What to make of the Trump administration backing down

It's consider this, where every day we go deep on one big news story. Today, the Trump administration backs down. We are not moving forward with the fund, period. The fund being the controversial $1.8 billion so-called anti-weaponization fund. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche told a House subcommittee this week, the Justice Department would comply with a recent court ruling temporarily blocking the fund. Now, to be clear, $1.8 billion is not a lot compared to about 70. billion dollars of spending, which the Senate advanced this week to support the Trump administration's

immigration enforcement through the rest of his term. But Republican lawmakers were actually holding up that immigration package because of the weaponization fund. Many saw it as funneling federal money to the president's supporters, possibly including January 6th rioters. I led the charge against that so-called anti-weaponization fund. Pennsylvania Congressman Brian Fitzpatrick was one of those Republicans. He spoke to NPR Thursday. I think about what's good for America. If we start thinking about what's good for the Republican Party or the Democrat Party, we've lost sight about what our job is.

This is not the first time in recent weeks that we have seen the Trump administration reverse course. In April, the Justice Department also backed off its investigation into former Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, only after Republican Senator Thom Tillis held up confirmation of the new Fed chair in protest. Consider this. For a president who claims broad authority over nearly everything, what can we make of his administration backing down? We will ask a scholar of modern authoritarianism.

From NPR, I'm Scott Detrow. This message comes from Schwab. At Schwab, you can get everything from self-directed investing to full-service wealth management. all in one place. No matter your investing goal, life stage, amount to invest, or know-how, you can invest your way with Schwab. This message comes from Active Campaign. Frustrated with spending hours on AI outputs that don't feel like your brand, Active Intelligence 2.8 from Active Campaign keeps you from sounding like everyone else. Describe your tone, your rules, and your brand once,

and Active Intelligence builds every email and campaign for you, with on-brand images and content that sounds like you wrote it. Marketers are saving 10 hours every week and getting campaigns they're proud to put their name on. Import your brand in seconds at activecampaign.com slash AI. This message comes from Dell Technologies. Get long-lasting battery life on the Dell XPS laptop powered by Series 3 Intel Core. Now from $699.

With exclusive student pricing from $599, visit Dell.com slash deals. It's Consider This from NPR. The Trump administration has gotten its way so much over the past 16 months, from Republicans in Congress especially, that it feels unusual to see it back down anywhere. So what, if anything, do this week's events mean for concerns about Democratic backsliding? To answer that question, let's bring in Ann Applebaum, a staff writer for the Atlantic and a Pulitzer Prize-winning historian of authoritarian-neutral. regimes. And welcome. Thanks for having me. Let me start with this. What to you was so particularly alarming about this $1.8 billion fund? It was alarming because, number one, it was the president illegally directing federal money, so taxpayers' money towards his supporters, including some

who had clearly and obviously broken the law. It was also disturbing because it seemed like the process by which they got to this figure was also less than legal. And so you saw the president bending the law in order to fund essentially his own political supporters. That's what happens in regimes where one party or one clique or one person has captured the state. One of the reasons I wanted to talk to you is because you have written so clearly, whether it's about Trump or whether it's about many other countries where we've seen similar trends, an authoritarian or an authoritarian type leader will push and they'll push and they'll push and they'll push and push and they don't stop pushing. Here we saw Trump try to do something, his own party say,

no, this is too far, and Trump backing off. What you're seeing now is the American system of checks and balances beginning to work the way it's supposed to work. When Trump first came to office the second time, it almost seemed as if his party in particular, his party in Congress, had decided to ignore the Constitution, to forget that they are or, you know, also supposed to play a role in American government for reasons of intimidation, ideology, fear, they did it anyway. Now that the president is unpopular, now that he's lost some important court cases, now that some of the arguments that people have been making about him, breaking the system, are beginning to seep through. What you're seeing is the leaders of Congress.

In this case, it's the Republicans who lead both the Senate and the House deciding to use the power that they have. that's a sign that our political system still has some health in it. As somebody who's closely following and worried about anti-democratic drift, does it matter to you whether or not this pushback is happening because Republicans are worried about saving their own seats or because they have broader constitutional concerns? I mean, I suppose I would prefer it if Republicans had broader constitutional concerns and we're thinking about the welfare of all Americans.

But if it happens in some cases that their motivation is political, in other words, they see that these things are unpopular. And maybe they're unpopular also because they appear to a lot of Americans to be undemocratic, then so be it. You've studied leaders in other countries, Hungary, Russia, Poland specifically. Is overplaying hand part of the storyline sometimes? Is that sometimes something that kind of leads to losing power? Some of them do. So we just saw in Hungary, we saw a prime minister who'd been in charge for 16 years and who very much overplayed his hand, who can. captured most of the state institutions who controlled 90% of the media. We saw that for a majority of Hungarians, that became too much, finally. People recognized that that system had enabled quite a lot of theft, quite a lot of graft, quite a lot of corruption, and Hungary was becoming poorer, actually very rapidly. And so you had a mobilization of voters and a pushback. And so it can

happen. I mean, there are, of course, states where it doesn't happen. Usually that's because the authorities either find ways to cheat in the elections or they begin to use violence against their opponents. Do you think this is a turning point or could be a turning point or are you still a little skeptical to call it that? I'm skeptical to call it that because I want to see how the midterms play out. And by that, I don't mean who's going to win. I mean, are the elections fair?

Are they conducted fairly? Do all states respect the rules? Does the federal government try to play any games with voter lists? Is ICE used on election day to intimidate voters? All those kinds of things that people have been talking about. That's the real test. You know, is this a normal American government in the sense that it is willing to lose power and will lose power with good grace if it does,

or are they going to try to alter the outcome of the election, both by manipulating it or maybe by not accepting the results? That is the Atlantics and Apple Box. Thanks so much, and I suspect we will be talking to you this fall. Great. Thank you so much. This episode was produced by Lena Muhammad, Karen Zamora, and Alejandra Marquez Hansa. It was edited by Patrick Jaron Wadanan. Our interim executive producer is Courtney Dorney.

Thanks to our Consider This Plus listeners who support the work of NPR journalists and help keep public radio strong. Supporters also hear every episode without messages from sponsors and unlock bonus episodes of Consider This. Learn more at plus.npr.npr.org. Let's consider this from NPR. I'm Scott Detrow. This message comes from Babbel. Babel's conversation-based language technique teaches you useful words and phrases to get you speaking quickly about the things you actually talk about in the real world,

with lessons handcrafted by over 200 language experts and voiced by real native speakers. Start speaking with Babel today. Get up to 55% off your Babel's subscription right now at babble.com slash NPR, spelled B-A-B-B-B-B-E-L.com slash NPR. Rules and restrictions may apply. This message comes from MintMobile. If you're tired of spending hundreds on big wireless bills, bogus fees, and free perks, MintMobile is for you. Shop plans at mintmobile.com slash switch. Taxes and fees extra. See MintMobile for details.