"He Handed Over a Bad Deal!" Is JD Vance Muddying the Waters?

The following statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose tree cure or prevent any disease. The human brain is truly incredible. It surpasses supercomputers with over 100 billion neurons that control our thoughts, emotions, and movements. Previgen wants to keep it incredible. Powered by Apuaquaren that was originally discovered in jellyfish, Previgen is designed specifically for the brain to help keep it amazing so you can continue doing what you love with confidence. Try Previgin for your brain today. From high atop, Fox News headquarters in New York City, always seeking solutions, never sewing division. It's Brian Kilmeade. Hi, everyone back in action. Thanks so much for listening, and we have a big show coming your way. I've got some great guests lined up. Of course, they add some insight and interest for you. And I know you're passionate about what's happening in politics as well as what's happening around the globe, especially as it has to do with this war in Iran. I'm going to get to Jonathan Shanzer shortly. He's one of the key officers at the Department of Defense of Democracy, he's a military expert. For five straight days, we have bombed significantly targets. inside Iran while trying to reopen the straight. But there's a strategy and game plan to this. Many people argue and some will look back and say, maybe we shouldn't have stopped to begin with, but the president wanted to give the ceasefire chance and the memorandum of understanding a chance to see if it could go anywhere. But the MOU, in my view, has made everything worse. It was a terrible document. It had a lot of gray area to it. Iran, that evil regime has taken advantage of that because of that. Holding onto the straight, you look at what it says on Article 5 of that. deal. They think they can hold on to the straight if you look at that and we'll discuss that later. Also, JD Vance hopped on with Joe Rogan for three hours. Okay, you got to sell a book and your vice president. You could do interviews. But I did read in Axios that he was originally supposed to meet with Republicans in the morning, but he had to push that at the afternoon, I guess, because he was on with Joe Rogan. At which time, he made it pretty clear. He thinks the Epstein Files was poorly handled by the administration. He wanted everything out right away, really? There's a downside to that because the president was friends with Epstein for a while because he was a financier living in Palm Beach and there's a fellow billionaire. That's what they do. They're not hanging out with me and you. They hang out with each other. And then when he turned out to be a pedophile, went to jail and the president a long time ago, say goodbye to the guy. But they knew that if you release all the files, the president's name's all over that because he was friends with him. And then they had a huge falling out. But that's not going to be in context with his political enemies. But still, JD Vance was on with Joe Rogan. He came out and he came out and made it clear that he blames Israel. This guy says a lot of things about Israel. It sounds much like those new anti-Israel sentiment on the left. anti-Jewish sentiment that we see on college campuses. Yesterday, Catherine Clark in Massachusetts, whipped together votes and got over 100 to over 100 votes, 103 votes to stop funding to Israel. 103.

2024, this vote was put up 37 House Democrats. That was alarming. Now look about this. You're talking about $3.3 billion with a funding. Israel modernizes. They give us intelligence back. There's a give and take between both relationships and gives us democracy and the entire region when we take our eyes off. And you know what happens? Things start blowing up here. Remember 9-11? Remember what happened with Israel just did tipping off the president that they're going to target the new Air Force One. That's why he switched planes. That was one of those leads was from Israel to say they picked up a plot. That's called an ally. Democrats see it as a political liability. I don't get it. For JD Vance, I really don't get it. I mean, he's trying to say the next generation of Republicans, more anti-Israel than pro-Israel, and this generation of Democrats all against Israel, and the previous ones are jumping off the Israeli bandwagon. If you were a Jewish-American, how you could ever vote for a Democrat who's not John Fetterman? I don't know who it is. Hakeem Jeffries right now, voted to keep Aide going, but that's not going to last too long. Here's JD Vance yesterday. Cut four. Beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to like actually shift us away from that policy because they want to continue the military campaign. There are some people within their system we know beyond a shadow of a doubt who are manipulating and trying to change American public opinion to keep the war going on indefinitely. Again, not towards any objective, but just indefinitely. Okay. Nobody in Israel wants war. You might have the squads. Like we have a squad here. Is that really American doctrine or policy? Really, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is the leader? So what you're saying, there might be a couple of right-wing extremists who want to fight all the time. I have never met them yet. But when you have Hezbollah rocketing you from the north and then Hamas rocketing you from the south and then kills over a thousand Israelis for no reason on October 7th, 2023. You're going to get a response. And when you rocket Israel like Iran did, you're going to get a response. And they're going to be assassinations. You try to get a nuclear weapon to destroy Israel. You're going to get a response. There are people in Israel that look at the MOU that he signed and said, this is terrible. That doesn't handle ballistic missiles. They're allowed to continue to control the straight. I don't know who's going to get their nuclear material out of the ground. The U.S. is not committed to that. So they were critical of it. It doesn't mean they want perpetual war. And why even bring it up like it's the doctrine? It's called preservation. If we were being rocketed by Mexico and Canada, you might say that we want war. No, we want them to stop it. And to do that, we have to show force. I thought we all understood that. So I interviewed Jonathan Chanzer. of defensive democracies. And I discussed this. Let's listen. Earlier yesterday, the U.S. carried out more strikes on Iran targeting Iranian military capabilities, marking the fifth day of attacks. In the meantime, President Trump says Iran has released an American citizen who was banned from leaving the country since 2024 under the Biden administration.

The president took to truth social saying this is a sign of goodwill by Iran. It's true. This marks the first American released by Iran since 2023, although there have been about five more Americans who are still believed to be wrongfully detained. Our next guest says Tehran is signaling it wants an off-ram. Here to further that discussion is the executive director of the Foundation for Democracy, Jonathan Shanzer. Jonathan, you really see something in that release of this woman. Well, look, I would just say that this is at least a sign of softening on the part of the Islamic Republic at a time where we're watching escalation across the Strait of Forum moves and beyond. It's a deviation from all of the other messages that we're getting out of Tehran right now, which to me signifies that there's something else going on. Of course, we've got Adam Boller, who's been that envoy for the Trump administration, who holds this portfolio, and that may be separate from what Steve Witkoff or Marco Rubio or. J.D. Bants are doing as they reach out to the Iranian regime. So how much damage have we done over the last five days? It seems really expansive. And yesterday we hit the 388th Battalion over in Iran, and that's a group over in the Balukistan area, and that is further into Iran than ever before. Why do you think we're doing that? I think what we're looking for right now are viable targets on the part of this regime. You know, when you look at that first wave of attacks that we carried out over those, you know, initial weeks of the war, we did a lot of damage to the regime. I think it's taken some time for the U.S. military. to acquire a new target bank. So in other words, we're looking further and deeper into Iran to look for things that we have and hit that are still significant that are worth these valuable munitions that we expend. I mean, these are exquisite munitions. They cost a lot of money. We don't want to waste them on weak targets. So we're looking for things. further into the regime. And I got to say, I think that right now the president is doing something that's really interesting. I mean, we're expanding those targets while trying to not expand the war significantly. So this is kind of a tightrope act that the president is engaging in right now. We've got to weaken the regime. We've got to show that tough resolve. But at the same time, we don't want to see a massive escalation. So it's an interesting balancing act that he's trying to carry out. So we're thinking about two things. It's on Tuesday's meeting that reports out of the situation where Cargallon finally take it, might need some troops on the ground, and pickaxe, let's blow it up the best we can. We have not really touched that facility in a significant way. Should he do both? Should he do one? Look, I think both are incredibly important targets. Carg Island is obviously crucial for the Iranian regime's income. This is the major source of oil exports, which of course means this is the major source.

for funding for this regime to the extent that we can neutralize this while also preserving that infrastructure so that the Iranian people can enjoy it when, if and when this regime falls. I think that's really important. And then Pickax Mountain, of course, this is kind of their alamo here. I mean, it is their underground facility where they can continue to try to advance that nuclear program. To the extent that we can neutralize it, we should. The question is how to get into it. We cannot just bomb it through conventional weapons from the air. We're going to need something a lot bigger than what we probably have used so far in this conflict. This would mean probably introducing new weapons that might make folks a little uncomfortable, but I do think it's going to be really important to neutralize this site. No one's ever attacked this country since they've been attacking us. It's the first time of president is degrading one of our enemies that declared war on us on a daily basis. As they've said, death to America is not a phrase, it's a policy. And I go back to the one statement in the MOU that's so problematic. It says Iran will conduct dialogue with the Sultan of Oman to define the future administration of maritime services in the strait. This is an evil regime who lies, but they're going on what was written, and that's problematic. Thanks so much, Jonathan. Appreciate it. All right. Hope you enjoy that. Very insightful. I cannot wait to see what the president does next. Meanwhile, coming up next, a deep thinker. Bill McGern, former Bush administration speechwriter, now Wall Street Journal columnist. You'll listen to the Brian Kilmeade. Politics, current events, and news that affects you. Brian's got a lot more to say. Stay with Brian Kilmeade. Nearly home. Isn't home where we all want to be? Reba here for Realtor.com, the pro's number one most trusted app. If you're hearing me, I'm going to assume you're awake. And if you aren't... Because while you're snoozing, someone else might be finding your dream home. That's where Realtor.com comes in. With over 500,000 new real listings straight from the pros every month, that's a lot of chances to find the place you've been dreaming of. Whether you're searching for a two-story mid-century with a pool or a little extra space with a spa-inspired bathroom, Realtor.com can help you find it today. So quit hitting that snooze button. Realtor.com isn't sleeping on finding your dream home. and neither should you. Download the Realtor.com app today because you're nearly home. Make it real with Realtor.com. Pro's number one most trusted app based on August 2024 proprietary survey. Over 500,000 new listings every month based on average new for sale and rental listings, February 24 through January 2025.

Talk show, that's real. This is the Brian Kilmeade. It was pretty stunning. There's so many stunning stories out there from Governor Wall saying it's bad news and we picked up a child molester. and forced him out of the country to the craziness with what's going on with anti-Israel, send them in this country. And I know the numbers look like everybody's against Israel. I think it's a lot of it is Islamic extremist propaganda, just being pumped into our country and blaming Israel for everything, which I think the academia has a lot to do with. But it really came to a head yesterday. As House Democrats, 103 of them voted to block funding, block funding to Israel. Now, just a few years ago, 37, 27, 24, 37 Democrats, and five years ago, zero Democrats voted against AIDS, Israel. Now, if they get the House, expected to be the policy. So I talked to Bill McGurran, former speechwriter for George W. Bush and longtime columnist for the Wall Street Journal about this new trend. And it's not, it's mostly on the left, but not just on the left. Here's that interview. More than 100 House Democrats voting against providing U.S. aid to Israel. It's stunning. It's a shift from two years ago when 37 voted this way. And 10 years ago, when none of them voted against Israeli aid. And now Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is warning the rest of her party to get in line. The majority of Democrats now have shifted where we are on this issue with respect to Israel, that the U.S. cannot continue to finance a reckless government that has no regard for human rights. I would certainly hope that anyone running for president in two years would not be stuck 10 years in the past. She doesn't know what she's talking about, and she's never been to that region, but she's right about this. Even Nancy Pelosi, formerly one of the most pro-Israeli Democrats in Congress, now flipping to vote against the funding bill. And our next guest warns, this is only the beginning, as Jewish Democrats discover, their loyalty to the party is not being returned. Fox News contributed, Bill McGurn, joins us now. Bill. Are you shocked over 100 Democrats and not including Hakeem Jeffries because he voted to fund Israel aid would vote against Israel? No, it's not a shock. This is the direction the Democratic Party today has taken in America. You know, 20 years ago would be a shock. I grew up in this area. So to see, like, the New York contingent especially, be overtaken by anti-Israeli voices.

