The Fight for Election Integrity

This episode, sponsored by mood. Okay, this is actually genius. Are you ever overwhelmed with choices at the dispensary? What if I told you that you could shop cannabis by the exact mood you want tonight? With mood, you don't shop by strain names or confusion. You shop by how you want to feel. Want to relax after work, sleep better, feel more creative, or be more social. Mood makes it simple. Pick the feeling, and mood recommends products to match. Mood has gummies, flour, pre-rolls, and edibles designed around your mood. I tried Mood's sleepy gummies, and within an hour I felt calm, settled, and ready for bed. No dispensary run, no second-guessing, just a smooth, relaxing experience delivered to my door. It's federally legal, third-party tested, and backed by a 100-day satisfaction guarantee. Go to Mood, M-O-O-D dot com. That's M-O-O-D dot com. However you want to feel tonight, mood helps you get there. 617-266-66. 68. Okay, super quick, because I want to go to Maggie and Amesbury. This is now President Trump in the Oval Office, and he's now saying, look, after this Supreme Court disastrous ruling, we've got to pass the Save Act, the Save America Act. And he then references Jimmy Carter. And listen to what he said about Jimmy Carter because it's 1,000% true. Roll cut to see, Mike. The cheating on the ballot's a mail-in-band. Jimmy Carter said it a long time ago. He said, you can't have bail-in-vails. He headed up a committee with Scoop Jackson and others. All respected. And he actually, I think it was Jimmy Carter's finest moment. Not doing president. But he headed up a committee and he said he came out with a strong conclusion that if you do mail-in ballots, he's going to be cheating. France gave it up. We're the only country in the world that does this type of mail-in ballot. There's no other country in the world. You know why? They tried it. And it was totally dishonest. And it's really dishonest. So we shouldn't do mail-in ballots. So it's not too much to ask for voter ID, proof of citizenship. And no mail in balance. And you have honest elections. Bingo. He's completely right. Like, I mean, completely right. You have voter, you know, photo voter ID, okay? You know, when you co-cast your ballot, show proof of citizenship in order to register to vote. And with a few exceptions, no mail in ballots. And then I'm telling you, you're guaranteed to have free, fair, secure, honest elections. Now, why would you be opposed to this unless you're cheating and you want to continue cheating? Maggie and Amesbury. Thanks for holding Maggie and welcome. Good morning, Jeff. Hi, Meg. I completely agree that mail-in ballots are fraught with potential for fraud, but one idea I have for Trump, especially for this coming election, get statisticians in every state.

And what you need to do is you need to convince people with numbers and statistics that don't lie. So, for example, there's a certain trend of voting, right, on regular election day and in-person voting. There's a trend of who's winning Republican, Democrat, in any given vicinity or area. What's happening is when the mail-in ballots come in, all of a sudden the trend goes berserk, right? And most times for the Democratic candidate. To get the statisticians there, count how the trend starts to change once you start doing the day after mail-in ballot counting. Get, put the statistics out there because people I talk to, they don't believe me. They think I'm crazy when I say the stats are there, the numbers are there. Oh, you're making it up. If you can gather these numbers and have a valid report, it gives Trump an actual challenge to the elections. But you have to have those numbers in place because that is what's going to prove. You know what I mean? You have to put it in people's face with numbers because those are solid. They don't lie. And they will show you the percentages of how many of these after-election-day votes go for the Democratic candidates. They will show you the trend curves, how the trend should be pretty consistent with the in-person ballot trend, and they are not. Am I making sense? You're making complete sense. Oh, look, Maggie, your complete sense. Here is the problem. Most Democrats deep down know that their party is cheating. They won't admit it, but they know their party is cheating. They know it. That's why when you say, well, why don't we just return to the way it was before? Like pre-2020. Just pre-2020. What's the problem? And no, no. Look, let's just look at Spencer Pratt, the L.A. mayor's race in California. Everybody knows that election was stolen, and it was stolen underneath our nose. Everybody knows. He ran a magnificent campaign. Even liberals and Democrats said you could not have run a better campaign. He had massive media coverage. All the polls had him winning, or at least finishing second. Poll after poll after poll. Everybody admitted he had phenomenal turnout on Election Day. So nobody said, oh, it was low turnout. No, they said, in fact, turnout was through the roof for Spencer Pratt. On election night, he's declared, I believe, second, almost first. The third place candidate, Democrat Socialist of America, a Zohran Mamdani communist, is so distraught on election night. Please, Maggie, don't take my word for it. You can see it. She's crying. She's basically delivering a concession speech. And she's saying, I didn't think I was going to do this bad. She's a distant third. She's crying. She's literally crying. And then all of a sudden, they keep counting ballots. And day after day, after day, after day, she starts gaining on Spencer Pratt to the point that then she surpasses him. And you want to talk about statistical analysis? The votes that she got.

