing this. Yeah, so there's, so basically the, uh, the start date for the statute of limitations is the last time they did something to maintain the conspiracy. Exactly. So if they did Sunningham January of this year, then it's five years from January of this year. Exactly, exactly. So, I mean, I'm hopeful that's the root. I mean, we know, and I mean, I lay it out in the book so that hopefully even a kindergartner can understand. I don't talk down to anybody in the book, but my point is that, you know, the country needs to really revisit and understand what happened because, one, until there's accountability, there's not, you know, this is going to continue to, I mean, if you look at Trump-Russia collusion, Simon. You know, that was obviously horrible and atrocious. But we went from there to 2020, which now they're, you know, saying they got the goods on the stolen election. And then from 2020, we get to 2024. We have unprecedented lawfare. And so it's just actually escalated every year. And, you know, if these people aren't putting handcuffs and put in prison, there's no deterrence, right? There's no reason for them not to do anything. I mean, it's like, it's like in California, where I live, where they, you know, passed the law. uh you know in the past where it's like well if you steal less you know nine hundred fifty dollars or less than goods like we're not going to prosecute you so you of course everyone's robin stores you know they're telling you you can steal nine fifty and you're good you know these people are being told you can you can do whatever you want as a government official or a democrat you know or deep state act and no one's ever going to do anything to you It is truly strange times, isn't it? But I do agree with you about one thing. They either need to stop talking about this stuff or they need to take some action because the FBI director said, we have all the evidence. Okay, we're waiting. Where are the handcuffs? That's what we need to see next. It is remarkable, just a little aside here, because, of course, we just got a brief extension to Pfizer that ends at the end of this month. The president, who was a victim of a weaponized Pfizer, is perhaps the biggest cheerleader for having this thing reauthorized. Yeah. I mean, things like that are frustrating. I mean, I...

I people are right to be upset by that stuff. I just think that, you know, I hate to do your audience. You've got to be more of a purist on this stuff. But, you know, I also am realistic about what he's up against with his own party in Congress. And, I mean, we can't even get the Save Act passed. We're fighting to get that passed, which, you know, over 80% of Americans in the court, which is obviously the requirement of, you know, proof of citizenship to vote in federal elections, et cetera. And we can't even get Republicans to pass that, even though we have 53 seats in the Senate. You know, some of these things he's got his hands tied on their fights that he can't win. And unfortunately, this is part of the compromise with the federal government. But, you know, what they do with this FISA stuff is, you know, they scare you. It's the same thing with these studies they do with, you know, gender theory. You know, if you, if a parent doesn't affirm their child's, you know, transgender status, your kid is going to kill themselves, right? That's the scare attack that they use to get parents to go along with this gender theory crap. And they do the same thing behind the closed doors with FISA, which is, you know, look. If you don't renew this, I know it was used as a political weapon to try and, you know, put you away and destroy the country. But they're also terrorists out there. They're also terrorists, Trump. And you've got blood on your hands if you don't pass this. So I'm pretty sure that's what's going on. Well, I did hear that 60% of his intelligence briefing that he gets daily is actually 60% of it is information coming from Pfizer warrants. That's scary. Yeah. Yeah. That's a big number, buddy. It's a huge number. And that's a tough thing. I mean, this goes back to George Washington and the founding fathers and talking about, you know, more, you know, you have to have a moral people that are running the country, obviously. And so if you have morality that goes by the wayside, I mean, nothing's going to prevent these tyrants from doing X, Y, and Z, or violating the Constitution. So. That's the tough thing. Anytime you give the government power, even when it is used or needed to help people, it can always be abused. And part of the problem in this country is a culture of corruption. Drew Allen is the author of Clinton hoax Obama coup, the declassified story of the Trump-Russia delusion. And we're doing that on the back of the FBI director Kash Patel, saying on Fox News that arrests are coming. in the 2016 Russia investigation. He said, and I quote, I am never going to let this go. We've got all the evidence. Drew and I are waiting for the arrests. Drew Allen, thank you very much, my friend. Appreciate you. Take care. Have yourself a good and safe rest of the day. We will talk again soon, all right? Thanks, brother. Talk too. You're very welcome. It is 548, really fascinating stuff. So many different things that we're talking about today because there's so many different things going on right now. So there's a Russia, Russia, Russia. This is the Simon Conway Show. Oh, Amazon, Amazon, Amazon. Is this true? Can this be true, Amazon? I didn't do it. I didn't order anything. No, no, we were away. They did call to check on you, honey, see if you're okay.

But I'm back. Yep. And I need a dress for a gala in a week. Of course you do. Amazon is using Sunbelt rental generators to charge their electric delivery vehicles. Okay, with me so far? These generators are powered by diesel fuel. And by the way, I'm looking at video. So they're using diesel fuel to charge their electric vehicles so they can tell the world they're going green. Makes me laugh. Oh, it's Earth Day. Oh, Brother Simeon could be around. Don't know. We'll have to wait and see. There's that. And then there is the Lego Criminal. He heard about Lego criminal, Mr. Ball? Thumbs up, thumbs down. Nope. Never heard about him. So a 28-year-old California man has been going around. He did this 70-0 times across five states, apparently. And he has been buying the expensive Lego sets, right? kept all the pieces of the Lego sets, and then returned the boxes, and he filled the little plastic bags with pasta pieces. He repeated this 70 times across five states. And nobody thought to check the box? Well, no, because there's little plastic things, and it shakes. It makes the right noise. But if the box is open, how hard is it to look in there? Well, if they looked in there, they saw little plastic bags of pasta. Unless they examined closely. I mean, they're clear bags. Uh-huh. Anyway, he got away with it 70 times. Police finally got their man, however. They actually dragged him out of the car. When they arrested him, did they say, Lego. Well, I mean, this is, you can pop me up here real quick. We've got time. This is real. This is from CBS Evening News. Police in California say they've solved a Lego mystery. This man was allegedly buying Lego sets, taking out the little bags of Legos, and returning the box to the store filled with little bags of pasta, stealing from the store and setting up the next customer for quite a surprise. Police say he got away with it dozens of times in five states before they got their Lego man. There you go. This is the Simon James Comey show.