I just would not have thought it imaginable. It's interesting. Look, you showed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez speaking instead of Chuck Schumer because she better represents where the Democratic Party is going, not Chuck Schumer. Bernie Sanders gets up every day wanting to defund Israel. He's a Jewish guy from Brooklyn. And Chuck Schumer wrote a book about anti-Semitism. He doesn't want to take ownership of that. He's too scared to come out on something like this and stand up to his own party. Yeah, and it's been a while for him because, you know, he likes to say that his last name comes from Shomer, which means protector, and he considers himself the protector of Israel. But, you know, when Obama made that very bad deal with Iran on the nukes, he in the end voted against it, but only when they had like the votes to where it didn't matter. If he really was a leader and a protector, he'd be leading the efforts. But the people like Chuck Schumer that are moderates or moderates on Israel, the party doesn't like them anymore. The party is firmly in these hate Israel camps comparisons to Nazi Germany and the like. So, Bill, maybe they'd be happier if Israel just let Hezbollah clear out the north part of their country, continue to send rockets there. Maybe they'd be thrilled if they didn't respond after October 7th and allowed Hamas to put endless rockets into their country. That would have been the Israel that they liked. They would acquiesce to their enemies and ultimately give up their land. I don't get what they want. But here's something else to be important. It's not just on the left. It's on the right. And I'm seeing it a lot from our current vice president. Listen to him yesterday when they spent three hours with Joe Rogan on Israel. Listen. I know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to like actually shift us away from that policy because they want to continue the military campaign. There are some people within their system we know beyond a shadow of a doubt who are manipulating and trying to change American public opinion to keep the war going on indefinitely. Again, not towards any objective, but just indefinitely. So what do you think the president thinks about that? And do you think he's right? No, I don't think he's right. I agree that if you want an end to it, I think the end is a victory, not another hollow victory, where Iran reconstitutes himself as major threat in the Middle East. So I'm not sure what purpose. the vice president's serving by attacking Israel or something. Also, it makes sense. If you were Israel, wouldn't you like it? Your primary enemy is it war with the U.S.? You might be rooting for it to go on until it's concluded, but that's just a matter of interest. I don't think he expressed it well. I think to, again, to single out Israel,

I think it gets your priorities wrong. And look, say this about Democrats and Republicans. I think there's one Republican that voted against Israel, and that's Thomas Massie. And Democrats have nearly half the party. There's anti-Semitic voices in the Republican Party, but not like the Democrats, half the House. half their House members. So I think it's a big difference. Ari Fleischer, my former colleague in the Bush administration, last year put it this way. He said, American Republicans have a cold with anti-Semitism. Democrats have a fever. And I think it's getting very severe. And if Chuck Schumer really the guardian, he fancies himself, he should speak up and denounce the drift of his party. You won't. He didn't speak up when they were the anti-Semitic rants over at Columbia. He's not going to speak up now, Bill. And I will say, too, that Israel is not attacking Iran because they want war. Iran is arming the proxies on either side of their country and as rockets heading into their country. That's why they want to get rid of Iran's arsenal because they're using it against them. Bill, thanks so much. Appreciate it. If Iran were peaceful, there'd be no protest. Thank you. Nothing from Israel. We used to understand that. I don't know what happened. Thanks, Bill. Bill McGurin is not an alarmist. He is somebody, it's noteworthy. And this is why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said about a month ago, Israel is going to be prepared to produce, make, export. and maybe exports for a profit, their own weapon system. Can't counter in America. That's why. Because of votes like this. He's not being alarmist. He's not trying to win elections. He's being a realist. They want to say it's Benjamin Netanyahu. There's the issue. It's not. You've got a problem with the democracy in the area. The following statements have not been evaluated by the FDA. This product is not intended to diagnose tree cure or prevent any disease. The human brain is truly incredible. It has 100 billion neurons surpassing even the most powerful supercomputers, and it controls our thoughts, our emotions, and everything we do. And Previgen is designed to help keep it amazing. Previgin also believes that good daily habits are a powerful part of any routine. Exercising regularly, eating well, getting good quality sleep, staying mentally active, and staying connected with friends and family are all great for your brain. And that's why so many people choose Prevagen, because it can help supplement those good habits, working alongside your daily routine to give your brain the care it deserves. Previgin is powered by Apoachoran, originally discovered in jellyfish and designed specifically for your brain. Because when your brain is at its best, you can continue doing what you love with confidence. Try Previgin for your brain today.

show like no other. It's Brian Kilmeade. Hey, welcome back, everybody. Special thanks to those special guests that helped us out today defining what's going on with the run. We're also looking at JD Vance's podcast, get an idea what he's going to be running on in 98, excuse me, in 28. Man, 98, it seems like a long time ago. 28 as he becomes his own person as he runs for president. Kamala Harris didn't. She ran on Joe Biden's policies. I think JD Vance letting everybody know, even though it's not even the midterms yet, that may running is something different than President Trump. And I don't know how President Trump's going to handle that in the big picture. And of course, the rise of socialism around the country. The other big issue that people talk about is AI, not only data center should they be built, but what about impersonating you? What about some of the fraud that is happening to you? What about some of the spam that pops up in your email every single day? How do you get rid of that? Who's tracking you? How do they know what your interests are? Kim Commando joins us now, radio personality and host of two daily radio shows and one weekend radio show on consumer technology. And if you are concerned about these things and so much more, especially when you see about... network anchors being almost, almost scammed into giving up their banking information because they said it was an emergency, someone pretending to be your bank, knowing everything about you, and then saying that you've been hacked and your money's going out the door. He almost gave up more information that would have lost that money for good. Kim joins us out to talk about. Kim, has there anything, have you run across things like that? There's any things you can do to stop being from being scammed or being a target? Well, I'll tell you, it's a whole big industry. It's called the data broker industry. It's a multi-billion dollar industry. And it's where your personal information is, what do you think about it, like contained in a file, and that's your name, your address, your phone number, your age, your political affiliation, the medications that you take, how fast do you drive? Basically, and it's hard to believe this, Brian, but you have and I have and every American has. for sale, 3,000 different data points at any given moment. And anybody can buy this information. I mean, you don't have to sit there and justify yourself and say, you know, I'm a big company. You know, I'm an insurance company. I want to figure out, you know, where Brian drives and what he buys at the grocery store and things like that. No, it's available for sale and literally for pennies on the dollar. So people just see an idea, but how do they profile you? How does people get a profile of what your likes and dislikes are where you can be targeted? You know, that's an interesting question. You know, how many of us have put an app on our phone and actually read the terms and conditions, right? We put an app on and we scroll down, down, down, down until we agree. And then suddenly that app is on our phone. You know, hidden inside those terms and conditions are things like, say, for example, you have an app that is telling you the lowest price of gas, right? Or you're trying to track your teenagers. Well, hidden inside the terms and conditions of that app is the fact that

anything that you do on your phone is going to be sold. And so it could be what you buy. It could be where you go. what time of day that you are actually traveling, your relatives, your contacts, whatever it may be. And so every time we pick up our phone, we're giving up more data points. And so it's really on us to figure out how to get us out of those databases. And so like, I'm sure, you know, like there are tons of those free people search sites online, right? I mean, you can type in somebody's name. And, you know, typically. that there are these opt-out forms, but they're really hidden. I mean, they're not going to make it easy for you to take yourself out of it, because if they do, then they're going to be losing money. And so, but if you ever want to do it, and if you want to try it, is that you go into the terms and conditions, and then you search for something that says opt-out. And typically, you have to fill out a form, maybe provide some type of government identification, maybe a driver's license, or passport. And then what happens, though, is you get yourself out of these databases. And you have to do each one. And there are thousands of them, by the way. And then what happens is the next time you pick up your phone, you're back in that database. And so it's really insidious when you think about it because you have all this personal information and anybody can buy it, whether it's a spammer, a scammer. And that's how the host that you were talking about, that's why they knew so much about him is because they bought information about him likely from a data broker. And then, of course, with AI, you can mimic people's voices, right? Yes, that's really crazy. I mean, people like you and I that are on, you know, hundreds of radio stations, our voices are just out there. And that's why you want to call your bank and you want to opt out out of any type of voice authentication. Because literally, it only takes three seconds of your voice to actually have it deep fake to cloned. And so whether it's a TikTok, it should be, maybe it's just a family video vacation, whatever may be, just three seconds and your voice is gone. So is that what Incogni does? Incogni will go in and handle this stuff for you? Yeah, so what Incogni does, it's a company that... that will go into the data brokers and on your behalf, legally on your behalf, is take you out of these databases. And they do it, you know, it's kind of wild because when you first sign in, you're like, oh, they got me out of 50 databases, 100 databases. Like with me, they've made almost 2,800 requests to get me out of these databases. And then once you're out of the databases, is that they make sure that you stay out of those databases. And then there's also these what they call data suppression lists.