almost were the exact same as the population, the homeless population in L.A. And not only was it the exact same, almost to the person, but video after video after video of homeless person after homeless person saying, oh, no, no, no, the Democrats came down and said we had to vote for her. Oh, no, no, no. The Democrats gave us money or food or booze or whatever. I mean, they're on tape. And they said, no, and this was after the election. And they said, please, just write your name and sign your name. We'll take care of everything else. So you have the video evidence of fraud. You have the statistical evidence of fraud. You have everybody in Los Angeles knowing it was stolen. And yet nobody does anything. Because you see, the Democrats hate us so much. 617-266-66-68 is the number. You know, to use an extreme analogy, you know, in response to Maggie's question about, you know, statistical analysis and can we use it? And, you know, it's been used and the Democrats don't want to see the evidence that is evident to everybody else. And so, you know, it's like Germany under Hitler. I know it's the most extreme case, but the Germans knew what was going on, more or less. Maybe not to the full extent of, you know, the gas chambers and the ovens and six million dead. But they knew Jews were being exterminated. They knew there were concentration camps. They knew this was an ugly, evil, brutal regime. So, you know, this whole we didn't know. We just did know. No, you didn't want to know. It's the same thing under communism. You know, after the crimes of communism were exposed, especially with the Cold War over, all of these former communist apparatchiks, oh, we had no idea. It was this bad. No, you knew you just didn't care because you were profiting from the system. So what I'm saying is, you know, again, not to beat a dead horse, you've got Spencer Pratt in L.A. Everybody knows it was stolen from Spencer Pratt. Pratt knows it. Karen Bass knows it. The Republicans know it. The Democrats know it. The media knows it. Everybody knows it. It's impossible for a guy to be ahead on election night, having run the campaign and the polls that he had. And then five, six days later, to the exact number, almost to the person of the homeless population, the person that finished third ends up, you know, leapfrogging him and becoming second. And you've got all of this documentary evidence of one homeless person after another after another. I mean, what, they're all lying? Said, no, Democrats came by. They offered me in on whatever, you know, $40 or $20 or a six pack of beer or, you know, whatever. And they just said, sign your name. And I said, okay. So you have massive evidence that they had homeless people illegally voting after the election. After Tuesday. They said, no, no, this was on a Thursday or on a Friday or whatever. No, no.

So you have evidence of rampant voter fraud statistically correlating to almost the exact number of the homeless population, which went to the third place finisher. And that's the other thing. The election is now over. Now, right, Karen Bass, in theory, wins. But guess what the amazing thing was, what all the vote counting, the so-called late mail-in ballots, that Amy Coney Barrett blessed yesterday at the Supreme Court? They all went for the third place finisher. You would think, again, statistically, well, if Karen Bass won, right, the trend would continue. The mail and the late mail-in ballots would go for Bass. Nope, they didn't go for Bass or for Spencer Pratt. They all went by hundreds and hundreds of thousands of votes to the one who finished third. To the one who won election night in front of an entire, you know, televised audience with all her supporters, I lost. I tried so hard. I was on the city council. I did. She's bawling her eyes out that she lost. And then all of a sudden, nope, she actually finished second. So everybody knows it was stolen. Now, why, you know, are the Democrats going to admit it? They'd be insane to admit it. They know they can't win an honest election. As Trump said yesterday, he said, how do you win an election? You want to raise people's taxes? You want to abolish prisons, literally? You want no police? You want criminals running wild in your neighborhood, in your streets, in your community. You want no border whatsoever. You want the country to be invaded by 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 million illegals. You want the government to confiscate and take over your property? You want to be forced to pay for sex change operations and the genital mutilation of children? And people are going to vote for that? On what planet are they going to vote for that? You got to steal. And you ask most Democrats, because we're all Nazis, we're all white supremacists, according to their propaganda. Trump, Trump, he's Hitler. He's Hitler. So what do you think their attitude is? Steal it. Who cares? By hook or by crook. Just keep the evil Nazi Republicans out. So what I'm saying is, you know, it's like trying to convince a, like telling a Nazi, well, look what's happening in the concentration camps with the Jews. If we just showed them the evidence, they're not interested in the evidence. You know, the term willfully blind, they're willfully blind. And frankly, on this issue, That's why the SAVE Act has 85% support. We've won the argument. I mean, what do you want to do? Convinced the last 15%. 85% say basically elections are dirty. The elections in our country are corrupt. And we need to change them, reform them dramatically. We want photo voter ID. We want proof of citizenship to register to vote.