And so they'll put you on data suppression list so that you won't be able, you're never going to be put back on that list. And then if you ever find a place online that you have your personal information, you just give them that URL and they actually put humans to work to do this. And then once you sign up for incognity, you're going to notice that. You're not getting any more spammy phone calls or spammy texts because you're not on the list. I mean, you know, they can't spam you if they can't find you. They can't scam you if you don't exist. And that's what incognity does. Kim, commandos with us now. She's consumer technology expert. So there's a story right now in New Jersey, Mikie Sherrill's administration will now suspend enforcement of the new data law looking out for people's back originally. But it looks like the administration realizes if they want to get people to go out and vote. They couldn't suspend people from going to mine your data. So now she gave into politics. So she's now allowing people to do that again over in New Jersey. Find out who you are and who you're going to vote for and try to change your mind or make sure you vote. And that's just it. I mean, you know, we don't really realize all the information that's available about us online and available through these data brokers and the ramifications that it may have. I mean, you can be sitting there saying, like, you know, I wonder why my car insurance went up. Okay. Unbeknownst to you is that the insurance companies bought your driving records. and how fast you drive, how hard you take corners. Maybe you're driving at 2 o'clock in a morning in an area where you shouldn't be driving. And then that's how you just got that insurance increase. Interesting. And if you want to get incogni, where do you go? I can go to incogny.com or you can go to privacy kim.com. I think, you know, obviously there's, you know, they are a sponsor of your show. So they can go to incogny.com slash Brian, I believe is your particular URL. So Kim, you and 60% of. They have people, human beings doing this to get rid of the bots, right? Yes, exactly. I mean, you know, and it's kind of wild when you think about it, is that you can't really have the bots do this. I mean, I know like there's a, there's somebody on TikTok who's saying like, oh, you could do this with an AI bot. The AI bot, once these data workers figure out that an AI bot is doing it, then they shut down that wall. Okay. So that's why you actually have to have humans. doing this. And it's a big operation. I mean, Incogny is part of a $3 billion company. I mean, this is just not some little tech startup. I mean, it's a company that you can trust to make sure that you will be taken care of it and removed from these data broker sites. Now, here sounds like a weird problem, but I have a situation where my bank is so sensitive to me being scammed or false credit cards. I get my, I buy, I make a purchase.

out of a town, even if it's New Jersey, I live in New York, and they'll suspend my card. Because has your card been stolen? No, it hasn't. I just, so that is the biggest hassle, too, because then I got to go through the whole dial-up thing and hit the number and then hit my claim number, and just to get my card back online, and it's me. It's super annoying, because I understand, I get the same thing too. And you're like, gosh, you know, all I was doing is just going to Starbucks. Yeah, it was Starbucks. Yeah. And, but, you know, but the banks are now trying to clamp down on this fraud because it's so rampant and because the information is out there and because our voices can be deep faked and our IP addresses can be deep faked. I mean, it's even goes down to if you're a person who goes to maybe want to get a rental for a vacation rental. And I, I, you and I are looking at the same property. And all of a sudden. I see that it's available, but you see that it's not available. Same dates. The reason why is because behind the scenes, these vacation rental companies are buying the data from the data broker companies. And they say, oh, well, you know, Kim Commando, you know, she doesn't drink any alcohol and she. You know, she doesn't drive late at night and she's not a party animal. And they look at you, Brian, they're like, oh, man, like partay in the city, right? And they're not going to let you rent that, but they'll let me rent again. This is all the information that is in this file about you that is just. bought and sold all day long. And a lot of people don't realize that it's, you know, they think like, oh, it's just my name and address. No, no, no. It's those 3,000 different data points. Think about that. 3,000 different data points about you that is being sold. It's crazy. But in Kogne's definitely an option everyone should consider if it's bothering you. If you have one of your email addresses, it's all spam. And you'll all wonder if you're going to click on something and then be followed for the rest of your life. Kim Commando, thanks so much. Appreciate it. You betcha. Thank you, Brian. You got it. 1-866-408-7669. Back with your calls in just a moment. Also, I'm going to be going over this socialism. There's been some pushback from the Democrats. Yes, some, not a lot, but some. I'll explain. Giving you everything you need to know. You're with Brian Kilmeade. For over two decades, the Tunnel to Towers Foundation has been there for our fallen and catastrophically injured first responders, military, and Gold Star families. Born from the tragedy of 9-11, Tunnel to Towers provides mortgage-free homes to Gold Star and fallen first responder families with young children and built specifically adapted smart homes for catastrophically injured veterans and first responders. The Foundation also offers scholarships for college and trade school programs for... the children of Gold Star families, fallen first responders, and catastrophically injured veterans. And Tunnels to Tower is committed to eradicating veteran homelessness and helping America never forget September 11th. To learn more about the Foundation's mission, impact, and how you can support our nation's heroes, visit T2T.org.

you listen, the more you'll know. It's Brian Kilmeade. Former President Joe Biden just announced that he's written a book about his presidency that's coming out in November. Here's the cover. The book was written by a ghostwriter, Joe Biden. It's the second book Biden has written. The first was The Odyssey. The book is about what Biden remembers from his presidency, so it's three pages. It's kind of a strange book because towards the end it starts being written by Kamala Harris. Where were those jokes? Where were those jokes for four years when he was in the White House, right? To be fair, Fallon would occasionally make age jokes, but the other two did. We had some, but yes. You imagine if he ever led with that and just that would have been legitimate? Of course, SNL should have led with it. But, I mean, where were those jokes for four years? Now it's okay to make fun of Joe Biden. And now they push back his book release until after the midterms. They did, but did you see his book release video? Did you? We have it. Do you have some of it? We do. Listen to this. Since that's the presidency, I've had a lot of people ask me, Joe, what are you been doing? I've been spending a lot of time with my family. I'm dealing with the cancer diagnosis, and I've been getting treatment, and it's been going really well. I want to thank all those well for their prayers and support and well wishes. You spent the world to me and to Jill. I've written a book about my time as president. It's called Promise Me America. It's coming out in November. It's available for pre-order now. It's about the challenge we face as a nation about the decisions I made and why I made them. Leading the country through COVID, rebuilding our economy, and restoring our democracy after the attack on January 6th. This is just absolutely terrible. And you're telling, I think about this is, unless he's just arrogant and says, I'm leaving that there. That's my take. No, no, it is a highly edited video. There's no way. It was like one take. It's like, it's very edited. So he did. How could his family let him do this? They need the money. I mean, the question is. What interviews will he do when the books comes out? Like, that's where I think, how can they let him? Well, everyone on MSNBC, right? Yeah. So he'll do that. Morning Joe. Morning Joe kept to propped him up. He kept calling Morning Joe for advice and things like that. So remember, he says this is the best version of Joe Biden ever. Even doing something live, though, I feel like. Would you do something with 60 minutes? I don't, I feel like Sunday morning would be like the lighter, fluffier place to go. But I know, I mean, I think we were talking about this earlier before the show saying the right thing would be for the family, like, we're not doing interviews because it's not going to go well. Well, I think it's, it's there. I mean, I was curious to see Jill Biden's book numbers because she opened up strong, right? Because everyone buys stuff for, you know. And then after a while, there's nobody who was curious about the book that listened to her interviews and said, I got to get that book. I mean, that really surprises you. Yeah, because Kamala Harris ended up selling a lot of books. And I thought that was the least interesting book. I remember thinking to myself, I'm not interested at all. I read the forward. I go, there's no way this is going to sell. It ended up selling pretty good. I mean, she promoted for nine months and she'll go to major DNC fundraisers and everyone buys it. But I was shocked at that. But I think he has less to say. I mean, and bottom of mind, if he was being honest, he's mad at Obama. He's mad at George Clooney. You know, he's...

Of course, he's mad at Trump and all these guys. But everybody on the left did he? Everybody abandoned him. Who stood by him? Nobody stood by him. But I mean, the question is, like, does he even remember any of it anymore? I mean, you saw him when Jill Biden was on the view and he stood up and started talking. I mean, That was, it was painful to watch. They just, I mean, it's, the people say it's elder abuse. They just let him go. They're done with them. They're just like, whatever happens happens. I can't make any more money off him. Jill Biden did her book and, you know, basically embarrassed him by saying I thought he had a stroke. and I've never seen him like that, which is a flat out lie. Other people in his office have seen him like that. They all came out and spoke about it, but they all did it after the fact. I laugh now when James Carville comes out and says Joe Biden did more damage. We have that when Joe Biden did more damage than anybody else that he knows. So, yeah, here it is. Yeah, let's listen. 34.

Huh. The computer doesn't want to hear more James Carville. Here's what Jim Carville said. You ready for this? The reason the Democratic Party is in the shape it is in is because Joe Biden wouldn't get out until July 21st of the election year, all right? Joe Biden got now in October 223. We would have been the, we would have a Democratic president. Don't kid yourself. Now, a couple of things. I am sure I could queue up. James Carville in June, May, March, or April saying that he's going to win re-election. Everybody was saying that he was fine. And when you brought it up, you know, you'd have a look at Donald Trump. Donald Trump says things. Sometimes he good talks in a circle and Donald Trump is losing it. Or Donald Trump is it, whatever, every time he brought up Joe Biden, the thing that happened to Joe Biden, if people are going to write this story, here's going to be the deal. Because of the Dobbs ruling that will overturn Roe v. Wade. It wasn't a bloodbath, a political bloodbath in the midterms. In fact, they lost the House, just barely lost the House. And the Senate got lost when Trump got in. So he was able to have the Senate lost the House, but just barely. But he said to himself, wait, I bucked history. Look how well I did. So I'm going to stay in. My party does like me. I did pass all this bipartisan thing. The gun control, the rescue plan, all that money that would poured in after COVID. So we did three things. He goes, they want me. I'm going to stay. And nobody pushed him out. until it became so obvious and then the meltdown on the debate that everyone came out and told the truth. One of the things about Republicans, if you have to go down very far to find critics of Donald Trump, who do you have? Now Marjorie Taylor Greene is a critic of Donald Trump. Jim, now John Cornyn is a critic of Donald Trump. Bill Cassidy is a critic of Donald Trump. Thomas Massie's a critical. I can name all these people. You know who is critical of Joe Biden? John Fetterman. And then you have someone like Joe Manchin say, yeah, Joe, I don't even recognize his cabinet, all these people that you hired a far left wing. That's all we got. And you had Cinema and Joe Manchin pushed back against his ridiculous rescue package that was once $4 trillion of just unmatched without any matching cuts, $4 trillion worth of spending. We've destroyed the whole economy. But no one ever stood up to it. We'll talk about it. Brian Kilmeade, Joe. Don't forget. See me on tour. Brian Kilmeade.com all fall, all fall. I'm talking about St. Louis, Missouri. I'm talking about Clearwater. I'm talking about Red Bank, New Jersey, and Long Island, New York. From the Fox News Radio Studios in Midtown Manhattan, it's the fastest-growing radio talk show. Brian Kilmeade.