And we don't want mail-in ballots or we want to really limit mail-in ballots. So the voters are saying the system is rotten, the elections are corrupt, and this voting system that they imposed on us in 2020, it no work. The question I have is not that Democrats don't want the Save Act. That for them, obviously, it's political survival. It's power. My question is, why aren't every single Republican? Why isn't every single Republican against it? That to me is the question. Jim in Nantucket. Thanks for holding Jim and welcome. Jeffrey. Jim. Yes, sir. Very few people call me, I mean, it's fine. My mother called me Jeffrey. Very few people call me Jeffrey. So I get nervous. Are you with the IRS? Are you with the FBI? Are you investigating me? The only thing that's even worse for me, Jeffrey, is Mr. Cooner. Because nobody calls me, and I mean nobody. Then I get really nervous. So please, go ahead, Jim. Well, I've been listening since day once, so that's why he called you Jeffrey. Well, thank you. That's a nice compliment. Thank you, Jim. And I think a big thing is we have all these holidays, and I think we should have a lesson day as a national holiday. So everybody has a day off, and our duty is to go boat. I mean, my brother is like I am, you know, whatever. But he likes the mail-in-ball. It's like, oh, what are you crazy? But it's so convenient, and that's the problem. Everybody, it's the easy way out all the time.

Jim, by the way, you're not 100. You're a thousand percent correct. And, you know, I know many libs make this point to me. They email me, text me, oh, my God, ad nauseum. They're like, well, what's wrong with making elections more convenient and easy to vote? And my obvious answer is voting is the most sacred thing in a democracy. I don't want to make it comfortable or easy. I want to make it secure. That's the most important question. Is my vote secure? Is my vote going to be properly counted? Is my vote going to be diluted? Because you see, Jim, this is the point Samuel Alito makes. Every time you allow an illegal alien or a non-citizen or a fraudulent voter, you know, whatever it is, that negates your vote. That negates my vote. To me, there's no greater crime outside of treason than that. That's why, to me, you don't want elections, you know, if you want to make it super easy, here, vote by phone. You know, just like everything, just do it on the iPhone. That's all. I mean, how much easier do you want than that? Don't even bother signing a piece of paper and putting it in the mail. No, we will never do it because obviously it'll be, I mean, completely overrun with fraud. No, the point of an election, the point of voting is that it's safe and secure. The sanctity of the vote, the sanctity of the ballot. Jim, am I wrong? But it's our civic duty to vote. And people work all the time. And we don't have time. You know, I mean, I go to work at 3.30 in the morning and I get out at, you know, 5 o'clock at night. And I'm beat. And I get home and shower and go vote. Oh, you're right. Jim, look, I really agree with you. Okay, just very, very quick. Listen now, President Trump in the Oval Office. This was after yesterday's really horrible Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots and basically saying, look, we've got to pass the Save America Act. And then he starts to go after some of the rhinos. And he starts naming names. And he says, for the life of me, I don't understand. Why are you enabling Democrats to cheat? To cheat and to steal elections. Roll cut 3A. Mike. When I look at the Save America Act, it's about saving America. And I'd like to have the Save America Act editor. And that's probably not going to happen because we have four Republican senators, maybe five that. Just won't vote for it. It's crazy. Somebody who didn't Lisa Murkowski from Alaska. Nobody's done more for Alaska than me. She's a Trump deranged. What can I tell you? But those four or five people that I mentioned Should vote. How do you vote against Save America? How do you vote against it? How do you vote against voter identification or proof of citizenship? The only people that would vote against that are people that are going to cheat in an election. He's completely right. That's the only reason why you want to vote against it is because you're engaging in voter fraud. You're going to cheat. So again, not to, you know, repeat myself, but it bears repeating.

I understand why the Democrats are against it. Okay, it's like crooks. You don't want to be arrested for robbing a bank. Of course, I get it. But if you're the bank manager or the bank owner or you have money deposited in the bank, why don't you want the crooks to be arrested? I don't understand that. So what I don't understand is the party that's being cheated on. where the votes are being stolen from. You don't want to vote for the Save America Act. Marilyn in Norwood, thanks for holding Marilyn and welcome. Morning, Jeff. Hi, Marilyn. I have two suggestions. First and foremost, from everything I've read and everything you've said and other concerned citizens. Florida appears to have the best model for voting. So if I were President Trump, or if I could sit down and meet with President Trump, I would strongly urge him to enlist Ron DeSantis because his term now is coming to an end also, if I understand this correctly, Donald... Byron or Byron Donalds's is running for governor. Yes. Okay. So Ron DeSantis, probably in tandem with Governor JD Vance, if he's available because of all that's going on in Iran, need to be the central sort of, exhibit the central leadership. analyzing and explaining, and this needs to be explained to the American public by the president in a nationwide speech once they have all the information, how it's done in Florida. And Florida should be the model for the nation. That's my first suggestion. I agree, Marilyn, and I promise I'll let you finish your point. Look, this is, I think, one of the weaknesses in the Trump administration. Overall, I think, as you know, I think it's a superb administration. I think he's got a world-class cabinet, a few exceptions. But I think overall, he's got an incredibly talented cabinet. And I think he surrounded himself with literally top-notch people. The one thing it doesn't have, and I'm going to use a sports analogy, which is going to, people are going to say, why, you'll see what I mean. One of the greatest hockey players to ever play was Wayne Gretzky. Was he the greatest? Was he not? There's a debate, but clearly one of the greatest. But one of the reasons why he was able to succeed is there was a guy who was on the ice with him the whole time by the name of Dave Semenko. No one's ever heard of Dave Semenko. Unless you're a die, diehard hockey fan. Who is Dave Semenko? Dave Semenko was Gwain Gretzky's enforcer. He was a big Ukrainian from Western Canada, I think 6'5, 250, 260 pounds. The guy was a monster, and he could fight, and he could hit. I mean, he was tough. And if anybody was harassing Gretzky,

You know, taking a stick and, you know, ripping away at his ankles or ripping away at his knees or harassing him on the ice or bullying him or all Gretzky would do is just literally look at Semenko with his eyes and, you know, like, this guy, this guy, just not his head, this guy, this guy. And Semenko would take care of him. And after a while, nobody messed with Wayne Gretzky. Because you know if you messed with Wren Gretzky, you're messing with Dave Semenko. Now, long story short, all the great presidents, I don't care, it can go, you know, Reagan, Nixon, I'm talking on the Republican side, Eisenhower, it doesn't matter. Lincoln, they had their own Dave Semenko. And by the way, so did FDR, so did John F. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.. Obviously, Bill Clinton, he had nothing but Dave Semenko's. What I'm saying is you need a political tough guy. You need an enforcer who can go to Congress and crack heads. He's the Dave Semenko, not just against the opposition, the Democrats, say if you're a Republican, but to the rhinos. You need a guy, whether it's the chief of staff, whether it's, there's somebody, there's a role, top political advisor, whatever. And when this guy comes into a room and the president just goes, you know, with the head, just a nod, you know, take care of John Thune for me, okay? He's giving me a hard time. And you walk into John Thune, and by the time this guy's done, John Thune's face is, you know, white as a ghost, and all of a sudden he's going to pass that Save Act for you. So what I'm saying is you need a political tough guy that is not afraid to go into Congress, even when it's your own party, maybe bribe them or entice them a little bit or intimidate him, or whatever it is. but you're going to switch votes. Alisa Lisa Murkowski, you're a no, now you're going to be a yes. Or whatever. These pictures of you are going to go to the media. I don't know. I'm just giving you an example. Or your finances. You really want the Department of Justice investigating that the way you guys are making money? That doesn't look kosher to me. What I'm saying is every president has that enforcer. Trump doesn't have that enforcer. That's the problem. In a way, he's his own enforcer. But he's not, and I'm needing this as a compliment, he's a nice guy. Deep down, he doesn't really want to hurt anybody. You understand? So he yells, he screams, he threatens, he cajoles. But, you know, he's not a political kneecapper, as they say. You need a political kneecapper. In other words, what Roger Stone was for Nixon. Okay, and there were others for Reagan. You need the votes. They're going to get you the votes. Because these guys, they take no prisoners. He doesn't have that. Ron DeSantis, to his credit, has that. Ron DeSantis put together an incredible electoral system in Florida, but there were many Republicans who were initially opposed to it. But he had his political enforcer.