All right, from Midtown Manhattan, heard around the country around the world. This is a Brian Kilmeade. This hour, we'll do a simulcast with Stuart Barney. Josh Croucho brings inside Washington, the politics, the confirmation hearings. Mark Teeson standing by. I just watched Senator Tom Cotton. We'll bring this back shortly. Contradict, which J.D. Van said about there are forces of the Israeli government trying to undermine the deal, the MOU that was put in place because they want to have perpetual war with Iran. It's forcical that Iran want, that Israel wants perpetual war. Yeah, there's always fringe people, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the squad. If people look at the squad and think that's American policy from the outside of you're in Thailand or Bangladesh and don't understand American politics, okay, you made a mistake. But when you're the vice president of the United States and you're going to say there are elements in the Israeli government trying to undermine the MOU because they want to continue to have war with Iran? I hope it's being disingenuous. I hope it's not really what he thinks. Big three. Number three. These people are so stupid. Is there a solution to beat Republicans? To run against Republicans? No. Their solution is to debate Democrats. You are part of the problem because you're a idiot. Socialism thriving on the left as same old Dems try pushing back, some old Dems try pushing back, but more than that, they get in line. This is why Americans, not just the European, must unite. I'll explain. Number two. There are people, you know, you see Mike Pence, who's sort of a super hawk, my predecessor, who are super hawkish in the American system, who have attacked. the deal and frankly in some ways have tried to derail the deal what is your actual argument BP JD Vance, Rance on the Joe Rogan podcast, that critics of the MOU are just warmongers or Israel rips into them saying that they are the problem. Or he admits his administration failed with the Epstein files. Is this good and healthy or is he starting to diverge from the Trump team as he forms his own 28 team? And is anyone on the left on Israel's team? We'll discuss it. Number one. I mean, game is on now. The administration realized. They're not going to meet the objective of opening up the straits or solving the nuclear weapons program by negotiations. Five straight days of intense bombings and an expansion of the targets have Iran absorbing tremendous damage, but the U.S. has yet to control the strait. Why, I think Trump ramps up before anything comes down? Mark Tienstein joins us now. Mark, do you agree with that? Do you think things will ramp up before they come down? Absolutely, I think they will. Look, I think the president has, you know, learned from this experience that there's a reason why for 47 years no American president has been able to make a deal with these people, at least a good deal. And he tried. He did, you know, God bless him. He gave them every opportunity to negotiate. They gave me every opportunity. And what's blown up the MOU is not Israel. It's not neocons. It's the Iranians.

They don't want to cut a deal. Donald Trump has two red lines. His red line is that they have to give up their nuclear program and they have to open the straight. And they're not willing to do any of those things. So, you know, they were they were never serious about negotiating. They're just tapping him along to try and stop the bombing. And, you know, truth be told, JD Vance got suckered. in this thing. And he goes on Joe Rogan, and he just, this guy is the master of tearing down straw men. You know, he says, well, the neocons or warmongers, whatever heck it is, they want to send 150,000 troops into Iran. There's literally nobody. I don't know anybody. Not one person. There's not a single person has advocated sending 150,000 troops. They want, they have no objective. There's a very clear objective. We were two weeks away from finishing the target list. You finish the target list and then you declare victory. You impose the blockade and you open the straight and by force. And then you arm and train the Iranian people to overthrow their government. There's a very clear objective. Everybody, the people, it's just, it's such weak argument to, to just downplay your opponents by creating false arguments about what they're asking for, saying they have no plan. It's, it's just, you know, it's, it's, I, quite frankly, I'm fine. It's stunning. So you listen to the whole podcast? No, I did not. I've listened to some of the excerpts of the worst parts. And then the other thing is like, you know, what, he treats Israel like it's a master, master, you know, manipulator. They're like that. Or are they manipulating Donald Trump? You know, is that what they're doing? Is that they, the Israel is somehow undermining Donald Trump or making him do things that he doesn't want to do? You know, that's it. I just, I just find the whole, the whole thing kind of. Here is JD Vance yesterday, cut 11. And then can I just say one other thing about this? Because there are people, you know, you see Mike Pence, who's sort of a super hawk, my predecessor, who say this. There are people, you know, who are super hawkish in the American system who have attacked the deal. And frankly, in some ways, have tried to derail the deal. And what I always say to those people is, what is your proposal? What is your actual argument? What is your argument? What is your proposal? Well, first of all, people criticize the deal because he brought Donald Trump a really bad deal. So it was, you know, $350 billion fund, which is twice the size of the Marshall Plan to, to, you know, to help the Iranian regime, a, you know, a promise of non-interference and internal affairs. So we would, we would be committed by agreement to not support the Iranian people against their government. I mean, I can just go on, you know, about, about what's our plan? I just told it to you. Finish the, we, we.

Beyond a shadow of a doubt that there have been people within the Israeli government who are trying to like actually shift us away from that policy because they want to continue the military campaign. There are some people within their system we know beyond a shadow of a doubt who are manipulating and trying to change American public opinion to keep the war going on indefinitely. Again, not towards any objective, but just indefinitely. Wow, I didn't even see those. I didn't see those last lines. That is unbelievable. Why do you think Israel would like to pour their economic dollars into a military campaign that never ends? We'll be the advantage of that for Israel. It's Israel, Israel, Israel. That's the new, that's the new slogan, I guess. Yeah, that's, it's, Israel wants to defend itself and they want to finish the job. And, you know, again, nobody's talking about indefinite campaigns. Nobody would, there's, again, it's all straw men. He's tearing down. There's, there's no Israeli conspiracy. There's nobody advocating for 150,000 troops. There's nobody advocating for indefinite military campaign. It's just none of it is true. And, you know, it would be more effective to actually try and take on the arguments of the people that people are actually making and dealing with the reality of what Israel is trying to do. Israel is our best ally in the, certainly in the Middle East and probably one of the best, you know, if you look at how some of our European allies behave during the war, perhaps one of our best allies in the entire world. And I don't understand why the Vice President of the United States is attacking them this way. So let's look at the actual military campaign. I mean, the goal is to open up the strait. Is the military, are this military operations through the air? Are they beginning to do that, beginning to open up the area and free it from drone activity? Yes, we can do that. We have the capability of opening the strait. And I think Donald Trump, quite frankly, is right and wanting to charge something for it. You know, I mean, I think 20% toll is pretty high, you know, that, but I mean, what do they charge for the business for trips to go through the Panama Canal? I think it's a million dollars a ship or something like that. You know, this is not a toll what he's talking about. What he's talking about is there is a hostile regime that is attacking international shipping. And he is, the United States of the military is going to go and defend. international shipping against the hostile regime. That's not the same as Iran charging a toll and doing a protection racket saying it would be a shame if something happened to your beautiful ship, give us $2 million or something like that. It's a completely different thing. It would be completely different than people charging tolls in other straits. We're providing a protection service to say that. And there's nothing wrong with asking the American taxpayers to be reimbursed in some way. Now maybe it's not a maybe it's through trade deals, maybe it's for something else. There's lots of ways to skin the cap, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with charging a fee and having American taxpayers be made whole for that. Especially since it's not our ships most of the time. Let's talk about Ukraine. President of the United States wondering if there's people are wondering if he's going to sign the sanctions bill that Senator Lindsey Graham wanted to see done. And that would put a massive sanctioned anyone doing trade deals with Russia. And that would be India. And that would be include China. And of course, Iran, cut 25.

Sir, do you want this Russia sanctions bill signed within the next week or two, and will you sign it? Well, I know that Lindsay wanted it very badly. I think they may be adding Iran to it. They're going to add Iran, which is a very big thing if they did that. They may add Hezbollah, too. Just put them if you do business with Esbalah. So we're looking at that, but they're seriously thinking, and this is in honor of Lindsay. This was his thing. He wanted this more than any other thing. You know how he felt. And there's a good chance that it gets done, but they'd like to add Iran, and they'd like to add Hezbollah to it. That's what I'm hearing. And if that's the secondary sanctions on China, India. Well, we'll have to look, and that hasn't been discussed. So what do you think is going to happen? Do you think with those sanctions he'd be passed? Yeah, I think it's going to pass overwhelmingly, and I think Donald Trump's going to sign it. And good for him. He's right. Lindsey Graham was right, and Donald Trump is right. And look, I mean, Trump, by the way, I mean, you know, this is strengthening sanctions. Donald Trump has already put a lot of sanctions on. Russia for what they're doing in Ukraine. He's put oil and gas sanctions, which Biden never did. He's seized shadow tankers, which Biden never did. And right now, we're doing great stuff in terms of helping the Ukrainians target Russian energy infrastructure. We're giving them exquisite intelligence on actually specifically where to hit, according to news reports, where to hit the refinery so they can't bring them back online. So we're putting a lot of pressure on that. Look, I think we're starting to see, we've spent, you know, a year and a half now trying to negotiate with the Iranians, trying to negotiate with the Russians, and they just don't come around. And so I think you have to, you have to coerce them and you have to put pressure on them. And I think that's what we're doing. All right, right now with Ukraine, they're out in the offensive, but they let go of their defense minister, a 35-year-old drone genius, and there's massive nationwide protest. And you might not. Do you have any idea why he would fire this guy? I do not know why. I think it's a really bad idea. The last thing Ukraine needs right now is internal turmoil going on. They finally got the upper hand. They finally got the United States. But look, to some extent, you know, their internal governmental things don't matter to us all that much. Because like... I mean, there's corruption all over the world. If there's corruption in the Ukrainian government, as long as American taxpayer dollars are not going to them, then that's not really our issue. We're selling the weapons to them. So, you know, if we want to sell the weapons, then, then, you know, that doesn't affect, that doesn't affect us. So I think they, I think what the genius of what Donald Trump did and moving from giving aid to Ukraine to selling weapons to Ukraine.

is one, he's creating a sustainable model for us to have defense cooperation with them. Two, he's completely disarmed the anti-Ukraine right because they've got nothing to complain about because it's not US tax dollars going in. And so when things like this happen, it's like, okay, I mean, that's not good, but it's not, you know, nobody's stealing American taxpayer dollars. So, you know, why, you know, we're just, we're trying to, we're doing it because it's in our interest to help the Ukrainian nation survive and not let the, uh, not let Vladimir Putin win. Even though you're part of the right that just wants perpetual war, I did like have it won, Mark Tyson. And 150,000 troops. Yes. I didn't realize that. I got to go dig up my op-ed where I wrote that in the Washington Post. Are you going to take up the one I saved it? I probably cut it out, so I'll help you with that. I'm sure you did. Because you have a scrapbook of all my columns, right? And mostly it's about fighting forever with taxpayer dollars. That's right. And mostly you cite JD as your as your motivational tool. Exactly. All right. Too bad. Mike Pence was the guy. You and Mike Pence, I guess, are on the same page. Mark Thiessen, thanks so much. Take care. Take care. Strong opinions, backed by hard facts. Get the truth behind the spin with Brian Kilmeade.

If you're interested in it, Brian's talking about it. You're with Brian Kilmeade. My long-term concern has been with the Democratic Party, as I am a member of that, is that our party is going to back away and turn their back to Israel. If our party ever becomes and just make it official as the anti-Israel party. You know, that's when I would leave because that's been a moral clarity for me. So that is Senator John Fetterman, moral clarity. He goes he's a moderate Democrat and working with Senator McCormick on defense and everything else that he's doing for Pennsylvania and data centers and fracking because he's good for the country. And then when he finds out 103 members of his house. of the Democratic members of the House voted against Israeli aid, 103, who was 37 in 2024. That was a lot, and it was zero. Two years part of that. He said, if that happens again, I'm out. But Republicans are waiting for him anyway. Brian Kilmeade. Josh Crashauer next.