And the first they started, no. And then by the time his people were done, it became a yes. And I don't know if Ron DeSantis can be that enforcer. But that's the one thing Trump needs. And that's the one thing he doesn't have right now. But anyway, please go ahead, Marilyn, finish your second point. Oh, okay. And I'm going to actually add one additional minor comment. The other thing, regarding California, California and Gavin Newsom for his term and office so far continues to market the state as the world leader in technology. It's the innovation economy. It's the third, fourth, or fifth largest economy in the world. Well, by nature of the, pardon my French, ask backwards, embarrassing fourth world voting system in place where two weeks after election, or five weeks after election, they're still counting votes. I am embarrassed as an American. I have a number of friends that live overseas. and they bring up the subject of voting it's very embarrassing the poorest of countries have better systems in place than we do he should be disqualified for running for president in 2028 on the grounds of the corruption and disorganization and poorly designed system in place. I mean, that should neutralize him as a candidate right here and now. And the Los Angeles mayoral race is also a national embarrassment. Because clearly, as you have acknowledged, Spencer Pratt was in the lead. And so it's really quite shameful. But I do hope the president does convene a group. And he has to stop thinking about how it's going to be perceived by the public if he chooses and Ron DeSantis is available or someone connected with the Ron DeSantis administration is available, you know, to actually take a proactive role. But the public has to understand, not on X. That's another thing I just would like to say briefly. Wasting time on X, getting into public sort of like a feud with celebrities and people of no significance to the success and future of this country is a complete and total waste of time. When he goes on X, if I were advising him, I would say, Mr. President, when you're on X, you're only discussing... government issues the future of the nation on X, nothing else. I don't care who says what about him in the public media. He should not be using that as a vehicle to express his displeasure. He needs to learn to let it go and just to singularly focus on making this country...

successful long term because I monitor a lot of science and global technology around the world. And I know for a fact based on what I see and read coming out of Washington, the key people in the White House and in even some of the top agencies, they do not understand the ferociousness of the global economy in terms of like China. China places... students in every major university of the world. What are those students doing? They're getting advanced education, but they're also monitoring the technology that's coming out of those universities. Now, the United States is now placing students in every university in the world. Some students do study overseas. So he really needs to change his focus. I don't care what Rosie O'Donnell says or anybody else, you know. It's got to be focused exclusively on the country. So any communication on X has to be about the country, the future success of the country, and nothing more. But more importantly, he needs to, after this is addressed, and hopefully it will be addressed between now and November in terms of what needs to be done, he needs to get on television and have a 9 p.m. talk to the nation, uninterrupted on all channels. that are licensed by the Federal Communication Commission. Thank you. Oh, Marilyn, thank you very much. Look, that was the key to FDR. FDR had weekly fireside chats. Then it was in TV. The primary medium was radio. And they were devastatingly effective. It worked. Really worked. Now, Reagan didn't do it every week, but he did something which you're talking about. He used television brilliantly and often. to get his message out, speak directly to the American people. Now, I understand a lot of Americans are on social media, they're on X. I'm not saying don't do it. It's a nice tool. But I would like to see him do a lot more TV. I agree with you. And talk directly to the American people. And, you know, make his case. Really tell him, look, the elections are being stolen. I need the Save Act. Here's why we need to Save Act. And by the way, you are not 100. You are 1,000% correct. The Europeans laugh at us. We're a national embarrassment. The world laughs at us how long it takes for us to do an election, to count votes. Someone is winning on election night, two weeks, three weeks later, suddenly that person has lost the election. And third world countries get it done the same night, if not within 24 hours. The poorest countries in the world do it. If they can do it, we can't do it. We're the only ones. Trump, when he says we're the only ones who do this mail-in balloting and just keep counting and counting. He's completely right. We're the only ones. And we're now becoming an international laughingstock. The world laughs at us. with our third world style elections. It's not even third world because they do it in 24 hours. It's fourth world. So you're absolutely correct. This is a joke. That's why the Supreme Court yesterday, look, if any of them had any patriotism, any pride, any civic sense of loyalty to this country, it should have been 9-0.