This is the Brian Kilmeade. Why wasn't happy about people saying, let's spend a whole lot of money challenging Democrats. You want to do that, do that. But don't think that that's something that is good for this year. Do it a year when we have the luxury of having the majority, but not when we're trying to, but you can't gain, you can't gain by losing. You know, people were saying, oh, Nancy Pelosi came out against socialism. No, she didn't. She says, just don't do it this year. Come out against it next year if we have the majority. So to me, you stand for nothing. Also, she voted to not give Israel any funds after spending most of her career fighting for Israel. Now it's not politically advantageous to say that. So she'll go along with the herd. Joining us now is Josh Krasher, Fox News Radio political analyst and editor-in-chief of the Jewish insider. Hey, Josh, you shocked by 103 Democrats voting against sending aid to Israel? I'm not shocked, but it tells you just how far to the left, even some of the mainstream figures in the party. You mentioned Nancy Pelosi, but anyone from like a Jake Auchin-Claas to Maggie Goodlander, a lot of like moderate pro-Israel Democrats felt pressure from the far left and put out all these mealy-mouthed statements about why they're cutting up, why they're voting to cut off aid to Israel. And that's the tide in the Democratic Party. And make no mistake. very interesting, Brian, when you're hearing people like Nancy Pelosi or maybe at a Rahm Emanuel talking about Democratic socialists, they're talking about how they're not helping them win elections. They're not running in swing districts. But there's a moral and principle component to the subject as well, and just how extreme their views are. And it is very, very telling that you're not even hearing someone who's a moderate like Rahm Emanuel confronting the extreme. of what these DSA candidates and what the DSA movement actually stands for, abolishing prisons, defunding the police, defunding Israel. These are like positions that would have been beyond the pale in our politics. And as you saw in that vote, which is a vote to defund, the end funding to Israel, you had about half of the Democratic Party, including folks who were once loyal allies.

the left wing base and turning on the one of their strongest out of one of the yeah but how about i mean even nancy plossey she wasn't she wasn't saying socialism's bad she said not yet i mean what does she stand for she knows socialism doesn't work well i mean she's 111 years old what is she waiting for to make a principled stand well you you're not and that that is another quote and sound by that you just played bryan that or doesn't maybe agree with it, it tells you a heck of a lot on where the party's ideological winds are blowing. And it tells you a lot about who's probably going to have the edge in the 2028 presidential nomination fight. It's the AOCs. It's the people that are trying to sound the most extreme, pandering to the most far-left forces in the party. And, you know, if you can't. actually say defunding the police is bad. We don't want those lawmakers represented in our party. If you can't say someone like Avila Chivalier, who was a self-avowed communist, according to her own words, is not welcome in the party and an interview should be rebuked. You've got a big problem because if it's just about political strategy, you're never going to get, you're never going to actually get anywhere. Or someone like Nancy Pelosi, who has, you know, been seen as. for her not to even confront and engage on these issues. It tells you a whole lot of where the party is. Yeah, here's Carville. Listen to James Carville. He does do the right thing. Cut 33. These people are so stupid. Is there a solution to beat Republicans, to run against Republicans? No. Their solution is to beat Democrats. Like, they're part of the problem. No, you are part of the problem because you're a fucking idiot. So, look, I think he's always unhinged. And this is another example. But fundamentally, I thought he would just be one of many saying that. You know, Tom Suozzi, I guess, said it, and some House Democrat, Republican Democrats came out and said, I'm a capitalist. You know, and I hear Josh Gottheimer alarmed about where his party's heading, him speak out but be marginalized. But I'm shocked there aren't more people like that. Well, we've seen this movie before, Brian. In 2020, you had that same activist wing of the party that took over everyone's imagination. And you had presidential debates in the 2020 primary where you had other than Joe Biden and maybe one or two others. the Democrats like Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, and even a whole lot of the quote-unquote more mainstream candidates like Kamala Harris were endorsing open borders, we're endorsing, you know, subsidized health insurance for illegal immigrants, or endorsing the funding the police in these debates. And it's gotten even worse, like the ideological movement has even gotten further to the left. That was why Kamala Harris lost the 2024 campaign. The biggest reason she lost was she was seen as too audiologically to the left, the famous ad. The Trump campaign ran against her, which she was talking about, you know, trans activism to the ACLU. That is why she lost appeal with a lot of, a lot of, like, swing voters in the 2024 election. And Democrats are making, you know, the midterms, we'll see what the impact of this in the midterms. It's a different dynamic. But in 2028, if the Democrats go in this direction, and it looks like they are.

That's why James Carville is so apoplectic. He's seen this move before. He's seen how damaging it has been in the recent past when Democrats embrace a whole slew of these radical exotic ideas. And the average American is not going to buy it and it's going to carry a political cost. Yeah, I mean, if you right now look at the party, if you look at the Senate, in Georgia, Jon Ossoff is outraising Susan Collins 20 times. In North Carolina, biggest chance for a flip, the best pickup opportunity perhaps. Cooper outraised Mike Michael Whatley, 8.2 million to 2.9 million. In Texas, James Talarico, off the charts, 21.5 million compared to 1.8 for Ken Paxton. But listen to some of the things that James Talarico is still saying. Cut 35. I'm worried about what this senseless border wall would do to our tourism here in the region, what it would do to our local economies, that we should be supporting and growing and cultivating, not attacking with political... useless border walls. Look, everybody in Texas was alarmed at what happened. They were using their own money to build their own wall and set up their own razor wire wall. And this guy's saying this, the walls, the problem is going to hurt tourism? Yeah. So I would caution that money does not equal. You can have all the money. And we saw this in Texas, by the way, in 2018 with Beto O'Rourke, who set all kinds of records with Democratic fundraising. and lost in that race. Or Jamie Harrison running against, you know, the late Senator Graham, who raised record amounts of money and lost badly, you know. Money does that. You have these national liberal donors that get drawn to certain candidates. And doesn't mean they're the most electable, but it does mean that they really like this, like back, they don't want to compete in. So I, look, Alsop, I think it's an exception. Allsop is in poll position in that Georgia.

the negative connection between who raises the most money in the Democratic Party and who's more electable. Because it's these national, very progressive donors that don't know anything about politics and they're giving to the most liberal people who often can't win. And they're actually pushing some of these candidates further to the left in the swing in purple states that they're competing in. You know, one of the most interesting things about this race that makes you think is these data centers. You do a lot of the polling and the AI polling on younger people. They're not all in for AI. But in my view, for the good of the country, the world is in for AI. And either we can win it, we can take a back seat and say, I'm afraid I'm going to lose my job or afraid I'm not going to be able to understand it. And I was shocked, but I shouldn't be. The New York Governor Kathy Hochul came out and said. This about banning data centers again in upstate New York who missed out on fracking, missed out on all that revitalization that Pennsylvania and Ohio got because they said it was bad for the environment, which was not true. Now this, cut 51. These data centers require millions of gallons of water straining the local supplies. And when powered by fossil fuels, they drive up. our carbon footprint, and they drive up costs for local rate bears. And I refuse to let those costs be passed on to New Yorkers, who already paid too much for the utility bills. There's already an executive order saying they've got to build up their own power source. They're going to build a data center. But all the jobs, the pipe fitters, the steam, the plumbers, the electricians, all those jobs are going to go buy the boards and just go to other states. Yeah, look, I mean, she's reading some of the... polling that on paper is turning against AI and expressing concern about very nimbie, not in my backyard. I don't want this data center to be next door to me. But it is very short-sighted to try to set your state and, frankly, set the country back when we're competing against China and a lot of our adversaries in this very important AI arms race. There are many smart ways to deal with AI and manage and regulate AI. Banning data centers is the most kind of It's the most, maybe political, maybe the easiest political thing to do, but it's actually the worst policy in terms of actually doing something about the, you know, allowing us to take advantage of the good of AI and regulate the things that could be excessive down the road. So that's very, I think, short-side. I mean, look, she's reading polling, showing a lot of opposition to the data centers. The reality is that, you know, she's talking about the environmental regulations and why we shouldn't have data centers being built. I mean, if you're going to. make the U.S. at a disadvantage against China when it comes to the AI race because of environmental issues with data centers. It's not going to be a politically compelling argument in the long term. Yeah. Thanks, Josh. And by the way, for the DNC, they owe $18 million. They've raised $15 million overall.

How can we help make stronger communities happen? Well, at J.P. Morgan Chase, we invest in what's working. Because when businesses can grow, that growth means more jobs for more people and more goods that can go to more restaurants and main streets and schools in the communities we love. Make the greengrass grow all around, all around, make the greengrass grow all around. Make momentum happen. Learn more at JPMorganchase.com slash impact. the Brian Kilmeade joins Fox Businesses Farnie and Company with Stuart Varney. Live on your radio and on Fox Business. Here's Brian Kilmeade. We're back. We'll be on FBN surely, and we'll talk a little World Cup. I don't know if you guys have seen the game yesterday, but Spain looked unbelievable and beating France 2-0. And then Argentina had to come back late, but just dominated. You knew they were getting two goals. As soon as England dropped into the defense and took Harry Kane and put him into midfield, I thought, wow, do they have a way to counterattack? Are they just looking for a quick counter? Instead, They watched the team just clear the ball out when they could, depend on their goalie to make big saves. So let's listen to Stuart Varnie. It's all, it is 1051 Eastern. That means it's time for Brian. All right, Brian, Argentina beat England 2-1 yesterday, a couple of late game goals. Spain and Argentina face off in the final this Sunday. Who do you expect to win? And by the way, let's not talk about England's game yesterday. Let's not mention England. Really? You got to the semifinals? You got to the final four and you didn't want to bring a Bingling. Okay. Well, it was a... The wrong tactics were played yesterday. I mean, they disappeared in the second half of the game. It was crazy. I can't believe the coaches, some of the best coaches in the world would go into a defensive shell with no counterattack. No counterattack. Harry Kane dropped into midfield. They dropped six back after going up 1-0 as if to say, I can't believe we scored. Let's not blow it. And if you give Argentina that many chances, of course they're going to score. It's just a matter of time. Yeah, that's right. So who wins Sunday? Well, right now, Spain comes in the favor and they should be. I mean, you have the cardiac kids in Argentina coming back to beat Egypt. Really, I mean, if that other third goal was really a goal, they shouldn't have won. Cape Verde gave everything they wanted and more, but they prevailed twice. And then trailing won nothing to England after 58th minute, they are able to pull that out. So they have not been dominant. Having been like, how do we score in these? When I look at Spain, I see dominance. I mean, they were clearly better than France, the number one team in the world, who they just beat in the European championships. But they look so confident, lethal offensively, steady defensively. I think they've only let up one goal the entire tournament. But Argentina's got this intangible qualities. The only world champions have. And they got this guy messy who can study a game and figure out a game. He could be invisible for 80 minutes. You give him one moment.

And everything changes. So I would say Spain comes in. I'm thinking they win 3-1. But with Messi, who knows? I think Spain wins, but I don't know about the score. We'll see. I'm going to shift the politics for a second, Brian. There was a dramatic vote in the House Wednesday. It shows a big shift in the Democrats' relationship with Israel. 103 House Democrats voted to cut all military and humanitarian ties aid to Israel. Cut everything. I think the Democrats have developed a severe anti-Semitism problem inside their party. And I think it's going to be a real problem for them. What say you? I mean, think about that. And then you have that vote, 103 Democrats in the House vote against Hakeem Jeffries, their so-called leader, who said, vote to keep made. But now he has a heavy Orthodox Jewish crowd in his district. So I guess he was worried about that. And he also thought, of course, we're going to support Israel. But he looked around and 103 people, 103 Democrats didn't. Now, Rahm Emanuel, what was he doing last week? The so-called moderate. He went to Israel to say, we're not going to support Israel. So he knows whatever he's seeing internally, you cannot be the Democratic nominee and support Israel, which prompted Senator John Fetterman to come out and say, if that's the case, I'm out of this party. So that'll be a big deal. And they are living off being anti-Israel. Think about this, Stuart. They get attacked October 7th. They, according to... John Spencer of the West Point Military College have went out more surgical than even we did in Iraq and Afghanistan to kill the terrorists and not hurt the people in Gaza, which they never wanted to do. And now they're vilified around the world. They attack Hezbollah back and they're vilified around the world. Hamas continues to attack and they're vilified around the world. And Iran is looked at it in a better light than Israel and America. You've got to be kidding me. I mean, something's really going screwy here, but it's not going to. get me involved. I know who the good guys are and it's Israel. Yeah, and so do I. It's Israel. Brian, thank you very much indeed. Straighten it out. You got it. I'll try. I'll do my best. Still ahead. So, I'm amazed how much this is becoming a big deal about Israel, but also amazed that on most channels, they don't care. They don't really care. It's like if we, if we stopped having relationships with the UK or Canada, it was a huge deal when things, relations are strained. But with Israel, they're like, of course, what took so long, which I don't get in the most difficult region there, the democracy, we're the one with history, fighting with them. I think we're going to need them to finish off Iran in a hurry. And I hope we do use them. So here's the President of the United States talking about how he wants to win this thing and he's not going to back off. And he knows who the problem is. Cut nine. I wanted to ask you, Mr. President, about Iran, an on Iran. You came to the conclusion that you couldn't negotiate with the IRGC. Does that mean that you might wipe them out like you did ISIS? Yeah, it does. We will see what's happening. We received a call just as I was coming here. They want to meet. They always want to meet. But, you know, they should have been done by other presidents for many years, for 47 years, but really a lot longer than that. And it wasn't.

And I never understood why, but now I do. Because if you're not going to do it the way I'm doing it, you're never going to make a deal with them. Yeah, because you've got to beat them senseless and let them know they have no opportunity to become self-preservation for the government, not the people. They don't care about the people, obviously. They keep hanging people from their prisons, and they have no problem killing people that rioting in their streets. So that is true. And the question is, not Mr. President Trump, why did you choose this war? The question is, why did other presidents not choose to fight this war? How many other hostages have to be killed? How much should they circumvent our allies and hurt our bases? They're rocketing our allies, Gulf allies and our bases in the region. I mean, that's how they act. They're going for our bases and we're going for them. So we have to finish them off. I think the president's making the right move in doing so. The question is, it's so obvious his vice president's not into it. How long does the president tolerate that? Sends him out to do the deal. It's a terrible deal. Then it's not where the paper it's written on. So now he's living with it and now we're going to fight it. But I do think the president's made the right decision for five straight days to continue to bomb them and dismantle them. Fundamentally, what they're doing is taking one of our premier allies and making them less lethal every single day. I think that's a positive. Hey, go to Brian Kilmeade.com. History, Liberty, and Laughs is no longer. Now we're doing the United States tour. That's my new book coming out, October 13th. I'm going to go on stage and bring it to life in Westbury, Long Island, and, of course, St. Louis, Missouri, and Clearwater, Florida. Cheers to America's 250th birthday. Get 20% off your first purchase at Fox Newswineshop.com with code FN Radio 20. 20% discount excludes wine club offers and cannot be combined with any other promotion. Expires July 31st, 2026. Must be 21 order to order. Please drink responsibly. Maya Tom, Fox News headquarters in New York City. Always seeking solutions, never sewing division. It's Brian Kilmeade. Hi, one, so glad you there. It's a Brian Kilmeade on this Thursday. It's been a quick week, and I appreciate you staying with us all week long. This hour, I'm going to be joined by Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery. He's over in Kiev. Just saw him on Fox News Channel. Senator John Eustid, working hard to keep that seat. He replaced... JD Vance. And now he wants to, he's in a tough fight against Gerard Brown. And we'll see how that goes because he's beginning to, people are beginning to coalesce and which turned out to be a very red state. Keep in mind, too, people love YouTube, our YouTube channel. Everybody's talking about. YouTube.com slash at the Brian Kilmeade. So let's get to the big three. Number three. These people are so stupid. Is there a solution to beat Republicans to run against Republicans? No.

The solution is to debate Democrats. You are part of the problem because you're a fucking idiot. Socialism thriving on the left is some old time Dems pushback as you just heard. But more get in line. This is why America, not just the GOP, needs to unite. I will explain. Number two. There are people, you know, you see Mike Pence, who's sort of a super hawk, my predecessor, who are super hawkish in the American system, who have attacked the deal. And frankly, in some ways, have tried to derail the deal. What is your actual argument? What's your argument is you did a terrible deal. How about that, Vice President JD Vance, as he rants on Joe Rogan, the critics of the MOU are just warmongers or Israel as he rips his own administration for the Epstein files? Is this good and healthy? Or is he starting to diverge from the Trump team as he forms his own 2018? Number one. I mean, Dane is on now. The administration realized they're not going to meet the objective of opening up the straits or solving the nuclear weapons program by negotiations. Five straight days of intense bombings on an expansion of targets have Iran absorbing tremendous damage. But the U.S. has yet to control the strait. Why I think Trump ramps up before anything comes down. I'll bring that to Rear Admiral Mark Montgomery. He's senior director of the Center on Cyber and Technology Innovation for the Freedom of Defense of Democracies. Admiral, welcome back. I believe the president's going to ramp up before he comes down. Do you think so, too? And what do you think of the targets he's picked so far in this internation on this fight? Well, thank you for having me, Brian. And I definitely think he should ramp up. before he ramps down because we're going to need to continue to impose costs, particularly in that area, 75 miles, you know, from Boucher to Bonder Abbas, 75 miles either side of the Strait of Hormuz center line, 50 to 75 kilometers deep in Iran. We've got, we've been working that over for five nights. We've got to continue to work it over so that it is very difficult to launch drones or missiles or assemble small boats for putting in the water. Because what you want to do is, create is minimize the risk, minimize the number of effects that are coming out towards ships that are doing the southern. transit scheme, you know, closest to Oman. And, you know, so that U.S. Navy shipping from the aircraft from overhead and from the fringes can reasonably protect those ships without putting our ships in an unrealistic danger. To do that, you're going to have to continue to strike. I don't believe Iran after 47 years is going to negotiate with us in any kind of good faith short of being punished like this. And of course, I know we'll talk about it, but you combine this with a blockade to get maximum.

effect. So he's also expanding targets to the 388th Brigade. It's located around 200 kilometers from the Iranian coast. Most of the strikes in July have been concentrated around its southern coast. The Artesh has conducted operations throughout the war and most recently claimed on July 15th, that's yesterday, that it conducted drone strikes targeting U.S. forces in and around Jim Jordan. So they're trying to find where the stuff is emanating from. So they're opening up the target list. So this is regular Army, right? Three and a Eighth Brigade, that's regular or is that RIAGC? No, that's correct. That's Artesh. And it's regular Army. And look, I mean, I'm not sure with this president, I'd go bragging online about attacking America or its allies and not expect that the next evening you're going to, you know, get some steel because we have all these things targeted. And we spent the last two months creating new target decks. based on what survived our original targeting, you know, 14,000 targets and making sure, you know, in seeing what, what, what, uh, where we were wrong or where we missed. And so we're ready to go back at those. Again, like as you said there, I would concentrate on the southern targets. But if there's stuff that's clearly hitting out at our allies, we should strike that as well. Um, I expect this to go up to three to four hundred strikes a day, uh, over, over the next week. I don't think we'll stay down around 140. At one point. Will we be in the not to just like a week, within a week, be able to tell merchant ships we can protect you? Do you think within a week? I'm not saying we're going to win in a week or are they going to quit. I'm not saying that, but is it going to be at a point where we, okay, we got your back here? I think that we'll tell them that it's a manageable risk within about a week. whether they accept that manageable risk and start going through it the numbers we want, which is about seven or eight large carriers a day, which is, you know, 14 to 16 million barrels. There's two million barrels. We had about 100, though. We had about 100 prior of the war, right? We had about 20 million barrels a day. So about 10 ships a day going through. 100 ships overall, that's LNG fertilizers, all kinds of other things. But 10 of these really big ones, not all ships are definitely not all ships are created equal in this transit plan. We really want those 2 million barrel a day, large crude ships and the large LNG ships going through. So that'll be an interesting point. But do you know what to Admiralty, it's always easy to get caught up in the day to day and not realize the significance of what's happening? We watched for the longest time and you studied. This was what you were doing for a living. What happened? How are we going to handle Iran? How are we going to keep Iran in line? What are they going to do next to Israel to our neighbors? How are they going to circumvent us in Iraq? And we've done nothing until this president took out Soleimani, then bombed out their sights in 2025 and now is hitting them again. We really never really hit them before outside Reagan blowing up a platform, right? Yeah, that's right. So we did do strikes in 1986 and again in 88, 89, as you said, under President Reagan, in response to the tanker war and in response to attacks on mining that affected U.S. shipping. But you're absolutely, in fact, we, at the time, that was our biggest naval shipping.

exchange since World War II. It was greatly surpassed by what happened during the 40 days this, you know, this spring. But look, this is a 47-year authoritarian regime that has killed 1,000 American soldiers in combat, killed 500 NATO soldiers, killed 30,000 of its own people. This is the appropriate thing to do. I don't understand why Vice President JD Vance considers this war-mongering. This is what I would consider a normal U.S. national security response to a threat from an authoritarian regime. I want to you what Brett McGirk said. You know, and the whole thing, I know we're adjusting your shot. You change it a little bit, but the shot was pretty steady. You don't really have to adjust if you don't want to. But I think what's most important is the vice president's come out, and he is responsible for the MOU. The MLU is deeply flawed. Everybody knows it's deeply flawed. I look at Brett McGirk. I was listening this morning, 4.30 in the morning. As you know, he worked for the Trump administration last time, and I find him to be reasonable and not a hater, in other words. Cut 18. It's one of the strangest international agreements I've ever read. It is kind of, there's so many gaps and potential areas of misunderstanding. And yet it was signed by the President of the United States and the President of Iran, the first time ever that this has ever happened since the Iranian Revolution's ever had such a high-level signed agreement. But the crux of it, the Strait of Hermuz, in Article 5, it basically says Iran... Iran will determine the arrangements in the Strait of Fremus. The Americans have said, and I've heard this from Middle East mediators as well, that's actually a side agreement that all ships should be going through. It should be unfettered. But whatever happened after the MAU was signed, the Iranians and the Revolutionary Guard have determined we are going to control the Strait of Hermuz. We'll attack ships that are violating our understanding. And until you can break that impasse, we are stuck. His verbiage that he signed off on that he hand over to the president has really muddied up the waters. No, it has. Look, it is not, it's, the president's signing it's not unusual. As you know, the president, this is an unusual president. He is more involved when he wants to be involved. And there's nothing wrong with that. But the writing of the fifth, you know, the fifth point of agreement, it is written poorly. It is certainly lends itself to the Iranians believing that in violation of international law, they would have some kind of control over transit through the strait. And so, you know, I wish it was written better. I wish we'd put more attention to this. You know, I'm not saying having State Department officials, you know, kind of career State Department officials is, you know, is the secret elixir to everything. But I think it might have helped in this case to have a few more of our professional diplomats going over this and catching these kind of inconsistencies that are now becoming problematic. Yeah, I want you to hear what he said to Joe Rogan, cut 15.