No, you're not going to count mail-in ballots after election day. No, we're not going to jerk around with something that's postmarked because we know you can change a postmark. No, this is not going to make our elections free, fair, honest, or secure. No, you want mail-in balloting. All the ballots have to arrive by election day. That's it. That's it. They don't arrive by Election Day. They come one minute after midnight. That's it. They're not valid. Bye. Okay, at a bare minimum. That should have been the decision yesterday. Instead, everybody's for sale or everybody's intimidated. Marilyn, thank you very much for that call. And honestly, that's what it is now. Either you're for sale or you're like Amy Coney Barrett and you're afraid of your own shadow. Well, if you're afraid of your own shadow, I'm sorry, don't be a Supreme Court justice. I'm not trying to be cruel or harsh, but it's one of the most important jobs in the world. You're making immense decisions that are going to have an immense consequence for our country. So if they're threatening your kids or you're afraid of death threats or what they threaten Brett Kavanaugh with and you're afraid that's going to happen to your husband or your children, then with all due respect, resign from the bench. As I said earlier, believe me, almost every university would want her teaching law. She'll make a mint as an academic professor. So she's not going to go hungry, far from it. Raymond in Arlington. Thanks for holding Raymond and welcome. Hey, I love you in a non-sexual way. Thank you, Raymond. Thank you, my friend. So this is what I got. Very simple, right? All we need is a receipt for our ballot. Tom. Well, that would also be nice. I agree with you. I mean, if we're going to use a mail-in ballot, can we at least get a receipt that it was counted? You know, not just that it was received, but that it was counted. Because, you know, it's one thing for them to receive it, but you want to make sure that it's counted. So can we at least get a receipt that it was counted? We don't even have that. You're completely right, Raymond. Raymond, I've got to ask you, in the wake now of yesterday's very depressing ruling, do we have to get the Save Act passed? In other words, if we don't get the Save Act passed, is Trump heading for a bloodbath in November? I don't even know why it wasn't passed the first time. I mean, what's really going on? Like you say, it's both sides. It's just, it's fake either way. None of these parties are for anybody but themselves. It is what it is. But, I mean, the only way that we'll fix stuff is by actually having receipts and ballots. At that point, we should be good. If you voted for Trump, should say Trump on your receipt. We voted for whoever else. It should say that name on the receipt so that everybody can say, hey, this is who I voted for. This is my number. I have a golden stamp on it, whatever it may be. There'd be no problems. It is what it is. Raymond, let me ask you this. You're right. I love your idea. But that's high tech. Let's even go low tech. In many third world countries and their elections are much more honest than ours.

They have them vote in person. There's no mail-in balloting or anything like that. And then after they vote, they dip one of their fingers in ink. I don't know, green ink, purple ink, whatever. A, it shows that they voted. And B, they can't vote a second time. Because, you know, they've got this ink on their finger. It's very hard to get off. It takes days and days to get it off. Should we even do this, the Iraq model? You know, the Afghanistan model? where if you're going to vote, we vote in person and everybody dips their finger in ink. What say you? No, no, no. There's way too many people. It's impossible to do. We need an algorithm with a sophisticated computer system. We can't go twice. And it has to be by a reputable person. It can't be somebody that's working and putting extra votes. It has to be something that's, you know, the big boys can take care of. This is the DOJ, NSA. One of those guys, something that you can't crack. That gives you your receipt or your identity. We all have Social Security numbers. Something in that way. I mean, that's the only possible way to do it. Nobody's going to go and stand in line and get their finger, you know, ink. I think that would be a disaster in itself. Interesting. Interesting. Raymond, thank you very much for that call. 617-266-68 is the number. Look, at a bare minimum, we should have photo ID to vote. Photo ID, not just an ID, but a picture. So it's you. We know it's you. The address on the ID with the address, you know, the person registered to vote, Jeff Cooner, the face matches the address. Okay? That's number one. We should definitely have proof of citizenship to be registered to vote. Only American citizens should vote in American elections. And preferably, one day, everybody votes in person with a few exceptions. and in-person balloting, and preferably paper ballots. This episode sponsored by She's Birdie. Every woman knows that feeling, and She's Birdie knows it too. The just-in-case feeling. Just in case I hear something. Just in case someone tries the door. Just in case I need to wake up fast. It's not fear, it's awareness. And Birdie Box from She's Birdie was made for exactly that. Birdie Box is a portable travel door alarm designed by She's Bertie for hotels, dorms, Airbnbs, and anywhere you're staying away from home. It installs in seconds on the doorframe. And if the door is opened, it activates a loud siren and flashing strobe to help draw attention instantly. She's Birdie, because peace of mind should check in with you. Birdie Box by She's Birdie. Visit she's birdie.com. That's S-H-E-B-I-R-D-I-E.com and order your Bertie box before your next day away from home.