I think fundamentally we are on the right trajectory. It's just going to be really messy, and there's going to be a lot of stops and starts. So what happens? The first week after we signed the MOU, we get 20 million barrels a day of oil out of the Strait of Hormuz. That's what it was before the war. The price of oil comes way down. And there are elements, the hardliners in the Iranian system kind of freak out a little bit. They're like, oh, shit. Did we just give away our major leverage point? Screw nuclear weapons. We just gave away the so in this MLU. And so there was this kind of freak out in their system. So they shot at a couple ships. We responded. I think that's entirely appropriate, of course. So is that how you saw it? So, well, glad to see the vice president speaks like a salty sailor. I'll say that he's correct in the sense that I don't believe that they thought we could establish a flow, a, a, a channel through the Oman straight, you know, it was normally the southern transit. Do we set up our own? And get numbers. Yeah, and yes, and get up with the IMOs, the International Maritime Organization. So really. the way you're supposed to do things. Clearly, we did some kind of queue route, which is a quick mine clearance to make sure to make sure there are no mines in that transit scheme. And then put aircraft overhead to take out small boats coming out. And then. ships nearby to try to get missiles and drones. And I think they were surprised at the degree we could do that. And clearly they decided to disrupt that. And that's what's got us back at the table. That part doesn't surprise me. And in his idea that we're in fits and starts is probably right. I just think for him to say we're probably going to have to keep doing this bombing and then accuse Vice President Pence of being a warmonger. saying that we need to do the bombing. That's kind of inconsistent. I think almost all of us understand if we're going to get this thing resolved correctly, we're going to have to hold, you have to push back Iranian military capability and capacity around the strait. We're going to have to blockade their ships. And we're going to have to do this for the amount of time it takes for them to break. What role should Israel play? I think that as long as Israel is not being attacked by Hezbollah, you know, from Lebanon, we probably want to do most of this ourselves. If there's any shots fired from Iran towards Israel, Katie bar the door. They're going to come down hard on all the nuclear and ballistic missile sites. But probably at this point, we can handle the right number of missions a night on our own and let us and keep it this way. I don't want to give the Iranian regime an excuse to really open this up more broadly. Are you worried about the Houthis shutting down the Red Sea? Yes, I think that's a great point. You know, there was a flight. We've tracked some flights from cargo flights from Iran to Yemen. Look, I don't think they're, you know, sending them like, you know, tents and water and food, right? I think they're sending them weapons, you know, missiles and drones and launch equipment.

and radar and small disk radars, you know, so that the Houthis can get back in the business of trying to shut down the Babo Mendeb. Because the way that Saudi oil is going from, you know, east to west across Saudi Arabia, it now has to come out this Babo Mandeb straight to get into the Indian Ocean. So I fully expect the Houthis to be back in business in the next weeks or month. You're in Kiev right now, and I understand Volodymyr Zelensky had really changed the tide of the war with drone technology and the 35-year-old defense minister. Now there's nationwide protest in Ukraine, unless you know differently, because he fired him yesterday. Why did he fire the guy? What are I missing? I'm not sure. So you're absolutely right. Defense Minister Federoff came from the Minister of Digital Affairs. And he'd been a drone expert there, brought his drone expertise in. He's done a lot. But he was unable to get control of the generals, the general staff. And he complained repeatedly to Volodymyr Zelensky about it. And I think at some point Volodymyr Zelensky viewed Federov as a threat. you know, but maybe politically long term, but viewed Fedorov and his chief of, you know, his actual general chief of staff, being in conflict with each other unacceptable. I think he did the wrong thing here, Volodymyr Zelensky. I mean, it's a democracy. This is the beauty of democracies. Stuff like this happens. People get pissed. They go in the streets. It is, I mean, I drove through it today when I was coming back from our training session, we're going to the cores. It was, you know, it's packed thousands of people. very unhappy. Could you imagine the United States, the Secretary of Defense gets fired and thousands of people are protesting, you know, in Lafayette Square, I just, I don't see it happening. But in this country, in the middle of this war, this leader, Federov, was seen as a change agent. Good. And I get the sense that Crimea has become uninhabitable. And I think the Ukrainians love that in every way. That started this whole thing. It's been fantastic. Look, I got to tell you, their medium range strike really enabled by a U.S. weapon, by a weapon provided by Eric Schmidt's company called Hornet, and by air weapons delivered by U.S. weapons delivered by Ukrainian aircraft called ERAB. We have made, the Ukrainians have made the logistics line from Russia, you know, the land bridge to Crimea. untenable. They cannot resupply Crimea. They've hit the Kerch Bridge. Crimea is, you know, has limited power, limited food, tough to get weapons and gas for their, you know, gas for their weapons and munition for their weapons. The Ukrainians are doing fantastic damage in the middle strike, and that's not even mentioning the long range strike, which is impacting their ability to produce, distribute, and refine fossil fuels. It's great. Yeah, they'll have, I think, 23 or 33 refineries. Admiral Mark Montgomery doing great work and the hotspots that are keeping America busy. Admiral, thanks so much. Thanks for having me. You got it. This is a Brian Kilmeade. We're going to be back at a moment. Bottom of the hour, we go to Senator John Eustid. Don't move. He just doesn't read the headlines. He breaks them down. Real talk. Real news. This is the Brian Kilmeade.

unique opinions. Hear it all on the Brian Kilmeade. the end of the day, it's a question, do you want Jay Clayton or do you want Bill Pulte? I actually think that the two people that were on the hill today. Wait, hold on. The two people that were on the hill today are exactly unqualified. I know you're trying to get a social media clip, Charles, but I think Sufito is trying to talk. I know you're trying to get your social media clip for the gotcha. I answered your question already, but I'm also not here to answer to you. I'm happy that you told me that because I really appreciate I'm sorry. I really appreciate you lecturing me about what I'm here to do because I'm here because Abby's show invited me here. And I have been in journalism for a very long time. In fact, I came to the New York Times when you, the year that you were born. So I would choose, I suggest that you choose a lane that is your own and stay in it. And don't lecture me because I won't be lectured by a child. Thank you. So Charles Blow, showing no respect for Lydia Moynihan. There's a fantastic comment for The New York Post. But that's why that show is. That is set up to make. to make, I guess, people have a conservative point of view look bad, and it doesn't usually work. I think you look pretty petty if you call someone a child because they're younger. A lot of times age has nothing to do with it in life. I think that was pretty clear. I thought that was pretty clear in the past. Senator John Houston's next. He treats everyone with respect. He is going to be here. Talking about Lindsey Graham's legacy, what he learned from him, how he plans on getting six years, the next six years, and beating a very tough opponent, Sherrod Brown, over in Ohio. And what the issues are that really fuel that race, because without Ohio, the Republicans will have trouble holding the Senate.

Fastest three hours in radio. You're with Brian Kilmeade. Where are you at on Christmas Day? Senator Graham, that is an undecided legal issue, which, well, I suppose I should ask exactly what you mean by that. I'm assuming that the question you mean is whether a person who was apprehended in the United States is... No, I just ask you where you're at on Christmas. You know, like all Jews, I was probably at a Chinese restaurant. Great answer. So, Lana Elena Kagan, when she was under confirmation that Lindsey Graham voted for, he was on the judiciary committee, he said, look, as long as it was Democrats had the majority, if there was somebody that could do the job, even if they're not conservative, I'm going to give him a green light. And that was pretty much the way he operated on regular basis. He wanted to get things done. Senator John Eustod was able to watch him in a short time he's been in the Senate and watch him operate and how welcoming you was. And Senator, before we get into your race and everything else, he just wanted you to comment on Senator Graham. Oh, we all miss him. I mean, you can, he's just left a huge hole. You know, I'm new. I was new. I was here a week. I was sitting in the cloakroom. Let's tell you a Lindsey Graham story that's funny about how he's always selling. He's always selling. He's got something to sell. He was trying to get me to support his Russia sanctions bill, all right? And he's giving me this hard sell on it, a hard sell on it. And about two minutes into the conversation, he's like, hey, what's your name again? Because that's how Lindsay was. He was like, you know, he just was trying to get his bill. He's trying to get me signed up on his bill. And he just was always trying to get things done around here. And we had a nice moment in the Senate conference lunch on Tuesday where everybody was telling their Lindsey Graham stories. Marco Rubio came in, told some Lindsey Graham stories. He just, he was beloved by people on both sides of the aisle. And he made the job fun because he had a, tremendous sense of humor. He was very smart and he cared about the country, cared about getting things done. And he's a great example for all of us. And the thing is, if you go in there, everyone wants to get everything they want. If you don't get everything, well, if I vote for that, I didn't get everything I want. So I'm going to get, I'm going to get a primary or I'm going to lose an election. He would say, what's possible? Push, push, push, what's possible? Let's do what I'm going to do that. The best he could, you know, with President Trump, unorthodox, he had to figure him out. After a while, I'm going to golf with the guy and I'm going to figure out a way to get my point across in a way that I'm going to, that's going to work with him. Different than George W. Bush, different than John McCain, different than Joe Lieberman. So what it would take? But what was the goal? Not to make Lindsey Graham famous, but to get something done to make the country better. And I know that for a fact, that's how we approached it. He was very good at taking complicated things and making them simple. He's like, you know, basically he would try to get you, get everybody on the same page by saying, look, we're either going to do this in the end, we're going to do this. And none of us want to do this. So let's let's go get this accomplished. We don't need to get bogged down in the details. We don't need to fight over pettiness. We just need to go get the job done. That was his approach to governing. So let's go talk about you. I know you can't because you're in your office. You can't talk about re-election. So.

But we know you want six more years and you're going to be in a tough race. But Ohio is always tough. So you're going to get going on that. But one thing you can run on, because you play a role in that, Ohio is ranked number one in the state to do business. Jump 33 places in just 16 years. So you were Secretary of State and Lieutenant Governor for 14 of those years. What do you think of some of the key moments that got you to that spot? Because we all know what happened to the Midwest when manufacturing left. And then who could make the adjustment? Brian, I got put this in context. When I was growing up, when I graduated high school, you know, my dad, the factory my dad worked at closed. And he lost his job. Two of my uncles lost their jobs. My aunt lost her job. My whole family had to leave Ohio because there was no place to go to work. We had 8% unemployment. And we were a dying state. And I remember. It wasn't just me, but when I got elected to the legislature, I became Speaker of the House. We did a lot of things to help Ohio climb that mountain from the 34th worst state to do business to the first, to number one. What were those things? Well, tax reform. We cut the income tax in Ohio. We eliminated taxes on businesses investing in machinery and equipment. We eliminated the death tax. We cut. We cut one third of the regulations. I used an AI tool when I was lieutenant governor to eliminate five million words of the 17 million word administrative code. We did things like that, just gradually making Ohio a little better place to do business. And then you combine that with the Made in America strategy that we've worked with with President Trump. And we're adding manufacturing jobs. And now Ohio has the most jobs it's ever had in its history in one of the lowest unemployment rates. But that's what you do. You just compete. And all the while, states like California, they make it more expensive to do business. States like Illinois, New York, more expensive to do business. So you start to see those jobs, leave those states come to places like Ohio. That's how you do it. You trust in capitalism. You will give people freedom, lower regulations, lower taxes, and boom, you climb that mountain. Ohio Senator John Euston, you sit our guest. And he's on Zoom if you're watching on the app. or Fox Nation. So you guys frack though, too, right? What's that? Do you frack? Do you guys have fracking? Oh yeah, yeah, yeah. We have. That's why we have some of the lowest natural gas prices for our residents of any state in the country because this is an interesting thing. New York could have lower gas prices, natural gas prices. Massachusetts could, but they have very high ones because they won't build the pipelines to be able to get access to that. So we've eliminated those regulations, protected the environment and proven that when you do that, you can create a lot of jobs. And these fracking jobs, a lot of them are in. in Appalachia, in the poorest rural parts of our state, and they've invested $100 billion over the previous decade in extraction, processing, transmission, and that's been great for the state. So I want you to hear, so first Andrew Cuomo blows it by doing an environmental study, and the study says it's okay to frack. And I'm sure you don't know the center, but upstate New York is dramatically different.

than New York City or Long Island. It's very sparsely populated, a lot of beautiful land and all this potential. But there's no industry. There used to be industry. There isn't. So fracking would have been great. They're all set to have these huge investments. But Andrew Cuomo says, no, I'm going to trump the environmental study that I had. And I'm going to say no. Then I'm going to shut down the nuclear power plant. And now when they're about to build data centers, in comes Governor Kathy Hochul, cut 51. These data centers. require millions of gallons of water straining the local supplies. And when powered by fossil fuels, they drive up our carbon footprint. And they drive up costs for local ratepayers. And I refuse to let those costs be passed on to New Yorkers who already paid too much for the utility bills. So she put it on hold. No data centers. So no plumbers, no electricians, no pipe fitters. They're not going to be building data centers. Yeah, energy's a problem. You've got to bring the energy to the grid. I get it. But is that the answer? Banning it? So I'm going to give you an example of two forms of energy. We've made it easier to explore and transmit natural natural gas. That's why we have low natural gas prices in Ohio. But under the Obama years and the Biden years, when Sherrod Brown was Ohio's U.S. Senator, they closed 23 electricity generating plants. So when you do that, that's what you see is that when you close things down, when you restrict supply, you drive prices up. All right. And that's what's happened to electricity prices in a lot of places, including Ohio, because they shut down the plants. But on this particular issue, President Trump signed a memorandum of understanding with the data center companies to demand that they build their own power. So make them build their own power. Don't put the, don't put the burden on the citizen. Put it on the data center, make them build their own power. But you want to know why they can't do that in New York? Because they don't want to build new power in New York. They don't want to build new fossil fuel generation in New York. We should build, make them build their own energy. And that would help lower prices for consumers and keep all of those construction workers employed. So how do you feel about it with data center? If they were to build one in Ohio, would you say yes? Because some states are saying no. Under certain circumstances. You need to make sure that they pay their local property taxes. You need to make sure that they're building their own electric generation. You need to make sure, and I prefer that they be on vacant sites, former industrial sites, maybe one of those close power plants so that the communities that have lost those jobs, get some new jobs. All of those things would be a smart way to do it that would protect the citizens, use land that is prime development, and also lower residential property taxes. when you make them pay the property taxes for their new facilities. So I want you with David Solomon said CEO of Goldman Sachs, cut 51. I know people are very nervous about the change that they bring, et cetera. There's always disruption from technology, but what these technologies do is they make us all more productive. And I think that's something to be excited about. But it's going to take some time to filter it into the economy.

So he says AI is something people are nervous about. They're getting pushback from. But how do you feel about it? Because we saw those graduates from college boo their commencement speakers when they brought up AI. I'm not used to that. I'm used to 60-year-olds or 70-year-olds being upset when the computers come onto Frey and, you know, come onto and people start saying how things are changing with email. That was older people that push back. Now we have younger people pushing back. How do you handle that center politically? Well, here's the issue. Whether you have a data center, for example, should be a local decision. It shouldn't be the federal government and it shouldn't be the state telling somebody whether they can do it or not. It should be a local decision, whether they want it or not. But on AI, well, first of all, you can understand why people are scared because this is a mistake that the AI companies made is they scared them. They told people this was going to take jobs. So why wouldn't you think if you're a citizen and the guy who owns the data center company or owns the AI company says it's going to take your job, you might just believe them. So they've done a poor job of selling what AI can do from an upside. And I think that the AI companies have a responsibility to do a better job with that if they want people to support their particular. industry. Now, the other thing that we can do is ingrained in education. I think AI can be a great tool at making sure that every child has a 24-7-365 tutor because you want to know something. These are amazing tutors at helping young people understand how to do complex things. Like, I couldn't help with, you know, your... your physics test or your i couldn't help you with your with your precalculus test those kinds of things but your data but your your a i technologies can help these students we need to make sure every student has access to it so they have this tutor that no matter where they are they have somebody they have this this tool that can help them with their educational opportunities and we need to make sure that that's happening Separate note, do you want to see the Russian sanctions bill passed? Are you one of the senators that are voting for it and hope the president signs it? That would put sanctions on anyone who trades with Russia like China, Turkey, and India, some of which we have delicate trade relations with. Is it worth that risk of rocking that in order to rock Russia? Well, I'm a co-sponsor of that legislation, and I want it to pass. But what's different about this compromise that, frankly, Senator Graham, when he was with us, helped to negotiate is it gives the administration some latitude in how they negotiate those. those sanctions or how they levy those sanctions. If you look at every successful sanctions regime over time, it's an important thing to give the administration some flexibility with the imposition of these sanctions so that they can take into account. For example, if somebody...

is dramatically, if they're relying on Russian oil, if they can prove that they're cutting their reliance on Russian oil over a longer period of time, and they can demonstrate that they're going to do that, then I think that that's an example of the flexibility that you could have and working with some of those countries. So we could contact India and say, this is what you're taking in. I need you to cut that back 5% every six weeks. or else we're going to hit you with tariffs. Is that an example? Yeah, I think that's an example of something that you could do to show, to put pressure on Russia, but also not their economy collapse due to lack of, a lack of access to. Right. We have to step up and tell India, we could supply that natural gas. We could be your partner. You know. Yeah, or someone else. But, you know, the idea that they're just going to go cold turkey is a hard thing for some of these folks to do. And so if you can gradually reduce it and prove that, puts pressure on Russia and also doesn't create too much tension with some of our allies. All right, Senator, thanks so much. I look forward to talking to you again. We'll see what happens this week or next, whether it comes with these sanctions because I think we need to pass it. Senator John Euston, thank you. Thank you. All right, 1-866408-7669. When we come back, I want you to hear who's making, who's having fun finally at Joe Biden's expense. And we're also going to talk a little World Cup. You listen to the Brian Kilmeade. Don't move. The headlines, the stories behind them and the people who make them only on the Brian Kilmeade.

Talk show that's getting you talking. You're with Brian Kilmeade. Sponsored by Previgin. Previgin, made for your brain. Enzo Fernandez on the header. The ball won over a guy, six foot one, and that was Argentina on the assist from Liano Messi. And the Argentina went up and tied to get. That was the 2-1 goal over England. They dominated it. After England went up, won nothing. It was kind of the worst thing that happened to him. They started unbalancing the game, thought, I'm just going to pack it in, put five in the back, drop my best offensive player, put him into midfield, and then see what will happen. Obviously, it was a tragic mistake for England. Because if you watch that last 30 minutes, it was like they were playing against the junior high school team. They just were destroying them. You knew it was a matter of time. So a lot of us happened. Now we're set up Argentina against Spain. It's going to be a fantastic game. It's going to be a fantastic game on paper that I think Spain has got the more talent. They've been playing better. I think they only let up one goal. The entire tournament, they are Euro champions. They just beat France, the number one team in the world. So I want you to see so much of this has been a lot of fun. for the players, for the fans, for FIFA. It's been unbelievably successful. I don't really know anybody, besides ticket prices being high, that's even said anything negative about it. I mean, people come here, they love it. The events have come up without a hitch. The problem's been the refereeing. Nothing you could do about that. A lot of it's the VAR, the instant replay, not working for soccer. Major overall has to happen next time. But Jimmy Fallon had one of the most interesting guys on. He's there. He's the center forward. He's the loan forward on Norway. And he is Holland. Is this guy, this guy from Norway, right? No, you have the other one. So he had Tom Holland on the actor. And he tried to DM Erland Holland. So cut five. There's another Holland that is, that was in the World Cup, that is very famous and popular. His name is Erling. Erling Holland. Erling Holland. Yes, and he became a superstar. I saw somewhere that you DM'd Erling Holland and he didn't respond to you. Yeah. That you tell us the truth. Did you DM Erling Holland? Yes. Yes. And I'll tell you what, that is exactly the type of humbling experience that is important for actors. Yeah. You know, I'll text him, I'll take him to dinner, not even a response. Not an excuse, not I'm busy tonight, I'm playing football, nada. Nothing.

He happens to be the coolest guy. He's a big blind guy. It looks like Thor and plays like Samson. All right. So we'll talk about that and we'll preview it tomorrow. We'll do something soccer related, I promise. And everyone's going to be watching Sunday at 3 o'clock Eastern Time.